Risk of Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty After Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the survivorship of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) over a medium-term follow-up in a large population-based sample and to identify potential risk factors for revision surgery. METHODS: The State Inpatient Database from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify patients who underwent aTSA or rTSA from 2011 through 2015 using ICD9 codes. We modeled the primary outcome of time to revision or arthroplasty using the Cox proportional hazards model. The predictors of revision surgery in the model include aTSA versus rTSA, indication for surgery, age, sex, race, urban versus rural residence, hospital length of stay zip code-based income quartile classification, and Elixhauser comorbidity readmission score. RESULTS: Among 43,990 patients in this study, 1,141 (4.0%) underwent revision or implant removal over the 4-year study period. The median age was 71 years, and 57% of patients were female. Indications for the index surgery included primary osteoarthritis (75.2%), cuff tear (8.5%), acute fracture (7.0%), malunion/nonunion (1.4%), and other (7.8%). Among these indications for surgery, the risk of revision or removal was greatest in patients who underwent the primary procedure for malunion/nonunion (hazard ratio [HR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69 to 3.39) compared with the reference of primary osteoarthritis. Male patients who underwent aTSA were less likely to need revision surgery than male patients who underwent rTSA (HR: 0.59, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.71), and the opposite relationship was observed in female patients (HR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.69). Age, length of stay, and Elixhauser comorbidity score were predictive of revision surgery (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0005, P < 0.0001, respectively), whereas race, urban versus rural, and zip code-based income quartile were not. DISCUSSION: aTSA and rTSA showed excellent 4-year survivorship of 96.0% in a large population-based sample. aTSA and rTSA survivorships were similar at the 4-year follow-up.

Conversion of Elbow Arthrodesis to Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Elbow arthrodesis is a salvage operation designed to relieve pain and enable weight bearing in young patients with painful arthritic joints who have failed all other treatment modalities. Unfortunately, elbow arthrodesis is poorly tolerated by many patients because there is no fusion position that accommodates all activities of daily living. As indications for elbow arthroplasty expand and implant design improves, patients living with elbow arthrodesis may seek conversion to arthroplasty to regain a functional range of motion. Only one case of elbow arthrodesis to elbow arthroplasty conversion has been reported in the English literature to date. We present the case of a 58 year old male, five years status post elbow arthrodesis, unable to perform his ADLs adequately, who was successfully converted to a total elbow arthroplasty. Indications, contraindications, and technical pearls are discussed.

Glenohumeral arthrodesis.

Glenohumeral arthrodesis is a salvage procedure indicated for brachial plexus palsy, refractory instability, humeral and/or glenoid bone loss, deltoid and rotator cuff insufficiency, and chronic infections. The aim is to provide a painless, stable shoulder that is positioned to maximize function. Scapulothoracic motion as well as motion of the elbow and hand deliver satisfactory function in most patients. Intra-articular, extra-articular, and more commonly, combined techniques involving glenohumeral and humeroacromial fusion, have been described. More recently, authors have reported arthroscopic assisted techniques for shoulder arthrodesis with promising results as well as less complicated conversion from shoulder arthrodesis to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Despite advances in materials and techniques, glenohumeral arthrodesis continues to be associated with complication rates as high as 43%. A thorough understanding of the indications, contraindications, outcomes, and complications is paramount to improving patient results. Glenohumeral arthrodesis is a safe and effective procedure for the appropriate indications. The high frequency of complications mandates a frank preoperative discussion to ensure that each patient understands the magnitude of the procedure, its risks, possible complications, and expected outcome.

