CRISPR-Cas genome editing in ex-vivo human lungs to rewire the translational path of genome-targeting therapeutics.

The ongoing advancements in CRISPR-Cas technologies can significantly accelerate the preclinical development of both in vivo and ex-vivo organ genome-editing therapeutics. One of the promising applications is to genetically modify donor organs prior to implantation. The implantation of optimized donor organs with long-lasting immunomodulatory capacity holds promise for reducing the need for lifelong potent whole-body immunosuppression in recipients However, assessing genome-targeting interventions in a clinically-relevant manner prior to clinical trials remains a major challenge due to the limited modalities available. This study introduces a novel platform for testing genome editing in human lungs ex vivo, effectively simulating pre-implantation genetic engineering of donor organs. We identified gene regulatory elements whose disruption via Cas nucleases led to the upregulation of the immunomodulatory gene IL-10. We combined this approach with adenoviral vector (AdV)-mediated IL-10 delivery to create favorable kinetics for early (immediate post-implantation) graft immunomodulation. Using ex-vivo organ machine perfusion and precision-cut tissue slice technology, we demonstrated the feasibility of evaluating CRISPR genome editing in human lungs. To overcome the assessment limitations in ex-vivo perfused human organs, we conducted an in vivo rodent study and demonstrated both early gene induction and sustained editing of the lung. Collectively, our findings lay the groundwork for a first-in-human-organ study to overcome the current translational barriers of genome-targeting therapeutics.

Alternative venous access sites for dual-lumen extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation.

OBJECTIVES: Dual-lumen cannulas for veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support are typically inserted in the right internal jugular vein (RIJV); however, some scenarios can make this venous route inaccessible. This multicentre case series aims to evaluate if single-site cannulation using an alternative venous access is safe and feasible in patients with an inaccessible RIJV. METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis including high-volume ECMO centres with substantial experience in dual-lumen cannulation (DLC) (defined as >10 DLC per year). Three centres [Freiburg (Germany), Toronto (Canada) and Vienna (Austria)] agreed to share their data, including baseline characteristics, technical ECMO and cannulation data as well as complications related to ECMO cannulation and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients received alternative DLC for respiratory failure. Cannula insertion sites included the left internal jugular vein (n = 5), the right (n = 7) or left (n = 3) subclavian vein and the right (n = 4) or left (n = 1) femoral vein. The median cannula size was 26 (19-28) French. The median initial target ECMO flow was 2.9 (1.8-3.1) l/min and corresponded with used cannula size and estimated cardiac output. No procedural complications were reported during cannulation and median ECMO runtime was 15 (9-22) days. Ten patients were successfully bridged to lung transplantation (n = 5) or lung recovery (n = 5). Ten patients died during or after ECMO support. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative venous access sites for single-site dual-lumen catheters are a safe and feasible option to provide veno-venous ECMO support to patients with inaccessible RIJV.

Implications of High Sensitivity Troponin Levels After Lung Transplantation.

Trends in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) after lung transplant (LT) and its clinical value are not well stablished. This study aimed to determine kinetics of hs-cTnI after LT, factors impacting hs-cTnI and clinical outcomes. LT recipients from 2015 to 2017 at Toronto General Hospital were included. Hs-cTnI levels were collected at 0-24 h, 24-48 h and 48-72 h after LT. The primary outcome was invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) >3 days. 206 patients received a LT (median age 58, 35.4% women; 79.6% double LT). All patients but one fulfilled the criteria for postoperative myocardial infarction (median peak hs-cTnI = 4,820 ng/mL). Peak hs-cTnI correlated with right ventricular dysfunction, >1 red blood cell transfusions, bilateral LT, use of EVLP, kidney function at admission and time on CPB or VA-ECMO. IMV>3 days occurred in 91 (44.2%) patients, and peak hs-cTnI was higher in these patients (3,823 vs. 6,429 ng/mL, p < 0.001 after adjustment). Peak hs-cTnI was higher among patients with had atrial arrhythmias or died during admission. No patients underwent revascularization. In summary, peak hs-TnI is determined by recipient comorbidities and perioperative factors, and not by coronary artery disease. Hs-cTnI captures patients at higher risk for prolonged IMV, atrial arrhythmias and in-hospital death.

