Risk factors and prognosis of complicated urinary tract infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitalized patients: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

PURPOSE: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are among the most frequent health-care-associated infections. In patients with cUTI, Pseudomonas aeruginosa deserves special attention, since it can affect patients with serious underlying conditions. Our aim was to gain insight into the risk factors and prognosis of P. aeruginosa cUTIs in a scenario of increasing multidrug resistance (MDR). METHODS: This was a multinational, retrospective, observational study at 20 hospitals in south and southeastern Europe, Turkey, and Israel including consecutive patients with cUTI hospitalized between January 2013 and December 2014. A mixed-effect logistic regression model was performed to assess risk factors for P. aeruginosa and MDR P. aeruginosa cUTI. RESULTS: Of 1,007 episodes of cUTI, 97 (9.6%) were due to P. aeruginosa. Resistance rates of P. aeruginosa were: antipseudomonal cephalosporins 35 of 97 (36.1%), aminoglycosides 30 of 97 (30.9%), piperacillin-tazobactam 21 of 97 (21.6%), fluoroquinolones 43 of 97 (44.3%), and carbapenems 28 of 97 (28.8%). The MDR rate was 28 of 97 (28.8%). Independent risk factors for P. aeruginosa cUTI were male sex (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.60-4.27), steroid therapy (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.10-5.27), bedridden functional status (OR 1.79, 95% CI 0.99-3.25), antibiotic treatment within the previous 30 days (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.38-3.94), indwelling urinary catheter (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.43-4.08), and procedures that anatomically modified the urinary tract (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.04-3.87). Independent risk factors for MDR P. aeruginosa cUTI were age (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99) and anatomical urinary tract modification (OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.06-21.26). Readmission was higher in P. aeruginosa cUTI patients than in other etiologies (23 of 97 [23.7%] vs 144 of 910 [15.8%], P=0.04), while 30-day mortality was not significantly different (seven of 97 [7.2%] vs 77 of 910 [8.5%], P=0.6). CONCLUSION: Patients with P. aeruginosa cUTI had characteristically a serious baseline condition and manipulation of the urinary tract, although their mortality was not higher than that of patients with cUTI caused by other etiologies.

Responsiveness of four patient-reported outcome measures to assess physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of four patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to measure change in physical function simultaneously in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) following currently recommended COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments) standards. METHOD: Patients with knee OA receiving conservative treatment following a stepped care approach were invited to complete a set of questionnaires at baseline and 3 months. Questionnaires included four widely used measures of physical function: the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), the Lequesne algofunctional index (LAI), the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function subscale (WOMAC-PF). Responsiveness of physical function was investigated according to the COSMIN standards by testing 15 a priori defined hypotheses. Responsiveness was considered positive if > 75% of the hypotheses could be confirmed. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients participated [61% female, mean (sd) age 59 (9) years and body mass index 29.7 (5.0) kg/m2]. Baseline values of the four PROMs were, mean (sd): KOOS-PS 53.6 (16.8), LAI 11.0 (4.0), LEFS 40.6 (14.1), and WOMAC-PF 51.8 (19.4). We could confirm 12 out of 15 predefined hypotheses (80%) about expected correlations for the WOMAC-PF whereas for the KOOS-PS, LAI, and LEFS < 75% hypotheses could be confirmed (73, 67, and 73%. respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the WOMAC-PF is able to detect changes over time in physical function and therefore should be the measure of first choice in clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention on physical function in knee OA patients.

Characterizing the concept of activity pacing as a non-pharmacological intervention in rheumatology care: results of an international Delphi survey.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensual list of the most important aspects of activity pacing (AP) as an intervention within the context of non-pharmacological rheumatology care. METHOD: An international, multidisciplinary expert panel comprising 60 clinicians and/or healthcare providers experienced in AP across 12 different countries participated in a Delphi survey. Over four Delphi rounds, the panel identified and ranked the most important goals of AP, behaviours of AP (the actions people take to meet the goal of AP), strategies to change behaviour in AP, and contextual factors that should be acknowledged when instructing AP. Additionally, topics for future research on AP were formulated and prioritized. RESULTS: The Delphi panel prioritized 9 goals, 11 behaviours, 9 strategies to change behaviour, and 10 contextual factors of AP. These items were integrated into a consensual list containing the most important aspects of AP interventions in non-pharmacological rheumatology care. Nine topics for future research on AP with the highest ranking were included in a research agenda highlighting that future research should focus on the effectiveness of AP interventions and on appropriate outcome measures to assess its effectiveness, as selected by 64% and 82% of the panellists, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The diversity and number of items included in the consensual list developed in the current study reflect the heterogeneity of the concept of AP. This study is an important first step in achieving more transparency and homogeneity in the concept of AP in both rheumatology daily clinical practice and research.

Randomized trial of the effectiveness of a non-pharmacological multidisciplinary face-to-face treatment program on daily function compared to a telephone-based treatment program in patients with generalized osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a non-pharmacological multidisciplinary face-to-face self-management treatment program with a telephone-based program on daily function in patients with generalized osteoarthritis (GOA). DESIGN: A pragmatic single-blind randomized clinical superiority trial involving 147 patients clinically diagnosed with GOA, randomly allocated to either a 6 week non-pharmacological multidisciplinary face-to-face treatment program comprising seven group sessions or a 6 week telephone-based treatment program comprising two group sessions combined with four telephone contacts. Both programs aimed to improve daily function and to enhance self-management to control the disease. The programs critically differed in mode of delivery and intensity. Daily function (primary outcome) and secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6, 26 and 52 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear or logistic multilevel regression models corrected for baseline, sex and group-wise treatment. RESULTS: No differences in effectiveness between both treatment programs were observed on the primary outcome (group difference (95% CI): -0.03 (-0.14, 0.07)) or on secondary outcome measures, except for a larger improvement in pain in the face-to-face treatment group (group difference (95% CI): 1.61 (0.01, 3.21)). Within groups, significant improvements were observed on several domains, especially in the face-to-face group. However, these benefits are relatively small and unlikely to be of clinical importance. CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in treatment effect between patients with GOA who followed a non-pharmacological multidisciplinary face-to-face self-management program and those who received a telephone-delivered program. Besides, our findings demonstrated limited benefits of a self-management program for individuals with GOA. Dutch Trial Register trial number: NTR2137.