Relative Bioavailability of a Single 4-mg Dose of Somatropin Administered by Subcutaneous Injection or by Needle-free Device and Coadministered With the Growth Hormone Inhibitor Octreotide Acetate in Healthy Adult Subjects.

PURPOSE: Somatropin, used to treat growth hormone deficiency, has been traditionally administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection with needle and syringe. Needle-free devices offer ease of administration and may improve adherence and outcomes. This study evaluated the relative bioavailability of somatropin delivered with a needle-free device compared with traditional SC injection. METHODS: In this randomized, single-dose, crossover study, healthy adults aged 18 to 35 years received single 4-mg doses of somatropin via a needle-free device or SC injection, along with octreotide to suppress endogenous growth hormone production. Blood samples were analyzed for serum somatropin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations over 24 hours after somatropin dosing. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated by using noncompartmental methods, and bioequivalence was determined based on ln transformation of the AUC0-24, AUC0-∞, Cmax, area under the effect-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUEC0-24), and maximum effect concentration (Emax). Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CIs of the needle-free device compared with the SC injection, constructed by using the two 1-sided hypotheses at the α = 0.05 level, for these pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters fell within the 80.00% to125.00% regulatory acceptance range. FINDINGS: A total of 57 subjects completed both study periods and were included in the pharmacokinetic analyses. Point estimates (90% CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (needle-free device/SC injection) based on serum somatropin were 1.013 (0.987-1.040) for AUC0-24, 1.012 (0.986-1.038) for AUC0-∞, and 1.200 (1.137-1.267) for Cmax. For IGF-1, baseline-corrected point estimates (90% CIs) were 0.901 (0.818-0.993) for AUEC0-24 and 0.867 (0.795-0.946) for Emax. Non-baseline-corrected values were 0.978 (0.953-1.004) for AUEC0-24 and 0.953 (0.923-0.984) for Emax. Both treatments were well tolerated; blood glucose levels increased in nearly all subjects (98.3%). All adverse events were mild and resolved spontaneously within 24 hours. IMPLICATIONS: Bioequivalence was shown for a single 4-mg dose of somatropin delivered by using a needle-free device compared with SC injection based on ln-transformed AUC0-24 and AUC0-∞ but not ln-transformed Cmax.

A randomized, three-treatment, three-period, six-sequence-crossover, single-center, bioequivalence study to evaluate the impact of different 10-mg crystalline forms on the pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the impact of varying lenvatinib crystalline forms in 10-mg lenvatinib capsules on drug bioavailability in healthy volunteers. MATERIALS: Lenvatinib 10-mg capsules (low C and high C forms). METHODS: This randomized, three-period- crossover study compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of two crystalline forms of capsules (low C-form, <4% crystalline; high C-form, 38% crystalline) to a standard (ref Cform, 15% crystalline). RESULTS: 59 subjects were evaluable for pharmacokinetics. Test/reference ratios of the geometric least squares means (LSM) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) for AUC0-t (t up to 120 hours), AUC0-∞, and Cmax for low C-form vs. ref C-form were 101 (94.8, 107), 101 (95.3, 107), and 98.7 (88.6, 110), respectively; and for high C-form vs. ref C-form were 96.0 (92.1, 100), 96.5 (92.5, 101), and 90.6 (83.5, 98.4), respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were comparable between all formulations (TEAE range 20-24%; TRAE range 15-19%). One serious TRAE (spontaneous abortion) occurred in the low C-form group. CONCLUSIONS: For both comparisons, the 90% CIs of the test/reference ratios were within the regulatory acceptance range (80-125%), suggesting that both test formulations (low Cform and high C-form) were bioequivalent to the reference formulation for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of standardized ragweed sublingual-liquid immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy with liquid extracts provides an appealing alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC), but a lack of robust evidence has deterred its use in North America. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of standardized glycerinated short ragweed sublingual allergen immunotherapy liquid (RW-SAIL) extract in subjects with ragweed-related ARC. METHODS: This phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in North America. Subjects (age range, 18-55 years) with or without asthma were selected based on ARC symptom severity and erythema skin prick reaction to short ragweed. Subjects self-administered the maximum tolerated dose of RW-SAIL (n = 218) or placebo (n = 211) daily beginning approximately 8 to 16 weeks before and through the end of the ragweed pollen season. The primary end point was subject-assessed total combined daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptom and medication scores (TCS). RESULTS: During the entire season, there was a 43% decrease in TCS in subjects treated with RW-SAIL compared with placebo. Similar decreases were observed in TCS between the 2 groups during peak season (42%) and in daily symptom scores during the entire (42%) and peak (41%) seasons. The occurrence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups; most were mild in severity. Treatment-related oromucosal local application site reactions occurred early and were transient and self-limited. No anaphylaxis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first successful North American confirmatory phase 3 clinical trial to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a sublingual standardized ragweed allergen immunotherapy liquid extract for the treatment of ARC.

A proof-of-concept study of the effect of a novel H3-receptor antagonist in allergen-induced nasal congestion.

