Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID-19 vaccination prevents severe disease in most patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but immunosuppressive medications can blunt serologic response. We followed adults with IBD for >1 year post-COVID-19 vaccination to describe factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination, evaluate for a protective SARS-CoV-2 antibody level, characterize SARS-CoV-2 antibody persistence, and identify factors associated with humoral immune response durability. METHODS: Using a prospective cohort of COVID-19 immunized adults with IBD, we analyzed factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination. We evaluated for an association between SARS-CoV-2 antibody level 12 weeks postvaccination and subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection and assessed for a threshold of protection using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. We then conducted a separate analysis evaluating factors associated with persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies 52 weeks postimmunization. RESULTS: Almost half (43%) of 1869 participants developed COVID-19 after vaccination, but most infections were mild, and <1% required hospitalization. Older age and corticosteroid use were associated with a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection postvaccination (50-59 years of age vs 18-29 years of age: adjusted hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.74; steroid users vs nonusers: adjusted hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.87). Most (98%) participants had detectable antibody levels at 52 weeks postvaccination. Antibody levels at 12 weeks and number of vaccine doses were positively associated with higher antibody levels at 52 weeks, while anti-tumor necrosis factor α therapy was negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination generates an effective and durable protective response for the vast majority of adults with IBD, including vulnerable populations such as corticosteroid users and older individuals. Patients with IBD benefit from COVID-19 booster vaccination.

2.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 47(7): 102170, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37352927

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Early life exposures increase risk of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but it is unknown whether they contribute to increased risk for non-EoE eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs). We aimed to assess the association between prenatal, antenatal, and early life factors and non-EoE EGIDs. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study based in EGID Partners, an online patient-centered research network. Adults (≥18 years) with non-EoE EGIDs, caregivers of children <18 years of age with an EGID, and non-EGID adult controls were eligible. Subjects completed our Early Life Exposure Questionnaire, detailing maternal and early childhood exposures. We assessed for associations between non-EoE EGIDs and early life exposures, focusing on exposures previously evaluated in association with EoE. RESULTS: We analyzed 61 non-EoE EGID cases and 20 controls. Of the EGID cases, 14 had eosinophilic gastritis, 19 had eosinophilic enteritis, 6 had eosinophilic colitis, and 22 had multiple areas affected; additionally, 30 had esophageal involvement. Relative to controls, EGID cases were more likely to have had antenatal/perinatal pregnancy-related complications (43% vs 13%; p = 0.02), NICU admission (20% vs 0%; p = 0.03), and antibiotics in infancy (43% vs 10%; p = 0.01). With adjustment for age at diagnosis, we observed increased odds of an EGID for pregnancy complications (aOR 3.83; 95% CI: 0.99-14.9) and antibiotic use in infancy (aOR 7.65; 95% CI: 1.28-45.7). CONCLUSIONS: Early life factors, including pregnancy complications, NICU admission, and antibiotics in infancy, were associated with development of non-EoE EGIDs. The impact of early life exposures on non-EoE EGID pathogenic mechanisms should be investigated.


Assuntos
Enterite , Esofagite Eosinofílica , Gastrite , Complicações na Gravidez , Criança , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Gastrite/complicações , Gastrite/epidemiologia , Enterite/complicações , Enterite/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Esofagite Eosinofílica/epidemiologia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/etiologia , Antibacterianos
3.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 29(3): 483-486, 2023 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35830416

RESUMO

We demonstrate low rates of breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and mild course of illness following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination in a large cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients. Residence in southern United States and lower median anti-receptor binding antibody level were associated with development of COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
4.
IEEE Trans Cybern ; 53(12): 7686-7698, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36054390

RESUMO

Understanding the feedback loop that links the spatiotemporal spread of infectious diseases and human behavior is an open problem. To study this problem, we develop a multiplex framework that couples epidemic spreading across subpopulations in a metapopulation network (i.e., physical layer) with the spreading of awareness about the epidemic in a communication network (i.e., virtual layer). We explicitly study the interactions between the mobility patterns across subpopulations and the awareness propagation among individuals. We analyze the coupled dynamics using microscopic Markov chains (MMCs) equations and validate the theoretical results via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. We find that with the spreading of awareness, reducing human mobility becomes more effective in mitigating the large-scale epidemic. We also investigate the influence of varying topological features of the physical and virtual layers and the correlation between the connectivity and local population size per subpopulation. Overall the proposed modeling framework and findings contribute to the growing literature investigating the interplay between the spatiotemporal spread of epidemics and human behavior.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis , Epidemias , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Cadeias de Markov , Método de Monte Carlo
5.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 118(1): 129-137, 2023 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36114773

