Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
3.
Aten Primaria ; 33(5): 254-60, 2004 Mar 31.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15033094

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the prevalence of the main cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) after diagnostic confirmation using clinical criteria. To analyse the degree of understanding and monitoring of these factors and to evaluate the association of CVRF with each other, so estimating who is susceptible to intervention. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study. SETTING: Population study conducted in Health Area 20 of the Community of Valencia (county of the Low Plain of the River Segura). PATIENTS: People who had lived in this Area for >=20 years. Proportional, multi-stage randomised sampling with definition of sample quotas according to type of residence. SAMPLE SIZE: 2550 people (no reply in first stage: 26%). The second stage involved the clinical confirmation of those identified as suffering from hypertension (HT) (374), hypercholesterolaemia (HCOL) (126), and diabetes (DM) (33). MEASUREMENTS: Patients identified were interviewed for taking blood pressure in the case of those with HT, and blood samples in the case of those with HCOL and DM. The diagnostic criteria recommended by the latest consensus were used. RESULTS: 1886 people (78.1%) took part. Prevalences found: total HT 42+/-2.2%, diagnosed: 11.7+/-1.4; total HCOL 26.6+/-2%; total DM 9.5+/-1.3%. Tobacco dependency was 33.6+/-2.1% and Obesity: 31.6+/-2.1%. Degree of control: HT, 8.6%; HCOL, 21.7%; DM, 56.1%. Association of CVR factors with each other: 25.5% had neither HT nor HCOL and did not smoke. CONCLUSIONS: High prevalence of CVRF in our area, compared with published national findings. Tobacco dependency is less common than at national level. The degree of control is very low and the association of the main CVRF factors for ischaemic cardiopathy reflect that nearly 75% of the population requires a preventive intervention.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/prevenção & controle , Hipercolesterolemia/terapia , Hipertensão/prevenção & controle , Hipertensão/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia
7.
Aten Primaria ; 30(9): 549-55, 2002 Nov 30.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12453388

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on waiting-lists and waiting time of an intervention that modified the appointment system in specialist out-patients. DESIGN: Intervention study. Intervention group, medical specialists (MS); and control group, surgical specialists (SS). Comparison of variables. Analysis at one year (1997) and at two years (1998) of the intervention in the two groups.Setting. Area 20 of the health board for the Community of Valencia, a Southern county in the province of Alicante, which had 12 health districts and included specialist care. PARTICIPANTS: The first-visit diary for medical and surgical specialist clinics.Interventions. Redistribution of MS first visits in proportion with the population over 14 by areas. Health centre self-management of specialist appointments. Introduction of visits of choice and second-visit re-scheduling from specialist care. Introduction of clinical protocols for action and referral. MEASUREMENTS: Referral percentage. Patients seen in primary care and at medical and surgical specialist clinics. Days waiting to be seen by a specialist. Patients on waiting list. Index of waiting for consultations. RESULTS: Referral ranged between 5.1% and 5.8%. There was a significant drop (P<.05) in the mean number of days an MS patient had to wait vs the SS (37 vs 48 in 1997 and 34 vs 50 in 1998), and in the number of MS consultations being waited for. There was a significant difference in the index of waiting for a consultation (P<.05) in favour of MS (17.74 vs 25.45 in 1997, and 16.77 vs 34.92). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention optimised specialist medical health care in terms of the number of consultations and reduction of waiting time, with an improvement of these variables against SS.


Assuntos
Área Programática de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina , Especialização , Listas de Espera , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo
8.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 30(9): 549-555, nov. 2002.
Artigo em Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-16438

RESUMO

Objetivo. Evaluar el impacto de una intervención que modifica el sistema de citación sobre las listas y el tiempo de espera de consulta externa especializada. Diseño. Estudio de intervención. Forman el grupo de intervención las especialidades médicas (EM) y el de control, las especialidades quirúrgicas (EQ). Comparación de variables. Análisis al año (1997) y a los dos años (1998) de la intervención en ambos grupos. Emplazamiento. Área 20 de la Conselleria de Sanitat de la Comunidad Valenciana, comarca sur de la provincia de Alicante, 12 zonas básicas de salud y asistencia especializada. Participantes. Agenda de primeras visitas de especializada, consultas médicas y quirúrgicas. Intervenciones. Redistribución de primeras visitas en consultas de EM proporcional a población mayor de 14 años por zonas. Autogestión desde los centros de salud de citas con especializada. Instauración de consultas preferentes y recitación de segundas visitas desde especializada. Implantación de protocolos clínicos de actuación y derivación. Mediciones. Porcentaje de derivación; pacientes atendidos en atención primaria y especialidades médicas y quirúrgicas; días de espera para visita por especialista; pacientes en lista de espera, e índice de espera por consultas. Resultados. El porcentaje de derivación oscila entre el 5,1 y el 5,8 per cent. Se observa una disminución significativa (p < 0,05) en la media de días de espera por paciente para las EM frente a las EQ (37 frente a 48 en 1997 y 34 frente a 50 en 1998), así como del número de consultas en espera para las EM. Existe una diferencia significativa del índice de espera por consulta (p < 0,05) a favor de las EM (17,74 frente a 25,45 en 1997 y 16,77 frente a 34,92 en 1998). Conclusiones. La intervención produjo una optimización de la actividad asistencial en EM en términos de número de consultas y reducción del tiempo de espera, con mejora de estas variables frente a las EQ. (AU)


