30-sit-to-stand power is a better tool than isometric knee extensor strength to detect motor impairment in people with haemophilic arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Regular assessment of motor impairments is crucial in people with haemophilic arthropathy (PwHA). This study aimed to determine if there are differences in 30-seconds sit-to-stand (30-STS) power and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the knee extensors between PwHA and healthy control group (CG). The secondary aims were to investigate the correlation between 30-STS power and MVIC of knee extensors with clinical characteristics and to assess their effectiveness in identifying motor impairment in PwHA. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted by collecting data from PwHA (n = 17) and a sedentary CG (n = 15). MVIC (torque) and 30-STS power were normalised to body mass. Correlation analysis and simple linear regression adjusted for age were used to assess the association between tests and clinical variables. Using z-scores derived from the mean and standard deviation of the CG, we compared the MVIC and the 30-STS power in PwHA. RESULTS: PwHA showed lower MVIC and 30-STS power compared to CG (p < .001; large effect size d > .8). Lower 30-STS power was associated with greater joint impairment and greater fear of movement, whereas MVIC showed no association with clinical variables. 30-STS power showed a lower z-score compared to MVIC (p < .001). In addition, 30-STS power detected 47% of PwHA with motor impairment compared to 0% for MVIC (p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that 30-STS power may be more effective than knee extensors MVIC in detecting motor impairment in PwHA. Consequently, lower limb skeletal muscle power, rather than maximum knee extensor strength, appears to be more affected in PwHA.

How does joint impairment affect the functional capacity of the lower limb in early haemophilia-related arthropathy?

INTRODUCTION: The impact of joint damage on functional capacity in patients with mild haemophilia (PwMH) has yet to be well studied. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of joint impairment on the functional capacity of the lower limb in PwMH. The secondary aim was to identify physical predictors of lower limb functional capacity. METHOD: Forty-nine PwMH were evaluated. Dynamic balance was assessed using Time Up and Go (TUG). Thirty-second sit-to-stand (30-STS) and 60-second-STS (60-STS) were used to assess muscle power and endurance, respectively. Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) was used to assess joint damage. PwMH were divided based on HEAD-US: with joint damage (≥3 points) and without or with very low joint damage (0-2 points). Univariate ANOVA and multiple regression analyses were performed to identify differences in functional capacity and potential physical predictors. RESULTS: Only 30-STS showed significant differences between groups (p = .002). TUG and 60-STS were primarily explained by age (r2  = .21 and r2  = .44, respectively), while for 30-STS, age combined with joint damage and pain level explains 54% of the variance. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the 30-STS is useful for assessing functional deterioration in people with early-stage haemophilia-related arthropathy. Our results also indicate that joint damage, combined with ageing and pain, may impact 30-STS outcomes in PwMH. Furthermore, our findings show that the loss in TUG and 60-STS performance in PwMH is related to ageing.

The hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis.

Prophylaxis is the gold standard treatment for children with haemophilia (CWH). MRI studies revealed joint damage, even with this treatment; this suggests the presence of subclinical bleeding. In the case of children with haemophilia, it is relevant to detect early signs of joint damage, as this allows the medical team to provide the appropriate treatment and follow-up, in order to avoid arthropathy development and its consequences. The aim of this study is to detect the hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis (CWHP) and analyse, by age group, which joint is the most affected. We define the hidden joint in CWH on prophylaxis as the joint that presents joint damage secondary to repetitive bleeding episodes and is detected in the joint evaluation, despite being asymptomatic or with mild symptoms. It is most commonly caused by repetitive subclinical bleeding. METHODS: This was an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study of 106 CWH on prophylaxis treated in our centre. Patients were divided according to age and type of treatment. Joint damage was defined as a HEAD-US score ≥ 1. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 12 years. All had severe haemophilia. The median age of onset of prophylaxis was 2.7. Forty-seven (44.3 %) patients received primary prophylaxis (PP) and 59 (55.7 %), secondary prophylaxis. Six hundred and thirty-six joints were analysed. Type of prophylaxis and joint involvement showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). However, patients on PP had a greater number of damaged joints at older ages. Twenty-two % (140) of the joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US. Cartilage was most frequently involved, followed by synovitis, and bone damage. We observed a greater frequency and degree of arthropathy in subjects aged 11 and above. Sixty (12.7 %) joints showed a HEAD-US score ≥ 1, with no history of bleeding. The ankle was the most affected joint, representing the hidden joint according to our definition. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis is the best treatment for CWH. However, symptomatic or subclinical joint bleeding may occur. The routine evaluation of joint health is relevant, particularly, of the ankle. In our study, early signs of arthropathy according to age and type of prophylaxis were detected by HEAD-US.

