Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Wound J ; 21(1): e14655, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272822

RESUMO

The prevention of pressure ulcer (PU) or pressure injury (PI) wounds is of public health importance in developed countries, including Hungary. The study aimed to assess the PU/PI prevention and care practices of Hungarian public hospitals and identify organizational and management factors. In 2022, a national, questionnaire-based survey of inpatient institutions relevant to PU/PI care was conducted, providing a picture of the practices of 86 hospitals for the year 2019. The questionnaire was processed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis. The survey results show that good practices in Hungary are isolated, the reporting system is inhomogeneous, and documentation is not uniform across our institutional system. Of the 86 institutions, 71.0% operate a PU prevention team, 64.0% use prophylactic dressings, and 88.3% use an anti-decubitus mattress, with an average ratio of 26.1% to the number of beds. Less than half of the institutions reported the incidence of hospital acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs). In this sample, we found no significant association between hospital type and hospital size with the incidence of full-thickness HAPIs (stage III and IV wounds). Developing a comprehensive PU/PI reporting system and updating the national PU/PI prevention and care guidelines are essential in Hungary.


Assuntos
Úlcera por Pressão , Humanos , Hungria , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Hospitais Públicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Leitos
2.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1219186, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37965520

RESUMO

Background: One hundred ten Health Promotion Offices (HPOs) have started operating in Hungary in response to public health challenges. Many of them have been active for almost 10 years, yet their operational experience has not been evaluated. The specific objectives of our study were: (1) to describe the current operational and funding system of HPOs, (2) to identify challenges related to the current management and funding practices, and (3) to formulate recommendations for improvement based on gathered experience and international experience. Design: In order to gain a deeper insight into the operational experience of HPOs, an online survey was conducted with the professional or economic managers of HPOs. A scoping review was carried out to gather international experiences about best practices to formulate recommendations for improvement in developing the operational and financing scheme for HPOs. Results: We found that current HPO network in Hungary faces three main challenges: a deficient management system, inflexible financing scheme, and unequal ability to purchase or provide services for the population. Conclusions: Based on the survey complemented by international experiences, we propose the overhaul of the professional management system and switching toa combination of fixed and performance-based financing scheme for the HPOs in Hungary.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde , Hungria
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 1054, 2023 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37784101

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated wide-ranging adaptations to the organisation of health systems, and primary care is no exception. This article aims to collate insights on the role of primary care during the pandemic. The gained knowledge helps to increase pandemic preparedness and resilience. METHODS: The role of primary care during the pandemic in five European countries (Austria, Denmark, France, Hungary, Italy) was investigated using a qualitative approach, namely case study, based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews. In total, 31 interviews were conducted with primary care providers between June and August 2022. The five country case studies were subjected to an overarching analysis focusing on successful strategies as well as gaps and failures regarding pandemic management in primary care. RESULTS: Primary care providers identified disruptions to service delivery as a major challenge emerging from the pandemic which led to a widespread adoption of telehealth. Despite the rapid increase in telehealth usage and efforts of primary care providers to organise face-to-face care delivery in a safe way, some patient groups were particularly affected by disruptions in service delivery. Moreover, primary care providers perceived a substantial propagation of misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines among the population, which also threatened patient-physician relationships. At the same time, primary care providers faced an increased workload, had to work with insufficient personal protective equipment and were provided incongruous guidelines from public authorities. There was a consensus among primary care providers that they were mostly sidelined by public health policy in the context of pandemic management. Primary care providers tackled these problems through a diverse set of measures including home visits, implementing infection control measures, refurbishing used masks, holding internal meetings and relying on their own experiences as well as information shared by colleagues. CONCLUSION: Primary care providers were neither well prepared nor the focus of initial policy making. However, they implemented creative solutions to the problems they faced and applying the learnings from the pandemic could help in increasing the resilience of primary care. Attributes of an integrated health system with a strong primary care component proved beneficial in addressing immediate effects of the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Áustria , Atenção Primária à Saúde
4.
Orv Hetil ; 164(21): 821-830, 2023 May 28.
Artigo em Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37245206

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A pressure sore (decubitus) is a wound that develops on the skin and subcutaneous tissue in places exposed to pressure. Primarily occurs in elderly, non-mobile individuals, the prevention and control of which requires not only medical and nursing participation, but it also financial expenditure. OBJECTIVE: In our study, after a systematic document analysis, we present the relevant results of the decubitus survey conducted among state hospitals during Q2 of 2022, focusing on the organizational and management factors of decubitus prevention and care. METHOD: The national survey was comprehensive in terms of the range of institutions relevant to decubitus care. After defining the selection criteria, we got a picture of 86 institutional practices for the base year of 2019. RESULTS: During the review and systematization of domestic and European Union professional policy documents, regulators and strategy documents, it can be established that pressure ulcer prevention and care can be adapted to several development policy objectives, and its incidence appears as a quality indicator of the health sector. DISCUSSION: Based on the results of our national decubitus survey, it can be said that domestic good practices operate in isolation, our reporting system is inhomogeneous, and the documentation is not uniform in our institutional system. 17 of the 86 institutions have new (2021-2022) documents regulating decubitus care at the institutional level, which in 17% of the institutions are dated 2010 or earlier. The scope of revision of the regulatory documents is set at 10% of the institutions. 61 of the examined institutions (71%) operate decubitus teams, 55 institutions (64%) use prophylactic bandages. There is a lack of professional monitoring measures and quality indicators, institutional-level expenditure analyses, controlling-type feedback, which would form the basis of costing and cost-effectiveness analyses. CONCLUSION: In addition to our proposals for several organizational and managerial measures, we advocate the renewal of the relevant professional directive and the introduction of a uniform institutional reporting system as well. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(21): 821-830.


Assuntos
Úlcera por Pressão , Humanos , Idoso , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/etiologia , Pele , Bandagens/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Política de Saúde
5.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(1)2023 Jan 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36676777

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: Medical imaging is a key element in the clinical workup of patients with suspected oncological disease. In Hungary, due to the high number of patients, waiting lists for Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were created some years ago. The Municipality of Budapest and Semmelweis University signed a cooperation agreement with an extra budget in 2020 (HBP: Healthy Budapest Program) to reduce the waiting lists for these patients. The aim of our study was to analyze the impact of the first experiences with the HBP. Material and Methods: The study database included all the CT/MRI examinations conducted at Semmelweis University with a referral diagnosis of suspected oncological disease within the first 13 months of the HBP (6804 cases). In our retrospective, two-armed, comparative clinical study, different components of the waiting times in the oncology diagnostics pathway were analyzed. Using propensity score matching, we compared the data of the HBP-funded patients (n = 450) to those of the patients with regular care provided by the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) (n = 450). Results: In the HBP-funded vs. the NHIF-funded patients, the time interval from the first suspicion of oncological disease to the request for imaging examinations was on average 15.2 days shorter (16.1 vs. 31.3 days), and the mean waiting time for the CT/MRI examination was reduced by 13.0 days (4.2 vs. 17.2 days, respectively). In addition, the imaging medical records were prepared on average 1.7 days faster for the HBP-funded patients than for the NHIF-funded patients (3.4 vs. 5.1 days, respectively). No further shortening of the different time intervals during the subsequent oncology diagnostic pathway (histological investigation and multidisciplinary team decision) or in the starting of specific oncological therapy (surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy) was observed in the HBP-funded vs. the NHIF-funded patients. We identified a moderately strong negative correlation (r = -0.5736, p = 0.0350) between the CT/MR scans requested and the active COVID-19 case rates during the pandemic waves. Conclusion: The waiting lists for diagnostic CT/MR imaging can be effectively shortened with a targeted project, but a more comprehensive intervention is needed to shorten the time from the radiological diagnosis, through the decisions of the oncoteam, to the start of the oncological treatment.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hungria , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Teste para COVID-19
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...