Excess of body weight is associated with accelerated T-cell senescence in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Several risk factors have been involved in the poor clinical progression of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), including ageing, and obesity. SARS-CoV-2 may compromise lung function through cell damage and paracrine inflammation; and obesity has been associated with premature immunosenescence, microbial translocation, and dysfunctional innate immune responses leading to poor immune response against a range of viruses and bacterial infections. Here, we have comprehensively characterized the immunosenescence, microbial translocation, and immune dysregulation established in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with different degrees of body weight. RESULTS: Hospitalised COVID-19 patients with overweight and obesity had similarly higher plasma LPS and sCD14 levels than controls (all p < 0.01). Patients with obesity had higher leptin levels than controls. Obesity and overweight patients had similarly higher expansions of classical monocytes and immature natural killer (NK) cells (CD56+CD16-) than controls. In contrast, reduced proportions of intermediate monocytes, mature NK cells (CD56+CD16+), and NKT were found in both groups of patients than controls. As expected, COVID-19 patients had a robust expansion of plasmablasts, contrasting to lower proportions of major T-cell subsets (CD4 + and CD8+) than controls. Concerning T-cell activation, overweight and obese patients had lower proportions of CD4+CD38+ cells than controls. Contrasting changes were reported in CD25+CD127low/neg regulatory T cells, with increased and decreased proportions found in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, respectively. There were similar proportions of T cells expressing checkpoint inhibitors across all groups. We also investigated distinct stages of T-cell differentiation (early, intermediate, and late-differentiated - TEMRA). The intermediate-differentiated CD4 + T cells and TEMRA cells (CD4+ and CD8+) were expanded in patients compared to controls. Senescent T cells can also express NK receptors (NKG2A/D), and patients had a robust expansion of CD8+CD57+NKG2A+ cells than controls. Unbiased immune profiling further confirmed the expansions of senescent T cells in COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that dysregulated immune cells, microbial translocation, and T-cell senescence may partially explain the increased vulnerability to COVID-19 in subjects with excess of body weight.

Mapping the metabolic responses to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with in vivo spatiotemporal metabolomics.

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival outlook for patients undergoing operations for lung metastases caused by colorectal cancer (CRC). However, a multidisciplinary approach that evaluates several factors related to patient and tumor characteristics is necessary for managing chemotherapy treatment in metastatic CRC patients with lung disease, as such factors dictate the timing and drug regimen, which may affect treatment response and prognosis. In this study, we explore the potential of spatial metabolomics for evaluating metabolic phenotypes and therapy outcomes during the local delivery of the anticancer drug, oxaliplatin, to the lung. 12 male Yorkshire pigs underwent a 3 h left lung in vivo lung perfusion (IVLP) with various doses of oxaliplatin (7.5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg/L), which were administered to the perfusion circuit reservoir as a bolus. Biocompatible solid-phase microextraction (SPME) microprobes were combined with global metabolite profiling to obtain spatiotemporal information about the activity of the drug, determine toxic doses that exceed therapeutic efficacy, and conduct a mechanistic exploration of associated lung injury. Mild and subclinical lung injury was observed at 40 mg/L of oxaliplatin, and significant compromise of the hemodynamic lung function was found at 80 mg/L. This result was associated with massive alterations in metabolic patterns of lung tissue and perfusate, resulting in a total of 139 discriminant compounds. Uncontrolled inflammatory response, abnormalities in energy metabolism, and mitochondrial dysfunction next to accelerated kynurenine and aldosterone production were recognized as distinct features of dysregulated metabolipidome. Spatial pharmacometabolomics may be a promising tool for identifying pathological responses to chemotherapy.

Randomized trial of routine versus on-demand intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation: A feasibility study.

In most centers, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is the preferred means to provide cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation. However, there is controversy about whether intraoperative venoarterial (VA) ECMO should be used routinely or selectively. A randomized controlled trial is the best way to address this controversy. In this publication, we describe a feasibility study to assess the practicality of a protocol comparing routine versus selective VA-ECMO during lung transplantation. This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial screened all patients undergoing lung transplantation. Exclusion criteria include retransplantation, multiorgan transplantation, and cases where ECMO is mandatory. We determined that the trial would be feasible if we could recruit 19 participants over 6 months with less than 10% protocol violations. Based on the completed feasibility study, we conclude that the protocol is feasible and safe, giving us the impetus to pursue a multicenter trial with little risk of failure due to low recruitment.

