Pharmacokinetic study of capivasertib and the CYP3A4 substrate midazolam in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Capivasertib, a potent, selective inhibitor of all three AKT serine/threonine kinase (AKT) isoforms, is being evaluated in phase 3 trials in advanced breast and prostate cancer. This study evaluated the drug-drug interaction risk of capivasertib with the cytochrome P450 3A substrate midazolam in previously treated adults with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients received oral capivasertib 400 mg twice daily (BID) on an intermittent schedule (4 days on/3 days off) starting on day 2 of cycle 1 (29 days) and on day 1 of each 28-day cycle thereafter. In cycle 1 only, patients received oral midazolam (1 mg) on day 1 (alone), and days 8 and 12 (3rd day off and 4th day on capivasertib, respectively). Midazolam pharmacokinetics on days 8 and 12 were analyzed versus day 1. Capivasertib, with or without standard-of-care treatment, was continued in patients deemed likely to benefit. Safety and exploratory efficacy analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Capivasertib-midazolam coadministration increased midazolam exposure (n = 21): geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) AUCinf and Cmax was 1.13 (0.97-1.32) and 1.15 (0.99-1.33) for day 8 versus day 1, and 1.75 (1.50-2.05) and 1.25 (1.08-1.46) for day 12 versus day 1. The capivasertib safety profile was manageable when administered with or without midazolam. Two patients had partial responses to treatment. CONCLUSION: The up to 1.75-fold increase in midazolam exposure indicates capivasertib is a weak CYP3A inhibitor at 400 mg BID on an intermittent schedule. Capivasertib was well tolerated; exploratory efficacy analysis demonstrated evidence of clinical activity in this heavily pre-treated population. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT04958226.

Pharmacokinetics of the Akt Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase Inhibitor, Capivasertib, Administered to Healthy Volunteers in the Presence and Absence of the CYP3A4 Inhibitor Itraconazole.

Capivasertib is a potent, selective inhibitor of all 3 Akt isoforms (Akt1/2/3), and it is currently being tested in Phase III trials for the treatment of prostate and breast cancer. To investigate the effect of a cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of capivasertib, a Phase I drug-drug interaction study of capivasertib and itraconazole was conducted in 11 healthy volunteers (median age, 54 years). The 8-day study had 3 stages: Participants received a single dose of capivasertib 80 mg in Stage 1, 4 doses of itraconazole 200 mg over 3 days in Stage 2, and a final dose of capivasertib 80 mg coadministered with itraconazole 200 mg in Stage 3. Capivasertib pharmacokinetics were examined in Stages 1 and 3. Itraconazole coadministration increased the maximum plasma concentration of capivasertib and total capivasertib exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time of administration to infinity) by 1.70-fold (90% confidence interval, 1.56-1.86) and 1.95-fold (90% confidence interval, 1.82-2.10), respectively.

The effect of food and acid-reducing agents on the pharmacokinetic profile of capivasertib: Results from a randomized, crossover study.

AIMS: This two-part, adaptive study assessed the effect of food and an acid-reducing agent (rabeprazole) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of capivasertib, a potent AKT inhibitor, in clinical development for cancer treatment. METHODS: In Part 1, healthy participants (n = 24) were randomized to receive single-dose capivasertib after overnight fasting, a high-fat, high-calorie meal and with rabeprazole postovernight fasting in one of six treatment sequences. Based on Part 1 results, a new group of participants (n = 24) were randomized (Part 2) to receive capivasertib after overnight fasting, a low-fat, low-calorie meal and modified fasting (food restricted from 2 h before dosing to 1 h postdose) in one of six treatment sequences. Blood samples were collected for PK analyses. RESULTS: Following a high-fat, high-calorie meal, capivasertib exposure increased versus overnight fasting (geometric mean ratio [GMR] [90% confidence interval (CI)]: area under the concentration-time curve [AUCinf ] 1.32 [1.22, 1.43], maximum concentration [Cmax ] 1.23 [1.08, 1.41]), but was comparable to that postmodified fasting (GMR: AUCinf 1.13 [0.99, 1.29], Cmax 0.85 [0.70, 1.04]). AUCinf was similar and Cmax was lower with/without rabeprazole (GMR: AUCinf 0.94 [0.87, 1.02]), Cmax 0.73 [0.64, 0.84]). Capivasertib exposure was similar after a low-fat, low-calorie meal versus overnight fasting (GMR: AUCinf 1.14 [1.05, 1.25], Cmax 1.21 [0.99, 1.48]) or modified fasting (GMR: AUCinf 0.96 [0.88, 1.05], Cmax 0.86 [0.70, 1.06]). Safety was consistent with that in larger trials. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that administering capivasertib with food or acid-reducing agents does not lead to clinically relevant PK or safety profile changes.