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may respond differently to COVID-19 immunization as compared with healthy children or adults with IBD. Those younger than 12 years receive a lower vaccine dose than adults. We sought to describe the safety and humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccine in children with IBD. METHODS: We recruited children with IBD, ages 5-17 years, who received ≥ 2 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine by a direct-to-patient outreach and at select sites. Patient demographics, IBD characteristics, medication use, and vaccine adverse events were collected. A subset of participants had quantitative measurement of anti-receptor binding domain IgG antibodies after 2-part immunization. RESULTS: Our study population included 280 participants. Only 1 participant required an ED visit or hospitalization because of an adverse event. Of 99 participants who underwent anti-receptor binding domain IgG antibody measurement, 98 had a detectable antibody, with a mean antibody level of 43.0 µg/mL (SD 67) and a median of 22 µg/mL (interquartile range 12-38). In adjusted analyses, older age ( P = 0.028) and antitumor necrosis factor monotherapy compared with immunomodulators alone ( P = 0.005) were associated with a decreased antibody level. Antibody response in patients treated with antitumor necrosis factor combination vs monotherapy was numerically lower but not significant. DISCUSSION: Humoral immune response to COVID-19 immunization in children with IBD was robust, despite a high proportion of this pediatric cohort being treated with immunosuppressive agents. Severe vaccine-related AEs were rare. Overall, these findings provide a high level of reassurance that pediatric patients with IBD respond well and safely to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Anticorpos , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Imunidade Humoral , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Necrose , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
6.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 117(3): 462-469, 2022 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35029167

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although an additional coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine dose for immunocompromised persons has been recommended in some countries, further data to guide vaccination strategies for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are urgently needed. We sought to identify factors affecting initial humoral immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines among patients with IBD. METHODS: In this prospective cohort of SARS-CoV-2 immunized patients with IBD, we evaluated associations between participant age, sex, vaccine type, medication use, and the presence of a detectable antireceptor binding domain antibody and quantitative antibody level. RESULTS: In total, 1,909 participants were included (1,123, 692, and 94 received BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S, respectively) of whom 96% achieved a positive antibody response. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with lack of antibody response were older age (P = 0.043), BNT162b2 vs mRNA-1273 (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-3.9), and combination therapy with anti-TNF and 6MP, azathioprine, or methotrexate (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4-7.3). The use of 5-aminosalicylate or sulfasalazine (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8) and ustekinumab (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.8) was associated with decreased odds of lacking antibody response. DISCUSSION: Most patients with IBD mount an initial response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, older patients and those treated with anti-TNF and immunomodulator have blunted responses and may benefit the most from an additional vaccine dose. Patients treated with other classes of immunosuppressive medications have more robust initial immune responses to vaccination. These data should inform key decisions about patient selection for additional coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine doses in patients with IBD.


Assuntos
Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Ad26COVS1 , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Imunidade Humoral/fisiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/imunologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico
7.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 28(10): 1497-1505, 2022 10 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34871388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination is recommended for all individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including those on immunosuppressive therapies; however, little is known about vaccine safety and efficacy in these patients or the impact of vaccination on IBD disease course. METHODS: We evaluated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) and the effect of vaccination on IBD disease course among participants in the PREVENT-COVID (Partnership to Report Effectiveness of Vaccination in populations Excluded from iNitial Trials of COVID) study, a prospective, observational cohort study. Localized and systemic reactions were assessed via questionnaire. Disease flare was defined by worsening IBD symptoms and change in IBD medications. Outcomes were stratified by vaccine type and IBD medication classes. RESULTS: A total of 3316 individuals with IBD received at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine. Injection site tenderness (68%) and fatigue (46% dose 1, 68% dose 2) were the most commonly reported localized and systemic AEs after vaccination. Severe localized and systemic vaccine-related AEs were rare. The mRNA-1273 vaccine was associated with significantly greater severe AEs at dose 2 (localized 4% vs 2%, systemic 15% vs 10%; P < .001 for both). Prior COVID-19 infection, female sex, and vaccine type were associated with severe systemic reactions to dose 1, while age <50 years, female sex, vaccine type, and antitumor necrosis factor and vedolizumab use were associated with severe systemic reactions to dose 2. Overall rates (2%) of IBD flare were low following vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide reassurance that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine is safe and well tolerated among individuals with IBD, which may help to combat vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine confidence.


The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine is safe and well tolerated among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Severe localized and systemic vaccine-related adverse events were rare, and rates of IBD flare were low (2%) following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination in a cohort of 3316 participants with IBD.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...