Comparison of the discriminatory accuracy of four risk criteria for preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVES: Several criteria have been proposed to categorize the risk of preeclampsia, with notable differences between these criteria. We compared the discriminatory accuracy of criteria for categorizing preeclampsia risk established by four institutions, namely, the World Health Organization (WHO), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and National Center for Technological Excellence in Health (CENETEC), and estimated the concordance between these criteria. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary data analysis of 590 Mexican obstetric patients who received prenatal care in primary care between 2016 and 2017; 160 had a diagnosis of preeclampsia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We estimated the true (TP) and false positive (FP) fractions, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and Kappa coefficient with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Only the WHO criteria, followed by the NICE criteria, had the greatest number of accuracy indicators with ideal or acceptable results: TP 83.6%, PPV 60.5%, NPV 90.3%, DOR 14.3, and AUROC 0.79 and TP 84.5%, PPV 51.0%, NPV 90.3%, DOR 9.7, and AUROC 0.74, respectively. The Kappa coefficient between WHO and NICE criteria was 0.78 (95% CI 0.71-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The discriminatory accuracies of the WHO and NICE criteria were superior to those of the ACOG and CENETEC criteria for classifying preeclampsia risk. Their concordance was good; thus, both criteria seem appropriate for screening preeclampsia in primary care.

[Prevalence of overweight and obesity in children from Monterrey, Nuevo León]. / Prevalencia de sobrepeso y obesidad en niños de Monterrey, Nuevo León.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric obesity is a major health problem around the globe. It has increased in the last decades up to 30 % (in 2010). The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children from zero to 14 years from three family medicine units and one school. METHODS: A prospective study of prevalence, which included children of both sexes who assisted to three family medicine units and a junior high school. We assessed the somatometry and compared it in accordance to the World Health Organization 2006-2007 references and standards. RESULTS: The overall overweight and obesity prevalence in 1624 children was 45.5 % (15.5 % of overweight and 29.9 % of obesity, respectively). A total of 354 of 840 women (42.1 %) and 385 of 784 men (49 %) had overweight and obesity (p < 0.05). In both sexes, we did not observed a difference in overweight (15.7, women; 15.4, men). However, with regards to obesity, women showed 26.4 versus 33.6 of men (p < 0.05). We observed only one family unit with major obesity prevalence, which probably had an initial overestimation. CONCLUSIONS: We found one of the highest prevalences of overweight and obesity in children at a national level: up to 45 % in a state of Mexican northwestern. Obesity doubled overweight, and it was almost 10 % higher in men than in women.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la obesidad infantil es un problema de salud pública mundial y se ha incrementado en forma alarmante en las últimas décadas hasta en 30 % en el 2010. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer la prevalencia de sobrepeso y obesidad en niños de cero a 14 años de tres unidades de medicina familiar (UMF). MÉTODOS: estudio prospectivo, de prevalencia, que incluyó a niños de ambos sexos que acudieron a tres UMF y una escuela primaria. Se evaluó la somatometría y se comparó de acuerdo con estándares y referencias de crecimiento de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) 2006-2007. RESULTADOS: la prevalencia de sobrepeso y obesidad en todo el grupo fue de 45.5 % en los 1624 niños de 0 a 14 años (15.5 %, sobrepeso; 29.9 %, obesidad). Un total de 354 de 840 mujeres (42.1 %) y 385 de 784 hombres (49 %) tuvieron sobrepeso u obesidad (p < 0.05). En las mujeres no se observó diferencia en cuanto a sobrepeso en relación con los hombres (15.7 frente a 15.4 %), pero sí en relación con la obesidad: 26.4 frente a 33.6 % (p < 0.05). Solo se observó una de las UMF con mayor prevalencia de obesidad, lo que probablemente se relacione con un sesgo de sobrerregistro. Conclusiones: se encontró una de las prevalencias de sobrepeso y obesidad infantiles más altas reportadas a nivel nacional, hasta en 45 %, en un estado del noreste mexicano. La obesidad fue dos a uno mayor al sobrepeso y casi 10 % mayor en hombres que en mujeres.