A Phase I Study of Capivasertib in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although androgen receptor-targeted agents prolong the lives of patients with metastatic prostate cancer, patients develop therapy resistance and most ultimately succumb to the disease. The PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway has been associated with the development of resistance, raising the possibility that pathway inhibitors may produce a clinical benefit. This open-label phase Ib study examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary clinical activity of adding capivasertib - a potent, selective inhibitor of AKT1/2/3 - to approved abiraterone acetate therapy. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had undergone at least 1 prior line of systemic therapy received abiraterone acetate 1000 mg (orally administered once daily), plus oral prednisone 5 mg (twice daily) with capivasertib 400 mg (orally, twice daily, with an intermittent schedule of 4 days on, 3 days off). RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The most frequent adverse events (all grade) were diarrhea (30%), anemia (26%), asthenia (22%), and nausea (22%). The most frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events were acute kidney injury (19%), hyperglycemia (7%), rash (7%), abdominal pain (7%), and asthenia (7%). Capivasertib and abiraterone PK were consistent with previously reported results from monotherapy dosing. Nine participants (33%) showed a 20% or greater decrease in prostate-specific antigen during study treatment. CONCLUSION: The combination of capivasertib and abiraterone acetate had an acceptable tolerability profile consistent with the known profile of each agent. These data support further evaluation of capivasertib and abiraterone acetate in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Concentration-QT modelling shows no evidence of clinically significant QT interval prolongation with capivasertib at expected therapeutic concentrations.

Pharmacokinetics-matched digital electrocardiogram data (n = 503 measurements from 180 patients) collected in a first-in-human, multi-part, dose-escalation (from 80 to 800 mg) and dose expansion (at 480 mg) phase 1 study in patients with advanced solid malignancies, were used to assess potential risk of QT prolongation associated with the AKT inhibitor capivasertib. The relationship between plasma drug concentrations and baseline-adjusted Fridericia-corrected QT (ΔQTcF) values was estimated using a prespecified linear mixed-effects model. The model provided an unbiased reproduction of the experimental data set, estimating a small but positive correlation between capivasertib concentration and ΔQTcF. At the expected therapeutic dose (400 mg twice daily) the predicted mean ΔQTcF at the steady state maximum concentration was 3.97 ms with an upper limit of the 90% CI of 5.07 ms; below the 10 ms limit proposed by ICH E14 guidance. This analysis suggests that capivasertib is not expected to present a clinically significant risk for QT prolongation that is associated with pro-arrhythmic effects.

Proliferation and AKT Activity Biomarker Analyses after Capivasertib (AZD5363) Treatment of Patients with ER+ Invasive Breast Cancer (STAKT).