A radiographic score for human donor lungs on ex vivo lung perfusion predicts transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is an advanced platform for isolated lung assessment and treatment. Radiographs acquired during EVLP provide a unique opportunity to assess lung injury. The purpose of our study was to define and evaluate EVLP radiographic findings and their association with lung transplant outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 113 EVLP cases from 2020-21. Radiographs were scored by a thoracic radiologist blinded to outcome. Six lung regions were scored for 5 radiographic features (consolidation, infiltrates, atelectasis, nodules, and interstitial lines) on a scale of 0 to 3 to derive a score. Spearman's correlation was used to correlate radiographic scores to biomarkers of lung injury. Machine learning models were developed using radiographic features and EVLP functional data. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve. RESULTS: Consolidation and infiltrates were the most frequent findings at 1 hour EVLP (radiographic lung score 2.6 (3.3) and 4.6 (4.3)). Consolidation (r = -0.536 and -0.608, p < 0.0001) and infiltrates (r = -0.492 and -0.616, p < 0.0001) were inversely correlated with oxygenation (∆pO2) at 1 hour and 3 hours of EVLP. First-hour consolidation and infiltrate lung scores predicted transplant suitability with an area under the curve of 87% and 88%, respectively. Prediction of transplant outcomes using a machine learning model yielded an area under the curve of 80% in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: EVLP radiographs provide valuable insight into donor lungs being assessed for transplantation. Consolidation and infiltrates were the most common abnormalities observed in EVLP lungs, and radiographic lung scores predicted the suitability of donor lungs for transplant.

Airway pepsinogen A4 identifies lung transplant recipients with microaspiration and predicts chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Aspiration is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes post-lung transplantation. Airway bile acids are the gold-standard biomarker of aspiration; however, they are released into the duodenum and likely reflect concurrent gastrointestinal dysmotility. Previous studies investigating total airway pepsin have found conflicting results on its relationship with adverse outcomes post-lung transplantation. These studies measured total pepsin and pepsinogen in the airways. Certain pepsinogens are constitutively expressed in the lungs, while others, such as pepsinogen A4 (PGA4), are not. We sought to evaluate the utility of measuring airway PGA4 as a biomarker of aspiration and predictor of adverse outcomes in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) early post-transplant. METHODS: Expression of PGA4 was compared to other pepsinogens in lung tissue. Total pepsin and PGA4 were measured in large airway bronchial washings and compared to preexisting markers of aspiration. Two independent cohorts of LTRs were used to assess the relationship between airway PGA4 and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Changes to airway PGA4 after antireflux surgery were assessed in a third cohort of LTRs. RESULTS: PGA4 was expressed in healthy human stomach but not lung. Airway PGA4, but not total pepsin, was associated with aspiration. Airway PGA4 was associated with an increased risk of CLAD in two independent cohorts of LTRs. Antireflux surgery was associated with reduced airway PGA4. CONCLUSIONS: Airway PGA4 is a marker of aspiration that predicts CLAD in LTRs. Measuring PGA4 at surveillance bronchoscopies can help triage high-risk LTRs for anti-reflux surgery.

Extending the age criteria of lung transplant donors to 70+ years old does not significantly affect recipient survival.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of older donor age (70+ years) on long-term survival and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant (LTx) recipients. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed on all LTx recipients from 2002 to 2017 and a modern subgroup from 2013 to 2017. Recipients were stratified into 4 groups based on donor lung age (<18, 18-55, 56-69, ≥70 years). Donor and recipient characteristics were compared using χ2 tests for differences in proportions and analysis of variance for differences in means. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to describe differences in long-term survival and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2017, 1600 LTx were performed, 98 of which were performed from donors aged 70 years or older. Recipients of 70+ years donor lungs were significantly older with a mean age of 55.5 ± 12.9 years old (P = .001) and had more Status 3 (urgent) recipients (37.4%, P = .002). After multivariable regression, there were no significant differences in survival or freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction between the 4 strata of recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation using donors 70 years old or older can be considered when all other parameters suggest excellent donor lung function without compromising short- or long-term outcomes.

