A change in surgical margin: do wider surgical margins lead to decreased rates of local recurrence in T1 and T2 oral tongue cancer?

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a change in macroscopic/surgical margin width upon histological margins and loco-regional failure in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC). In 2009, the surgical margin protocol was increased from 10 mm to 15 mm. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent treatment for early OTSCC between 2009 and 2016 with a 15-mm surgical margin (n = 142), and these patients were compared to those treated between 1999 and 2008 with a 10-mm surgical margin (n = 78). There was a significant increase in the rate of clear histological margins (P < 0.001). The rates of close (P = 0.002) and involved (P < 0.001) histological margins decreased significantly. There were significant reductions in local (P < 0.001) and regional (P < 0.001) recurrence rates. This study demonstrated that a surgical margin of 15 mm delivered significantly lower rates of close/involved histological margins and improved local and regional disease recurrence in early OTSCC when compared with a surgical margin of 10 mm.

The impact of travel distance to treatment centre on oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma survival and recurrence.

There have been no prior studies examining the effect of distance to the treatment centre on oral squamous cell carcinoma outcomes in Australia. The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of travel distance on oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) outcomes. This was a retrospective analysis of 243 patients who received surgical treatment ± adjuvant therapy between 2007 and 2016. The overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and freedom from loco-regional failure (FFLRF) survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. A competing risk (CR) analysis was conducted. Patients living ≥200 km from the treatment centre, when compared with those living within 40 km, had worse OS (hazard ratio (HR) 3.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74-5.54), DSS (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.30-5.12), and FFLRF (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.22-5.01). These discrepancies were significant when adjusted for socioeconomic status (OS P < 0.001, DSS P 0.004, FFLRF P = 0.005) and in the presence of CR (OTSCC-specific death with CR 'non-disease-related death' P =0.030, FFLRF with CR 'any cause death' P = 0.013, FFLRF with CR 'OTSCC-specific death' P = 0.004). Patients with OTSCC living ≥200 km from the treatment centre were found to have worse outcomes than those living within 40 km.