Roles of endothelin ETA and ETB receptors in nociception and chemical, thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia induced by endothelin-1 in the rat hindpaw.

Evidence on the relative roles of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in mediating the nociceptive and hyperalgesic actions of endothelin-1 is still fragmented and conflicting, due to variations between species and/or models. This study assesses the participation of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors on the nociceptive behavior and hyperalgesia to chemical (formalin), mechanical and thermal stimuli evoked by endothelin-1 injected into the rat hind-paw. Intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of endothelin-1 (1-30 pmol, 50 microl) induced dose-dependent nociceptive behaviors over the first hour. Endothelin-1 (3-30 pmol) also potentiated both phases of nociception induced by a subsequent ipsilateral i.pl. injection of formalin (0.5%, 50 microl). Endothelin-1, at 10 pmol, increased responses of the first phase (0-10 min) by 97% and of the second phase (15-60 min) by 120%, and similar degrees of potentiation were observed following 30 pmol of the peptide. Endothelin-1 (1-30 pmol) caused slowly developing long-lasting thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia with maximum effects at 10 and 30 pmol, respectively, reaching significance at 2-3h and remaining elevated for up to at least 8h after injection. Treatment with the selective ET(A) and ET(B) peptidic antagonists BQ-123 and BQ-788 (i.pl., both at 10 nmol, 3.5h after ET-1 injection) or with the non-peptidic antagonists atrasentan and A-192621 systemically (i.v., 10 and 20mg/kg, respectively) each caused significant reductions in endothelin-1-induced nociception, as well as chemical, thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. Thus, the nociceptive and hyperalgesic effects induced by i.pl. endothelin-1 seem to be mediated by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors.

Endothelin-1 causes pruritus in mice.

Endothelin (ET)-1 evokes a burning pruritus sensation when injected intradermally in humans and nocifensive behavior when injected into the hind paw of rodents. Because pain and pruritus are clearly distinct nociceptive sensory modalities in humans, the current study evaluates the potential of ET-1 to elicit scratching behavior in mice. Mice received an intradermal injection of 1-30 pmol ET-1; 10 microg of the mast cell degranulator compound, 48/80; 100 nmol histamine; or vehicle into the scruff, and the number of scratching bouts displayed during the first 40 mins was recorded. ET-1 caused dose-dependent scratching bouts, which, like the responses to histamine and compound 48/80, occurred mainly during the first 5 to 10 mins of injection, but fewer episodes were also seen up to 35 mins. The effect of ET-1 was maximal at 10 pmol (total 40 +/- 7 bouts), a value similar to that caused by histamine (52 +/- 5 bouts) and compound 48/80 (53 +/- 6 bouts). The selective ET(B) receptor agonist, IRL-1620 (10 pmol), was not pruritic per se, and actually inhibited responses to histamine and ET-1. Pruritus induced by ET-1 was inhibited by the ET(A) receptor antagonists, 10 nmol BQ-123 (co-injected; net inhibition, 87%) and 10 mg/kg atrasentan (intraperitoneal administration; net inhibition, 83%), or the ET(B) receptor antagonist, 20 mg/kg A-192621 (intraperitoneal administration; net inhibition, 64%), but the response was augmented by co-injection of the ET(B) receptor antagonist, 3 nmol BQ-788 (net potentiation, 234%). Responses to compound 48/80 or responsiveness of vehicle-treated mice were unaffected by these antagonists. Thus, ET-1 displays potent pruritic actions in the mouse mediated to a substantial extent via local ET(A) receptors. The findings with IRL-1620 and BQ-788 suggest that local ET(B) receptors exert an antipruritic role, but, for reasons still unknown, the results obtained using systemic A-192621 injection are at variance with this view.

Ethanol consumption enhances endothelin-1-induced contraction in the isolated rat carotid.

