Mutation of valine 53 at the interface between extracellular and transmembrane domains of the ß2 principal subunit affects the GABAA receptor gating.

GABAA receptors (gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors) are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels mediating inhibition in adult mammalian brains. Their static structure has been intensely studied in the past years but the underlying molecular activatory mechanisms remain obscure. The interface between extracellular and transmembrane domains has been recognized as a key player in the receptor gating. However, the role of the valine 53 in the ß1-ß2 loop of the principal subunit (ß2) remains controversial showing differences compared to homologous residues in some cys-loop counterparts such as nAChR. To address the role of the ß2V53 residue in the α1ß2γ2L receptor gating, we performed high resolution macroscopic and single-channel recordings. To explore underlying molecular mechanisms a variety of substituting amino acids were investigated: Glutamate and Lysine (different electric charge), Alanine (aliphatic, larger than Valine) and Histidine (same residue as in homologous α1H55). We report that mutation of the ß2V53 residue results in alterations of nearly all gating transitions including opening/closing, preactivation and desensitization. A dramatic gating impairment was observed for glutamate substitution (ß2V53E) but ß2V53K mutation had a weak effect. The impact of histidine substitution was also small while ß2V53A markedly affected the receptor but to a smaller extent than ß2V53E. Considering available structures in desensitized and bicuculline blocked shut states we propose that strongly detrimental effect of ß2V53E mutation on receptor activation results from electrostatic interaction between the glutamate and ß2K274 on the loop M2-M3 which stabilizes the receptor in the shut state. We conclude that ß2V53 is strongly involved in mechanisms underlying the receptor gating.

Glycine substitution of α1F64 residue at the loop D of GABAA receptor impairs gating - Implications for importance of binding site-channel gate linker rigidity.

GABAA receptors (GABAARs) play a crucial role in mediating inhibition in adult mammalian brains. In the recent years, an impressive progress in revealing the static structure of GABAARs was achieved but the molecular mechanisms underlying their conformational transitions remain elusive. Phenylalanine 64 (α1F64) is located at the loop D of the orthosteric binding site of GABAAR and was found to directly interact with GABA molecule. Mutations of α1F64 were demonstrated to affect not only binding but also some gating properties. Loop D is a rigid ß strand which seems to be particularly suitable to convey activatory signaling from the ligand binding site (LBS) to the gate at the channel pore. To test this scenario, we have investigated the substitution of α1F64 with glycine, the smallest amino acid, widely recognized as a rigidity "reducer" of protein structures. To this end, we assessed the impact of the α1F64G mutation in the α1ß2γ2L type of GABAARs on gating properties by analyzing both macroscopic responses to rapid agonist applications and single-channel currents. We found that this substitution dramatically altered all gating features of the receptor (opening/closing, preactivation and desensitization) which contrasts with markedly weaker effects of previously considered substitutions (α1F64L and α1F64A). In particular, α1F64G mutation practically abolished the desensitization process. At the same time, the α1F64G mutant maintained gating integrity manifested as single-channel activity in the form of clusters. We conclude that rigidity of the loop D plays a crucial role in conveying the activation signal from the LBS to the channel gate.

The ß2 subunit E155 residue as a proton sensor at the binding site on GABA type A receptors.

GABA type A receptor plays a key role in inhibitory signaling in the adult central nervous system. This receptor can be modulated by protons but the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been fully explored. To find possible pH-sensor residues, a comparative study for proton-activated GLIC channel and α1ß2γ2 GABA receptor was performed and pK 's of respective residues were estimated by numerical algorithms which consider local interactions. ß E155, located at the GABA binding site, showed pKa values close to physiological values and dependence on the receptor state and ligation, suggesting a role in modulation by pH. To validate this prediction, pH sensitivity of current responses to GABA was investigated using patch-clamp technique for WT and mutated (ß2E155[C, S, Q, L]) GABA receptors. Cysteine mutation preserved pH sensitivity. However, for remaining mutants, the sensitivity to acidification (pH = 6.0) was reduced becoming not statistically significant. The effect of alkaline pH (8.0) was maintained for all mutants with exception for ß2E155L for which it was nearly abolished. To further explore the impact of considered mutations, molecular docking was performed which indicated that pH modulation is probably affected by interplay between binding site residues, zwitterion GABA and protons. These data, altogether, indicate that mutation of ß2E155 to hydrophobic residue (L) maximally impaired pH modulation while for polar substitutions the effect was smaller. In conclusion, our data provide evidence that a key binding site residue ß2E155 plays an important role in proton sensitivity of GABA receptor.

