Altered dopamine D2-like receptor binding in rats with behavioral sensitization to quinpirole: effects of pre-treatment with Ro 41-1049.

Repeated treatment with the dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole produces a sensitized behavioral response in rats manifested as an increase in locomotor activity. Pre-treatment with certain monoamine oxidase inhibitors, such as Ro 41-1049 [N-(2-aminomethyl)-5-(3-fluorophenyl)-4-thiazolecarboxamide HCl], changes the sensitized response from locomotion to stationary, self-directed mouthing. In this study, the effects of quinpirole sensitization, with and without pre-treatment with Ro 41-1049, were determined on dopamine D2-like receptors in the nucleus accumbens and the striatum. Long-Evans rats were pre-treated with Ro 41-1049 (1 mg/kg) 90 min prior to administration of quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg, 8 injections, every 3-4 days). Dopamine D2-like receptor binding was determined 3 days after the last injection by ex vivo radioligand assays using [3H]spiperone and [3H]quinpirole. Densities of [3H]spiperone- and [3H]quinpirole-labeled sites were both increased 32% in the nucleus accumbens of rats with demonstrated locomotor sensitization to quinpirole. In contrast, the density of dopamine D2-like receptors in quinpirole-sensitized rats pre-treated with Ro 41-1049 was not different from saline controls. These findings support the involvement of alterations in dopamine D2-like receptors in the development of locomotor sensitization to quinpirole and suggest that modification of these alterations in dopamine D2-like receptors contributes to the change from sensitized locomotion to mouthing observed when rats are pre-treated with Ro 41-1049.

Effects of hypophysectomy on compulsive checking and cortical dendrites in an animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Hormones may modulate the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but the evidence is equivocal and not consistent across studies, with findings of hormone-associated increases and decreases of symptoms. To assess whether a strong endocrine influence on OCD exists, the effects of hypophysectomy were examined in an animal model of OCD. The model involves repeated injections of the dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist, quinpirole, to induce locomotor sensitization and compulsive checking behavior. Intact and hypophysectomized rats were administered quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg x 6, twice weekly) or saline and compulsive checking in a large open field was measured according to a standard protocol. Results showed that in hypophysectomized animals, the development of locomotor sensitization was attenuated but the expression of quinpirole-induced compulsive checking was full-blown. Analysis of Golgi-stained neurons showed changes in spine density in Cg3 and Par1 and increased branching of apical dendrites in Cg3. It is suggested that compulsive checking could be coupled with drug-induced increases in Cg3 dendritic branching and that changes in spine density may reflect a compensatory adjustment in dopamine-innervated regions. On the basis of the animal model findings, it is concluded that the presence of OCD checking compulsions is not dependent on pituitary axis hormones.

Differential effects of clorgyline on sensitization to quinpirole in rats tested in small and large environments.

RATIONALE: Cotreatment with clorgyline shifts the development of sensitization to the D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonist quinpirole from locomotion to mouthing, an effect apparently unrelated to the monoamine oxidase inhibition property of clorgyline. This phenomenon was demonstrated in rats examined in small activity chambers. However, like with other psychostimulant drugs, sensitization to quinpirole is modulated by environmental context. It is not known whether the clorgyline cotreatment effect is likewise influenced by the environment. OBJECTIVE: To determine the generality of the clorgyline effect on behavioral sensitization by evaluating the effects of clorgyline cotreatment on sensitization to quinpirole in two different environments: a small activity chamber and a large open field. METHODS: Male rats received eight injections of quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg, twice weekly) in an open field or activity chamber; one group in each environment received a constant infusion of clorgyline (1 mg/kg/day via osmotic minipumps) while the other group served as the sham surgery control. For quinpirole injection 7 or 8, rats were tested in the alternate environment. RESULTS: In activity chambers, clorgyline cotreatment switched sensitization to quinpirole from locomotion to mouthing. In the open field, clorgyline cotreatment increased mouthing and expanded the explored space without a change in path stereotypy or the amount of locomotion compared to treatment with quinpirole alone. CONCLUSIONS: Structure of the environment can modulate the clorgyline cotreatment effect on behavioral sensitization to quinpirole. The behavioral profiles produced by clorgyline cotreatment in the two environments resembled the behavioral effects observed with quinpirole and D1 agonist cotreatment. It is suggested that clorgyline cotreatment produces a behavioral profile characteristic of enhanced dopamine D1 and D2 receptor costimulation.

Hypophysectomy does not block sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole or its modulation by the MAOI clorgyline.