We investigated the mechanisms involved in the enhancement of endothelin (ET)-1 vascular reactivity induced by ethanol consumption. Ethanol intake for 2, 6, and 10 weeks enhanced the ET-1-induced contractile response of endothelium-intact but not endothelium-denuded rat carotid rings independently of the treatment duration. Conversely, phenylephrine-induced contraction was not affected by ethanol intake. The contraction induced by IRL1620 [succinyl-(Glu(9),Ala(11,15))-ET-1-(8-21)], a selective ET(B) agonist, was increased after treatment with ethanol in endothelium-intact but not in endothelium-denuded carotid rings. Moreover, ET-1- and IRL1620-induced relaxation was reduced in endothelium-intact phenylephrine-precontracted rings from ethanol-treated rats. Acetylcholine-induced relaxation was not affected by ethanol treatment. N(G)-Nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, 1H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one, indomethacin, and tetraethylammonium reduced the relaxation induced by IRL1620 in carotid glands from control but not ethanol-treated rats. The mRNA levels for ET(A) and ET(B) receptors were not altered by ethanol consumption. However, ethanol treatment reduced the protein expression of ET(B) receptors. Furthermore, immunohistochemical assays showed reduced immunostaining for endothelial ET(B) receptors after treatment with ethanol. We conclude that ethanol consumption enhances ET-1-induced contraction in the rat carotid and that this response is not different among the three periods of treatment used in this study. Finally, the potentiation of ET-1-induced vascular reactivity is probably caused by reduced expression of relaxing endothelial ET(B) receptors.

Chronic ethanol consumption enhances phenylephrine-induced contraction in the isolated rat aorta.

Changes in reactivity to phenylephrine in aortas isolated from 2-, 6-, and 10-week ethanol-treated rats and their age-matched control and isocaloric rats were investigated. Chronic ethanol consumption enhances the contractile response of endothelium-intact and -denuded rat aortic rings to phenylephrine, a response that is time-independent. Pretreatment with indomethacin reduced E(max) for phenylephrine in denuded aortas from ethanol-treated rats but not control or isocaloric rats. After indomethacin treatment, no differences in E(max) from phenylephrine were observed among the groups. SQ29548 ([1S-[1alpha-2alpha(Z)3alpha,4alpha]]-7-[3-[[(phenylamino)carbonyl]hydrazino]methyl]-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl]-5-heptenoic acid), an antagonist of prostaglandin H(2)/thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) receptors, did not alter phenylephrine-induced contraction in control or isocaloric aortas. However, in ethanol-treated aortas, E(max) was reduced to control level. Moreover, phenylephrine-stimulated release of thromboxane B(2), a stable metabolite of TXA(2), was higher in tissues from ethanol-treated rats. Simultaneous measurement of the changes in [Ca(2+)](i) and contraction induced by phenylephrine showed that both parameters are higher in the rat aorta from ethanol-treated rats. CaCl(2)-induced contraction in free Ca(2+) solution containing phenylephrine was increased in ethanol-treated aortas. Additionally, the enhancement in CaCl(2)-induced contraction was prevented by SQ29548. The major contribution of the present study is that it demonstrates a detailed description of the mechanisms involved in the enhancement of phenylephrine-induced contraction in rat aorta from ethanol-treated rats. We provided evidence that this response was not different among the three periods of treatment employed in this study and that it is maintained by two mechanisms: an increased release of vascular smooth muscle-derived vasoconstrictor prostanoids (probably TXA(2)) and an enhanced extracellular Ca(2+) influx.

Central endothelin ET(B) receptors mediate IL-1-dependent fever induced by preformed pyrogenic factor and corticotropin-releasing factor in the rat.

