Multicenter performance evaluation of a transcription-mediated amplification assay for screening of human immunodeficiency virus-1 RNA, hepatitis C virus RNA, and hepatitis B virus DNA in blood donations.

BACKGROUND: The performance of the recently launched Procleix Ultrio (Chiron/Gen-Probe) human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) blood screening assay was evaluated in a European multicenter study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serial dilutions of reference materials were tested to determine the detection limits. Robustness and specificity were assessed by testing alternating high-load HCV RNA-positive and -negative samples, and 2912 test pools of eight donations. The added value of minipool and single-donation HBV nucleic acid testing protocols was compared to the currently used Prism (Abbott GmbH & Co. KG) hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and Auszyme (Abbott GmbH & Co. KG) dynamic HBsAg tests in 15 HBV seroconversion panels. RESULTS: The 95 percent detection limits (and 95% confidence interval [CI]) on the WHO International Standards was 26 (16-58) IU per mL for HIV-1 RNA, 4.6 (3.7-6.5) IU per mL for HCV RNA, and 11 (7.3-22) IU per mL for HBV DNA. No cross-contamination was observed. Testing 2912 pools of eight donations revealed 16 initial reactive samples; 11 were confirmed. The specificity after initial testing and percentage of invalid results were 99.83 and 0.48 percent, respectively. The HBV window-period (WP) reductions relative to HBsAg seroconversion in Prism and Auszyme dynamic HBsAg were, respectively, 6 days (95% CI, 3-8) and 9 days (95% CI, 7-12) in 1:8 minipool (MP) testing. CONCLUSION: The performance characteristics of Procleix Ultrio assay and the Procleix HIV-1 and HCV assay are comparable. The sensitivity for HIV-1 and HCV met the directives of the Paul-Ehrlich Institute and the FDA. The assay can reduce the WP for HBV by 6 days to 2 weeks when used in small MP (<1:8) or single-donation screening protocols.

Quantitative real-time detection of parvovirus B19 DNA in plasma.

BACKGROUND: As of 2004, the European Pharmacopoeia demands that plasma pools for production of anti-D immunoglobulin should not contain more than 104 IU per mL of parvovirus B19 (B19V) DNA. Hence, before pooling, highly viremic donations have to be identified, and after pooling the level of B19V DNA must be determined. The performance of a new real-time B19V DNA PCR test (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) was studied, using a DNA extractor (NucliSens, bioMerieux, Boxtel, the Netherlands) for isolation of nucleic acid, and using a DNA quantification test (LightCycler apparatus, Roche, Mannheim, Germany) for amplification and detection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Dilutions of the international B19V DNA standard and reference preparations were tested to determine the precision, linear range, and accuracy of the assay and to calculate the factor for conversion of B19V DNA copies to IUs. The internal control signals, invalid test results, and the effect of cryo-poor plasma were studied as a measure for robustness. Routine performance was assessed by testing 164 manufacturing pools (not screened for B19V) and 1048 test pools of 480 donations each. RESULTS: The copies-to-IU conversion factor was calculated to be 3.34 (95% CI, 3.07-3.63). The assay appears linear between 10(3) and 10(7) IU per mL. Between 10(3) and 10(5) IU per mL, the test can discriminate samples differing a factor two in B19V DNA content. Overall, 0.78 percent of the test results were invalid. Of 127 B19V DNA negative control plasma samples, 7 were contaminated with low levels of B19V DNA. Of 164 nonscreened manufacturing plasma pools, 92 contained B19V DNA (56%); 13 contained more than 10(4) IU per mL. Of 503,040 donations, 29 contained more than 5 x 10(6) IU per mL B19V DNA (1:17,346). CONCLUSION: The B19V DNA quantification test (LightCycler, Roche ) is suitable for quantitative, routine, in-process measurement of B19V DNA levels in plasma pools, using the DNA extractor (NucliSens, bioMerieux) for nucleic acid isolation.

Sensitivity of HCV RNA and HIV RNA blood screening assays.

BACKGROUND: The FDA requirement for sensitivity of viral NAT methods used in blood screening is a 95-percent detection limit of 100 copies per mL, whereas the NAT screening system should have a sensitivity of at least 5000 copies per mL per individual donation. According to the Common Technical Specifications of the European Directive 98/79/EC for in vitro diagnostics, viral standard dilutions (calibrated against the WHO standard) should be tested at least 24 times for a statistically valid assessment of the 95-percent detection limit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Viral standard dilution panels (PeliCheck, VQC-CLB) were prepared for HCV RNA genotypes 1 and 3 and for HIV RNA genotypes B and E. In a multicenter study, 23 laboratories tested the panels all together in 8 to 91 test runs per NAT method. RESULTS: The following 95-percent detection limits (and 95% CIs) were found on the HCV RNA genotype 1 reference panels (shown as geq/mL): Gen-Probe TMA, 85 (64-118); AmpliScreen, 126 (83-225); AmpliScreen with NucliSens Extractor, 21 (13-44); Amplicor with NucliSens Extractor, 69 (50-102), and Amplicor with Qiagen extraction technology, 144 (74-102). On HIV RNA genotype B dilution panels, the following 95-percent detection limits were found (shown as geq/mL): Gen-Probe TMA, 31 (20-52); AmpliScreen, 126 (67-311); AmpliScreen with NucliSens Extractor, 37 (23-69), and NucliSens QL assay, 123 (51-566). HIV RNA genotype E panels were detected with equal sensitivity as HIV RNA genotype B panels. In the Gen-Probe TMA assay, the 50-percent detection limits on HIV RNA type B and type E were 3.6 (2.6-5.0) and 3.9 (2.4-5.8) geq per mL, respectively. The HCV RNA genotype 1 and 3 standards were detected with equal sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The differences in sensitivity between NAT assays can be explained by the input of isolated viral nucleic acid in the amplification reactions. The FDA requirements for sensitivity of NAT blood screening assays can be met by the Gen-probe TMA, as well as by the AmpliScreen assays, particularly when combined with the NucliSens Extractor.