Epilepsy in neurofibromatosis type 1: Prevalence, phenotype, and genotype in adults.

PURPOSE: Studies have shown an increased risk of epilepsy in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). However, most reports focus on the pediatric population. In this study, we describe the trajectory of patients with NF1 and epilepsy beyond childhood. METHODS: Patients with NF1 ≥18 years-old consecutively seen at a multidisciplinary neurofibromatosis clinic during a four-year period were prospectively enrolled and offered routine EEG, MRI, and genetic testing. The lifelong and point prevalence of epilepsy in patients with NF1 were calculated. Demographic, genetic, radiological, and clinical features found to be statistically associated with having received a diagnosis of epilepsy were incorporated into a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among 113 patients with NF1 included in this study (median age at study inclusion: 33 years), the lifelong prevalence of epilepsy was 11% (CI95%=6-18%) and point prevalence 7% (CI95%= 3-13%). Most patients (73%) were diagnosed with epilepsy before the age of 18 and achieved seizure-freedom by adulthood. At study inclusion, three-quarters of patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy had been seizure-free for more than one year and a third had resolved epilepsy. A routine EEG with epileptiform discharges had a sensitivity of 25% (CI95%=3-65) and specificity of 99% (CI95%=93-100) for identifying adult patients with NF1 and unresolved epilepsy. A history of epilepsy was associated with having a low-grade glioma (OR: 38.2; CI95%=2.2-674.7; p<0.01), learning disability (OR: 5.7; CI95%=1.0-31.5; p<0.05), and no plexiform neurofibroma (OR: 0.05; CI95%=0.0-0.8; p=0.04). No single mutation type was associated with the development of epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NF1, although resolution of epilepsy over time was observed in many cases, the prevalence of epilepsy was higher among adults with NF1 than that reported in the general population. Epileptogenesis in NF1 likely requires the combination of multiple genetic and environmental factors and suggests involvement of a network that spreads beyond the borders of a well-defined parenchymal lesion.

Systematic Comparison of Muscle Ultrasound Thickness in Polyneuropathies and Other Neuromuscular Diseases.

BACKGROUND: We have aimed to assess whether muscle thickness ultrasound (US) shows differences between patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), chronic axonal polyneuropathy (CAP), and other neuromuscular (NM) diseases compared to controls and to each other. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study from September 2021 to June 2022. All subjects underwent quantitative sonographic evaluation of muscle thickness in eight relaxed muscles and four contracted muscles. Differences were assessed using multivariable linear regression, correcting for age and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 65 healthy controls, and 95 patients: 31 with CIDP, 34 with CAP, and 30 with other NM diseases. Both relaxed and contracted muscle thickness in all patient groups were lower than in the healthy controls, after controlling for age and body mass index (BMI). Regression confirmed that the differences persisted between patient groups and healthy controls. Differences between patient groups were not apparent. CONCLUSION: The current study shows that muscle ultrasound thickness is not specific in NM disorders, but shows a global reduction in thickness compared with healthy controls after corrections for age and BMI.

Retrospective study on the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIM: Given the lack of information on safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients, we aimed to review our experience after surveying patients, as part of routine clinical practice, to ensure that advice on safety is accurate. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of MG patients from the Prosserman Family Neuromuscular Clinic at the Toronto General Hospital who received two injections of any COVID-19 vaccine from February to August 2021. Demographic data were abstracted from the patient medical records. We assessed changes in the severity of MG using the virtual Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (vMGII), the simple single question (SSQ), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). We also assessed adverse effects after vaccination. RESULTS: We included 200 patients with a mean age of 64.3 ± 13.9 y, 51.5% were men, and 82% had generalized MG. The vMGII, SSQ, and PASS scores remained stable after each vaccine dose, and at last follow-up. Of the patients, 60% reported an adverse reaction after the first injection, and 56% after the second. The most common adverse reactions reported were local pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, and fever. DISCUSSION: COVID-19 vaccinations were well tolerated in MG patients and were not associated with worsening severity of their MG. The prevalence of vaccine-related adverse reactions was the same as in the general population.