PURPOSE: The STAKT study examined short-term exposure (4.5 days) to the oral selective pan-AKT inhibitor capivasertib (AZD5363) to determine if this drug can reach its therapeutic target in sufficient concentration to significantly modulate key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and tumor proliferation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: STAKT was a two-stage, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, "window-of-opportunity" study in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ invasive breast cancer. Stage 1 assessed capivasertib 480 mg b.i.d. (recommended monotherapy dose) and placebo, and stage 2 assessed capivasertib 360 and 240 mg b.i.d. Primary endpoints were changes from baseline in AKT pathway markers pPRAS40, pGSK3ß, and proliferation protein Ki67. Pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic properties were analyzed from blood sampling, and tolerability by adverse-event monitoring. RESULTS: After 4.5 days' exposure, capivasertib 480 mg b.i.d. (n = 17) produced significant decreases from baseline versus placebo (n = 11) in pGSK3ß (H-score absolute change: -55.3, P = 0.006) and pPRAS40 (-83.8, P < 0.0001), and a decrease in Ki67 (absolute change in percentage positive nuclei: -9.6%, P = 0.031). Significant changes also occurred in secondary signaling biomarker pS6 (-42.3, P = 0.004), while pAKT (and nuclear FOXO3a) also increased in accordance with capivasertib's mechanism (pAKT: 81.3, P = 0.005). At doses of 360 mg b.i.d. (n = 5) and 240 mg b.i.d. (n = 6), changes in primary and secondary biomarkers were also observed, albeit of smaller magnitude. Biomarker modulation was dose and concentration dependent, and no new safety signals were evident. CONCLUSIONS: Capivasertib 480 mg b.i.d. rapidly modulates key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and decreases proliferation marker Ki67, suggesting future potential as an effective therapy in AKT-dependent breast cancers.

Pharmacokinetics of the Oral Selective CXCR2 Antagonist AZD5069: A Summary of Eight Phase I Studies in Healthy Volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to summarise the pharmacokinetic findings from eight phase I studies in healthy volunteers given oral AZD5069, a selective small-molecule CXCR2 antagonist. METHODS: 240 healthy volunteers across eight phase I studies received single (0.1-200 mg) or multiple once- or twice-daily (10-120 mg) oral AZD5069 as solution, suspension, capsules or tablets. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated using non-compartmental analysis methods. RESULTS: AZD5069 was rapidly absorbed (time to maximum concentration ~ 2 h) under fasting conditions. A high-fat, high-calorie meal delayed and reduced the peak plasma AZD5069 concentration (Cmax) by 50%, but total exposure (AUC) was unchanged (fed:fasting geometric mean ratio 90% confidence interval within 0.80-1.25). The plasma concentration of AZD5069 declined with an initial half-life of 4 h and terminal half-life of 11 h. Steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved within 2-3 days and accumulation was ~ 1.1-fold with twice-daily dosing. Systemic exposure was approximately proportional to dose. Intra- and inter-subject variability in AUC was 3-11 and 29-64%, respectively. Less than 5% of the AZD5069 dose was excreted as parent drug in the urine. Elderly subjects had 39% higher AZD5069 AUC and 21% higher Cmax than younger adults. Japanese subjects had similar or slightly higher exposure to AZD5069 than Caucasian subjects. Co-administration with ketoconazole resulted in 2.1-fold higher AUC and 1.6-fold higher Cmax. All formulations had similar bioavailability. CONCLUSIONS: AZD5069 demonstrated predictive linear pharmacokinetics with low intra- and moderate inter-subject variability and no major influences from ethnicity, age, food or formulation. Half-life data indicated suitability for twice-daily dosing. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT00953888, NCT01051505, NCT01083238, NCT01100047, NCT01332903, NCT01480739, NCT01735240, NCT01989520.

A Phase 1, open-label, multicentre study to compare the capsule and tablet formulations of AZD5363 and explore the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic exposure, safety and tolerability of AZD5363 in patients with advanced solid malignancies: OAK.

PURPOSE: AZD5363 is a potent pan-AKT inhibitor originally formulated as a capsule; a tablet was developed for patient convenience and manufacturing ease. This study assessed the PK comparability of both formulations (Part A) and the effect of food (Part B) on the PK/safety of the tablet. METHODS: Adults with advanced solid tumours received AZD5363 480 mg bid in a partially fasted state by tablet (Week 1) and capsule (Week 2) in a '4-days-on/3-days-off' schedule (Part A). PK parameters were evaluated using pre-defined 90% CIs for AUCτ and Cmax ratios of 0.75-1.33 to assess comparability. In Part B, AZD5363 tablet was given to a new cohort of patients under the same conditions as Part A, except on the morning of PK assessment days, when it was administered after an overnight fast (Week 1) and standard meal (Week 2). RESULTS: In evaluable patients (N = 11), the geometric least-squares mean ratios (tablet:capsule) for AUCτ and Cmax were 0.90 (0.77-1.06) and 1.02 (0.86-1.20), respectively, demonstrating comparable PK in the partially fasted state. Tablet and capsule safety data were also comparable. Tablet PK profiles indicated later tmax and lower Cmax after food versus overnight fast. Fed and fasted AUCτ and Cmax ratios were 0.89 (0.76-1.05) and 0.67 (0.55-0.82), respectively (N = 9). The safety/tolerability profile of the tablet was comparable between fed and fasted states. CONCLUSIONS: PK and safety/tolerability of AZD5363 tablet and capsule were comparable. Food did not affect the bioavailability of AZD5363, but reduced the absorption rate without discernibly affecting safety/tolerability.