How mild is mild haemophilia?

INTRODUCTION: People with mild haemophilia (PWMH) experience sporadic bleeds and are less likely to receive an early diagnosis, appropriate treatment and medical care. Arthropathy is a key determinant of health-related quality of life (QoL), producing pain, limitations in mobility and daily activities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence, risk factors and QoL associated with arthropathy in PWMH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional cohort study. Data were collected in a single interview and evaluated by a physiotherapist and an orthopaedist and analysed on demographics; baseline factor levels; as well as clinical (Haemophilia Joint Health Score [HJHS]), ultrasound (Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound [HEAD-US]), radiological (Pettersson score [PS]), pain (visual analogue scale [VAS]) and QoL evaluations. We defined arthropathy when at least one of the joints shown with a HEAD-US score ≥ 1. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients and 510 joints were included. Patients' mean age was 35.9 years-old. Median age was 44.2 in patients with arthropathy versus 14.9 in patients without; the difference was statistically significant (p < .001). In patients over 20 years old, 90.5% shown arthropathy. Only 24 (28%) patients had no joint damage (HEAD-US = 0), and 61 (72%) had at least one joint with a HEAD-US ≥ 1. The ankle was the most affected joint. Patient age was found to be the most important risk factor associated with the development of arthropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Joint damage as a result of prior hemarthrosis was the most relevant factor associated with lower QoL, and emphasised the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate management in this particular population.

DNA extracellular traps as potential biomarker of chronic haemophilic synovitis and therapeutic perspective in patients treated with PRP: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Hemarthrosis causes chronic haemophilic synovitis (CHS). Although neutrophils are major immune cells infiltrating joints after bleeding, their role on the pathogenesis of CHS is unknown. Neutrophils release extracellular DNA traps (ETs), structures of DNA with bound granular enzymes that were associated with tissue damage. AIMS: To evaluate the presence of ETs as pathogenic biomarker and the protective effect of intraarticular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients with CHS. METHODS: Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and bleeding episodes (BE) were measured and correlated with ETs indicators (DNA/DNA-Elastase) in synovial fluids (SF), PRP and plasma of 21 patients. RESULTS: Soluble DNA and DNA-Elastase were detected in SF and plasma of patients. The synovial and plasma levels of DNA-Elastase positively correlated with worse HJHS/BE. Interestingly, remaining ETs-inducer factors were present in SF that induced the in vitro release of ETs from blood-isolated neutrophils. This phenomenon was impaired by adding plasma or PRP. Finally, preliminary data obtained from five patients indicate that levels of DNA-Elastase and HJHS/BE decreased after receiving intraarticular injection of PRP. CONCLUSIONS: The synovial and plasma levels of DNA-Elastase correlated with worse HJHS/BE suggesting that ETs formation could be a biomarker and potential therapeutic target for CHS. The intraarticular injection of PRP underlined a new potential alternative therapy, decreasing ETs formation in synovia of patients with CHS. However, our hypotheses must be confirmed in the future with better designed and more statistical power studies. Meanwhile, the use of intraarticular injections of PRP for the treatment of CHS remains controversial.

Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of patients with haemophilia on prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Primary prophylaxis is the current gold standard in haemophilia care for the prevention of bleeding and ensuing joint damage. Early detection of joint bleeding, whether symptomatic or subclinical, preferably during childhood, helps prevent joint deterioration and subsequent disability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of agreement between the Haemophilia Joint Health Score and the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound tools in children with severe haemophilia on primary and secondary prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were followed up regularly at our centre. Elbows, knees and ankles were evaluated by physical examination using the Haemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS 2.1), and by ultrasound with HEAD-US score. RESULTS: A total of 80 children with haemophilia on prophylaxis were included in this study. Mean age was 10.8 years (range 4-18). We evaluated 480 joints, of which 423 (88.1%) were concordant with both tools, whereas 57 (11.9%) were discordant; 377 (78.5%) joints scored 0 on HJHS, 370 (77%) on HEAD-US and 345 (72%) on both tools. The overall Kappa concordance coefficient was .656. For elbows, knees and ankles the respective values were .783, .522 and .589. For HJHS scores greater than 3, all joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US. CONCLUSION: HJHS and HEAD-US are used to assess joint health in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis. In this study, the level of agreement between both tools was consistent with literature values only for the elbow joint.

Platelet-rich plasma vs platelet-rich plasma plus hyaluronic acid for haemophilic knee arthropathy treatment.

Repeated joint bleeding leads to chronic synovitis, cartilage damage and bone alterations which result in haemophilic arthropathy and are associated with pain, functional impairment and poor quality of life. There are evidence that Hyaluronic Acid (HA) and Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) have different mechanisms of action in the treatment of arthropathy for this reason we decided to use both components. The aim of this study is to compare, the efficacy, safety and duration of a single intra-articular injection of PRP against PRP+HA for pain, bleeding episodes and joint health, in the same patient with bilateral hemophilic knee arthropathy. Twenty-one men patients (42 knee joints) were treated with intra- articular injections of PRP or PRP+HA. All of them were haemophilia type A severe. The mean age was 36.6 years (21-72). All patients were evaluated for: Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), pain (VAS), the number of bleeding episodes (BE) in the last 30 days, before treatment, at three and six months after treatment. Statistically significant improvement were shown for both knee joints at three and six months after treatment for VAS and BE (P < 0.00001). The HJHS score did not significantly improve for either knee in the 6-month period after injection. A single PRP or PRP+HA injection is safe and effective in treating haemophilic arthropathy of the knee for up to 6 months follow-up, reducing pain, bleeding episodes and delaying total knee arthroplasty.

Inhibition of Fenton reaction is a novel mechanism to explain the therapeutic effect of intra-articular injection of PRP in patients with chronic haemophilic synovitis.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Haemarthroses cause major morbidity in haemophilia resulting in chronic haemophilic synovitis (CHS) and arthropathy. Oxidation of haemoglobin-coupled iron released in synovium after haemolysis induces chondrocytes death and cartilage damage, allowing postulate using iron-chelating drugs as potential therapeutic tool for haemophilic joint damage. Considering that albumin, the most abundant plasma protein, is a physiologic iron chelator, we aim to demonstrate that impediment of haemoglobin oxidation is exerted by plasma as a mechanism involved in the therapeutic effect of intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma in CHS. METHODS: Oxidation of haemoglobin (Hb) to methaemoglobin (MeHb) through Fenton reaction was induced in vitro by addition of potassium ferricyanide in the presence or absence of peripheral blood-derived platelets-rich or platelets-poor plasma (PRP/PPP) or albumin. The relevance of in vitro findings was analysed in synovial fluid (SF) samples from one patient with CHS obtained before and after 6 months of PRP intra-articular injection. RESULTS: MeHb formation was completely impaired either by of PPP, PRP or albumin indicating that PRP exerts an anti-oxidative effect, probably due by plasma albumin. Analysis of SF samples revealed the presence of MeHb levels and haemosiderin-laden macrophages in SF obtained before PRP treatment. Reduction of synovial MeHb, normalization of cellular composition and improvement of health joint haemophilic score, pain and bleeding episodes were registered after 6 months of PRP intra-articular injection. CONCLUSION: Inhibition of Fenton reaction and the consequent normalization of joint cellular composition is a noncanonical mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of PRP intra-articular injection in CHS.