Age differences to methylphenidate-NAc neuronal and behavioral recordings from freely behaving animals.

Methylphenidate (MPD) is a psychostimulant that is widely prescribed to treat attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, but it is abused recreationally as well. The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is part of the motivation circuit implicated in drug-seeking behaviors. The NAc neuronal activity was recorded alongside the behavioral activity from young and adult rats to determine if there are significant differences in the response to MPD. The same dose of MPD elicits behavioral sensitization in some animals and behavioral tolerance in others. In adult animals, higher doses of MPD resulted in a greater ratio of tolerance/sensitization. Animals who responded to chronic MPD with behavioral sensitization usually exhibited further increases in their NAc neuronal firing rates as well. Different upregulations of transcription factors (ΔFOSB/CREB), variable proportions of D1/D2 dopamine receptors, and modulation from other brain areas may predispose certain animals to express behavioral and neuronal sensitization versus tolerance to MPD.

Adolescent rats respond differently to methylphenidate as compared to adult rats- concomitant VTA neuronal and behavioral Recordings.

Methylphenidate (MPD) is the most widely prescribed psychostimulant used in adolescents and adults to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The recreational use of MPD is becoming more prevalent because of its ability to improve cognitive enhancement. The ventral tegmental area (VTA) of the brain is highly associated with reward, cognition and addiction to drugs including psychostimulants like MPD. The VTA neuronal activity was recorded alongside the horizontal behavioral activity from freely behaving non-anesthetized rats. Four adolescent and four adult groups were treated with either saline, 0.6, 2.5 or 10.0 mg/kg MPD. In both adolescent and adult animals, the animals responded to MPD in a dose-dependent manner, such that as the dose of MPD increased, more animals and more VTA unit responded to the drug. The same doses of MPD elicited in some animals behavioral and neuronal sensitization and in other animals behavioral and neuronal tolerance. In the 0.6 and 10.0 mg/kg MPD dose groups there were significant differences between the age groups for how many animals expressed behavioral sensitization and behavioral tolerance to chronic MPD exposure. Additionally, the animal's behavioral response to MPD by excitation or attenuation of activity did not always correlate to the VTA neuronal response, and the age group with significantly higher behavioral responses did not always correlate to the age group with significantly higher VTA neuronal responses for a given MPD dose. These findings differ from similar studies recorded from the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which exhibited behavioral responses continuously directly correlated to PFC responses for increasing MPD doses. This demonstrates that unlike other areas of the brain, there is not a direct relationship between VTA firing and behavioral activity, suggesting that there is input or modulation of this area from elsewhere in the brain. Further investigation is needed to clearly understand the relationship between VTA firing rates and behavioral responses to different MPD doses, especially given the significant differences in response between young and adult animals and the increasing use of the drug in adolescent populations.

Adult female rats' altered diurnal locomotor activity pattern following chronic methylphenidate treatment.

Methylphenidate (MPD) is one of the most prescribed pharmacological agents, which is also used for cognitive enhancement and recreational purposes. The objective of this study was to investigate the repetitive dose-response effects of MPD on circadian rhythm of locomotor activity pattern of female WKY rats. The hypothesis is that a change in the circadian activity pattern indicates a long-lasting effect of the drug. Four animal groups (saline control, 0.6, 2.5, and 10.0 mg/kg MPD dose groups) were housed in a sound-controlled room at 12:12 light/dark cycle. All received saline injections on experimental day 1 (ED 1). On EDs 2-7, the control group received saline injection; the other groups received 0.6, 2.5, or 10.0 mg/kg MPD, respectively. On ED 8-10, injections were withheld. On ED 11, each group received the same dose as EDs 2-7. Hourly histograms and cosine statistical analyses calculating the acrophase (ϕ), amplitude (A), and MESOR (M) were applied to assess the 24-h circadian activity pattern. The 0.6 and 2.5 mg/kg MPD groups exhibited significant (p < 0.05) change in their circadian activity pattern on ED 11. The 10.0 mg/kg MPD group exhibited tolerance on ED 11 and also a significant change in activity pattern on ED 8 compared to ED 1, consistent with withdrawal behavior (p < 0.007). In conclusion, chronic MPD administration alters circadian locomotor activity of adult female WKY rats and confirms that chronic MPD use elicits long-lasting effects.