A Phase I Open-Label Study to Identify a Dosing Regimen of the Pan-AKT Inhibitor AZD5363 for Evaluation in Solid Tumors and in PIK3CA-Mutated Breast and Gynecologic Cancers.

Purpose: This phase I, open-label study (Study 1, D3610C00001; NCT01226316) was the first-in-human evaluation of oral AZD5363, a selective pan-AKT inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. The objectives were to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of AZD5363, define a recommended dosing schedule, and evaluate preliminary clinical activity.Experimental Design: Patients were aged ≥18 years with World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0 to 1. Dose escalation was conducted within separate continuous and intermittent [4 days/week (4/7) or 2 days/week (2/7)] schedules with safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic analyses. Expansion cohorts of approximately 20 patients each explored AZD5363 activity in PIK3CA-mutant breast and gynecologic cancers.Results: MTDs were 320, 480, and 640 mg for continuous (n = 47), 4/7 (n = 21), and 2/7 (n = 22) schedules, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicities were rash and diarrhea for continuous, hyperglycemia for 2/7, and none for 4/7. Common adverse events were diarrhea (78%) and nausea (49%) and, for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3 events, hyperglycemia (20%). The recommended phase II dose (480 mg bid, 4/7 intermittent) was assessed in PIK3CA-mutant breast and gynecologic expansion cohorts: 46% and 56% of patients, respectively, showed a reduction in tumor size, with RECIST responses of 4% and 8%. These responses were less than the prespecified 20% response rate; therefore, the criteria to stop further recruitment to the PIK3CA-mutant cohort were met.Conclusions: At the recommended phase II dose, AZD5363 was well tolerated and achieved plasma levels and robust target modulation in tumors. Proof-of-concept responses were observed in patients with PIK3CA-mutant cancers treated with AZD5363. Clin Cancer Res; 24(9); 2050-9. ©2017 AACRSee related commentary by Costa and Bosch, p. 2029.

A Phase Ib Open-Label Multicenter Study of AZD4547 in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancers.

Purpose: Squamous cell lung cancers (SQCLC) account for 25% of all NSCLCs, yet the prognosis of these patients is poor and treatment options are limited. Amplified FGFR1 is one of the most common oncogenic events in SQCLCs, occurring in approximately 20% of cases. AZD4547 is a potent and selective FGFR1-3 inhibitor with antitumor activity in FGFR1-amplified SQCLC cell lines and patient-derived xenografts.Experimental Design: On the basis of these data, we performed a phase I study of AZD4547 in patients with previously treated stage IV FGFR1-amplified SQCLCs (NCT00979134). FGFR1 amplification (FGFR1:CEP8 ≥ 2) was determined by FISH. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and molecular analyses.Results: Fifteen FGFR1-amplified patients were treated. The most common related adverse events (AE) were gastrointestinal and dermatologic. Grade ≥3-related AEs occurred in 3 patients (23%). Thirteen patients were evaluable for radiographic response assessment. The overall response rate was 8% (1 PR). Two of 15 patients (13.3%) were progression-free at 12 weeks, and the median overall survival was 4.9 months. Molecular tests, including next-generation sequencing, gene expression analysis, and FGFR1 immunohistochemistry, showed poor correlation between gene amplification and expression, potential genomic modifiers of efficacy, and heterogeneity in 8p11 amplicon.Conclusions: AZD4547 was tolerable at a dosage of 80 mg oral twice a day, with modest antitumor activity. Detailed molecular studies show that these tumors are heterogeneous, with a range of mutational covariates and stark differences in gene expression of the 8p11 amplicon that likely explain the modest efficacy of FGFR inhibition in this disease. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5366-73. ©2017 AACR.