Blockade of central endothelin ET(B) receptors inhibits fever induced by LPS in conscious rats. The contribution of ET(B) receptor-mediated mechanisms to fever triggered by intracerebroventricular IL-6, PGE2, PGF(2alpha), corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), and preformed pyrogenic factor derived from LPS-stimulated macrophages (PFPF) was examined. The influence of natural IL-1 receptor antagonist or soluble TNF receptor I on endothelin (ET)-1-induced fever was also assessed. The selective ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 (3 pmol icv) abolished fever induced by intracerebroventricular ET-1 (1 pmol) or PFPF (200 ng) and reduced that caused by ICV CRF (1 nmol) but not by IL-6 (14.6 pmol), PGE2 (1.4 nmol), or PGF(2alpha) (2 nmol). CRF-induced fever was also attenuated by bosentan (dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist; 10 mg/kg iv) but unaffected by BQ-123 (selective ET(A) receptor antagonist; 3 pmol icv). alpha-Helical CRF(9-41) (dual CRF1/CRF2 receptor antagonist; 6.5 nmol icv) attenuated fever induced by CRF but not by ET-1. Human IL-1 receptor antagonist (9.1 pmol) markedly reduced fever to IL-1beta (180 fmol) or ET-1 and attenuated that caused by PFPF or CRF. Murine soluble TNF receptor I (23.8 pmol) reduced fever to TNF-alpha (14.7 pmol) but not to ET-1. The results of the present study suggest that PFPF and CRF recruit the brain ET system to cause ET(B) receptor-mediated IL-1-dependent fever.

Endothelin-1 as a central mediator of LPS-induced fever in rats.

Fever induced by E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in rats is substantially reduced by blockade of central endothelin ET(B) receptors. This study explores the role of endothelin-1 as a central mediator of fever in rats, by investigating the effect of a pyrogenic dose of LPS on the levels of big endothelin-1 and endothelin-1 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and endothelin-1 in the plasma. We further assessed whether the increase in body temperature caused by central injection of endothelin-1 constitutes solely a hyperthermia or a true integrated febrile response. LPS (5 mug kg(-1), i.v.) induced fever which peaked at 1.16 +/- 0.24 degrees C within 2 h and remained stable up to 5 h. CSF levels of immunoreactive (ir) big endothelin-1 decreased to undetectable levels at 3 h after LPS, returning only partially at 5 h post-injection. CSF ir-endothelin-1 levels were undetectable in saline-treated animals, but reached 21.9 +/- 5.2 fmol ml(-1) at 3 h after LPS treatment. Plasma ir-endothelin-1 levels were unchanged after saline or LPS. Central injection of endothelin-1 (1 pmol, i.c.v.) caused long-lasting increases in body temperature (0.81 +/- 0.17 degrees C, 3 h), but simultaneously decreased tail skin temperature (-1.10 +/- 0.26 degrees C), indicating cutaneous vasoconstriction. Moreover, endothelin-1 induced fever (1.0 +/- 0.3 degrees C, 3 h) when injected into the preoptic area of the anterior hypothalamus (100 fmol), but not i.v. (1 or 10 pmol). These data suggest that endothelin-1 is produced in the brain and acts centrally as a mediator of LPS-induced fever.

Functional characterization and expression of endothelin receptors in rat carotid artery: involvement of nitric oxide, a vasodilator prostanoid and the opening of K+ channels in ETB-induced relaxation.

We aimed to functionally characterize endothelin (ET) receptors in the rat carotid artery. mRNA and protein expressions of both ETA and ETB receptors, evaluated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western immunoblotting, were detected in carotid segments. Immunohistochemical assays showed that ETB receptors are expressed in the endothelium and smooth muscle cells, while ETA receptors are expressed only in the smooth muscle cells. In endothelium-denuded vessels, levels of ETB receptor mRNA were reduced. Vascular reactivity experiments, using standard muscle bath procedures, showed that ET-1 induces contraction in endothelium-intact and -denuded carotid rings in a concentration-dependent manner. Endothelial removal enhanced ET-1-induced contraction. BQ123 and BQ788, selective antagonists for ETA and ETB receptors, respectively, produced concentration-dependent rightward displacements of the ET-1 concentration-response curves. IRL1620, a selective agonist for ETB receptors, induced a slight vasoconstriction that was abolished by BQ788, but not affected by BQ123. IRL1620-induced contraction was augmented after endothelium removal. ET-1 concentration dependently relaxed phenylephrine-precontracted rings with intact endothelium. The relaxation was augmented in the presence of BQ123, reduced in the presence of BQ788 and completely abolished after endothelium removal. IRL1620 induced vasorelaxation that was abolished by BQ788 and endothelium removal, but not affected by BQ123. Preincubation of intact rings with N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), indomethacin or tetraethylammonium (TEA) reduced IRL1620-induced relaxation. The combination of L-NAME, indomethacin and TEA completely abolished IRL1620-induced relaxation while sulfaphenazole did not affect this response. 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), but not apamin, glibenclamide or charybdotoxin, reduced IRL1620-induced relaxation. The major finding of this work is that it firstly demonstrated functionally the existence of both ETA and ETB vasoconstrictor receptors located on the smooth muscle of rat carotid arteries and endothelial ETB receptors that mediated vasorelaxation via NO-cGMP pathway, vasodilator cyclooxygenase product(s) and the activation of voltage-dependent K+ channels.