Distinct Modulation of Spontaneous and GABA-Evoked Gating by Flurazepam Shapes Cross-Talk Between Agonist-Free and Liganded GABAA Receptor Activity.

GABAA receptors (GABAARs) play a crucial inhibitory role in the CNS. Benzodiazepines (BDZs) are positive modulators of specific subtypes of GABAARs, but the underlying mechanism remains obscure. Early studies demonstrated the major impact of BDZs on binding and more recent investigations indicated gating, but it is unclear which transitions are affected. Moreover, the upregulation of GABAAR spontaneous activity by BDZs indicates their impact on receptor gating but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Herein, we investigated the effect of a BDZ (flurazepam) on the spontaneous and GABA-induced activity for wild-type (WT, α1ß2γ2) and mutated (at the orthosteric binding site α1F64) GABAARs. Surprisingly, in spite of the localization at the binding site, these mutations increased the spontaneous activity. Flurazepam (FLU) upregulated this activity for mutants and WT receptors to a similar extent by affecting opening/closing transitions. Spontaneous activity affected GABA-evoked currents and is manifested as an overshoot after agonist removal that depended on the modulation by BDZs. We explain the mechanism of this phenomenon as a cross-desensitization of ligand-activated and spontaneously active receptors. Moreover, due to spontaneous activity, FLU-pretreatment and co-application (agonist + FLU) protocols yielded distinct results. We provide also the first evidence that GABAAR may enter the desensitized state in the absence of GABA in a FLU-dependent manner. Based on our data and model simulations, we propose that FLU affects agonist-induced gating by modifying primarily preactivation and desensitization. We conclude that the mechanisms of modulation of spontaneous and ligand-activated GABAAR activity concerns gating but distinct transitions are affected in spontaneous and agonist-evoked activity.

Comparison of kinetic and pharmacological profiles of recombinant α1γ2L and α1ß2γ2L GABAA receptors - A clue to the role of intersubunit interactions.

The fastest inhibitory mechanism in the CNS is mediated by ionotropic GABAA receptors and it is known that subunit composition critically determines their properties. While a typical GABAA receptor consists of two α, two ß and one γ/δ subunit, there are some exceptions, e.g. αß receptors. Functional α1γ2 GABAA receptors can be expressed in recombinant model (Verdoorn et al., 1990) and although their role remains unknown, it seems appealing to extend their characterization to further explore the structure-function relationship of GABAA receptors. Intriguingly, this receptor is lacking canonical GABA binding sites but it can be activated by GABA and dose-response relationships for α1ß2γ2L and α1γ2L receptors overlap. Deactivation kinetics was similar for both receptors but the percentage of the fast component was smaller in the case of α1γ2L receptors and, consequently, the mean deactivation time constant was slower. The rate and extent of macroscopic desensitization were smaller in the case of α1γ2L receptors but they showed slower recovery. Both receptor types had a similar proton sensitivity showing only subtle but significant differences in pH effects on deactivation. Flurazepam exerted a similar effect on both receptors but the rapid deactivation components were differently affected and an opposite effect was observed on desensitization extent. Rebound currents evoked by pentobarbital were undistinguishable for both receptor types. Taking altogether, although some significant differences were found, α1ß2γ2L and α1γ2L receptors showed unforeseen similarity. We propose that functioning of GABAA receptors might rely on subunit-subunit cooperative interactions to a larger extent than believed so far.

α1F64 Residue at GABA(A) receptor binding site is involved in gating by influencing the receptor flipping transitions.