BACKGROUND: H1-receptor inverse agonists are used effectively for treating several symptoms of allergic rhinitis, including nasal itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing, although most agents are not very effective in treating nasal congestion. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the relative efficacy of a novel selective H3-receptor antagonist, JNJ-39220675, in preventing nasal congestion induced by exposing participants with ragweed allergy to ragweed allergen in an environmental exposure chamber model. METHODS: In this single-dose, patient-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled, phase IIa cross-over study, 53 participants were randomized to JNJ-39220675 plus placebo, placebo plus pseudoephedrine, or only placebo. The primary efficacy assessment was change in nasal patency assessed by measuring the minimal cross-sectional area of the nasal cavity by using acoustic rhinometry. Secondary assessment included total nasal symptom scores (TNSSs) over the 8-hour environmental exposure chamber exposure period. RESULTS: Smaller decreases in minimal cross-sectional area were observed after JNJ-39220675 (least square mean difference, -0.126; P = .06) and pseudoephedrine (least square mean difference, -0.195; P = .004) treatment compared with placebo. The means for the baseline-adjusted area under the curve of TNSSs were significantly smaller for JNJ-39220675 (P = .0003) and pseudoephedrine (P = .04) versus placebo. JNJ-39220675 was significantly effective in treating all 4 individual symptoms (P ≤ .05 for all scores) compared with placebo, whereas pseudoephedrine only showed a trend for improvement in individual symptom scores of the TNSS. Insomnia was the most frequent adverse event (17.3%) associated with JNJ-39220675 treatment. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic treatment with the H3-antagonist JNJ-39220675 relieved allergen-induced nasal congestion by using standard nasal symptom scoring; however, in contrast to pseudoephedrine, it only showed a trend for increasing nasal patency by using objective measures.

Provocation of nonallergic rhinitis subjects in response to simulated weather conditions using an environmental exposure chamber model.

Nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) subjects present clinically with similar symptoms to subjects with allergic rhinitis, but which mechanistically are not IgE- mediated. NAR is difficult to study because of multiple, as yet unknown, disease mechanisms and lack of biomarkers and diagnostic tests. The purpose of this proof of concept pilot study was to develop an environmental exposure chamber (EEC) model to simulate weather conditions in a controlled setting to objectively diagnose NAR subjects and ultimately to investigate novel NAR therapies. Thirty-seven subjects with a history of NAR confirmed by negative skin-prick test to a panel of aeroallergens were tested with cold dry air (CDA) and temperature change challenges. Objective (acoustic rhinometry [AcR] and nasal secretions) and subjective measures (total nasal symptom scores [TNSSs]: congestion, rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip [0-3]) were collected. Data was presented as mean ± SEM and statistical significance was assessed by paired t-test. The NAR EEC AcR responders to CDA had a significant decrease in mean minimal cross-sectional area (MCA; a measure of nasal patency) of 22.2 ± 2.43% (p < 0.0001) and 6.7 ± 7.22% (not statistically significant) at 30 and 60 minutes, respectively, with a concomitant increase in TNSS of 1.0 ± 0.24 U and 1.4 ± 0.30 U, respectively. AcR responders to temperature change showed a significant decrease in mean MCA to warm air of 16.0 ± 3.82% (p < 0.001) and 19.4 ± 3.88% (p < 0.0001) at 30 and 60 minutes, respectively, with an increase of TNSS of 0.4 ± 0.25 U and 0.4 ± 0.27 U, respectively. With rapid conversion to cold air, further decrease in mean MCA accompanied by an increase in TNSS was observed at 30 and 60 minutes. Increase in rhinorrhea was highest for CDA and the cold air phase of the temperature change challenge. Using the NAR EEC model, significant symptoms were induced in response to simulated weather changes in NAR patient responders. This proof of concept pilot study shows that the EEC model provides a consistent and reliable method to phenotype weather-induced NAR subjects that could be used to investigate disease mechanisms and novel therapies for NAR.

Solubilized nasal steroid (CDX-947) when combined in the same solution nasal spray with an antihistamine (CDX-313) provides improved, fast-acting symptom relief in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Studies indicate that allergy sufferers remain dissatisfied with available antiallergic therapies. A new convenient formulation of solubilized steroid combined in the same nasal spray solution with antihistamine may provide added symptom relief. The objective was to evaluate effects of CDX-947 (solubilized budesonide) and CDX-313 (solubilized azelastine + budesonide) against their suspension-type comparators (budesonide [Rhinocort Aqua {RA}] or azelastine + budesonide [Astelin] {AS} + RA]) and placebo on nasal allergy symptoms of patients exposed to controlled levels of ragweed pollen in an environmental exposure chamber (EEC). Two separate EEC studies that enrolled 173 patients were analyzed. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and onset of action were captured. Mean change from baseline of TNSS was compared with analysis of covariance and the onset of action determined. Meta-analysis was performed to allow cross-comparisons between studies. All active treatments significantly reduced TNSS when compared with placebo and both CDX-947 and CDX-313 showed increased improvement over the suspension-type comparators. CDX-313 provided significantly faster onset of action for itchy nose and sneezing. No clinically significant adverse events were reported in this study. The novel combination product, CDX-313, provided fast, long-lasting relief for allergic rhinitis symptoms. Compared with products where corticosteroid remains suspended, the new solubilized nasal spray formulation provides added benefit including faster onset of action and superior, convenient dosing of two therapeutics in one convenient product.

