Cost saving in implementing ERAS protocol in emergency abdominal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol is now proposed as the standard of care in elective major abdominal surgery. Implementation of the ERAS protocol in emergency setting has been proposed but his economic impact has not been investigated. Aim of this study was to evaluate the cost saving of implementing ERAS in abdominal emergency surgery in a single institution. METHODS: A group of 80 consecutive patients treated by ERAS protocol for gastrointestinal emergency surgery in 2021 was compared with an analogue group of 75 consecutive patients treated by the same surgery the year before implementation of ERAS protocol. Adhesion to postoperative items, length of stay, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Cost saving analysis was performed. RESULTS: 50% Adhesion to postoperative items was reached on day 2 in the ERAS group in mean. Laparoscopic approach was 40 vs 12% in ERAS and control group respectively (p ,002). Length of stay was shorter in ERAS group by 3 days (9 vs 12 days p ,002). Morbidity and mortality rate were similar in both groups. The ERAS group had a mean cost saving of 1022,78 € per patient. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocol implementation in the abdominal emergency setting is cost effective resulting in a significant shorter length of stay and cost saving per patient.

Previous colonic resection is a risk factor for surgical relapse in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite the improvement of medical therapies, nearly half of patients with Crohn's disease require surgery within 10 years after diagnosis. However, intestinal resection is not curative and recurrence may occur. AIMS: To evaluate post-surgical outcomes for patients with Crohn's disease in a large monocentric cohort, and to identify variables associated with clinical and surgical relapse. METHODS: Patients with Crohn's disease who had surgery for ileal and colonic Crohn's disease between 2004 and 2016 and on at least one-year follow-up following surgery were included. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients were included in the study. Crohn's disease recurrence concerned 53% of patients after a median 56-month (6-158) follow-up and 29% of patients required a second surgical intervention. At logistic regression analysis, active smoking and young age at diagnosis were identified as independent risk factor for post-surgical relapse (p = 0.01), while colonic or ileocolonic resection was recognized as a risk factor for surgical Crohn's disease relapse (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Post-surgery recurrence is frequent for patients with Crohn's disease. Active smoking and young age at diagnosis are risk factors for Crohn's disease recurrence. As compared with patients undergoing small-bowel surgery, patients with colonic resection are proner to relapse requiring a second surgical intervention.