Combining Wire Localization of Clipped Nodes with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The ideal technique for lymph node staging for patients with pathologically confirmed node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of wire/clip localization and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the axillary staging of these patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in which lymph node staging was performed using wire localization of positive lymph nodes and an SLNB with dual tracer. All patients who presented no metastatic involvement of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) or clip/wire-marked lymph node were spared an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The multidisciplinary committee agreed on axillary treatment for patients with lymph node involvement. RESULTS: Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. We identified and extirpated the clip/wire-marked node in all patients (100%), with SLNB performed successfully in 95.3% of patients. The SLN and wire-marked node matched in 80% of patients; 73.8% of patients did not undergo ALND. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Several studies have evaluated the efficacy of various procedures for lymph node marking for women with prechemotherapy lymph node involvement. Most of the studies reported high identification rates (> 94.8%), with false negative rates of < 7%. Similarly, our study allows us to conclude that combined axillary marking (clip and SLNB) in patients with metastatic lymph node at diagnosis and NAC offers a high identification rate (100%) and a high correlation between the wire-marked lymph node and the SLN (80%). This procedure has enabled the suppression of ALND for a significant number of patients (73%).

Radioterapia axilar en la cirugía conservadora del cáncer de mama en estadio temprano (estadio I y II) / Axillary radiotherapy in conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer (stage I and II)

INTRODUCCIÓN: Diversos estudios clínicos analizan el tratamiento axilar en el cáncer de mama temprano debido a los cambios actuales en la indicación de la linfadenectomía axilar. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el impacto de la radioterapia axilar en la supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad en mujeres con un carcinoma de mama en estadio inicial tratadas mediante cirugía conservadora. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo en mujeres con un carcinoma infiltrante de mama en estadios iniciales tratadas mediante cirugía conservadora. Análisis comparativo de las mujeres con afectación ganglionar y factores de riesgo asociados que recibieron radioterapia axilar frente a un grupo con afectación ganglionar de bajo riesgo sin tratamiento radioterápico. Se utilizó una regresión logística para determinar los factores que influían en la supervivencia y en la aparición de linfedema. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 541 mujeres, 384 (71%) sin afectación de ganglios linfáticos axilares y 157 (29%) con afectación de 1-3 ganglios axilares. Las pacientes con radioterapia axilar tenían un mayor número de ganglios metastásicos respecto a las no irradiadas (1,6 ± 0,7 vs. 1,4 ± 0,6; p = 0,02). El grupo de mujeres con afectación ganglionar y radioterapia axilar tuvo una supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad a los 10 años similar a las pacientes sin irradiación de la axila (89,7 y 77,2%, respectivamente). La afectación de 3 ganglios incrementó 7 veces el riesgo de fallecer (HR = 7,20; IC 95%: 1,36-38,12). En el estudio multivariante, la linfadenectomía axilar fue el único factor de riesgo independiente de aparición de linfedema (HR = 22,22; IC 95%: 4,71-105,59; p < 0,001). CONCLUSIÓN: La recidiva axilar en el cáncer de mama en estadios I y II es un evento poco frecuente. En las enfermas con afectación axilar y factores de riesgo asociados, la radioterapia regional contribuye al control locorregional de la enfermedad con igual supervivencia global

INTRODUCTION: Several clinical studies analyze axillary treatment in women with early-stage breast cancer because of changes in the indication for axillary lymph node dissection. The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of axillary radiotherapy in disease-free and overall survival in women with early breast cancer treated with lumpectomy. METHODS: Retrospective study in women with initial stages of breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy. A comparative analysis of high-risk women with axillary lymph node involvement who received axillary radiotherapy with the group of women with low risk without radiotherapy was performed. Logistic regression was used to determine factors influencing survival and lymphedema onset. RESULTS: A total of 541 women were included in the study: 384 patients (71%) without axillary lymph node involvement and 157 women (29%) with 1-3 axillary lymph node involvement. Patients with axillary radiotherapy had a higher number of metastatic lymph node compared to non-irradiated (1.6 ± 0.7 vs. 1.4 ± 0.6, P=.02). The group of women with axillary lymph node involvement and radiotherapy showed an overall and disease-free survival at 10 years similar to that obtained in patients without irradiation (89.7% and 77.2%, respectively). 3 lymph nodes involved multiplied by more than 7 times the risk of death (HR = 7.20; 95% CI: 1.36 to 38.12). The multivariate analysis showed axillary lymph node dissection as the only variable associated with the development of lymphedema. CONCLUSION: The incidence of axillary relapse on stage I and II breast cancer is rare. In these patients axillary radiotherapy does not improve overall survival, but contributes to regional control in those patients with risk factors

Axillary radiotherapy in conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer (stage I and II). / Radioterapia axilar en la cirugía conservadora del cáncer de mama en estadio temprano (estadio I y II).

INTRODUCTION: Several clinical studies analyze axillary treatment in women with early-stage breast cancer because of changes in the indication for axillary lymph node dissection. The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of axillary radiotherapy in disease-free and overall survival in women with early breast cancer treated with lumpectomy. METHODS: Retrospective study in women with initial stages of breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy. A comparative analysis of high-risk women with axillary lymph node involvement who received axillary radiotherapy with the group of women with low risk without radiotherapy was performed. Logistic regression was used to determine factors influencing survival and lymphedema onset. RESULTS: A total of 541 women were included in the study: 384 patients (71%) without axillary lymph node involvement and 157 women (29%) with 1-3 axillary lymph node involvement. Patients with axillary radiotherapy had a higher number of metastatic lymph node compared to non-irradiated (1.6±0.7 vs. 1.4±0.6, P=.02). The group of women with axillary lymph node involvement and radiotherapy showed an overall and disease-free survival at 10 years similar to that obtained in patients without irradiation (89.7% and 77.2%, respectively). 3 lymph nodes involved multiplied by more than 7 times the risk of death (HR=7.20; 95% CI: 1.36 to 38.12). The multivariate analysis showed axillary lymph node dissection as the only variable associated with the development of lymphedema. CONCLUSION: The incidence of axillary relapse on stage I and II breast cancer is rare. In these patients axillary radiotherapy does not improve overall survival, but contributes to regional control in those patients with risk factors.