Enhancing bariatric surgery safety for patients refusing blood transfusions: a specialized protocol with comprehensive technical measures.

Bariatric surgery has become a leading treatment for obesity, with techniques such as Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) demonstrating notable success in sustained weight loss and improved quality of life. Technological advancements and improved techniques have enhanced the safety of these procedures. The surgical procedures of Jehovah's Witnesses, who refuse blood transfusions as part of their beliefs, pose unique challenges and have rarely been addressed in the context of bariatric surgery. This report aimed to investigate the safety of bariatric surgery in patients who refuse blood transfusion, with an established protocol to minimize the risk of bleeding. We examined the prospectively collected data of Jehovah's Witness patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 2019 to 2023. The surgeries were conducted following a protocol that included specific measures to prevent bleeding. Data were reviewed for demographics, anthropometrics, comorbidities, preoperative medications, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, hemoglobin level, drainage volume, tranexamic acid use, and postoperative 30-day complications. Eleven Jehovah's Witness patients underwent bariatric surgery, including 10 LSG and 1 LRYGB. A patient with iron deficiency anemia underwent intravenous iron treatment before the surgery. There were no intraoperative complications or major postoperative complications. All patients maintained stable hemodynamics postoperatively. Only one patient encountered nausea-vomiting, classified as a minor complication. One patient experienced a small amount of hemorrhagic drainage, which transitioned to serous after tranexamic acid infusion. Bariatric surgery can be performed safely with established protocols in patients who refuse blood transfusions.

Correct Stapling Technique in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Are We Increasing the Bleeding? A Prospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most common bariatric surgery procedure. Bleeding is the most common complication of this surgery and mostly occurs from the staple line. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether waiting between compression and firing during the stapling phase reduces the postoperative bleeding. Methods: A total of 325 patients who underwent LSG between April and July 2022 were analyzed prospectively. In terms of postoperative bleeding, the two groups, which we waited 30 seconds between staple firings and the no wait group, were compared. Results: The mean age of patients was 37.36 (±11.12) years and mean body mass index was 45.18 (±3.1) kg/m2. Eleven patients needed transfusion. The rate of haemorrhagic complications was 3.38% (Group 1% 6.21 and Group 2% 1.11) (P = .012). The duration of surgery was ∼10 minutes longer in the study group, which we waited (P = .0001). Conclusions: During the stapling stage in LSG, waiting between compression and firing can help reduce postoperative bleeding.

A Case Report of Malaria Infection Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

A 41-year-old woman from the Democratic Republic of the Congo underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a surgical treatment for obesity. Despite an unremarkable preoperative evaluation, the patient developed a fever and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels postoperatively. Physical examination findings, laboratory tests, and imaging studies ruled out surgical complications, leading to the consideration of infectious causes. A thorough patient history revealed a residence in a malaria-endemic region with a history of recurrent malaria episodes. In addition to her complaints, the patient developed pancytopenia. The blood smear revealed the presence of ring forms of Plasmodium falciparum in red blood cells, along with other species of Plasmodium. The rapid diagnostic test (RDT) showed a positive result for the P. falciparum antigen, a negative result for the P. vivax antigen, and a positive result for the pan-antigen. Based on these findings, a mixed malaria infection was considered for the patient, and she was transferred to an advanced infectious disease hospital for specific typing and further treatment. The patient received prompt treatment and was discharged in stable condition. Malaria could potentially be among the uncommon factors leading to fever after bariatric surgery in patients from malaria-endemic countries. Surgical stress may exacerbate the course of a malaria infection.

Sleeve gastrectomy in situsinversustotalis case.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery is a procedure that has become more common in the past 10 years. Situsinversustotalis is an extremely rare condition. SG can be performed safely in SIT patients. However, pre-operative multidisciplinary evaluation is very important. In this article, we present a 25-year-old female patient with a body mass index of 47.6 who had no idea that she had SIT until pre-operative tests revealed it. The patient was discharged on the 3rd post-operative day without any problem. We would like to emphasize the importance of imaging even if the patient does not have any disease or risk before bariatric surgery. We believe that more studies should be done with SIT and bariatric surgery.

Acute Intrathoracic Migration With Incarceration of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Due to Incomplete Hiatal Hernia Repair.

Concomitant hiatal hernia repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is recommended if it is detected. Intrathoracic sleeve migration (ITSM) is a sliding hiatal hernia that develops after LSG. In this article, we present an early ITSM due to an incomplete repair of a hiatal hernia. An obese patient had hiatal hernia in the preoperative endoscopy. After LSG, the defect was repaired with anterior cruroplasty. Vomiting attacks were observed after the operation. Based on clinical signs and radiological findings, laparoscopic exploration was indicated. During the reoperation, an acute entrapment of the upper portion of the sleeve was observed, which had migrated through the hiatus. This suture was undone. There was no gastric ischemia. No additional hiatal repair was attempted. The operation was sufficient to alleviate the symptoms. The patient was discharged on the second postoperative day uneventfully. Until the most recent follow-up, the patient has progressed with adequate weight loss, without complaints of reflux and without proton pump inhibitors ITSM with incarceration is a complication that can occur after incomplete hiatal repair. Failure to perform hiatal repair with proper technique can be attributed to this complication.

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-sparing rectal cancer surgery. Incidence and risk factors.

BACKGROUNDS: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) was defined with symptoms such as frequency, incontinence, urgency, and constipation in patients who underwent Sphincter-Sparing Rectum Surgery (SSRC). In this study, LARS rates and risk factors of the patients who underwent SSRC were Investigated. MATERIAL METHOD: The medical records of patients with SSRC at general surgery department were examined retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, neo/adjuvant chemo-radiotherapies, distal resection levels, open/laparoscopic procedures, postoperative complications, and pathological outcomes were recorded. LARS scoring system defined by Emmertsen and Laurberg was used to calculate LARS scores. RESULTS: The number of eligible patients was 129. The rectal resection was performed by either low anterior resection (LAR) or very low anterior resection (VLAR). VLAR was used to specify that had anastomosis <5cm to the anal verge. The median follow-up time was 12 (1-30) months. LARS were detected in 60 (%47) patients. LARS rates were significantly higher in the patients underwent VLAR (n: 35 9% vs. 48%<0,001). In univariate analysis, the level of distal resection, open surgeries, neoadjuvant RT, and diversion with temporary stoma were significantly different in LARS group. However, in multivariate analysis, distal resection level was the only significant risk factor for LARS. CONCLUSION: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) was frequently seen in patients who underwent sphincter-sparing rectum surgery (SSRS). It was detected that distal resection levels were the most important risk factor for the development of LARS. This result showed that LARS should not be disregarded in patients underwent SSRS. KEY WORDS: Bowel Disfunction, Cancer, Incontinence, LARS, Rectum.