Prenatal and Birth Care of Roma Women.

BACKGROUND: The reproductive health of Roma women has been poorly studied. It is important to determine the follow-up care received by Roma women from pregnancy to the first postpartum visit, together with neonatal outcomes, to improve prenatal care and maternal-child outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine differences in prenatal care and maternal-infant outcomes between Roma and non-Roma women. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in 122 pregnant women (28 Roma and 94 non-Roma women) recruited from seven primary care centers in three districts of Asturias (Spain). Sociodemographic variables, prenatal control, birth characteristics, feeding, and neonatal outcomes (gestational age, weight, and APGAR [appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration]) were collected from the electronic medical records. Prenatal care was assessed using three indices: the Kessner index, the Modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Spanish Index, and an ad hoc index that considered adherence to the recommendations for pregnant women in Spain. RESULTS: Compared with non-Roma women, advanced maternal age (≥35 years) and primigravida were less common among Roma women. Roma women visited the dentist less often, smoked more, and underwent group B streptococcus screening less frequently. No differences were found in the number of prenatal visits between Roma and non-Roma women. Consequently, there were no differences between the Kessner index and the Modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Spanish Index. Using the ad hoc index, the non-Roma women more frequently had adequate prenatal visits. There were no differences in birth characteristics, type of feeding, and neonatal outcomes. DISCUSSION: Overall, prenatal care was slightly worse in Roma women; however, this did not imply worse neonatal health outcomes. Both study groups had similar birth characteristics and immediate puerperium, including feeding.

Limitación auditiva y fragilidad social en hombres y mujeres mayores / Hearing loss and social frailty in older men and women

Objetivo: Explorar la asociación entre la limitación auditiva y la fragilidad social en una muestra de personas mayores de España. Método: Estudio transversal con una muestra de 445 personas (190 hombres y 255 mujeres) de 65 y más años de edad no institucionalizadas, reclutadas de centros de atención primaria en España. La limitación auditiva se determinó de forma autoinformada utilizando tres preguntas. Se consideró que existía fragilidad social cuando la persona presentó dos o más de las siguientes condiciones: vivir solo/a, ausencia de persona que brinde ayuda, contacto infrecuente con la familia, contacto infrecuente con amistades, falta de confidente y falta de ayuda para las actividades cotidianas en los últimos 3 meses. Para estudiar la asociación entre la limitación auditiva y la fragilidad social se realizaron modelos de regresión logística ajustados por posibles factores de confusión, incluyendo la presencia de fragilidad física. Resultados: La edad media de los/las participantes fue de 76,2 años (77,5 años para las mujeres). El 54,4% presentaban limitación auditiva y el 23,2% fueron considerados/as frágiles sociales. La limitación auditiva se asoció con la fragilidad social ( odds ratio ajustada [ORa]=1,78; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 1,043,06). No obstante, la asociación fue dependiente del sexo (p de interacción=0,041) y en los análisis estratificados la asociación solo se halló en las mujeres (ORa=3,21; IC95%: 1,447,17).Conclusiones: La limitación auditiva se asoció con fragilidad social en las mujeres, pero no en los hombres. Se precisan estudios longitudinales que confirmen esta asociación y ayuden a entender el efecto diferencial del sexo. (AU)

Objective: To explore the association between hearing loss and social frailty in a sample of Spanish older adults recruited from primary health care network.Method: Crosssectional study on a sample of 445 noninstitutionalized adults aged 65 or more years (190 men and 255 women), recruited from primary care centers in Spain. Three selfreported hearing impairment questions were used to assess hearing loss. Social frailty was deemed to exist when the person presented two or more of the following conditions: living alone, absence of a person to provide help, infrequent contact with family, infrequent contact with friends, lack of confident and lack of help for daily activities in the last 3 months. To study the association between hearing loss and social frailty we used logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders, including physical frailty. Results: The mean age of participants was 76.2 years (77.5 years for women). More than half of the participants (54.4%) reported hearing loss and the frequency of social frailty was 23.2%. Hearing loss was associated with social frailty (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.78; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.043.06). However, the association was sexdependent (p for interaction=0.041). In stratified analysis, the association was only found in women (aOR=3.21; 95%CI: 1.447.17). Conclusions: Hearing loss was associated with social frailty in women, but not in men. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm this association and to understand the differential effect of gender. (AU)