Impact of intraoperative therapeutic plasma exchange on bleeding in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Our program uses a desensitization protocol that includes intraoperative therapeutic plasma exchange (iTPE) for crossmatch-positive lung transplants, which improves access to lung transplant for sensitized candidates while mitigating immunologic risk. Although we have reported excellent outcomes for sensitized patients with the use of this protocol, concern for perioperative bleeding appears to have hindered broader adoption of it at other programs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to quantify the impact of iTPE on perioperative bleeding in lung transplantation. METHODS: All first-time lung transplant recipients from 2014 to 2019 who received iTPE were compared to those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between iTPE and large-volume perioperative transfusion requirements (≥5 packed red blood cell units within 24 hours of transplant start), adjusted for disease type, transplant type, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass use. The incidence of hemothorax (requiring reoperation within 7 days of lung transplant) and 30-day posttransplant mortality were compared between the 2 groups using chi-square test. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients (16%) received iTPE, and 755 patients (84%) did not. The mean number of perioperative pRBC transfusions was 4.2 among patients who received iTPE and 2.9 among patients who did not. iTPE was associated with increased odds of requiring large-volume perioperative transfusion (odds ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.9, p-value = 0.007) but was not associated with an increased incidence of hemothorax (5% in both groups, p = 0.99) or 30-day posttransplant mortality (3.5% among patients who received iTPE vs 2.1% among patients who did not, p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the use of iTPE in lung transplantation may increase perioperative bleeding but not to a degree that impacts important posttransplant outcomes.

In vivo solid phase microextraction for therapeutic monitoring and pharmacometabolomic fingerprinting of lung during in vivo lung perfusion of FOLFOX.

In vivo lung perfusion (IVLP) is a novel isolated lung technique developed to enable the local, in situ administration of high-dose chemotherapy to treat metastatic lung cancer. Combination therapy using folinic acid (FOL), 5-fluorouracil (F), and oxaliplatin (OX) (FOLFOX) is routinely employed to treat several types of solid tumours in various tissues. However, F is characterized by large interpatient variability with respect to plasma concentration, which necessitates close monitoring during treatments using of this compound. Since plasma drug concentrations often do not reflect tissue drug concentrations, it is essential to utilize sample-preparation methods specifically suited to monitoring drug levels in target organs. In this work, in vivo solid-phase microextraction (in vivo SPME) is proposed as an effective tool for quantitative therapeutic drug monitoring of FOLFOX in porcine lungs during pre-clinical IVLP and intravenous (IV) trials. The concomitant extraction of other endogenous and exogenous small molecules from the lung and their detection via liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) enabled an assessment of FOLFOX's impact on the metabolomic profile of the lung and revealed the metabolic pathways associated with the route of administration (IVLP vs. IV) and the therapy itself. This study also shows that the immediate instrumental analysis of metabolomic samples is ideal, as long-term storage at -80 °C results in changes in the metabolite content in the sample extracts.

Establishment of an Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Rat Model for Translational Insights in Lung Transplantation.

Since the establishment of lung transplantation as a therapeutic strategy for advanced lung diseases, the scientific community is faced with the problem of a low number of lungs considered viable for the donation process. In recent decades, however, this scenario has been positively changed, given the development of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) as a strategy for evaluating and reconditioning marginal lungs. The establishment of EVLP in large transplant centers has favored an increase in the number of lung transplants, both by increasing the diagnostic accuracy of lung function and by constituting an effective platform for the reconditioning of lung grafts. In this context, faced with ethical and logistical issues, as well as in the study of immunological factors associated with lung transplantation, the development of rodent EVLP models has become important, given their reliability, the possibility of genetic manipulation, and lower costs. This paper describes a protocol for establishing a rat EVLP model and shows the inflammatory profile associated with the perfused lungs. This will help propagate knowledge about the rat EVLP model, promoting our understanding of the biological responses associated with that revolutionary technique.

A machine-learning approach to human ex vivo lung perfusion predicts transplantation outcomes and promotes organ utilization.

