RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has been overwhelmingly applied to motor regions to date and our understanding of frontotemporal metabolic signatures is relatively limited. The association between metabolic alterations and cognitive performance in also poorly characterised. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a multimodal, prospective pilot study, the structural, metabolic, and diffusivity profile of the hippocampus was systematically evaluated in patients with ALS. Patients underwent careful clinical and neurocognitive assessments. All patients were non-demented and exhibited normal memory performance. 1H-MRS spectra of the right and left hippocampi were acquired at 3.0T to determine the concentration of a panel of metabolites. The imaging protocol also included high-resolution T1-weighted structural imaging for subsequent hippocampal grey matter (GM) analyses and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for the tractographic evaluation of the integrity of the hippocampal perforant pathway zone (PPZ). RESULTS: ALS patients exhibited higher hippocampal tNAA, tNAA/tCr and tCho bilaterally, despite the absence of volumetric and PPZ diffusivity differences between the two groups. Furthermore, superior memory performance was associated with higher hippocampal tNAA/tCr bilaterally. Both longer symptom duration and greater functional disability correlated with higher tCho levels. CONCLUSION: Hippocampal 1H-MRS may not only contribute to a better academic understanding of extra-motor disease burden in ALS, but given its sensitive correlations with validated clinical metrics, it may serve as practical biomarker for future clinical and clinical trial applications. Neuroimaging protocols in ALS should incorporate MRS in addition to standard structural, functional, and diffusion sequences.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiple Sclerosis treatment with B-cell targeted therapies may be associated with an increased incidence of headache. We aimed to find and compare the association of B-cell targeted therapies with the incidence of headache in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. METHODS: In a systematic based approach, the following databases were searched from inception until the 6th of June 2020: Pubmed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) enrolling patients with Multiple Sclerosis comparing B-cell targeted therapies (Rituximab, Ocrelizumab, Ofatumumab, Ublituximab or Cladribine) with placebo were selected for the systematic review and further meta-analysis. PRISMA guidelines were followed at all stages of the systematic review. The primary outcome was an all-cause headache of B-cell targeting therapy in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were included. Compared with placebo, treatment with B-cell targeting therapies revealed a trend in headache risk, but it was not statistically significant (Relative Risk 1.12 [95% Confidence Interval 0.96-1.30]; p = 0.15; I2 = 9.32%). Surprisingly, in a sub-group analysis, Cladribine was statistically significant for an increase in headache risk (RR 1.20 [95% CI 1.006-1.42]; p = 0.042; I2 = 0%; 3 studies with 2107 participants). CONCLUSIONS: Even though a trend is shown, B-cell targeted therapies do not correlate with an increased incidence of headache as an adverse effect. Sub-analyses revealed a significant association between Cladribine alone and an increased incidence of headache. Whereas a purinergic signaling cascade is proposed as a mechanism of action, further research is needed to unravel the underlying pathogenetic mechanism of headache induction and establish headache prevention strategies.
RESUMO
Now more than ever is the time of monoclonal antibody use in neurology. In headaches, disease-specific and mechanism-based treatments existed only for symptomatic management of migraines (i.e., triptans), while the standard prophylactic anti-migraine treatments consist of non-specific and repurposed drugs that share limited safety profiles and high risk for interactions with other medications, resulting in rundown adherence rates. Recent advances in headache science have increased our understanding of the role of calcitonin gene relate peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) pathways in cephalic pain neurotransmission and peripheral or central sensitization, leading to the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or small molecules targeting these neuropeptides or their receptors. Large scale randomized clinical trials confirmed that inhibition of the CGRP system attenuates migraine, while the PACAP mediated nociception is still under scientific and clinical investigation. In this review, we provide the latest clinical evidence for the use of anti-CGRP in migraine prevention with emphasis on efficacy and safety outcomes from Phase III and real-world studies.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Despite frequent use of fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF), studies comparing clinical efficacy and withdrawal rates of DMF and FTY concerning different pretreatment situations are rare. The aim of our study was to compare relapse occurrence and withdrawal rates of DMF and FTY in different pretreatment situations. METHODS: Patients from 4 European centers were retrospectively identified and followed until the 1st relapse after treatment start or if no relapse occurred for a maximum of 2 years. Cox regression analyses adjusted for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) disease duration, sex, and region were performed for the following pretreatment situations: treatment naive or injectables or DMF/FTY or natalizumab. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-two patients with RRMS (female/male: 2.4:1.0; DMF n = 409, FTY n = 323) were analyzed. Compared with FTY-treated patients, DMF-treated patients discontinued treatment more frequently mainly because of side effects (DMF/FTY: 29.3%/20.7%). Clinical relapses occurred in 24.5% of the patients within 24 months. Survival analysis demonstrated that compared with FTY treatment, DMF treatment was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for occurrence of relapse of 1.9 (95% CI 1.4-2.6, p < 0.001, n = 732). Stratification into pretreatment groups unmasked a higher relapse risk in DMF patients pretreated with natalizumab (aHR [95% CI] 4.5 [1.9-10.8], p = 0.001, n = 122) or to a lesser extend also in treatment-naive patients (aHR [95% CI] 1.9 [1.01-3.6], p = 0.045, n = 230). No differences were observed in patients pretreated with injectables or the respective other oral drug (injectables: p > 0.05, n = 341; other oral: p > 0.05, n = 39). CONCLUSIONS: DMF treatment was associated with higher clinical disease activity compared with FTY treatment. A subgroup analysis suggested beneficial effects of FTY in treatment-naive and patients pretreated with natalizumab.