Endothelin ETB receptors inhibit articular nociception and priming induced by carrageenan in the rat knee-joint.

The participation of the endothelin system on nociception and priming induced by carrageenan in the knee-joint was investigated. Intra-articular (i.a.) carrageenan (300 microg) caused long-lasting nociceptive effects (i.e., increases in paw elevation time [PET]), which were potentiated by endothelin-1 (dual endothelin ETA/ETB receptor agonist) and inhibited by sarafotoxin S6c (endothelin ETB receptor agonist; both at 30 pmol, i.a., 24 h beforehand). Priming the naive joint with carrageenan augmented nociceptive responses to a second carrageenan challenge, 72 h later. Carrageenan-induced priming, but not nociception, was potentiated by local BQ-788 (10 nmol, i.a., 15 min before priming; endothelin ETB receptor antagonist; N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarbonyl-tryptophanil-D-norleucine), but BQ-123 (endothelin ETA receptor antagonist; cyclo [D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]) was ineffective. Sarafotoxin S6c markedly suppressed carrageenan-induced priming to nociception triggered by carrageenan, endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c, and BQ-788 prevented this action. Thus, selective endothelin ETB receptor agonists inhibit carrageenan-induced nociception and priming in the naive joint. This priming effect of carrageenan to nociception evoked by subsequent inflammatory insults is limited by an endothelin ETB receptor-operated mechanism.

Endothelins contribute towards nociception induced by antigen in ovalbumin-sensitised mice.

1. The contribution of endogenous endothelins to nociceptive responses elicited by ovalbumin (OVA) in the hind-paw of mice sensitised to this antigen (50 microg OVA+5 mg Al(OH)(3), s.c., 14 days beforehand) was investigated. 2. Sensitised mice exhibited greater nocifensive responsiveness to intraplantar (i.pl.) OVA (total licking time over first 30 min: 85.2+/-14.6 s at 0.3 microg; 152.6+/-35.6 s at 1 microg) than nonsensitised animals (29.3+/-7.4 s at 1 microg). Nocifensive responses of sensitised mice to 0.3 microg OVA were inhibited by morphine (3 mg kg(-1), s.c.) or local depletion of mast cells (four daily i.pl. injections of compound 48/80). 3. Pretreatment with i.v. bosentan (mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist; 52 micromol kg(-1)) or A-122722.5 (selective ET(A) receptor antagonist; 6 micromol kg(-1)) reduced OVA-induced licking from 124.8+/-20.6 s to 45.7+/-13.0 s and 64.2+/-12.1 s, respectively, whereas A-192621.1 (selective ET(B) receptor antagonist; 25 micromol kg(-1)) enhanced them to 259.2+/-39.6 s. 4. Local i.pl. pretreatment with BQ-123 or BQ-788 (selective ET(A) or ET(B) receptor antagonists, respectively, each at 3 nmol) reduced OVA-induced licking (from 106.2+/-15.2 to 57.0+/-9.4 s and from 118.6+/-10.5 to 76.8+/-14.7 s, respectively). Sarafotoxin S6c (selective ETB receptor agonist, 30 pmol, i.pl., 30 min after OVA) induced nocifensive responses in OVA-sensitised, but not in nonsensitised, animals. 5. Compound 48/80 (0.3 microg, i.pl.) induced nocifensive responses per se and potentiated those induced by i.pl. capsaicin (0.1 microg). Treatment with BQ-123 (3 nmol, i.pl.) reduced only the hyperalgesic effect of compound 48/80, whereas BQ-788 (3 nmol) was ineffective. 6. Thus, immune-mediated Type I hypersensitivity reactions elicit mast cell- and endothelin-dependent nociception in the mouse hind-paw, which are mediated locally by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. The nocifensive response to antigen is amenable to blockade by systemic treatment with dual ET(A)/ET(B) or selective ET(A) receptor antagonists, but is sharply potentiated by systemic selective ET(B) receptor antagonist treatment. The apparently distinct roles played by ET(B) receptors in this phenomenon at local and other sites remain to be characterised.