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a data-intensive platform used for the assessment of isolated lungs outside the body for transplantation; however, the integration of artificial intelligence to rapidly interpret the large constellation of clinical data generated during ex vivo assessment remains an unmet need. We developed a machine-learning model, termed InsighTx, to predict post-transplant outcomes using n = 725 EVLP cases. InsighTx model AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) was 79 ± 3%, 75 ± 4%, and 85 ± 3% in training and independent test datasets, respectively. Excellent performance was observed in predicting unsuitable lungs for transplantation (AUROC: 90 ± 4%) and transplants with good outcomes (AUROC: 80 ± 4%). In a retrospective and blinded implementation study by EVLP specialists at our institution, InsighTx increased the likelihood of transplanting suitable donor lungs [odds ratio=13; 95% CI:4-45] and decreased the likelihood of transplanting unsuitable donor lungs [odds ratio=0.4; 95%CI:0.16-0.98]. Herein, we provide strong rationale for the adoption of machine-learning algorithms to optimize EVLP assessments and show that InsighTx could potentially lead to a safe increase in transplantation rates.

Time to extubation for lung transplant recipients represents a pragmatic end-point to guide the development of prognostic tests.

The field of transplantation would benefit from the integration of advanced precision medicine techniques. Although predictive tests for lung transplantation require a well-defined clinical end-point, there exists no consensus regarding which outcomes are optimal end-points for these purposes. While many possible candidate end-points exist, we propose that time-to-extubation is an optimal end-point for prognostic tests because of its: clinical relevance; objectiveness; stability over time; and association with healthcare expenditure. Herein, we describe the rationale for this selection and present the limitations of alternative outcomes for this purpose. Using a 72-hour cut-off, time to extubation correlated well with Primary Graft Dysfunction Grade 3, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and a greater than 2-fold increase in healthcare cost ratios. Given that time-to-extubation is an objective measure that is readily measured by all lung transplant centers, this metric represents a preferred primary end-point for prognostic tests developed for lung transplantation.

Incidence of post-transplant cytomegalovirus viremia in patients receiving lungs after ex vivo lung perfusion.

Objectives: Cytomegalovirus infection after lung transplant is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Inflammation, infection, and longer ischemic times are important risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection. Ex vivo lung perfusion has helped to successfully increase the use of high-risk donors over the last decade. However, the impact of ex vivo lung perfusion on post-transplant cytomegalovirus infection is unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult lung transplant recipients from 2010 to 2020. The primary end point was comparison of cytomegalovirus viremia between patients who received ex vivo lung perfusion donor lungs and patients who received non-ex vivo lung perfusion donor lungs. Cytomegalovirus viremia was defined as cytomegalovirus viral load greater than 1000 IU/mL within 2 years post-transplant. Secondary end points were the time from lung transplant to cytomegalovirus viremia, peak cytomegalovirus viral load, and survival. Outcomes were also compared between the different donor recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus matching groups. Results: Included were 902 recipients of non-ex vivo lung perfusion lungs and 403 recipients of ex vivo lung perfusion lungs. There was no significant difference in the distribution of the cytomegalovirus serostatus matching groups. A total of 34.6% of patients in the non-ex vivo lung perfusion group developed cytomegalovirus viremia, as did 30.8% in the ex vivo lung perfusion group (P = .17). There was no difference in time to viremia, peak viral loads, or survival when comparing both groups. Likewise, all outcomes were comparable in the non-ex vivo lung perfusion and ex vivo lung perfusion groups within each serostatus matching group. Conclusions: The practice of using more injured donor organs via ex vivo lung perfusion has not affected cytomegalovirus viremia rates and severity in lung transplant recipients in our center.

Identification of regional variation in gene expression and inflammatory proteins in donor lung tissue and ex vivo lung perfusate.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosing lung injury is a challenge in lung transplantation. It has been unclear if a single biopsy specimen is truly representative of the entire organ. Our objective was to investigate lung inflammatory biomarkers using human lung tissue biopsies and ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate. METHODS: Eight human donor lungs declined for transplantation were air inflated, flash frozen, and partitioned from apex to base. Biopsies were then sampled throughout the lung. Perfusate was sampled from 4 lung lobes in 8 additional donor lungs subjected to ex vivo lung perfusion. The levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, and interleukin-1ß were measured using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction from lung biopsies and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay from ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate. RESULTS: The median intra-biopsy equal-variance P value was .50 for messenger RNA biomarkers in tissue biopsies. The median intra-biopsy coefficient of variance was 18%. In donors with no apparent focal injuries, the biopsies in each donor showed no difference in various lung slices, with a coefficient of variance of 20%. The exception was biopsies from the lingula and injured focal areas that demonstrated larger differences. Cytokines in ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate showed minimal variation among different lobes (coefficient of variance = 4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Cytokine gene expression in lung biopsies was consistent, and the biopsy analysis reflects the whole lung, except when specimens were collected from the lingula or an area of focal injury. Ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate also provides a representative measurement of lung inflammation from the draining lobe. These results will reassure clinicians that a lung biopsy or an ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate sample can be used to inform donor lung selection.