Thirty-day readmissions and reoperations after total elbow arthroplasty: a national database study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of short-term complications after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and identify predictors of readmission and reoperation. We hypothesized that TEA performed for acute elbow trauma would have higher rates of 30-day readmission and reoperation than TEA performed for osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for the years 2011-2017, we identified patients undergoing TEA for fracture, OA, or inflammatory arthritis. Patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, reoperations, and readmissions within 30 days of surgery were analyzed. Potential predictors of reoperation and readmission in the model included age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, bleeding disorders, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, wound classification, operative time, and indication for surgery. RESULTS: A total of 414 patients underwent TEA from 2011-2017. Of these patients, 40.6% underwent TEA for fracture; 37.0%, for OA; and 22.7%, for inflammatory arthritis. The overall rate of unplanned readmissions was 5.1% (21 patients). The rate of unplanned reoperations was 2.4% (10 patients). Infection was the most common reason for both unplanned readmissions and reoperations. The rates of reoperations and readmissions were not significantly associated with any of the 3 operative indications: fracture, OA, or inflammatory arthritis. Multiple logistic regression analysis found increased BMI to be associated with lower odds of an unplanned readmission (odds ratio [OR], 0.883; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.798-0.963; P = .0035) and found wound classification ≥ 3 to be associated with increased odds of an unplanned reoperation (OR, 16.531; 95% CI, 1.300-167.960; P = .0144) and total local complications (OR, 17.587; 95% CI, 2.207-132.019; P = .0057). Patients who were not functionally independent were more likely to experience local complications (OR, 4.181; 95% CI, 0.983-15.664; P = .0309) than were functionally independent patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day unplanned reoperation rate after TEA was 2.4%, and the unplanned readmission rate was 5.1%. Low BMI was predictive of readmission. Wounds classified as contaminated or dirty were predictive of reoperation. Dependent functional status and contaminated wounds were predictive of local complications. The indication for TEA (fracture vs. OA vs. inflammatory arthritis) was not found to be a risk factor for reoperation or readmission after TEA.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of subscapularis management techniques in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal subscapularis management technique in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes between subscapularis tenotomy (ST), lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO), and subscapularis peel (SP) techniques. METHODS: We performed a level III systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing ST, LTO, and SP in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Our primary collection endpoints included range of motion, subscapularis function, subscapularis healing, functional patient-reported outcomes, complications, and revision surgery. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis was performed owing to the comparison of 3 groups. RESULTS: Eight studies met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. There was no difference in sex or primary diagnosis between the 3 cohorts. No significant difference was found in postoperative external rotation or forward flexion between the groups. Meta-analysis found the SP cohort to have significantly greater internal rotation strength than the ST cohort. The belly-press test results were negative most commonly in the LTO group, and there was a significant difference compared with the ST or SP group (P < .0001). The weighted-mean healing rate for the LTO site was 98.9% on radiographic imaging. There was a significantly higher ultrasound healing rate in the LTO cohort than in the ST and SP cohorts. All groups had good postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score range, 78.6-87) and a relatively low rate of complications (3%). CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis demonstrates that the LTO group has superior healing and postoperative subscapularis-specific physical examination test results compared with the ST and SP groups. However, no difference in postoperative range of motion was found between the groups, and all techniques demonstrated good functional patient-reported outcomes, with a low rate of postoperative complications. These findings provide evidence-based support that ST, SP, and LTO all demonstrate similar outcomes; therefore, selection should be based on surgeon experience and comfort.

Increased articular exposure of the lateral elbow joint with the anconeus approach compared to the Kocher approach: a cadaver study.

INTRODUCTION: The Kocher approach is the workhorse approach to the lateral elbow. However, the exposure is often limited, particularly for open reduction. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the articular exposure of the anconeus and Kocher approaches to the lateral elbow. METHODS: Eight surgical approaches (four Kocher and four Anconeus) were performed on four fresh cadavers. The right elbows of the first two specimens were dissected via the Kocher approach, and the left elbows via the anconeus approach. For the remaining two specimens, the laterality of the approaches was reversed. Access to key articular landmarks were assessed, including the capitellum, humeral trochlea, radial head, olecranon, coronoid process, and greater and lesser sigmoid notches of the ulna. A calibrated digital image was taken from the optimum surgeon's viewing angle of each approach, and these images were analyzed with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) to calculate the area of exposed articular surfaces. RESULTS: The average surface area exposed was 2.9 times greater with the anconeus approach compared with the standard Kocher approach (8.3 vs 3.1 cm2, p value 0.001). All key anatomic landmarks were directly visualized with the anconeus approach in each specimen. Visualization of the humeral trochlea, olecranon, coronoid process, and greater and lesser sigmoid notches of the ulna was not obtained in any of the Kocher approaches. DISCUSSION: The Anconeus approach provides superior exposure of the lateral elbow joint compared with the Kocher approach. We recommend consideration of the anconeus approach for treatment of select traumatic injuries of the lateral elbow requiring increased access to the ulnohumeral and radiocapitellar joints.