Simultaneous changes in intracellular calcium and tension induced by endothelin-1 and sarafotoxin S6c in guinea pig isolated gallbladder: influence of indomethacin.

The relationships between changes in intracellular Ca2+ and smooth muscle tension triggered by endothelin-1 and the selective endothelin ETB receptor agonist sarafotoxin S6c, as well as their susceptibility to modification by the nonselective cyclooxygenase blocker indomethacin, were assessed in guinea pig isolated gallbladder strips. Cumulative additions of either agonist (1, 10, and 100 nM) induced simultaneous graded, strongly correlated, slowly developing, and sustained changes in tension and intracellular Ca+2 (Fura-2 technique). Sarafotoxin S6c was more effective than endothelin-1 in raising intracellular Ca2+ at 1 or 10 nM, but their abilities to cause contractions were similar at all concentrations. Indomethacin (5.6 microM) markedly inhibited the changes in both intracellular Ca2+ and tension caused by all concentrations of sarafotoxin S6c (in response to 100 nM, increases in Ca2+ fluorescence intensity and tension were inhib ited from 7.7 +/- 0.7 to 4.0 +/- 0.4% and from 460 +/- 100 to 160 +/- 40 mg, respectively) but only reduced the contraction triggered by 100 nM endothelin-1 (from 560 +/- 100 to 230 +/- 70 mg). Endothelin-1 caused greater prostacyclin release from gallbladder than sarafotoxin S6c (at 100 nM, 6-keto-PGF1alpha levels in the medium rose 4.8- and 2.8-fold, respectively; P < 0.05) and slightly increased thromboxane A2 release (1.6-fold; P < 0.05). Thus, gallbladder contractions triggered by combined ETA/ETB or selective ETB receptor stimulation (with endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c, respectively) are strongly correlated with increases in intracellular Ca2+ but differentially affected by indomethacin. It remains to be assessed if this difference is because endothelin-1 triggers greater prostacyclin release than sarafotoxin S6c and (or) is due to the coupling of ETA and ETB receptors to distinct patterns of generation of cyclooxygenase-derived eicosanoids.

Influence of indomethacin on effects of endothelin-1 on guinea pig isolated rings of common bile duct and sphincter of Oddi.

The effects of endothelin-1 on motility of guinea pig extra-hepatic biliary tract portions were studied. Endothelin-1 (< or =100 nM) failed to contract rings of hepatic, cystic, proximal or distal common bile ducts, or choledochal or papillary halves of sphincter of Oddi. At 100 nM, endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c (selective endothelin ET(B) receptor agonist) inhibited contractions of choledochal (but not papillary) sphincter of Oddi to carbachol (1 microM) by 63+/-5 and 45+/-9%, respectively. In distal common bile duct, indomethacin (5.6 microM) unmasked potent contractile effects of endothelin-1 [EC(50) 7.8 (5.5-11.1) nM; E(MAX) 80+/-6% of response to 80 mM KCl] and enhanced the contractile potency of carbachol (585-fold at EC(50) level), but not cholecystokinin C-terminal octapeptide. Inhibition of cholinergic responsiveness of the choledochal sphincter of Oddi by endothelin-1 was reduced by BQ-123 (1 microM; endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist; cyclo[DTrp-DAsp-Pro-DVal-Leu]) and abolished by either BQ-123 plus BQ-788 (1 microM; endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist; N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarboyl-D-norleucine) or indomethacin. Thus, eicosanoids of the cyclo-oxygenase pathway (i.e. prostanoids) suppress endothelin-1-induced contractions of distal common bile duct and mediate endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptor-dependent inhibition of cholinergic responsiveness of the choledochal portion of the sphincter of Oddi.