Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma of the Salivary Glands: An Analysis of 246 Cases.

OBJECTIVE: Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) is a rare neoplasm of the salivary glands. In this study, we aim to examine the demographic, clinicopathologic, and survival features of EMC using a population-based approach. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database (1973-2010) was queried for EMC of the major salivary glands. Data were analyzed with respect to various demographic and clinicopathologic factors. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: In total, 246 cases were available for frequency analysis and 207 for survival analysis. Mean ± SD age at diagnosis was 63.8 ± 15.4 years. EMC affected females more frequently (57.3%). Distant metastases were present at diagnosis in only 4.5% of cases. Overall disease-specific survival (DSS) at 60, 120, and 180 months was 91.3%, 90.2%, and 80.7%, respectively. Patients with low-grade histology had significantly better survival at 180 months relative to those with high-grade tumors (90.6% vs 0.0%, P = .0246). When stratified by tumor size, patients with lesions >4 cm had the worst survival at 180 months (58.8%, P = .0003). All but 9 of the 207 cases available for survival analysis underwent surgery. A total of 85 patients (41.1%) received radiotherapy in addition to surgery. No survival benefit was noted for patients who received radiotherapy compared with those who did not (P = .4832). CONCLUSION: This report represents the largest series of EMC to date. Despite being regarded as a low-grade, indolent tumor, a significant fraction of our cohort underwent radiotherapy in addition to surgery, with no apparent added survival benefit.

Demographics and survival trends of sinonasal adenocarcinoma from 1973 to 2009.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to study the demographics and survival of patients diagnosed with sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC) within the time period of 1973 to 2009 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the U.S. National Cancer Institute's SEER registry was performed to study the demographics and survival for SNAC from 1973 to 2009. Analysis was conducted based on race, gender, and stage. RESULTS: In total, 1270 cases of SNAC were analyzed for demographics and survival. Males accounted for 51.6% of cases, while females accounted for 48.4% of cases, amounting to a male to female ratio of 1.06:1.00. Disease specific survival at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 65.2%, 50.9%, 40.9%, and 36.5%, respectively. When analyzed by gender, females had higher survival than males, although this difference was not statistically significant. When analyzed by race, the category of other, which encompasses American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, and unknown or unspecified race, was shown to have the best survival, followed by whites and blacks, respectively. CONCLUSION: SNAC is a rare tumor classically associated with occupational exposure and carries a variable prognosis. This is the first dedicated large-scale, retrospective analysis of a North American SNAC population. SNAC appears to affect both males and females equally and predominantly affects whites. Patients categorized as other had significantly better survival outcomes, while gender appeared to have no significant effect on survival.

Gender differences in successful National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gender differences in individual National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards and in funding totals exist in ophthalmology, and to further characterize whether factors such as experience, academic rank, and terminal degree play a role. DESIGN: A retrospective review of awards granted to primary investigators (PIs) in ophthalmology departments from 2011 through the present was conducted. PIs were classified by gender, degree, experience, and academic position. The NIH funding database was used to gather award data. SETTING: Academic medical center. RESULTS: Men had higher mean NIH awards ($418,605) than their female colleagues ($353,170; p = 0.005) and had higher total funding per PI (p = 0.004). Men had statistically higher awards at the level of assistant professor than their female counterparts (p < 0.05). A gender difference was statistically significant and most marked among researchers holding an MD (or equivalent) degree. When controlled for publication experience, men had higher NIH awards throughout their careers, although this difference only reached statistical significance on comparison of faculty with 10 or fewer years of experience. CONCLUSIONS: Male PIs receiving grants since 2011 had higher awards than their female colleagues did, most markedly among PIs in the earlier portions of their career. Differences in gender representation among senior faculty and in positions of leadership in academic ophthalmology may be partially a result of disparities in research output, as scholarly productivity is an important component of the academic advancement process in ophthalmology.

Image-guidance in endoscopic sinus surgery: is it associated with decreased medicolegal liability?

BACKGROUND: The use of image-guidance (IG) in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has escalated over the last decade despite a lack of consensus that its use improves outcomes or decreases complications. One theoretical reason for using IG in ESS is its potential to minimize legal liability should an adverse outcome occur. In this study, we aimed to characterize the role of IG in ESS litigation, and further detail other factors in pertinent cases. A secondary objective was to characterize recent malpractice litigation for other relevant factors. METHODS: Relevant cases from Westlaw were examined to determine whether the use of IG played a role in initiating litigation in ESS malpractice suits. Factors such as patient demographics and alleged cause(s) of malpractice litigation were examined. RESULTS: Out of 30 malpractice cases from 2004 to April 2013, 4 (13.3%) mentioned the use of IG during ESS, although this did not appear to be a factor affecting the plaintiff's decision to initiate litigation, nor the case outcomes. In the 26 cases (86.7%) in which IG was not used, its non-use was not specified as an alleged cause of negligence. Eleven (36.7%) cases were resolved in the defendant's favor. Frequently-cited factors included iatrogenic injury (83.3%), permanent deficits (66.7%), needing additional surgery (63.3%), orbital and intracranial injury, and perceived deficits in informed consent (40.0%). CONCLUSION: The use of IG was not found to be a factor in ESS litigation. This suggests that not using IG does not necessarily make one more vulnerable to malpractice litigation.