Repeated administration of the dopamine agonist quinpirole induces behavioral sensitization in rats that is characterized by a four- to eight-fold increase in the amount of locomotion compared to an acute dose of quinpirole, in the absence of any increases in mouthing behavior. The monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor, clorgyline, switches behavioral sensitization to quinpirole from that of locomotion to self-directed mouthing. The mechanism by which clorgyline produces this switch in behavioral sensitization is unknown, but is independent of the known effects of clorgyline, namely, inhibition of MAO, inhibition of striatal dopamine uptake, or stimulation of sigma and I(2) receptors. Because clorgyline also inhibits hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function, and increased HPA activity facilitates the behavioral effects of psychostimulant drugs, the effects of clorgyline on quinpirole sensitization are possibly due to an inhibition of HPA function. Therefore, the present study examined whether HPA activity is required for sensitization to quinpirole, and whether clorgyline exerts its effects on quinpirole sensitization via inhibition of HPA function. Control and hypophysectomized rats were administered clorgyline (1 mg/kg, s.c.) or vehicle 90 min before each injection of quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg x 8, twice weekly) or saline. To assess the level of sensitization reached by control and hypophysectomized rats, test injections of quinpirole (0.0, 0.07, and 0.2 mg/kg) were administered. Chronic quinpirole administration produced equivalent levels of locomotor sensitization in control and hypophysectomized rats. Clorgyline was equally effective in blocking the development of locomotor sensitization in control and hypophysectomized rats, and in sensitizing self-directed mouthing. The present study suggests that (1). HPA function is not necessary for the development of quinpirole sensitization and, (2). clorgyline does not produce its effects on behavioral sensitization to quinpirole via an inhibition of HPA activity. Moreover, the observation that quinpirole sensitization develops normally in the absence of any pituitary endocrine function suggests that pituitary-gonadal and pituitary-thyroid axes activity are also not necessary for quinpirole sensitization to occur.

Clorgyline-induced switch from locomotion to mouthing in sensitization to the dopamine D2/D3 agonist quinpirole in rats: role of sigma and imidazoline I2 receptors.

RATIONALE: The monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) clorgyline, blocks locomotor sensitization to the D(2)/D(3) dopamine agonist quinpirole and sensitizes self-directed mouthing behavior in rats by a mechanism independent of MAO inhibition. Clorgyline has a high affinity for imidazoline I(2) and sigma receptors, which could account for its effects on quinpirole sensitization. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the effect of clorgyline on quinpirole sensitization is attributed to stimulation of either I(2) or sigma receptors. METHODS: In one experiment, rats received injections of the I(2) receptor agonist 2-BFI (0.2 mg/kg, IP) or vehicle, 90 min prior to each injection of quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg, SC, x 8, twice weekly) or saline. A similar protocol was used to examine the effects of the MAOI Ro 41-1049 (10 mg/kg, SC) on quinpirole sensitization. Unlike clorgyline, Ro 41-1049 has no affinity for sigma or I(2) sites. An initial experiment demonstrated that intermittent injections of clorgyline (1 mg/kg, SC) are as effective as a continuous clorgyline administration (1 mg/kg per day via osmotic mini-pump) on quinpirole sensitization. RESULTS: Like clorgyline, Ro 41-1049, but not 2-BFI, blocked the development of quinpirole-induced locomotor sensitization and induced instead sensitization of self-directed mouthing. CONCLUSIONS: Because Ro 41-1049 produced the same effects as clorgyline, and 2-BFI had no effects on quinpirole sensitization, it is unlikely that clorgyline exerts its effects via an action at sigma or I(2) receptors. Our results are consistent with the suggestion that clorgyline and Ro 41-1049 affect the behavioral response to quinpirole via the MAOI-displaceable quinpirole binding (MQB) site, and the hypothesis that the MQB site selects what motor output becomes sensitized to repeated injections of quinpirole.

Effect of nicotine on quinpirole-induced checking behavior in rats: implications for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Rats treated chronically in a large, open field with the dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole (QNP) develop compulsive checking behavior as defined by a set of behavioral criteria. This paradigm has been suggested as an animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Because nicotine blocks various behaviors induced by ontogenetic QNP administration, we asked whether nicotine could attenuate QNP-induced compulsive checking. METHODS: Adult male Long-Evans rats (n = 14/group) were treated twice weekly with saline (control), or with QNP (0.5 mg/kg) for 14-16 injections. On the last two injections, rats were pretreated in random order with an acute dose of nicotine (0.3 mg/kg base) or saline 10 min before administration of QNP or saline; and the effects on checking behavior was examined. The effects of chronic QNP treatment on nicotinic receptors in discrete brain regions were also determined. RESULTS: Chronic QNP resulted in compulsive checking and increases in cerebellar alpha4beta2 and alpha7 nicotinic receptor densities. Nicotine pretreatment significantly reduced one of the three measures of compulsive checking behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine attenuates some symptoms of compulsive checking in a rat model of OCD; however, the mechanisms of this effect and therapeutic efficacy of nicotinic agonists in OCD require further study.