Contribution of students to nursing practice settings during clinical training: Design and validation of a questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: A validated questionnaire to measure the contributions of nursing students to clinical settings could potentially assist in the improved management of students in healthcare institutions. AIM: To develop and test the psychometric properties of the questionnaire 'Nursing Student Contributions to Clinical Settings' (CEEEC, Spanish acronym for 'Contribuciones de los Estudiantes de Enfermería a los Entornos Clínicos'). DESIGN: Instrument design and psychometric testing. PARTICIPANTS/SETTINGS: A multicentre study involving 1,098 nursing professionals from three universities and five hospitals of Spain, between January 2019 and March 2020. METHODS: The study was carried out in two phases. Phase 1 involved the questionnaire design by experts (n = 28), which required a review of the available literature, cognitive interviews and Delphi rounds, and a preliminary validity study, which included a pilot test with responses from a sample of nurses (n = 143). Phase 2 involved a formal validation with a wider sample of nurses (n = 927), including factor analysis and a study of convergent validity with the Practice Environment Scale-Nursing Work Index and Health Sciences-Evidence Based Practice. RESULTS: Experts selected 42 items on student contributions. After cognitive interviews, three items were eliminated and seven failed to reach the minimum content validity index (78%). Based on the remaining 32 items, the discrimination index of each item was calculated, and those with <0.3, eight items were sequentially eliminated. The resulting questionnaire contained 24 items grouped into a single factor, which explained 41% of the variance. The internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.94), and the convergent validity was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: A 24-item questionnaire was designed and validated to measure the contributions of nursing students to clinical practice settings. IMPACT: Most hospitals are also teaching centres where nursing students undergo clinical practice. The application of this test will provide insight into the nursing professionals' perception of the students' role.

[Hearing loss and social frailty in older men and women]. / Limitación auditiva y fragilidad social en hombres y mujeres mayores.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between hearing loss and social frailty in a sample of Spanish older adults recruited from primary health care network. METHOD: Cross-sectional study on a sample of 445 non-institutionalized adults aged 65 or more years (190 men and 255 women), recruited from primary care centers in Spain. Three self-reported hearing impairment questions were used to assess hearing loss. Social frailty was deemed to exist when the person presented two or more of the following conditions: living alone, absence of a person to provide help, infrequent contact with family, infrequent contact with friends, lack of confident and lack of help for daily activities in the last 3 months. To study the association between hearing loss and social frailty we used logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders, including physical frailty. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 76.2 years (77.5 years for women). More than half of the participants (54.4%) reported hearing loss and the frequency of social frailty was 23.2%. Hearing loss was associated with social frailty (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.78; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.04-3.06). However, the association was sex-dependent (p for interaction=0.041). In stratified analysis, the association was only found in women (aOR=3.21; 95%CI: 1.44-7.17). CONCLUSIONS: Hearing loss was associated with social frailty in women, but not in men. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm this association and to understand the differential effect of gender.

Impact of a Nurse Intervention to Improve Sleep Quality in Intensive Care Units: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients of adult intensive care units (ICUs) often suffer from a lack of sleep. Reducing anxiety by promoting adaptation to the ICU prior to admission may be an appropriate way to increase sleep quality. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on sleep quality of a brief nurse intervention. METHODS: This was a pilot randomized controlled trial in Spain. Forty patients admitted in hospital for valve cardiac surgery were randomly allocated to (1) control group (n = 20), receiving usual care, and to (2) experimental group (EG, n = 20), receiving a nurse intervention the day before surgery and admission in the ICU. The intervention was based on Roy Adaptation Model. A trained nurse anticipated the stressful stimulus to patients in order to develop functional adaptive behaviors. A set of photographs and videos was used to illustrate the environment and assistance in the ICU. Sleep quality in the ICU was measured with the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire and usual sleep quality with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. RESULTS: After the intervention, sleep quality was lower in the EG compared with the control group (-4 points in Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire, P = .69). Adjustment for main confounders led this reduction to -1.9 points (P = .87) among patients in EG. Stratified analyses shown a positive impact for people who usually slept well (+5.2 points, P = .77), but negative for those who had previous poor sleep quality (-20.0 points, P = .24). CONCLUSION: A nurse intervention prior to ICU admission did not increase patients' sleep quality. In addition, the intervention could have incremented anxiety over the patients who used to sleep poorly at their homes.