Sources of contamination in the operating room: A fluorescent particle powder study.

This study utilized fluorescent particle powder to investigate 2 potential sources of sterile field contamination in the operating room (OR): forced-air warming blankets and OR light manipulation. In part 1, sterile draping for knee replacement surgery was performed on a mannequin in a sterile OR, comparing field contamination with the forced-air warming on versus off during draping. In part 2, OR lights coated with fluorescent powder were manipulated over a sterile field. Proper operation of these devices may reduce the particle burden on the surgical field.

Comparing the Incidence of Index Level Fusion Following Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of index level fusion following open or minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 174 patients with a symptomatic single-level lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus who underwent microdiscectomy via a mini-open approach (MIS; 39) or through a minimally invasive dilator tube (135). Outcomes of interest included revision microdiscectomy and the ultimate need for index level fusion. Continuous variables were analyzed with independent sample t test, and χ2 analysis was used for categorical data. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for patients that required index level fusion after lumbar microdiscectomy. RESULTS: There was no difference in patient demographics in the open and MIS groups aside from length of follow-up (60.4 vs 40.03 months, P < .0001) and body mass index (24.72 vs 27.21, P = .03). The rate of revision microdiscectomy was not statistically significant between open and MIS approaches (10.3% vs 10.4%, P = .90). The rate of patients who ultimately required index level fusion approached significance, but was not statistically different between open and MIS approaches (10.3% vs 4.4%, P = .17). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that the need for eventual index level fusion after lumbar microdiscectomy was statistically predicted in smokers and those patients who underwent revision microdiscectomy (P < .05) in both open and MIS groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a low likelihood of patients ultimately requiring fusion following microdiscectomy with predictors including smoking status and a history of revision microdiscectomy.

Short-Term Complications of Anterior Fixation of Odontoid Fractures.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: Anterior fixation of odontoid fracture has been associated with high morbidity and mortality in small, single institution series. Identifying risk factors may improve risk stratification and highlight factors that could be optimized preoperatively. The objective of this study was to determine the 30-day complication rate following anterior fixation of odontoid fractures and to identify associated risk factors among patients in a large national database. METHODS: Patients who underwent anterior fixation were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database (ACS NSQIP) from 2007 to 2012. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, perioperative complications, and postoperative complications up to 30 days were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 103 patients met criteria for the study. The average age was 73.9 years and patients were predominantly white (85.4%). Cardiac comorbidity was common (66.0%), as were dependent functional status (14.6%) and bleeding disorders (13.6%). Complications occurred in 37.9% of patients, and mortality was high (6.8%). Age, white race, and history of bleeding disorders were independently predictive of complications in the multivariate analysis. The postoperative hospital stay was >5 days for 45.6% of patients. CONCLUSION: In a large, multicenter database study, anterior fixation of odontoid fracture was associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although advanced age was associated with increased risk of complications, patients undergoing anterior fixation were older, on average, than in prior studies. Bleeding disorder was a potentially modifiable risk factor for complications that could be optimized prior to surgery.

Trifurcate Origin of Long Head of Biceps Brachii: A Case Report and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Variant anatomy of the intra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) is rare, and its clinical significance is poorly understood. However, these variants are encountered with increasing frequency due to increasing use of shoulder arthroscopy. CASE REPORT: We report a case of a trifurcate intra-articular LHBT, a variation which, to our knowledge, has not been previously described. The patient was an adult male presenting with chronic atraumatic shoulder pain that worsened with overhead activity. On arthroscopy, the LHBT was found to have three origins from the (1) supraspinatus tendon, (2) superior labrum, and (3) rotator interval that joined together distally within the biceps tunnel. We believe the split tendon may have caused impingement the biceps tunnel; therefore, the patient was treated with subpectoral tenodesis. He also underwent subacromial decompression and rotator cuff debridement. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of surgeon and radiologist awareness of split LHBT variant anatomy, such that misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment may be avoided.