Adolescent rat circadian activity is modulated by psychostimulants.

Circadian pattern of activity regulates many aspects of mammalian physiology and behavior to particular times of the day by entraining the circadian clocks to external environmental signals. Since circadian rhythms are sensitive to many pharmacological agents, it is important to understand if the repetitive use of psychostimulants such as amphetamine will alter the circadian rhythm behavioral activity pattern. The present study uses male Sprague-Dawley rats to study the long-term effects of amphetamine on the locomotor circadian rhythm activity pattern. Rats were randomly assigned to a testing cage that recorded their locomotor activity nonstop for eleven days using the open field assay, as follows: one day of baseline activity was recorded and then the experimental group was injected with amphetamine (0.6mg/kg) for 6days, no treatment for 3days (i.e., washout days) and then re-challenged with amphetamine for one more day while the control group was treated similarly with saline. The Cosine Curve Statistical Analysis (CCSA) test was used to fit a 24-hour curve to activity pattern. Results indicate that repetitive daily amphetamine injections cause behavioral sensitization and a significant change of circadian rhythm of locomotor activity pattern, and elicit behavioral expectation to receive the drug or expression of withdrawal during the washout days. The results suggest that either changes in circadian rhythm caused sensitization and withdrawal or sensitization and withdrawal caused the change in circadian rhythm activity.

Psychostimulants given in adolescence modulate their effects in adulthood using the open field and the wheel-running assays.

Acute and chronic methylphenidate (MPD) were given to adults treated with MPD only in adulthood (adult I) and to adults that had been treated repeatedly during adolescence and adulthood (adult II). Two locomotor activity assays, the open field and the running wheel, were used in a dose response experiment to assess whether methylphenidate (MPD) treatment during adolescence would affect responses to MPD in adulthood. Each experiment lasted 11 days as follows: saline control on experimental day 1 (ED 1), followed by a single daily dose of saline, 0.6, 2.5, or 10mg/kg MPD for 6 days (ED 2 to ED 7), 3 washout days with no drug administration (ED 8 to ED 10), and saline or MPD challenge on ED 11 at a dose identical to that given on ED 2 to ED 7. Acute MPD elicited characteristic dose response increases in locomotion in both experimental assays of adult I and adult II groups. Adult I and adult II rats tested in the open field assay exhibited sensitization to 2.5mg/kg MPD and tolerance to 10mg/kg MPD, while in the wheel-running assay all the three MPD doses elicited sensitization in both adult I and adult II rats. MPD treatment in adolescence did not change the baseline activity when animal reached adulthood. However, the responses to MPD in adult II rat groups were significantly different from the adult I group. Similar observations were noted during washout days. At the low and moderate MPD treatment both experimental assay exhibited similar observations while following the high dose of MPD treatment, the open field assay indicated that tolerance to MPD was expressed, while the wheel-running assay indicated that behavioral sensitization was developed. The distinction between the two assays and adult I and II differences are discussed.

Bilateral six-hydroxydopamine administration to PFC prevents the expression of behavioral sensitization to methylphenidate.

Psychostimulants like amphetamine and methylphenidate (MPD) are used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which is marked by developmentally inappropriate inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Neuropsychological analyses indicate that ADHD patients are impaired on tasks of behavioral inhibition, reward reversal, and working memory, which are functions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and are modulated by the mesocortical dopamine (DA) system. Non-specific electrical lesioning of PFC eliminated the expression of behavioral sensitization elicited by chronic MPD administration. Behavioral sensitization is the progressive augmentation of locomotor activity as a result of repetitive (chronic) exposure to the drug. It is believed that the sensitization to chronic drug treatment is caused due to an increase in DA in the mesocorticolimbic DA system, which includes the PFC. Therefore, this study investigated the role of PFC DA in mediating the behavioral sensitization to repeated administration of MPD in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. On experimental day (ED) 1, the behavior was recorded post-saline injection. On ED 2, the rats were divided into three groups--control, sham and bilateral 6-OHDA treated group; and the sham and 6-OHDA treated groups underwent respective surgeries. After 5 days of rest following surgery, the post-surgery baseline was recorded on ED 8 following a saline injection. All three groups received 2.5 mg/kg MPD for 6 days (from ED 9 to ED 14), followed by a 3-day washout period (ED 15 to ED 18). On ED 19, a rechallenge injection of 2.5 mg/kg MPD was given and locomotor activity was recorded. It was found that the 6-OHDA lesion group failed to exhibit behavioral sensitization to MPD. The involvement of the dopaminergic afferents of PFC in behavioral sensitization to MPD is discussed.