In Silico Predictions and In Vivo Results of Drug-Drug Interactions by Ketoconazole and Verapamil on AZD1305, a Combined Ion Channel Blocker and a Sensitive CYP3A4 Substrate.

The objectives were to estimate and compare, in silico and in vivo, the effects of a strong and a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor on AZD1305 pharmacokinetics. In silico, simulations were performed with the computer software Simcyp, and the predicted outcome was compared with the results observed in healthy male subjects. In silico, the geometric mean plasma exposure of AZD1305 + ketoconazole showed a 7.1-fold higher AUC and a 4.4-fold higher Cmax compared with AZD1305 alone. Coadministration with verapamil gave a 1.9-fold higher AUC and a 1.7-fold higher Cmax compared with AZD1305 alone. In vivo, the plasma exposure of AZD1305 + ketoconazole showed a 7.7-fold higher AUC and a 4.8 -fold higher Cmax compared with AZD1305 alone. Coadministration with verapamil gave a 2.2-fold higher AUC and a 2.0-fold higher Cmax compared with AZD1305 alone. The mean maximum QTcF increase from baseline was 407, 487, and 437 milliseconds for AZD1305, alone and in combination with verapamil or ketoconazole, respectively. Simcyp predicted the effects of ketoconazole and verapamil on the sensitive CYP3A4 substrate AZD1305 pharmacokinetics well. Both the in vivo study and the Simcyp predictions suggest a contraindication for strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and AZD1305 when given in combination.

Efficacy and safety of a CXCR2 antagonist, AZD5069, in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Airway neutrophilic inflammation is a pathological feature in some patients with severe asthma. Stimulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR2 mediates neutrophil migration into the airways. We investigated the safety and efficacy of AZD5069, a CXCR2 antagonist, as an add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with uncontrolled asthma despite combination therapy with long-acting ß2 agonists and medium-dose or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio via an interactive voice-response or web-response system to receive 5, 15, or 45 mg oral AZD5069 twice daily or matched placebo. The primary endpoint was the number of severe asthma exacerbations in 6 months. Safety was assessed in the 6-month treatment period and an optional 6-month safety extension. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704495. FINDINGS: 640 patients with a mean age of 52 (SD 11·8) years were randomised, 478 to receive AZD5069 (5 mg n=160, 15 mg n=156, and 45 mg n=162) and 162 placebo. No dose of AZD5069 reduced the rate of severe exacerbations compared with placebo (rate ratio for 5 mg 1·29, 90% CI 0·79-2·11; for 15 mg 1·53, 0·95-2·46; and for 45 mg 1·56, 0·98-2·49). Treatment with AZD5069 was generally well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse event overall was nasopharyngitis, seen in 18 (11·5%) receiving 5 mg, 13 (8·5%) receiving 15 mg, and 18 (11·2%) receiving 45 mg AZD5069, and 31 (19·5%) of those receiving placebo. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with this selective CXCR2 antagonist did not reduce the frequency of severe exacerbations in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. These findings bring into question the role of CXCR2-mediated neutrophil recruitment in the pathobiology of exacerbations in severe refractory asthma. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran and relationship to clinical response in acute deep vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, and the relationship between melagatran exposure and clinical outcome in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on samples from patients with deep vein thrombosis participating in a randomized dose-finding study (THRombin Inhibitor in Venous thrombo-Embolism [THRIVE I]). Patients received fixed doses of oral ximelagatran (24, 36, 48, or 60 mg twice daily) for 12 to 16 days. Thrombus size was evaluated by venography before and after treatment. Exposure-response curves were characterized for the probability of regression, no change, and progression of the thrombus extension and of having a bleeding-related event, by use of logistic regression models. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of melagatran (1836 samples in 264 patients) was predictable, without significant time or dose dependencies. Clearance after oral administration (population mean, 27.3 L/h) was correlated with creatinine clearance (P < 10(-6)), and volume of distribution (population mean, 176 L) was correlated with body weight (P = 2 x 10(-5)). Gender, age, or smoking did not significantly influence melagatran pharmacokinetics after the influence of renal function and body weight was accounted for. Unexplained interpatient variability values in total plasma clearance and bioavailability were 19% and 21%, respectively. The median area under the plasma melagatran concentration versus time curve across all patients and dose levels was 3.22 h x micromol/L (5th-95th percentiles, 1.35-7.69). There was no significant relationship between area under the plasma concentration versus time curve and change in thrombus extension (P = .59) or bleeding-related events (P = .77), and the estimated exposure-response curves were relatively flat. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of melagatran in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis was predictable after oral ximelagatran administration. Shallow exposure-response curves for efficacy and bleeding indicate that there is no need for individualized dosing or therapeutic drug monitoring in the patient population studied.