Pharmacokinetic equivalence of a levothyroxine sodium soft capsule manufactured using the new food and drug administration potency guidelines in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of a new soft capsule formulation of levothyroxine versus a marketed reference product and to assess the soft capsule formulated with stricter potency guidelines versus the capsule before the implementation of the new potency rule. METHOD: Two single-dose randomized two-way crossover pharmacokinetic equivalence studies and one dosage form proportionality single-dose study comparing low, medium, and high strengths of the new formulation. All three studies were performed in a clinical setting. Participants were healthy male and female adult subjects with normal levothyroxine levels. A total of 90 subjects participated in the three studies. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated on baseline- adjusted concentrations. The first pharmacokinetic equivalence study compared the levothyroxine sodium soft capsule formulation (Tirosint) with the reference Synthroid tablets and the two products were considered bioequivalent. The dosage form proportionality study compared the 50-, 100-, and 150-µg test capsules strengths dosed at the same level (600 µg) and all three strengths were considered equivalent when given at the same dosage. The last study compared the test capsule used in the first two studies with a new capsule formulation following the new potency guideline (±5%) set forward by the Food and Drug Administration and the two capsules were considered bioequivalent. Doses were well tolerated by subjects in all three studies with no serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: The levothyroxine soft capsule formulated with the stricter new potency guideline set forward by the Food and Drug Administration met equivalence criteria in terms of rate and extent of exposure under fasting conditions to the reference tablet formulation. Clinical doses of the capsule formulation can be given using any combination of the commercialized strengths.

Treatment satisfaction with sildenafil in a Canadian real-life setting. A 6-month prospective observational study of primary care practices.

INTRODUCTION: While the efficacy of sildenafil for the management of erectile dysfunction (ED) has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials, few data exist on its effectiveness in a real-life setting. AIM: The objective of this study was to examine the treatment satisfaction and effectiveness with sildenafil in a real-life setting in Canada. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective study, using an educational program aimed at optimizing sildenafil treatment, was conducted at 231 primary care sites across Canada. Patients who received their first prescription of sildenafil for ED within the usual practice of medicine were invited to participate in the study. Data were collected through patient self-administered questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire was used to determine the erectile function at baseline, month 3 and month 6. Treatment satisfaction at months 3 and 6 was assessed using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population consisted of 2,573 patients. The mean age was 55 years (18 to 92 years). At baseline, the mean SHIM score was 11.9 with 21.7% of men having severe ED, 22.9% moderate ED, 36.5% mild-to-moderate ED, and 16.9% mild ED. At month 3, the mean SHIM score improved significantly to 18.0 (P < 0.0001) and 33.3% of patients had a SHIM score above 21 (no ED). At 6 months, the mean SHIM score was 18.7. At both months 3 and 6, approximately 89% of patients were satisfied with their treatment (i.e., EDITS score >or= 50), suggesting no attenuation of the satisfaction over the 6 months of use. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of sildenafil in the management of ED was demonstrated in a large cohort of men treated in a primary care setting in this Canadian real-life study. Persistence with therapy and lack of attenuation over time among the vast majority of men was shown.

Can an educational program optimize PDE5i therapy? A study of Canadian primary care practices.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of patient instructions, designed to optimize therapy with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), has recently been demonstrated. AIM: To evaluate the impact of an educational program for new sildenafil users against usual ED management in Canadian primary care practices. METHODS: This multicenter, 6-month cluster randomized prospective study was conducted across Canada in general practitioners' offices where sites were randomized to receive a treatment optimization program (TOP) tool at visit 1 (TOP sites) or not to receive the TOP tool (non-TOP sites) while continuing with usual practice. Study participants were men seeking medical attention for ED and who were sildenafil naïve. The TOP tool consisted of a tear-off sheet, a brochure, and a video. Study drug was not provided to the patients. Sildenafil samples and prescriptions were dispensed as per usual care practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire was used to determine treatment satisfaction at visit 2 (month 3) and visit 3 (month 6). Patient and physician satisfaction with the TOP tool was assessed using self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 2,573 patients from 231 primary care sites. At visits 2 and 3, treatment satisfaction with sildenafil was high with almost 9 patients out of 10 satisfied with treatment. No significant statistical differences were observed in the EDITS scores between the TOP and the non-TOP groups at visits 2 and 3. More than 80% of the participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the video and the brochure. More than 8 out of 10 participating physicians (84%) would use the TOP tool in their current practice if available. CONCLUSIONS: TOP is a valuable and time-efficient ED management tool providing benefits to newly diagnosed ED patients and to their physicians.