Incidence and Risk Factors for 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions After Elective Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To perform a multiinstitutional assessment on the incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmissions following elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Understanding what may drive rehospitalizations is a necessary step toward higher quality care. Identifying risk factors for unplanned readmission is especially important for elective PLF, which is a common procedure that is known to be associated with significant adverse events. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing PLF were identified using current procedure terminology (CPT) from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Both descriptive and comparative statistics were performed for patient characteristics, clinical factors, and postoperative complications. Subsequently, a step-wise multivariate logistic regression was employed. RESULTS: Of the 2301 patients who met inclusion criteria for this study, 117 were unplanned readmissions (5.1%). These occurred at a mean of 15.9 days (range: 3-30 days) after surgery. The risk-adjusted analysis revealed that bleeding disorder (odds ratio, OR = 2.8, confidence intervals, CI = 1.0-7.6, P = 0.043), insulin dependent diabetes (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.4-4.4, P = 0.004), and total length of stay > 5 days (OR = 1.8, CI = 1.2-2.8, P = 0.009) were independent predictors for unplanned readmission. Significant postoperative complications included wound complications (OR = 27.6, CI = 13.9-54.8, P < 0.0001), pulmonary embolism and/or deep vein thrombosis/thrombophlebitis (OR = 11.9, CI = 5.0-28.5, P < 0.0001), sepsis (OR = 8.5, CI = 2.3-32.1, P = 0.002), and urinary tract infections (OR = 2.4, CI = 0.9-6.9, P = 0.094). CONCLUSION: The unplanned readmission rate for patients undergoing PLF was low, but this study's findings of potentially modifiable risk factors suggest that substantial improvement with this quality metric is possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Outcome Instruments in Spinal Trauma Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Study Design Literature review. Objective To identify outcomes instruments used in spinal trauma surgery over the past decade, their frequency of use, and usage trends. Methods Five top orthopedic journals were reviewed from 2004 to 2013 for clinical studies of surgical intervention in spinal trauma that reported patient-reported outcome instruments use or neurologic function scale use. Publication year, level of evidence (LOE), and outcome instruments were collected for each article and analyzed. Results A total of 58 studies were identified. Among them, 26 named outcome instruments and 7 improvised questionnaires were utilized. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was used most frequently (43.1%), followed by the Short Form 36 (34.5%), Frankel grade scale (25.9%), Oswestry Disability Index (20.7%) and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (15.5%). LOE 4 was most common (37.9%), and eight LOE 1 studies were identified (10.3%). Conclusions The VAS pain scale is the most common outcome instrument used in spinal trauma. The scope of this outcome instrument is limited, and it may not be sufficient for discriminating between more and less effective treatments. A wide variety of functional measures are used, reflecting the need for a disease-specific instrument that accurately measures functional limitation in spinal trauma.

Use of Molecular Profiling to Guide Treatment Decisions in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Preliminary Results.

This case series demonstrates the potential of molecular profiling to improve selection of antitumor therapies in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors. Carcinoid tumors resected at one institution over a 3-year period were sent for molecular profiling to guide choice of treatment. Potentially beneficial therapies were identified based on the measured expression of 20 proteins and oncogenes and a comprehensive review of the chemotherapy response literature. The clinical charts of 41 patients were reviewed retrospectively, and 12 were selected as representatives of the range of effects molecular profiling has on carcinoid treatment. Their presentation, molecular profile results, treatment, and disease progression is reviewed in the following case series. A total of nine patients were treated with drugs identified as potentially beneficial by molecular profile reports. These include capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, temozolomide, oxaliplatin, and gemcitabine. Based on clinical symptoms, serum markers of disease, and radiographic evidence five of nine patients responded to treatment, two had mixed responses, and two did not respond to treatment. At this early juncture, our critique of molecular profiling for neuroendocrine tumors is favorable, as a significant number of our patients responded to drugs identified by molecular profiling as potentially beneficial.

Current Trends in the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Degenerative Cervical Spine Surgery.