No effect of encapsulation on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin.

BACKGROUND: In double-blind comparator studies with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor (oral DTI) ximelagatran, warfarin (Coumadin) was administered in encapsulated form in order to maintain patient and investigator blinding. This open, randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted to determine whether the encapsulated warfarin tablets (Coumadin) used in the ximelagatran studies are bioequivalent to nonencapsulated, commercially available warfarin (Coumadin) tablets. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen healthy men received two 2.5 mg tablets of encapsulated warfarin and two 2.5 mg tablets of nonencapsulated warfarin as single oral doses, 14 days apart. The 90% confidence intervals for the mean treatment ratio (encapsulated tablet/nonencapsulated tablet) fell within the limits considered to reflect bioequivalence (0.80, 1.25) for total area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC(infinity)), AUC to the last evaluable concentration (AUC(t)), and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for both R-warfarin (AUC(infinity) [0.93, 1.03], AUC(t) [0.95, 1.03], C(max) [0.90, 1.04]) and S-warfarin (AUC(infinity) [0.93, 1.03], AUC(t) [0.94, 1.03], C(max) [0.90, 1.06]). CONCLUSIONS: The encapsulated form of warfarin (Coumadin) used in comparator studies with the oral DTI ximelagatran is bioequivalent to the nonencapsulated, commercially available form of warfarin (Coumadin). Thus, the results of ximelagatran clinical trials with encapsulated warfarin can be generalized to the commercially available form.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, are not influenced by acetylsalicylic acid.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA or aspirin) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of melagatran in healthy volunteers. Melagatran is the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomised, two-way, crossover study consisting of two treatment periods separated by a washout period of at least 2 weeks. Twelve subjects received, in a randomised order, either melagatran plus ASA in the first treatment period and melagatran plus placebo in the second treatment period or vice versa. Two single doses of ASA were given, first 450 mg on the day before (day 1) and then 150 mg just before administration of melagatran on day 2. Melagatran 4.12 mg was administered as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 4 h on day 2 of both treatment periods. Serial blood samples were collected over the course of the study for the determination of melagatran plasma concentration and coagulation analyses [activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and activated clotting time (ACT)]. Capillary bleeding time was measured before ASA/placebo on day 1 and before and after the start of the melagatran infusion on day 2. RESULTS: The plasma concentration of melagatran during the i.v. infusion was maintained at about 0.2 micro mol/l, and ASA did not influence the PK parameters of melagatran. APTT and ACT increased with increasing melagatran plasma concentration, and the observed increases were similar whether melagatran was administered on top of ASA or placebo. Administration of ASA significantly prolonged the capillary bleeding time (by 41% relative to placebo). Melagatran also prolonged the bleeding time significantly (by 25% relative to placebo alone), but this prolongation was not significantly different from the observed prolongation when melagatran was administered on top of ASA (by 17% relative to ASA alone). CONCLUSION: In young healthy volunteers, ASA had no effect on the PK or PD properties of melagatran at the studied dose. That the combination of ximelagatran with ASA may be used with acceptable safety must be verified in the relevant patient populations.