The implications of antithrombotic agents on subdural hematoma evacuation: what does "reversal" truly entail?

OBJECTIVE: The optimal perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients requiring urgent neurosurgical intervention for subdural hematoma (SDH) is poorly understood. The delicate equilibrium of effective hemostasis while preventing thrombosis is complex and relies on numerous factors such as indication for and type of ATT, medical comorbidities, and extent of neurological injury. This study aimed to analyze the impact of ATT and reversal strategies on surgical outcomes to highlight current challenges in the management of these high-risk patients. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective surgical cohort analysis of 100 patients undergoing urgent SDH evacuation at a level I trauma center between March 2020 and May 2021. The patients were first stratified into two cohorts based on preoperative ATT use and then further segregated by receipt of reversal agents. Statistical analysis included the chi-square test, Welch two-sample t-test, and multivariate logistic regression. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary endpoints included radiographic SDH reexpansion, revision surgery, improvement in preoperative neurological deficits, and incidence of thromboembolism. A crossover cohort was secondarily analyzed in patients for whom ATT was interrupted for a minimum duration equal to effective drug metabolism. Finally, ATT reinitiation patterns were examined. RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 48% received ATT, 54.2% of whom were given reversal agents. ATT use was significantly associated with decreased rates of postoperative neurological improvement (p = 0.023) with trends toward increased mortality (p = 0.078), SDH reexpansion (p = 0.12), and need for revision surgery (p = 0.10). Patient crossover revealed a 4 times greater likelihood of death in patients without ATT interruption prior to surgery (p = 0.040) without an observable impact on secondary outcomes. ATT reversal contributed no improvement in outcomes other than a decreased intensive care unit length of stay when adjusted for in-hospital mortality (p = 0.014). The rate of postoperative thromboembolism following ATT reversal was 11.5%. ATT reinitiation was highly variable, occurring in 59.5% of patients, with median times of 17 and 15 days for antiplatelets and anticoagulants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of preoperative ATT portends poor clinical outcomes following nonelective SDH evacuation regardless of attempts to reverse these medications with replacement blood products. This study further reinforces the critical need for judicious use of ATT and optimization of reversal strategies in high-risk patient populations as best guided by multidisciplinary teams and evolving clinical practice guidelines.

Systematic Review of WHO Grade 4 Astrocytoma in the Cerebellopontine Angle: The Impact of Anatomic Corridor on Treatment Options and Outcomes.

Background Despite advances in multimodal oncologic therapies and molecular genetics, overall survival (OS) in patients with high-grade astrocytomas remains poor. We present an illustrative case and systematic review of rare, predominantly extra-axial World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 astrocytomas located within the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) and explore the impact of anatomic location on diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Methods A systematic review of adult patients with predominantly extra-axial WHO grade 4 CPA astrocytomas was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines through December 2022. Results Eighteen articles were included comprising 21 astrocytomas: 13 exophytic tumors arising from the cerebellopontine parenchyma and 8 tumors originating from a cranial nerve root entry zone. The median OS was 15 months with one-third of cases demonstrating delayed diagnosis. Gross total resection, molecular genetic profiling, and use of ancillary treatment were low. We report the only patient with an integrated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH-1) mutant diagnosis, who, after subtotal resection and chemoradiation, remains alive at 40 months without progression. Conclusion The deep conical-shaped corridor and abundance of eloquent tissue of the CPA significantly limits both surgical resection and utility of device-based therapies in this region. Prompt diagnosis, molecular characterization, and systemic therapeutic advances serve as the predominant means to optimize survival for patients with rare skull base astrocytomas.

Osteoporosis as a Risk Factor for Intraoperative Complications and Long-term Instrumentation Failure in Patients With Scoliotic Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review study. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the effect of osteoporosis on spine instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Osteoporosis is a common skeletal pathology that affects systemic cortical bone maintenance and remodeling. This disease accelerates the degeneration of the spine, often necessitating spinal surgery for progressive vertebral deformity, pathologic fracture, bony canal stenosis, and/or neural element decompression. There is a paucity of literature describing the role of osteoporosis as it relates to both perioperative complications and outcomes after spine fusion surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively maintained database for patients undergoing spine surgery between January 1, 2006 and October 3, 2017. Inclusion criteria included age 18 years and above and surgery performed for the correction of thoracolumbar scoliosis. Data collected included various demographic, clinical, and operative variables. RESULTS: A total of 532 patients met inclusion criteria, including 144 (27%) patients with a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis was significantly associated with increased blood volume loss (P=0.003). Postoperatively, osteoporosis was associated with increased rates of instrumentation failure (19% vs. 10%; P=0.008) and the need for revision surgery (33% vs. 16%; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed osteoporosis to be an independent risk factor for increased mean number of spinal segments fused (P<0.05), mean blood volume loss (P<0.05), rate of postoperative deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (P<0.05), rate of instrumentation failure (P<0.05), and need for revision surgery (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is a significant risk factor for instrumentation failure and need for revision surgery following arthrodesis for scoliosis correction. Furthermore, patients with osteoporosis have a significantly higher risk of intraoperative blood volume loss and postoperative thromboembolic events.

Operation "NeuroTeam": rendering the absolute best care for the most deserving patients under the most difficult conditions.

The tenets of neurosurgery worldwide, whether in the civilian or military sector, espouse vigilance, the ability to adapt, extreme ownership, and, of course, an innate drive for developing a unique set of technical skills. At a time in history when the complexity of battlefield neurotrauma climaxed coupled with a chronic shortage of military neurosurgeons, modernized solutions were mandated in order to deliver world-class neurological care to our servicemen and servicewomen. Complex blast injuries, as caused by an increased incidence of improvised explosive devices, yielded widespread systemic inflammatory responses with multiorgan damage. In response to these challenges, the "NeuroTeam," originally a unit of two neurosurgeons as deployed during Operation Desert Storm, was redesigned to instead pair a neurosurgeon with a neurointensivist and launched itself during two specialized missions in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Representing a hybridized version of present-day neurocritical care teams, the purpose of this unit was to optimize neurosurgical care by focusing on interdisciplinary collaboration in an Echelon III combat support hospital. The NeuroTeam provided unique workflow capabilities never seen collectively on the battlefield: downrange neurosurgical capability by a board-certified neurological surgeon within 60 minutes from the point of injury paired with a neurocritical care-trained intensivist. This also set the stage for intraoperative telemedicine infrastructure for neurosurgery and optimized the ability to evaluate, triage, and stabilize patients prior to medical evacuation. This novel military partnership ultimately allowed the neurosurgeon to focus on the tenets of the craft and thereby the dynamic needs of the patient first and foremost. Since the success of these missions, the NeuroTeam has evolved into a detachable unit, the "Head and Neck Team," comprising neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, and ophthalmologists, supported by a postinjury hospital unit, which includes an embedded neurocritical care physician. The creation and evolution of the NeuroTeam, necessitated by a shortage of military neurosurgeons and the dangerous shift in military wartime tactics, best exemplifies multidisciplinary collaboration and military medicine agility. As neurocritical care continues to evolve into a highly complex, distinct specialty, the lessons learned by the NeuroTeam ultimately serve as a reminder for civilian and military physicians alike. Despite the conditions and despite one's professional ego, patients with highly complex morbid neurological disease deserve expert, multidisciplinary management for survival.