Study Design Bibliometric analysis. Objective To determine trends, frequency, and distribution of patient-reported outcome instruments (PROIs) in degenerative cervical spine surgery literature over the past decade. Methods A search was conducted via PubMed from 2004 to 2013 on five journals (The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, The Bone and Joint Journal, The Spine Journal, European Spine Journal, and Spine), which were chosen based on their impact factors and authors' consensus. All abstracts were screened and articles addressing degenerative cervical spine surgery using PROIs were included. Articles were then analyzed for publication date, study design, journal, level of evidence, and PROI trends. Prevalence of PROIs and level of evidence of included articles were analyzed. Results From 19,736 articles published, 241 articles fulfilled our study criteria. Overall, 53 distinct PROIs appeared. The top seven most frequently used PROIs were: Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (104 studies), visual analog scale for pain (100), Neck Disability Index (72), Short Form-36 (38), Nurick score (25), Odom criteria (21), and Oswestry Disability Index (15). Only 11 PROIs were used in 5 or more articles. Thirty-three of the PROIs were appeared in only 1 article. Among the included articles, 16% were of level 1 evidence and 32% were of level 4 evidence. Conclusion Numerous PROIs are currently used in degenerative cervical spine surgery. A consensus on which instruments to use for a given diagnosis or procedure is lacking and may be necessary for better communication and comparison, as well as for the accumulation and analysis of vast clinical data across multiple studies.

Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A critical review of the current literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine frequency, trends, and methods of utilization of spine-related PROIs over the last 10 years. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patient-reported outcome instruments (PROIs) have become the gold standard to assess the efficacy of various medical and surgical treatments. Currently, however, there is an expansive range of PROIs without a clear consensus or guideline addressing which PROIs should be used for a particular diagnosis or surgical intervention. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted from 2004 to 2013 of 5 orthopedic journals (The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, The Bone and Joint Journal, The Spine Journal, The European Spine Journal, and Spine) that publish spine articles, chosen on the basis of readership and impact factor. Journal abstracts were inspected for spine surgery and inclusion of at least 1 PROI. All articles containing PROIs and investigating a surgical intervention with a level of evidence (LOE) 1 to 4 were included for analysis. Article title, LOE, journal, and chosen PROI were recorded for selected articles. RESULTS: Out of 19,736 articles published in our selected time frame, 1,079 utilized PROIs. Most studies were LOE 4 (32.7%). Nearly half (48.9%) of all articles addressed degenerative thoracolumbar conditions. In total, there were 206 unique PROIs in the studies chosen for inclusion. The top 6 instruments utilized were the (1) visual analog scale, (2) Oswestry disability index, (3) Short Form-36, (4) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Outcome Questionnaire, (5) Neck Disability Index, and (6) Scoliosis Research Society-22. CONCLUSION: The breadth of PROIs in spine surgery is extensive. Although there are preferred patient-reported outcome measures, a consensus or guideline addressing which instruments should be used for a particular diagnosis or procedure may be warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine is a common and increasingly prevalent condition that is often implicated as the primary reason for chronic low back pain and the leading cause of disability in the western world. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative disease has historically been approached by way of open surgical procedures aimed at decompressing and/or stabilizing the lumbar spine. Advances in technology and surgical instrumentation have led to minimally invasive surgical techniques being developed and increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Compared to the traditional open spine surgery, minimally invasive techniques require smaller incisions and decrease approach-related morbidity by avoiding muscle crush injury by self-retaining retractors, preventing the disruption of tendon attachment sites of important muscles at the spinous processes, using known anatomic neurovascular and muscle planes, and minimizing collateral soft-tissue injury by limiting the width of the surgical corridor. The theoretical benefits of minimally invasive surgery over traditional open surgery include reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain and narcotics use, shorter hospital length of stay, faster recover and quicker return to work and normal activity. This paper describes the different minimally invasive techniques that are currently available for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.

Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Pediatric Deformity Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Bibliometric analysis. OBJECTIVES: To identify patient-reported outcomes instruments (PROIs) used in pediatric deformity surgery research over the past decade and their frequency and usage trends. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The emphasis on PROIs is increasing along with the demand for evidence-based medicine and cost-effectiveness research. Therefore, investigators and PROI consensus writers should be aware of the PROIs used in pediatric deformity and usage trends. METHODS: Five top orthopedics journals were reviewed from 2004 to 2013 for clinical studies of surgical intervention in pediatric deformity that report PROIs. Publication year, level of evidence (LOE), and PROIs were reported for each article. Mean and range scores for the most frequently used PROIs were analyzed at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 79 studies using PROIs were published in the pediatric deformity literature over the period studied. The researchers identified 21 named PROIs and 6 additional custom questionnaires. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 was the most frequently used instrument (32.9%), followed by the SRS-24 (29.1%), Oswestry disability index (17.7%), visual analog scale (12.7%), SRS-30 (10.1%), and Short Form-36 (6.3%). Level of evidence III was most common (39.2%) and 1 LOE I study was identified. Mean preoperative and postoperative SRS instrument scores were 4.0 (95% confidence interval, 3.8-4.1) and 4.5 (95% confidence interval, 4.4-4.6), respectively, in SRS-22r equivalents. No studies met the criteria for mean and range calculation for the other top instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Scoliosis Research Society instruments are used in 74.7% of pediatric deformity studies reporting PROIs. Therefore, there is a consensus that SRS instruments should be used in pediatric deformity outcome studies; yet, consistent use of the most up-to-date version, the SRS-22r, is still needed. General health questionnaires are currently underused in pediatric deformity research. Version reporting and use of the latest versions of PROIs need to be improved in future studies.

Patient Reported Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Bibliometric analysis. OBJECTIVES: To identify patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used in adult spinal deformity (ASD) research over the past decade, their frequency, and usage trends. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The emphasis on PROs is increasing along with the demand for evidence-based medicine. However, there is currently no standardization or consensus on which PROs ought to be used in ASD. METHODS: Five top orthopedics journals were reviewed from 2004 to 2013 for clinical studies of surgical intervention in ASD that report PROs. Publication year, level of evidence (LOE), and PROs were collected for each article. Errors and inconsistencies of PRO score reporting were analyzed for the 3 most commonly used PROs. RESULTS: A total of 84 PRO studies were published in ASD literature over the period studied. The number of PRO studies published increased from 1 in 2004 to 16 in 2013. We identified 24 unique PROs. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was the most frequently used single instrument (47.8%), followed by the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 (35.6%) and SRS-24 (21.1%), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) and visual analog scale (VAS) were tied (13.3%). The combined use of SRS instruments exceeded ODI use. LOE 4 was most common (42.9%), and no LOE 1 studies were identified. Incomplete preoperative and postoperative PRO scores was the most common reporting inconsistency, occurring in 16% of articles using ODI, 58% of articles using SRS-24, and 22% of articles using SRS-22. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of studies using PROs in ASD research has increased over the past decade, yet quality studies and standardization are lacking. In general, the ODI and SRS instruments are emerging as standards in ASD surgery; however, frequent use of many uncommon PROs presents a challenge for interstudy comparisons. Additionally, of the top 5 instruments used, only SF-36 is routinely used for cost-effectiveness studies, making procedure cost-outcome decisions difficult.

Outcomes and complications of diabetes mellitus on patients undergoing degenerative lumbar spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect glycemic control has on perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective degenerative lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent disease of glucose dysregulation that has been demonstrated to increase morbidity and mortality after spine surgery. However, there is limited understanding of whether glycemic control influences surgical outcomes in patients with DM undergoing lumbar spine procedures for degenerative conditions. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was analyzed from 2002 to 2011. Hospitalizations were isolated on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, procedural codes for lumbar spine surgery and diagnoses codes for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Patients were then classified into 3 cohorts: controlled diabetic, uncontrolled diabetic, and nondiabetic. Patient demographic data, acute complications, and hospitalization outcomes were determined for each cohort. RESULTS: A total of 403,629 (15.7%) controlled diabetic patients and 19,421 (0.75%) uncontrolled diabetic patients underwent degenerative lumbar spine surgery from 2002 to 2011. Relative to nondiabetic patients, uncontrolled diabetic patients had significantly increased odds of cardiac complications, deep venous thrombosis, and postoperative shock; in addition, uncontrolled diabetic patients also had an increased mean length of stay (approximately, 2.5 d), greater costs (1.3-fold), and a greater risk of inpatient mortality (odds ratio=2.6, 95% confidence interval=1.5-4.8, P<0.0009). Controlled diabetic patients also had increased risk of acute complications and inpatient mortality when compared with nondiabetic patients, but not nearly to the same magnitude as uncontrolled diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: Suboptimal glycemic control in diabetic patients undergoing degenerative lumbar spine surgery leads to increased risk of acute complications and poor outcomes. Patients with uncontrolled DM, or poor glucose control, may benefit from improving glycemic control prior to surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.