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Medicina , Listas de Espera , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo , Área Programática de Saúde
10.
Aten Primaria ; 30(4): 207-13, 2002 Sep 15.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12237025

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity and tobacco dependency, in Health Area 20 of the Community of Valencia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study. SETTING: Population study carried out in Health Area 20 of the Community of Valencia (Vega Baja del río Segura county). PATIENTS: >=20 years-old people, living in this area. Multi-stage randomised sample proportional to the definition of sample quotas according to the kind of residence (urban, peri-urban or rural), age groups and sex. Calculated sample size of 2550 people. Pregnant women and people diagnosed with incapacitating psychiatric or physical illnesses (134) were excluded. The rest (2416) were included. MEASUREMENTS: A questionnaire was filled out in a face-to-face interview and a basic physical examination was made. A blood sample was taken. The following variables were recorded: personal details, social and economic details, previous illnesses (cardiovascular, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, DM), tobacco habit, Body Mass Index, blood pressure, haemogram and standard biochemical test. The most recently agreed and recommended diagnostic criteria were used for each factor. RESULTS: 1886 people of the 2416 eligible took part (78.06%). Prevalence was as follows: hypertension, 30.3+/-2.1% (women, 34.1+/-2.9%; men, 25.8+/-2.9%); hypercholesterolaemia, 22.6+/-1.9%; diabetes, 8.4+/-1.2%; tobacco dependency, 33.6+/-2.1% (women, 25.4+/-2.7%; men, 42.2+/-3.3%; 20-39 years old age-group, 56.9+/-3.8%), and obesity, 31.6+/-2.1% (women, 34.6+/-2.9%; men, 28.1+/-3%; age group >=60 years old, 46.7+/-3.9%). Detection data were shown. CONCLUSIONS: High presence of hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes and obesity, greater than the country-wide level. Tobacco dependency was less common, though very high in young people. Known hypertension and obesity are more common in women than men.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 30(4): 207-213, sept. 2002.
Artigo em Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-16168

RESUMO

Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular: hipertensión arterial (HTA), hipercolesterolemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), obesidad y tabaquismo en el Área de Salud 20 de la Comunidad Valenciana. Diseño. Estudio observacional descriptivo transversal.Emplazamiento. Estudio poblacional realizado en el Área de Salud 20 de la Comunidad Valenciana (comarca de la Vega Baja del río Segura).Pacientes. Personas 20 años de edad residentes en dicha área. Muestreo aleatorio polietápico proporcional con definición de cuotas muestrales según tipo de residencia (urbano, periurbano y rural), según grupos de edad y sexo. Tamaño muestral calculado de 2.550 personas. Se excluyen las embarazadas y las personas diagnosticadas de enfermedad psíquica o física incapacitante (n = 134). Se incluye el resto (n = 2.416).Mediciones. Mediante entrevista personal se cumplimenta un cuestionario y se realiza una exploración física básica. Posteriormente se practica una extracción sanguínea. Se recogen las siguientes variables: filiación, datos socioeconómicos, enfermedades previas (cardiovasculares, HTA, hipercolesterolemia, DM), hábito tabáquico, índice de masa corporal, presión arterial, hemograma y bioquímica estándar. Se han utilizado los criterios diagnósticos preconizados por el último consenso para cada factor. Resultados. De las 2.416 personas elegibles, participan 1.886 (78,06 per cent). Prevalencias halladas: HTA conocida: 30,3 ñ 2,1 per cent (mujeres: 34,1 ñ 2,9 per cent, varones: 25,8 ñ 2,9 per cent); hipercolesterolemia conocida: 22,6 ñ 1,9 per cent; diabetes conocida: 8,4 ñ 1,2 per cent; tabaquismo: 33,6 ñ 2,1 per cent (mujeres: 25,4 ñ 2,7 per cent; varones: 42,2 ñ 3,3 per cent; grupo de edad 20-39 años: 56,9 ñ 3,8 per cent), y obesidad: 31,6 ñ 2,1 per cent (mujeres: 34,6 ñ 2,9 per cent; varones: 28,1 ñ 3 per cent; grupo de edad 60 años: 46,7 ñ 3,9 per cent).Se presentan los datos de detección. Conclusiones. Se han encontrado prevalencias elevadas de hipertensión arterial, hipercolesterolemia, diabetes y obesidad, superiores a las halladas en el ámbito nacional. El tabaquismo es menos frecuente, aunque en los jóvenes es muy prevalente. La hipertensión conocida y la obesidad son más prevalentes en mujeres que en varones (AU)


Assuntos
Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Espanha , Fatores de Risco , População Urbana , Tabagismo , Prevalência , Distribuição por Idade , Obesidade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus , Hipertensão , Hipercolesterolemia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...