Psychostimulant treatment for ADHD is modulated by prefrontal cortex manipulation.

The psychostimulant amphetamine (Amph) is widely used treatments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Chronic intermittent exposure to psychostimulants induces behavioral sensitization. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of prefrontal cortex (PFC) in the acute and chronic effect of Amph using the open-field assay. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned randomly to three groups, (1) an intact control group (2) a PFC sham-operated group, and (3) a PFC lesion group. All the three groups showed increases in locomotor activity after acute amphetamine injection (P<0.05), and activity levels were especially augmented in PFC lesion group. Following chronic amphetamine, the control group and sham-operated group exhibited behavioral sensitization (P<0.05). However, the PFC lesion group failed to exhibit behavioral sensitization and the pattern of locomotion was altered, which indicated that the nature of behavioral sensitization was changed. The results suggest that PFC lesion enhance the acute effects of amphetamine on locomotor activity and is required for development of behavior sensitization.

Descending glutamatergic pathways of PFC are involved in acute and chronic action of methylphenidate.

Progressive augmentation of behavioral response following repeated psychostimulant administrations is known as behavioral sensitization, and is an indicator of a drug's liability for abuse. It is known that methylphenidate (MPD) (also known as Ritalin), a drug used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), induces sensitization in animals following repeated injections. It was recently reported that bilateral electric (non-specific) lesion of prefrontal cortex (PFC) prevented MPD elicited behavioral sensitization. Since PFC sends glutamatergic afferents to both ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc), sites that are involved in induction and expression of behavioral sensitization respectively and glutamate from PFC is known to modulate dopamine cell activity in VTA and NAc, this study investigated the role of descending glutamate from PFC in MPD elicited behavioral sensitization. Locomotor activity of three groups of rats-control, sham operated and group with specific chemical lesion of glutamate neurons of PFC-was recorded using an open-field assay. On experimental day (ED) 1, the locomotor activity was recorded post a saline injection. The sham and lesion groups underwent respective surgeries on ED 2, and were allowed to recover for 5 days (from ED 3 to ED 7). The post-surgery baseline was recorded on ED 8 following a saline injection. On ED's 9 through 14, 2.5 mg/kg MPD was given, followed by a 4-day washout period (ED 15 -18). All three groups received a rechallenge injection of 2.5 mg/kg on ED 19 and their locomotor activity on various days was analyzed. It was found that ibotenic acid lesion modulated the acute and chronic effects of MPD and hence suggests that PFC glutamatergic afferents are involved in the acute effect of MPD as well as in its chronic effects such as behavioral sensitization to MPD.

Methylphenidate and amphetamine modulate differently the NMDA and AMPA glutamatergic transmission of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area.

