Liberação miofascial no ganho de potência muscular do quadríceps: um estudo controlado e randomizado / Myfascial release in quadriceps muscle power gain: a controlled and randomized study

A prescrição de exercícios para o ganho de força e potência muscular é utilizado com o objetivo de ajudar na reabilitação de lesões musculares e para o aprimoramento físico nas práticas esportivas. Dentre as técnicas que são apontadas como possíveis condutas que poderiam auxiliar no fortalecimento muscular e potência destaca-se a Liberação Miofascial. Deste m o do, o estudo buscou analisar e comparar um programa de treinamento para ganho de potência muscular com fortalecimento muscular resistido isolado e os resultados de sua combinação com a Liberação Miofascial. Trata-se de um estudo quantitativo, transversal, analítico, de caráter experimental, comparativo, controlado e randomizado. A amostra foi composta por 11 mulheres com idade de 18 a 40 anos subdivididas em dois grupos de intervenção. As intervenções ocorerram 3 vezes por semana durante 4 semanas. Os membros do Grupo controle realizaram apenas o fortalecimento muscular com exercício de agachamento a partir de 0 º de flexão de joelhos até o limite de 90º de flexão e retornando ao grau 0. As voluntárias do Grupo Liberação Miofascial associado ao treino de força inicialmente foram submetidas a intervenções de Liberação Miofascial dos músculos quadríceps bilateralmente e posteriormente ao treino de fortalecimento muscular descrito no grupo controle. Foram avaliadas as variáveis distância do salto vertical e carga suportada em 1 Repetição Máxima. A estatística inferencial utilizada foi através do t este T de Student emparelhado para verificar a diferença entre as médias do antes e depois dos tratamentos em cada grupo. Para verificar as diferenças em relação às técnicas utilizadas em grupos diferentes foi realizado o teste T de Student não compartilhado. Os resultados demonstraram não haver diferença estatisticamente significante entre os grupos no que se refere a carga máxima suportada em 1 Repetição Máxima (p=0,484), mesmo sendo essa diferença numericamente de 3,31kg a mais de ganho para o Grupo que utilizou a Liberação Miofascial associada ao treino de força, e não foi encontrada diferença significativa (p=0,068) entre a distância de salto vertical nos grupos, apesar desta distânicia ser 4,35 cm maior também no grupo Liberação Miofascial associada ao treino de força. Foi possível demonstrar, desta form a, que a liberação miofascial não otimiza o ganho da potencia muscular associado ao exercício resistido . Desta forma, através dos resultados deste estudo, não é possível recomendar a utilização da LM como um recurso para ser utilizado pré treino com objetivo de ganho de potência muscular...(AU)

The prescription of exercises to gain muscle strength and power is used to help in the rehabilitation of muscle injuries and for physical improvement in sport practices. Among the techniques that are pointed as possible ways that could help in muscle strengthening and power, Myofascial Release stands out. Thus, the study sought to analyze and compare a training program for muscle power gain with isolated resistance muscle strengthening and the results of its combination with myofascial release. It is a quantitative, cross-sectional, analytical, experimental, comparative, controlled and randomized study. Our sample consisted of 11 women aged 18 to 40 years old, subdivided into two interventio n gro ups. Th e interventions occurred 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Control Group members only perform muscle strengthening with squats from 0º of knee flexion up to the limit of 90º of flexion and return of grade 0. As volunteers of the Myofascial Release Group associated with strength training, t hey were subm it ted t o Myofascial Release of the quadriceps muscles bilaterally and after the muscle st rengt hening t raining described in the control group. The variables vertical jump distance and load supported in 1 Maximum Repetition were evaluated. The inferential statistics used was through the paired Student's T test to verify the difference between the means of before and after treatments in each group. To verify the differences in relation to the techniques used in different groups, the Student's t-test was not shared. T here was n o statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the maximum load supported in 1 Maximum Repeat (p=0.484), even though this difference was numerically 3 .3 1kg m o re gain fo r t he Myofascial Release Group.No significant difference (p=0.068) was found either between t he v ertical jump distance, which was 4.35 cm higher ­ also in the Myofascial Release group. Thus, it was demonstrated that myofascial release does not optimize the gain in muscle power associat ed with resistance exercises. Thus, through the results of this study, it is not possible to recommend the use of SCI as a resource to be used pre-training in order to gain muscle power...(AU)

Analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery: intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a widely purposed and performed treatment for rectal cancer. Downstaging effects possibly enhance the rate of curative surgery and may enable sphincter preservation in low-lying tumours. The current study examines the clinical outcomes in patients enrolled in a neoadjuvant CRT-surgery protocol for rectal cancer, distinguishing between intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal cancer. From 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of rectal cancer were enrolled in a single-centre, not randomized study based on 5-week sessions of radiotherapy associated with a 30-day protracted venous 5-FU infusion followed by surgical resection. The study population was divided into two groups according to the localization of the tumour: 18 intraperitoneal and 40 extraperitoneal (EPt). Fifty-eight patients were treated with neoadjuvant CRT and surgery. Overall mortality rate was 25.9%, no deaths were recorded during hospitalization; 10 patients (all EPt) died because of recurrence. Significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival rates were found between intraperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal tumours (P = 0.006), both intraperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal tumours N(0) (P = 0.04 and P < 0.05) and intraperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal tumours N(+) (P < 0.05). We diagnosed all local recurrence and liver metastasis in extraperitoneal tumours (t = 0.02 and t = 0.04), and only one case of lung metastasis arose from intraperitoneal cancer. Extraperitoneal tumours could be more aggressive than intraperitoneal ones, spreading more precociously, and/or less responsive to the neoadjuvant CRT because of their localization rather than biological differences. Aside from lymph node status, the location of the tumour with respect to the peritoneum border, is also a prognostic factor of survival in rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant CRT and surgery.

Surgical therapy for patients with extraesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

AIM: The last 20 years have seen a systematic reappraisal of the physiopathology and diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its associated typical symptoms, while less attention has been paid to correlating GERD with certain extraesophageal symptoms and the value of surgery for their treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and physiopathological features and the outcome of surgery, in a group of patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD with atypical symptoms, and to compare the results with another group of patients operated for GERD with typical symptoms. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-one patients were evaluated for GERD at our Digestive Physiopathology outpatients surgery from January 2001 to January 2003. Of the 36 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication, 23 had the typical symptoms of GERD and 13 had atypical symptoms. Twelve months after surgery, these patients were compared in terms of 24-h pH monitoring, esophageal manometry, regression of symptoms and degree of satisfaction. RESULTS: Postoperatively, patients with atypical symptoms had a smaller increase in effective peristalsis (P = 0.06) and a more limited improvement in symptoms (54% vs 91%, P = 0.001), and they expressed less satisfaction with the surgical treatment (5.9 vs 8.2, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The results of surgery in GERD patients with atypical symptoms are worse than in those with typical symptoms. A careful preoperative work-up, based on 24-h pH monitoring, is fundamental for patients with atypical symptoms, who also need to be informed of the high likelihood of surgery proving clinically unsuccessful.

Diverticulum of the midthoracic esophagus: pathogenesis and surgical treatment.

Midthoracic esophageal diverticula represent 15% of all esophageal diverticula. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, barium swallow, esophageal manometry (indispensable for detecting any motor alterations often at the root of the pathogenesis of the diverticulum and for selecting the best surgical option), and 24-h pHmetry are the correct examinations to perform. Simple diverticulectomy performed via thoracoscopy can be sufficient for small diverticula without associated motor alterations. In other cases, it is best to combine diverticulectomy with a longitudinal extramucous myotomy extending at least 3 or 4 cm above and below the neck of the diverticulum or to the entire esophageal body for diffuse esophageal spasm. We report the case of a 67-year-old male patient with a sacciform diverticulum at the mid-third on the anterior wall of the thoracic esophagus. Manometric examination showed peristaltic waves with an amplitude and duration that were above normal at the inferior third of the esophagus. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) were essentially normal. The diagnosis was pulsion-type midthoracic esophageal diverticulum. We performed a diverticulectomy with endoGIA via right thoracoscopy and extramucous myotomy extended from the upper margin of the diverticulum to the esophageal inlet in the hiatus, corresponding to the area showing motor alteration. After 3 months, the patient reported complete remission of symptoms and had gained 4 kg. Radiography of the digestive tube showed a normal transit at the distal esophagus. Manometric follow-up revealed the presence of peristaltic waves with a normal amplitude and duration along the entire esophagus.

Application of a clinical score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in childhood: a retrospective analysis of 197 patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to validate a clinical scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in childhood. METHODS: The authors retrospectively applied a clinical scoring system on 197 consecutive pediatric patients operated on for acute appendicitis. They therefore looked for a correlation between the management suggested by the scoring system and pathologic diagnosis on surgical specimens. RESULTS: Based on final pathologic specimen, surgery has been performed unnecessarily in 23% of cases. The proposed scoring system could have reduced unnecessary surgery to 2%. Only 8% of patients with acute appendicitis would have been discharged home. Sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system used in this study was 87% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The clinical scoring system proposed in this study could be of help in early clinical diagnosis of appendicitis to reduce the rate of unnecessary emergency surgery.

Venous flow through coiled and noncoiled umbilical cords. Effects of external compression, twisting and longitudinal stretching.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between umbilical cord coiling and perinatal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: Ten umbilical cord segments, six coiled and four noncoiled, were categorized according to Strong's coiling index and were examined experimentally. The umbilical arteries and vein were perfused, pressurized, placed in a saline bath at 37 degrees C and subjected to compression, twisting and stretching while measuring venous flow. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in umbilical venous flow between coiled and noncoiled cords when external compression, twisting and longitudinal stretching were applied to the cord segments. CONCLUSION: Differences in morbidity associated with umbilical cord coiling should not be attributed simply to mechanical factors, and other mechanisms should be sought.