Outcomes of patients with respiratory failure declined for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Descriptive information on referral patterns and short-term outcomes of patients with respiratory failure declined for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-centre observational cohort study of ECMO referrals to Toronto General Hospital (receiving hospital) for severe respiratory failure (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19), between 1 December 2019 and 30 November 2020. Data related to the referral, the referral decision, and reasons for refusal were collected. Reasons for refusal were grouped into three mutually exclusive categories selected a priori: "too sick now," "too sick before," and "not sick enough." In declined referrals, referring physicians were surveyed to collect patient outcome on day 7 after the referral. The primary study endpoints were referral outcome (accepted/declined) and patient outcome (alive/deceased). RESULTS: A total of 193 referrals were included; 73% were declined for transfer. Referral outcome was influenced by age (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 0.96; P < 0.01) and involvement of other members of the ECMO team in the discussion (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.28 to 15.2; P < 0.01). Patient outcomes were missing in 46 (24%) referrals (inability to locate the referring physician or the referring physician being unable to recall the outcome). Using available data (95 declined and 52 accepted referrals; n = 147), survival to day 7 was 49% for declined referrals (35% for patients deemed "too sick now," 53% for "too sick before," 100% for "not sick enough," and 50% for reason for refusal not reported) and 98% for transferred patients. Sensitivity analysis setting missing outcomes to directional extreme values retained robustness of survival probabilities. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the patients declined for ECMO consideration were alive on day 7. More information on patient trajectory and long-term outcomes in declined referrals is needed to refine selection criteria.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: On manque d'informations descriptives sur les schémas de références et les devenirs à court terme des patient·es atteint·es d'insuffisance respiratoire n'ayant pas pu recevoir une oxygénation par membrane extracorporelle (ECMO). MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte observationnelle prospective monocentrique sur les références vers l'ECMO à l'Hôpital général de Toronto (hôpital d'accueil) pour insuffisance respiratoire grave (COVID-19 et non-COVID-19), entre le 1er décembre 2019 et le 30 novembre 2020. Les données relatives à la référence, à la décision de référence et aux motifs du refus ont été recueillies. Les motifs de refus ont été regroupés en trois catégories mutuellement exclusives sélectionnées a priori : « Trop malade maintenant ¼, « Trop malade avant ¼ et « Pas assez malade ¼. En ce qui concerne les références refusées, un sondage envoyé aux médecins traitant·es avait pour objectif de recueillir les devenirs des patient·es le jour 7 suivant la référence. Les critères d'évaluation principaux de l'étude étaient le résultat de la référence (accepté/refusé) et le devenir des patient·es (vivant·e/décédé·e). RéSULTATS: Au total, 193 références ont été incluses; le transfert a été refusé dans 73 % des cas. L'acceptation ou le refus de la référence était influencé par l'âge (rapport de cotes [RC], 0,97; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,95 à 0,96; P < 0,01) et la participation d'autres membres de l'équipe ECMO à la discussion (RC, 4,42; IC 95 %, 1,28 à 15,2; P < 0,01). Les devenirs des patient·es étaient manquants pour 46 (24 %) des personnes référées (incapacité de localiser les médecins traitant·es ou incapacité des médecins de se souvenir du devenir). À l'aide des données disponibles (95 références refusées et 52 références acceptées; n = 147), la survie jusqu'au jour 7 était de 49 % pour les références refusées (35 % pour la patientèle jugée « trop malade maintenant ¼, 53 % pour celle « trop malade avant ¼, 100 % pour celle « pas assez malade ¼ et 50 % pour les cas où la raison du refus n'était pas déclarée) et 98 % pour les patient·es transféré·es. L'analyse de sensibilité établissant les résultats manquants à des valeurs extrêmes directionnelles a conservé la robustesse des probabilités de survie. CONCLUSION: Près de la moitié des patient·es pour lesquel·les un traitement sous ECMO a été refusé étaient en vie au jour 7. Davantage d'informations concernant la trajectoire et les devenirs à long terme des patient·es refusé·es sont nécessaires pour parfaire les critères de sélection.

Immunomodulation of the donor lung with CRISPR-mediated activation of IL-10 expression.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory injury in the donor lung remains a persistent challenge in lung transplantation that limits donor organ usage and post-transplant outcomes. Inducing immunomodulatory capacity in donor organs could address this unsolved clinical problem. We sought to apply clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated (Cas) technologies to the donor lung to fine-tune immunomodulatory gene expression, exploring for the first time the therapeutic use of CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation in the whole donor lung. METHODS: We explored the feasibility of CRISPR-mediated transcriptional upregulation of interleukin 10 (IL-10), a key immunomodulatory cytokine, in vitro and in vivo. We first evaluated the potency, titratability, and multiplexibility of the gene activation in rat and human cell lines. Next, in vivo CRISPR-mediated IL-10 activation was characterized in rat lungs. Finally, the IL-10-activated donor lungs were transplanted into recipient rats to assess the feasibility in a transplant setting. RESULTS: The targeted transcriptional activation induced robust and titrable IL-10 upregulation in vitro. The combination of guide RNAs also facilitated multiplex gene modulation, that is, simultaneous activation of IL-10 and IL1 receptor antagonist. In vivo profiling demonstrated that adenoviral delivery of Cas9-based activators to the lung was feasible with the use of immunosuppression, which is routinely applied to organ transplant recipients. The transcriptionally modulated donor lungs retained IL-10 upregulation in isogeneic and allogeneic recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the potential of CRISPR epigenome editing to improve lung transplant outcomes by creating a more favorable immunomodulatory environment in the donor organ, a paradigm that may be extendable to other organ transplants.

Intra-subject variability in oscillometry correlates with acute rejection and CLAD post-lung transplant.

Background: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major cause of death post-lung transplantation, with acute cellular rejection (ACR) being the biggest contributing risk factor. Although patients are routinely monitored with spirometry, FEV1 is stable or improving in most ACR episodes. In contrast, oscillometry is highly sensitive to respiratory mechanics and shown to track graft injury associated with ACR and its improvement following treatment. We hypothesize that intra-subject variability in oscillometry measurements correlates with ACR and risk of CLAD. Methods: Of 289 bilateral lung recipients enrolled for oscillometry prior to laboratory-based spirometry between December 2017 and March 2020, 230 had ≥ 3 months and 175 had ≥ 6 months of follow-up. While 37 patients developed CLAD, only 29 had oscillometry at time of CLAD onset and were included for analysis. These 29 CLAD patients were time-matched with 129 CLAD-free recipients. We performed multivariable regression to investigate the associations between variance in spirometry/oscillometry and the A-score, a cumulative index of ACR, as our predictor of primary interest. Conditional logistic regression models were built to investigate associations with CLAD. Results: Multivariable regression showed that the A-score was positively associated with the variance in oscillometry measurements. Conditional logistic regression models revealed that higher variance in the oscillometry metrics of ventilatory inhomogeneity, X5, AX, and R5-19, was independently associated with increased risk of CLAD (p < 0.05); no association was found for variance in %predicted FEV1. Conclusion: Oscillometry tracks graft injury and recovery post-transplant. Monitoring with oscillometry could facilitate earlier identification of graft injury, prompting investigation to identify treatable causes and decrease the risk of CLAD.

Outcomes after flow cytometry crossmatch-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization.

Our program previously reported successful outcomes following virtual crossmatch (VXM)-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization, but our ability to stratify their immunologic risk was limited without flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) data before 2014. The aim of this study was to determine allograft and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival following VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants, which are performed at a minority of programs due to the high immunologic risk and lack of data on outcomes. All first-time lung transplant recipients between January 2014 and December 2019 were divided into 3 cohorts: VXM-negative (n = 764), VXM-positive/FCXM-negative (n = 64), and VXM-positive/FCXM-positive (n = 74). Allograft and CLAD-free survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Five-year allograft survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 64% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 57% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .7171). Five-year CLAD-free survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 60% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 63% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .8509). This study confirms that allograft and CLAD-free survival of patients who undergo VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants with the use of our protocol does not differ from those of other lung transplant recipients. Our protocol for VXM-positive lung transplants improves access to transplant for sensitized candidates and mitigates even high immunologic risk.