Behavioral and neurochemical studies suggest that the induction of behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants involves transient changes at the synapses of the ventral tegmental area's dopaminergic neurons (VTA-DA). Differences in the behavioral response to amphetamine (Amph) and methylphenidate (MPD) were observed. In an attempt to understand these behavioral differences at the neuronal level, the dose-response characteristics of these two psychostimulants on electrophysiologically identified VTA-DA neurons at the glutamatergic synapse were investigated. Miniature excitatory post-synaptic currents (mEPSCs) and electrically induced EPSCs were recorded from horizontal midbrain slices of rats that had been pretreated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with saline (control), Amph (2.5, 5.0, 10.0 or 20.0 mg/kg), or MPD (2.5, 5.0, 10.0 or 20.0 mg/kg) 24 h before the recording. Perfusion of Amph through the bath (2.5, 5.0, 10.0 or 20.0 microM) increased the frequency (p<0.01) and the amplitude (p<0.05) of mEPSCs in dose-response characteristics, while MPD perfusion through the bath (2.5, 5.0, 10.0, or 20.0 microM) increased only the frequency (p<0.05) of the mEPSC. Both psychostimulants increased the prefrontal cortex's (PFC) glutamatergic EPSC in the VTA-DA neurons. However, only the higher doses of MPD induced significant effects (p<0.05) on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated EPSC but had no effects on the EPSC mediated by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA/kainate) receptors. Contrarily, Amph increased both kinds of mediated EPSC, but mainly the EPSC mediated by AMPA/kainate receptors (p<0.01). These electrophysiological differences could represent the underlying mechanism responsible for the differences of behavioral effects, such as behavioral sensitization, elicited by MPD and Amph.

Dopaminergic ventral tegmental neurons modulated by methylphenidate.

Treatment of psychostimulants leads to the development of behavioral sensitization, an augmented behavioral response to drug re-administration. The induction of behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants such as amphetamine and cocaine occurs at the ventral tegmental area's dopaminergic neurons (VTA-DA). Currently, there is limited experimental data about the physiological properties of methylphenidate (MPD) on VTA-DA neurons. Behavioral and electrophysiological experiments using male rats were performed before and after MPD treatment. The behavioral experiment included dose-response (0.6, 2.5, and 10.0 mg/kg MPD) study to select the most effective dose for the electrophysiological study. Methylphenidate increased locomotion in typical dose response characteristics. Based on this experiment, the 10.0 mg/kg MPD was used in two types of electrophysiological recordings: 1) intracellular recording of neuronal activity performed on horizontal 275-300 microm brain slices and 2) whole-cell patch clamping before and after electrical stimulation to study post-synaptic currents on neurophysiologically identified VTA-DA neurons. Methylphenidate suppressed the neuronal activity of these neurons for 210 +/- 30 sec. Stimulation of the prefrontal cortex afferent fibers to these VTA-DA neurons in the presence of TTX, saclofen, and picrotoxin led to the conclusion that this input is mediated via NMDA and kainate/AMPA receptors and may participate to induce behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants.

Opiate-like substances mediate norepinephrine-induced but not serotonin-induced antinociception at spinal level: reevaluation by an electrophysiological model of formalin test in rats.

After subcutaneous injection of formalin (5%, 50 microl) into a hindpaw of rats, biphasic excitatory nociceptive discharges were recorded extracellularly in thalamic parafascicular neurons. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of either norepinephrine (NE. 6 nmol, 10 microl) or serotonin (5-HT, 120 nmol, 10 microl) prior to the second phase significantly inhibited the second phase of the formalin-induced parafascicular nociceptive discharges. Intrathecal naloxone (Nal, 50 nmol, 10 microl) did not show any effect on the parafascicular nociceptive discharges. However, when i.t. Nal was given 5 min before NE, Nal prevented the NE antinociceptive effect. Pre-administration of Nal before 5-HT did not affect the antinociceptive effects of 5-HT on the second phase of nociceptive discharges. These results indicate that opiate-like substances are involved in the mediation of NE-induced antinociception. It is suggested that endogenous NE and 5-HT released from brainstem descending terminals at the spinal level carry out their antinociceptive actions differently.

Effects of lithium chloride on induction and expression of methylphenidate sensitization.

Repeated administration of psychomotor stimulants produces an enduring and progressively enhanced behavioral response known as behavioral sensitization, which has been implicated as a model for psychiatric disorders such as mania, schizophrenia, and drug addiction. The objective of the study was to determine whether lithium chloride (LiCl), an anti-manic agent, is effective in blocking the development and/or the expression of behavioral sensitization to methylphenidate. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=64) weighing 170-190 g were randomly divided into seven treatment groups. A computerized animal activity monitor system continuously recorded locomotor activity for 16 days. Effects of LiCl on induction of methylphenidate sensitization were studied by giving LiCl before or during six daily methylphenidate administrations. Effects of LiCl on the expression of methylphenidate sensitization were studied by injecting LiCl after sensitization to methylphenidate was induced. It was shown that LiCl treatment modulated the acute methylphenidate effects by transiently attenuating the locomotor response to methylphenidate during the six daily methylphenidate administrations but neither single nor multiple treatments with LiCl blocked the development or the expression of behavioral sensitization.

