Osmolality in oral supplements drives ileostomy output: Defining the Goldilocks zone.

BACKGROUND: Patients with an ileostomy often have impaired quality of life, sodium depletion, secondary hyperaldosteronism, and other organ-specific pathologies. The osmolality of oral supplements influences ileostomy output and increases sodium loss. We hypothesized the existence of an osmolality range in which fluid absorption and secondary natriuresis are optimal. METHODS: This was a single-center, quasi-randomized crossover intervention study, including patients with an ileostomy and no home parenteral support. After an 8-h fasting period, each patient ingested 500 mL of 3-18 different oral supplements and a standardized meal during the various intervention periods, followed by a 6-h collection of ileostomy and urine outputs. The primary outcome was 6-h ileostomy output. RESULTS: A total of 14 ileostomy patients with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range 38-70 years) were included. The association between osmolalities (range 5-1352 mOsm/kg) and ileostomy output forecasted an S-curve. A linear association between osmolality of oral supplements (range 290-600 mOsm/kg) and ileostomy output was identified and assessed with a mixed-effects model. Ileostomy output increased by 57 g/6 h (95% confidence interval (CI) 21-94) when the oral supplement osmolality increased by 100 mOsm/kg (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Osmolality in oral supplements correlated with ileostomy output. Our results indicate that patients with an ileostomy may benefit from increased ingestion of oral supplements with osmolalities between 100 and 290 mOsm/kg. We define this range as the Goldilocks zone, equivalent to optimal fluid and electrolyte absorption.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis as a clinical marker of health status in adult patients with benign gastrointestinal disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Body composition reflects nutritional status, disease status and progression, and treatment responses. Mounting evidence supports the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) as a non-invasive tool to assess body composition. Patients with benign gastrointestinal (GI) disease experience disease-related alterations in their body composition, and bioimpedance outcomes in patients with benign GI diseases have not previously been summarized. We aimed to evaluate BIA as a clinical body composition marker for benign GI diseases and describe its association with physical health status. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL from inception to October 2023 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021265866). Of 971 screened studies, 26 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total of 2398 adult patients with benign GI disease. The main outcome was raw impedance data. RESULTS: The most frequently reported BIA outcome was phase angle (PhA) (reported in 18 of 26 studies), followed by fat-free-mass (FFM) (reported in 13 of 26 studies). The consensus view of the included studies illustrates that BIA can be a useful tool for evaluating body composition in patients with benign GI diseases, and low PhA and FFM were associated with increased nutritional risk, abnormal physical characteristics, and increased mortality risk. CONCLUSION: To fully utilize BIA as a clinical marker of health in patients with benign GI disease, standardized protocols specific to this population are needed and prospective studies testing cut-offs and ranges, accuracy, and other raw BIA parameters for classifying disease status.

Prognosis of Patients with Bronchopulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in a Tertiary Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence.

INTRODUCTION: The European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) reports variables of prognostic significance in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (BP-NENs). The aim of this study was to investigate prognostic factors, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) for patients with typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid (AC), and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Current follow-up practices vary as the evidence is sparse, and we aimed to explore the relevance of routine bronchoscopy in follow-up. METHODS: This was a cohort study of 208 patients with BP-NENs followed at Aarhus University Hospital in 2008-2019. RFS and OS were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method for the variables such as primary tumor, primary treatment, smoking status, gender, and histological subtypes. RESULTS: The study included 153 patients with TC, 29 with AC, and 26 with LCNEC. Median follow-up was 48 months. The majority of patients (n = 191) received surgical resection, of which 22 (11%) recurred over time. Seventeen patients had nonsurgical treatment, of which 10 (59%) progressed. The 5-year OS rate was 86% for operated and 9% for nonoperated patients (p < 0.05). Patients with TC had a 5-year OS of 90% compared with 63% and 39% for AC and LCNEC, respectively. As for prognostic factors, nonsmokers did not secure a significant difference in OS compared with current/previous smokers (p = 0.51). In the follow-up period, only 2 (9%) of the 22 recurrences were found on a routine bronchoscopy. Both of these recurrences were also found by diagnostic imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment, especially, and diagnosis of TC were associated with a good prognosis. Furthermore, our data did not support routine bronchoscopy as part of a follow-up program for bronchial carcinoids.