GABA receptors (GABAARs) mediate inhibition in the adult brain. These channels are heteropentamers and their ligand binding sites are localized at the ß+ / α- interfaces. As expected, mutations of binding-site residues affect binding kinetics but accumulating evidence indicates that gating is also altered, although the underlying mechanisms are unclear. We investigated the impact of the hydrophobic box residue localized at α1(-), F64 (α1F64), on the binding and gating of rat recombinant α1ß1γ2 receptors. The analysis of current responses to rapid agonist applications confirmed a marked effect of α1F64 mutations on agonist binding and revealed surprisingly strong effects on gating, including the disappearance of rapid desensitization, the slowing of current onset, and accelerated deactivation. Moreover, nonstationary variance analysis revealed that the α1F64C mutation dramatically reduced the maximum open probability without altering channel conductance. Interestingly, for wild-type receptors, responses to saturating concentration of a partial agonist, P4S, showed no rapid desensitization, similar to GABA-evoked responses mediated by α1F64C mutants. For the α1F64L mutation, the application of the high-affinity agonist muscimol partially rescued rapid desensitization compared with responses evoked by GABA. These findings suggest that α1F64 mutations do not disrupt desensitization mechanisms but rather affect other gating features that obscure it. Model simulations indicated that all of our observations related to α1F64 mutations could be properly reproduced by altering the flipped state transitions that occurred after agonist binding but preceded opening. In conclusion, we propose that the α1F64 residue may participate in linking binding and gating by influencing flipping kinetics.

Monoterpene α-thujone exerts a differential inhibitory action on GABA(A) receptors implicated in phasic and tonic GABAergic inhibition.

A monoterpene ketone, α-thujone originally attracted attention as a major natural ingredient of absinthe and was suspected to cause adverse effects such as hallucinations and seizures in persons excessively consuming this beverage. Although subsequent studies ruled out any major role of α-thujone in the "absynthism", it was found that at high doses it may induce epileptic activity pointing to an interaction with GABAergic inhibition. Indeed, subsequent studies, including those from this laboratory, showed that α-thujone inhibits GABAergic currents. However, GABAA receptors are extremely heterogeneous and in the present study we have investigated the effect of α-thujone on different recombinant GABAA receptors (α1ß2γ2L, α1ß2, α1ß2δ and α4ß2δ) relevant to phasic or tonic forms of inhibition. We report that α-thujone inhibits all considered receptor types by a qualitatively similar mechanism but the strongest effect is observed for α1ß2δ receptors, suggesting that tonic currents might be more sensitive to α-thujone than the phasic ones. Moreover, we demonstrate that tonic currents, mimicked by response to a submicromollar GABA concentration (0.3 µM) in cultured neurons, showed a substantially larger sensitivity to α-thujone than responses elicited by higher [GABA] (more similar to phasic currents) or Inhibitory Postsynaptic Currents in the same preparation. Importantly, the extent of tonic current inhibition by α-thujone was as strong as in the case of currents mediated by α1ß2δ receptors. Altogether, these data provide evidence that different GABAA receptor subtypes show distinct sensitivities to α-thujone and suggest that this compound may differentially affect tonic and phasic components of GABAergic inhibition.

Oligomerization of ZFYVE27 (Protrudin) is necessary to promote neurite extension.

ZFYVE27 (Protrudin) was originally identified as an interacting partner of spastin, which is most frequently mutated in hereditary spastic paraplegia. ZFYVE27 is a novel member of FYVE family, which is implicated in the formation of neurite extensions by promoting directional membrane trafficking in neurons. Now, through a yeast two-hybrid screen, we have identified that ZFYVE27 interacts with itself and the core interaction region resides within the third hydrophobic region (HR3) of the protein. We confirmed the ZFYVE27's self-interaction in the mammalian cells by co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization studies. To decipher the oligomeric nature of ZFYVE27, we performed sucrose gradient centrifugation and showed that ZFYVE27 oligomerizes into dimer/tetramer forms. Sub-cellular fractionation and Triton X-114 membrane phase separation analysis indicated that ZFYVE27 is a peripheral membrane protein. Furthermore, ZFYVE27 also binds to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate lipid moiety. Interestingly, cells expressing ZFYVE27(ΔHR3) failed to produce protrusions instead caused swelling of cell soma. When ZFYVE27(ΔHR3) was co-expressed with wild-type ZFYVE27 (ZFYVE27(WT)), it exerted a dominant negative effect on ZFYVE27(WT) as the cells co-expressing both proteins were also unable to induce protrusions and showed cytoplasmic swelling. Altogether, it is evident that a functionally active form of oligomer is crucial for ZFYVE27 ability to promote neurite extensions.