Methylphenidate sensitization is modulated by valproate.

Repeated administration of the stimulant methylphenidate (MPD) produces sensitization to its own effects. Glutamate, dopamine, and GABA have been implicated in the underlying mechanism of sensitization to stimulants such as amphetamine and cocaine. We have investigated effects of the GABAergic agent sodium valproate (VAL) on the locomotor response to MPD. Activities of male Sprague-Dawley rats were continuously recorded by a computerized activity monitoring system for 15 days. We studied the dose effect of valproate 1) at 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg (i.p.) on motor activities, 2) on the acute response of motor activities to 2.5 mg/kg MPD, and 3) on behavioral sensitization to subsequent repeated injections of MPD. Valproate alone did not significantly affect motor activities. All three doses of valproate attenuated the acute locomotor effects of MPD, while only the 50 mg/kg dose blocked the development of sensitization to subsequent administration. Possible mechanisms involving substrates for the effect of GABA agonists on sensitization are discussed.

The role of MK-801 in sensitization to stimulants.

Behavioral responses to stimulants can be progressively and persistently enhanced by their repeated administration. This phenomenon, called behavioral sensitization, may underlie substance abuse, psychosis, recurrence in bipolar disorder, or other psychiatric problems. A growing body of work has implicated excitatory amino acid systems in behavioral sensitization. Most of the evidence for a role of excitatory amino acids has come from experiments demonstrating prevention of sensitization by excitatory amino acid antagonists, especially the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801. Results of studies with MK-801 have varied, however, leading to conflicting interpretations of its relationship to behavioral sensitization. This paper critically discusses the design of experiments that have used MK-801, and interprets data from these experiments in terms of the two leading explanations for the role of MK-801: 1) that sensitization is an example of the family of plastic events that require excitatory amino acid transmission or 2) that interoceptive cues associated with MK-801 lead to state-dependent learning that modifies sensitization because, in essence, the animal does not recognize the stimulant as the same drug if it is given in close association with MK-801. Based on conflicting reports on effects of MK-801, we propose 1) strategies for distinguishing components of MK-801's effects on responses to stimulants, 2) a model that is a hybrid of the two interpretations of its effects on sensitization, and 3) experimental strategies for testing this model.

Blockade of sensitization to methylphenidate by MK-801: partial dissociation from motor effects.

The role of MK-801's locomotor effect in blocking the development of sensitization to methylphenidate was investigated utilizing a computerized locomotor activity monitoring system. After 7 days of acclimation to a 12:12 light-dark cycle (lights on at 07:00), male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=62) were housed in test cages and motor activity was recorded continuously for 16 days. The first 2 days of recording served as a baseline for each rat, and on day 3 each rat received a saline injection. On days 4 to 9 rats were randomly divided into seven groups: Rats received either six daily s.c. injections of methylphenidate (2.5 mg/kg; Group 1), or six daily i.p. injections of 0.30 mg/kg, 0.05 mg/kg MK-801 (Groups 2 and 3, respectively); two MK-801 pre-treatment groups received a single i.p. injection of 0.05, or 0.30 mg/kg MK-801 one hour prior to 2.5 mg/kg methylphenidate (n=8 each) on day 4 followed by five daily injections of 2.5 mg/kg methylphenidate; and finally, two cotreatment groups received a challenge dose of 2.5 mg/kg methylphenidate on day 4 followed by either 0.05 or 0.30 mg/kg MK-801 i.p. one hour prior to 2.5 mg/kg methylphenidate from days 5 to 9. All groups were allowed five days of no treatment before being re-challenged on day 15 with the same treatment they received on day 4. Methylphenidate and 0.30 mg/kg MK-801 sensitized to their own locomotor effects, but 0.05 mg/kg MK-801, which had no acute motor effects, did not. The administration of MK-801 (0.30 mg/kg) prior to methylphenidate either singly on day 4, or coadministered throughout the repeated methylphenidate treatment phase, blocked the development of sensitization to methylphenidate. However, MK-801 at 0.05 mg/kg delayed the development of sensitization when co-administered on days 5 to 9, but a single injection 1 h prior to methylphenidate on day 4 did not prevent sensitization to subsequent methylphenidate administration. In conclusion, MK-801 prevents sensitization to methylphenidate; motor stimulation by MK-801 is not necessary for short-term prevention or delay of sensitization to methylphenidate but may be necessary for a persistent blockade of sensitization.

Valproate modulates the expression of methylphenidate (ritalin) sensitization.

Repeated administration of amphetamine, cocaine, and methylphenidate (MPD) has been reported to elicit behavioral sensitization to their locomotor and stereotypic effects in rodents. GABAergic drugs have been shown to inhibit behavioral effects of stimulants. The objective of the present study was to determine whether single or multiple administration of sodium valproate, a GABA agonist, would prevent the expression of sensitization to the locomotor effect of MPD once it has developed. Twenty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three treatment groups: a control group received only 2.5 mg/kg MPD during the 14-day cycle, a group received a single 50 mg/kg valproate injection on Day 9, and a group received multiple 50 mg/kg valproate injection on Days 9-13. Rats were housed in test cages and behavioral activities were recorded for 14 consecutive days. All injections were given between 12:00 h and 14:00 h. Multiple injection of MPD elicited sensitization to its locomotor and stereotypic effects. Single administration of valproate did not block the expression of sensitization in the four locomotor indices measured. However, multiple administration of valproate prevented MPD sensitization to horizontal activity, total distance and number of stereotypic movements.

Norepinephrine modulates single hypothalamic arcuate neurons via alpha(1)and beta adrenergic receptors.

The effects of norepinephrine (NE) on the electrophysiological activities of single hypothalamic arcuate neurons were studied using extracellular recording of 385 neurons from 169 brain slices in rats. The results showed that: (1) of 236 neurons selected randomly and tested with NE application, 137 (58.0%) were excited, 67 (28.4%) were inhibited, and 32 (13.6%) failed to respond; (2) substitution of low Ca(2+)-high Mg(2+) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) for normal ACSF abolished the NE-induced inhibitory effect but failed to abolish the excitatory effect; (3) both the NE-induced excitatory and inhibitory effects were antagonized partly by phentolamine, prazosin, and propranolol but not by yohimbine; (4) naloxone and glibenclamide, a blocker of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive (K(ATP)) channels, blocked the NE-induced inhibitory effect; and (5) neurons that were inhibited by NE were also inhibited by morphine and cromakalim, an agonist of K(ATP) channels, and moreover, the morphine-induced inhibitory effect could be blocked by glibenclamide, while the cromakalim-induced inhibitory effect was not blocked by naloxone. These results imply that: (a) NE excites arcuate neurons through a mechanism that is insensitive to lowering the extracellular Ca(2+) suggesting a direct postsynaptic response through alpha(1)- and beta-adrenergic receptors, while NE inhibits cells through at least an inhibitory interneuron in arcuate and so is dependent on a Ca(2+)-sensitive presynaptic release mechanism; and (b) the inhibitory interneuron may be opioidergic, being excited first through alpha(1)- and beta-adrenergic receptors, after which the released opioids inhibit the neurons being recorded with an involvement of activation of K(ATP) channels. This possibility needs to be substantiated in much more detail.

Diurnal differences in sensitization to methylphenidate.

Using a computerized monitoring system, we investigated the development of motor sensitization to methylphenidate (MPD) in the rat, and determined whether sensitization was dependent on the time of drug administration. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were housed in test cages and motor activity was recorded continuously for 16 days. The first 2 days served as baseline for each rat, and on day 3 each rat received a saline injection. The locomotor response to 0.6, 2.5, or 10 mg/kg of MPD was tested on day 4, followed by 5 days of single injections of 2.5 mg/kg MPD (days 5-9). After 5 days without injection (days 10-14) rats were re-challenged (day 15) with the same doses they received on day 4. There were three separate challenge doses and four different times of administration: 08:00, 14:00, 20:00, or 02:00 h. Horizontal activity, total distance, vertical activity, stereotypic activity, and number of stereotypic movements were recorded. Sensitization to MPD was dependent on the time of administration, the motor index studied, and the challenge dose used. It was more pronounced for forward ambulation than for rearing, with no augmented response to stereotypic effects. The expression of the sensitized response was dose-dependent and mainly observed with the 0.6 and 2.5 mg/kg challenge dose groups. The development of sensitization to MPD was also time-dependent with the most robust sensitization occurring during the light phase, while no sensitization was observed during the middle of the dark phase. In addition, repeated MPD administration caused a significant increase in the amount of nocturnal forward ambulation that persisted long after cessation of drug treatment.

MK-801 blocks the development of sensitization to the locomotor effects of methylphenidate.

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided to three groups (each n = 8) and were housed in test cages where motor activity was recorded continuously for 16 days using a computerized motor activity monitoring system to determine whether repeated administration of MK-801 could block the development and/or the expression of sensitization to the locomotor effects of methylphenidate (MPD). One group of rats received six daily injections (days 4-9) of 0.30 mg/kg MK-801, followed by 5 days without injection (days 10-14) and re-challenged (day 15) with 0.30 mg/kg MK-801. The second group received a challenge dose of 2.5 mg/kg MPD (day 4) followed by 5 days of co-treatment with MK-801 (0.30 mg/kg) given 1 h prior to MPD (days 5-9). This group was then re-challenged with MPD (2.5 mg/kg) on day 15. The last group received six daily injections of 2.5 mg/kg MPD (days 4-9). They were then split into two subgroups of rats which received either no treatment (control) or five daily injections of 0.30 mg/kg MK-801 (days 10-14) before being re-challenged on day 15 with 2.5 mg/kg MPD. MK-801 sensitized to its own locomotor effects. MK-801 given after sensitization had developed (i.e., days 10-14) was able to mask the expression of a sensitized response on day 15, but the effect was only transient since the sensitized response was present 3 weeks later. Moreover, MK-801, when coadministered during the repeated treatment phase was able to block the development of a sensitized response, which suggest that NMDA receptors involved in the process of MPD sensitization.

Valproate prevents the induction of sensitization to methylphenidate (ritalin) in rats.

Repetitive exposure to methylphenidate (MPD) elicits sensitization to its locomotor effects. Drugs that affect the GABA system may modify adaptations to drug exposure. Therefore, we have examined the effect of sodium valproate, which enhances GABA function, on the development of sensitization to MPD using an automated, computerized animal activity monitoring system to record each rat's motor activities for 15 consecutive days. Rats were recorded before and after saline injection (Days 1-2) to provide baseline activity. Animals were then randomly assigned to the following three groups that received: (1) 2.5 mg/kg MPD (s.c.) for six consecutive days (Days 3-8), (2) a single dose of valproate (50 mg/kg; i.p.) 1 h prior to the first (Day 3) of six daily doses of MPD (2.5 mg/kg; s.c. ), or (3) five daily doses of valproate (50 mg/kg, i.p.) 1 h prior to MPD (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.) on Days 4-8. There was no drug treatment during the next 5 days (Days 9-13). All rats were then re-challenged with MPD (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.) on Day 14. Group 2 rats were also re-challenged with 50 mg/kg valproate followed by 2.5 mg/kg MPD 1 h later on Day 15. Administration of MPD alone produced a sensitized response. Multiple valproate injections prevented the induction of MPD-elicited sensitization in all four motor indices, while a single valproate injection prevented the induction of MPD-elicited sensitization in two of four motor indices studied. In conclusion, a single injection 50 mg/kg valproate given prior to any MPD treatment partially blocked the induction of MPD sensitization while repeated injections of valproate co-administered with MPD treatment completely prevented this effect.