A Phase I/II Study of Stereotactic Hypofractionated Once-weekly Radiation Therapy (SHORT) for Prostate Cancer.

AIMS: Stereotactic radiation therapy has been investigated predominantly in patients with low-intermediate-risk disease. We conducted a clinical trial of stereotactic hypofractionated radiation therapy delivered in once-weekly fractions on patients with all-risk non-metastatic disease to test feasibility, acute toxicities and patient-reported outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase I/II study, 30 patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma, any Gleason score, T1-4N0 and prostate-specific antigen ≤60 ng/ml were treated with volumetric intensity modulated arc radiation therapy to a dose of 35 Gy in five fractions delivered once weekly. Patients with high-risk disease also received elective nodal irradiation to a dose of 25 Gy in five fractions simultaneously. Androgen deprivation was offered to intermediate- and high-risk patients. The primary outcome was acute toxicity. Secondary outcome measures included biochemical control and late toxicity. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the International Prostate Symptom Score and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ). RESULTS: All 30 patients completed treatment per-protocol. Most patients had T3 (60%) and Gleason 7 (50%) tumours. The median prostate-specific antigen was 17 ng/ml. High-risk disease was present in 20 patients (66.7%). There was a low incidence of acute toxicities (grade 2 + urinary 3.3%, grade 2 rectal 0%). Within the EORTC QLQ framework, only the urinary symptom score showed a clinically meaningful worsening from a mean of 20/100 at baseline to 34/100 at the end of treatment (P < 0.001), but reduced to 24/100 at 6 months (P = 0.08). With a median follow-up of 41.5 months, two patients each reported grade 2 late urinary and rectal toxicity. The 3- and 4-year biochemical control rates were 96.7 and 87.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of mainly high-risk cancers, stereotactic once-weekly radiation therapy was easy to implement and well tolerated, with a low incidence of acute and late toxicity and excellent biochemical control.

Oncology Gold Standard™ practical consensus recommendations 2016 for treatment of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

The Oncology Gold Standard (OGS) Expert Group on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) developed the consensus statement to provide community oncologists practical guidelines on the management of advanced clear cell (cc) RCC using published evidence, practical experience of experts in real life management, and results of a nationwide survey involving 144 health-care professionals. Six broad question categories containing 33 unique questions cover major situations in the routine management of RCC. This document serves as a ready guide for the standard of care to optimize outcome. The table of "Take Home Messages" at the end is a convenient tool for busy practitioners.

Outcomes Following a Moderately Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiation (START B Type) Schedule for Breast Cancer in an Unscreened Non-Caucasian Population.

AIMS: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Western data have confirmed hypofractionated radiation therapy to be safe and effective in the adjuvant radiation therapy of breast cancers. We report the disease-related outcomes in a non-Caucasian, unscreened population treated with hypofractionated radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unselected case notes of patients presenting to a tertiary cancer centre between June 2011 and December 2013 were reviewed from the electronic hospital case records. Patients with a diagnosis of non-metastatic invasive non-sarcomatous breast cancer were identified. Demographic information, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 status, pathological tumour, nodal stage at diagnosis and outcomes of treatment, including systemic therapies, surgery and hypofractionated radiation, were documented. Local recurrence rates, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were calculated. RESULTS: Overall 925 patents were identified, median age 53.0 years (interquartile range 45-61), 330 of whom had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 22.6 months and 23.5 months for overall and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups, respectively. ER, PR and HER2 status was available in 788 patients, 77.2% of whom were ER/PR positive, 14.7% had triple negative disease, while 9.5% were HER2 rich. Overall, 34.2% (113 patients) underwent breast conservation surgery; 744 (80.4%) patients were treated with systemic chemotherapy and 878 (94.9%) patients received adjuvant radiation therapy, of whom 407 (44.0%) received supraclavicular-fossa radiotherapy. Overall survival, DFS and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) for the overall group were 93%, 86.9% and 97.1%, respectively. LRRFS in the breast conservation surgery versus mastectomy groups were 99% versus 95.5% (P=0.003), with more node-positive patients in the mastectomy group. Stage N0/1 had better LRRFS compared with N2/2 (99.1% versus 95.7%); 94.3% versus 82.3%; P=0.005, 0.000. Grade 3 (53.8%) tumours had worse overall survival compared with grade 1 or grade 2 disease (89.6% versus 100% and 96.4%; P<0.001) although the LRRFS was not significantly different between the groups (98.9% versus 97.8%; P=0.37). There was no difference in LRRFS based on molecular subtypes. CONCLUSION: Local recurrence rates following hypofractionated radiation in our population were comparable with those reported by the START trialists and were found to be safe in the medium term for patients irrespective of breast conservation surgery/mastectomy or radiotherapy to the supraclavicular field. Molecular group frequencies were comparable with Western populations but did not affect LRRFS.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia: an experience from a tertiary care centre in north India.

BACKGROUND: There are very limited data reported about acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) from developing countries. We reviewed the clinical course and treatment outcome of APL patients treated at our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and December 2007, 33 patients with APL received induction therapy using ATRA + daunorubicin (n = 26), As = 26), As2O3 (n = 4) or daunorubicin + cytosar ( n = 3). RESULTS: Median age was 30 years with a male to female ratio of 1.68. Twenty seven patients (82%) achieved CR. Complications during induction therapy were febrile neutropenia (33%), ATRA syndrome (30%), bleeding (58%), and diarrhea in (6%) patients. During induction and follow up, 8 (24.24%) patients died, 6 (18.18%) during induction, 1 (3%) during maintenance, and 1 (3%) after relapse. Median OS is 128 months while median EFS is 61 months. Four patients relapsed at a median time of 61 months. At the time of censoring, 25 patients were alive at a median follow up of 13 months (range 0.6 -127 months); 21 in CR1, 3 in CR2, 1 in CR3. Comparisons among the risk groups (CR and relapse rate and survival statistics) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: APL is a highly curable malignancy. Our results confirm the findings of the published literature from larger cooperative studies from the West. We may further improve outcome with quicker diagnosis and more efficient supportive care system.