Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(8): e19191, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32080103

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Chronic neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder that is associated with functional disability and decreased of quality of life. Electrophysical agents are commonly used to relieve pain, however the effects of combined use of these agents are little studied. The objective is to investigate the efficacy of photobiomodulation and electrical stimulation to relieve pain, both in isolation and combined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This a 4-arm randomized placebo-controlled trial with patient and evaluator blinded. This study will be performed in Department of Physical Therapy at Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos/SP, Brazil. One hundred and forty-four patients with chronic neck pain will be randomized into 4 groups: active photobiomodulation therapy with active electrical stimulation, active photobiomodulation therapy, active electrical stimulation, or placebo treatment. They will receive 10 sessions of treatment. PRIMARY OUTCOME: pain intensity (measured by pain numerical rating scale) posttreatment. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: pain during movement, neck disability, range of motion, pressure pain threshold, temporal summation, conditioned pain modulation, depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, quality of life, analgesic intake, and global perceived effect at posttreatment (10 sessions). Pain intensity and global perceived effect will also be measured after 6 weeks randomization. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study might clarify the importance of using the photobiomodulation therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for patients with chronic neck pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04020861. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04020861?term=NCT04020861&draw=2&rank=1.


Assuntos
Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Cervicalgia/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Dor Crônica , Terapia Combinada , Depressão/epidemiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cervicalgia/epidemiologia , Medição da Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Adulto Jovem
2.
Lasers Med Sci ; 35(1): 157-164, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31168678

RESUMO

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the in vivo response of different wavelengths (red and near-infrared) of light-emitting diode (LED) on full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) in rats. Thirty rats were randomly allocated into three experimental groups: control group (C); red LED treated group (R); and near-infrared LED group (NIR). Skin grafts were irradiated daily for ten consecutive days, starting immediately after the surgery using a red (630 nm) or near-infrared (850 nm) LED. The results showed that the red wavelength LED significantly enhanced the skin graft score in relation to the NIR group and increased transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß) protein expression and density of collagen fibers compared with the other experimental groups. These results suggest that the red wavelength LED was efficient to improve the dermo-epidermal junction and modulate the expression proteins related to tissue repair.


Assuntos
Raios Infravermelhos/uso terapêutico , Fototerapia/métodos , Transplante de Pele , Animais , Colágeno/metabolismo , Epiderme/metabolismo , Epiderme/efeitos da radiação , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Ratos , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/metabolismo , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Cicatrização/efeitos da radiação
3.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) ; 7(5): 157-163, 2018 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29755851

RESUMO

Objective: Technological advances have provided new alternatives to the analysis of skin flap viability in animal models; however, the interrater validity and reliability of these techniques have yet to be analyzed. The present study aimed to evaluate the interrater validity and reliability of three different methods: weight of paper template (WPT), paper template area (PTA), and photographic analysis. Approach: Sixteen male Wistar rats had their cranially based dorsal skin flap elevated. On the seventh postoperative day, the viable tissue area and the necrotic area of the skin flap were recorded using the paper template method and photo image. The evaluation of the percentage of viable tissue was performed using three methods, simultaneously and independently by two raters. The analysis of interrater reliability and viability was performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland Altman Plot Analysis was used to visualize the presence or absence of systematic bias in the evaluations of data validity. Results: The results showed that interrater reliability for WPT, measurement of PTA, and photographic analysis were 0.995, 0.990, and 0.982, respectively. For data validity, a correlation >0.90 was observed for all comparisons made between the three methods. In addition, Bland Altman Plot Analysis showed agreement between the comparisons of the methods and the presence of systematic bias was not observed. Innovation: Digital methods are an excellent choice for assessing skin flap viability; moreover, they make data use and storage easier. Conclusion: Independently from the method used, the interrater reliability and validity proved to be excellent for the analysis of skin flaps' viability.

4.
Pain Manag ; 8(2): 71-77, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29451431

RESUMO

The aim of the study will be to compare different types of analgesic electrical currents in relation to the pressure pain threshold and sensory comfort in healthy individuals. A total of 100 individuals will be randomly assigned to four groups: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, interferential current, Aussie current or placebo. The electrical stimulation will be administered with a strong level for 30 min and to the placebo group, the electrodes will be positioned while the equipment will remain switched off. The pressure pain threshold and sensory comfort will be measured with an algometer and the visual analogue scale, respectively. The level of significance will be p < 0.05. STUDY REGISTRATION: NCT01950728 (clinical trials).


Assuntos
Manejo da Dor/métodos , Limiar da Dor , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Humanos , Dor/prevenção & controle , Medição da Dor/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA