Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 723, 2023 Oct 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37880663

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance poses a public health threat for the treatment of community-acquired urinary tract infections. This study determined the susceptibility patterns of uropathogens and associated risk factors among outpatients diagnosed with urinary tract infections at the Kanifing General Hospital in the Gambia. METHODS: A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted among patients with suspected urinary tract infections at Kanifing General Hospital from March to May 2021. Data on socio-demographic and other risk factors were collected from the study participants using a structured pre-tested questionnaire. Mid-stream urine samples were collected, and bacteria identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing done using standard microbiological methods. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis were done to determine factors associated with urinary tract infection at 95% confidence level and a p -value < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 422 patients were enrolled with 82.5% (348/422) being females. The prevalence of community acquired urinary tract infection was 12.8% (54/422). Escherichia coli was the most prevalent isolate (74.1%, 40/54), followed by Klebsiella spp (8.5%, 10/54). Antimicrobial resistance was highest for Ampicillin (87.0%, 47/54), Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (77.8%, 42/54) and Tetracycline (75.9%, 41/54). Uropathogens sensitivity was 77.8% (42/54) for Nitrofurantoin and 75.9% (41/54) for Ceftazidime. Being female (aOR 5.90 95% CI = 1.48-23.67), previous history of urinary tract infection (aOR 2.34, 95% CI = 1.06-5.14), use of unprescribed antibiotics (aOR 2.0, 95% CI = 1.05-3.62) and having no formal education (aOR 8.02, 95% CI = 1.04-62.0) were significant factors associated for having uropathogenic bacterial infection. CONCLUSION: E. coli was the most prevalent uropathogen isolated. Ciprofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin and Ceftazidime were the most sensitive antibiotics. Routine surveillance of susceptibility of uropathogenic bacteria would be helpful to update clinicians on the choice of antibiotics.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Nitrofurantoína , Escherichia coli , Hospitais Gerais , Ceftazidima , Estudos Transversais , Gâmbia/epidemiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Bactérias , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 99(1): 115173, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32992142
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31332060

RESUMO

The mortality rate associated with Vibrio vulnificus sepsis remains high. An in vitro time-kill assay revealed synergism between tigecycline and ciprofloxacin. The survival rate was significantly higher in mice treated with tigecycline plus ciprofloxacin than in mice treated with cefotaxime plus minocycline. Thus, combination treatment with tigecycline-ciprofloxacin may be an effective novel antibiotic regimen for V. vulnificus sepsis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Tigeciclina/farmacologia , Vibrioses/tratamento farmacológico , Vibrio vulnificus/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Cefotaxima/farmacologia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Minociclina/farmacologia , Sepse/microbiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Sepse/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Vibrioses/microbiologia , Vibrioses/mortalidade , Vibrioses/patologia , Vibrio vulnificus/crescimento & desenvolvimento
4.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 13(6): e0007478, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31188821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with a third-generation cephalosporin (TGC) and a tetracycline analogue is recommended for Vibrio vulnificus infection. The combination of a TGC and ciprofloxacin has synergistic in vitro bactericidal activity against V. vulnificus. No clinical study has compared the standard regimen with TGC plus ciprofloxacin therapy for V. vulnificus infection. METHODS: Patients with a confirmed V. vulnificus infection at two medical centers in Korea from 1991 to 2016 were enrolled in this study. The patients were grouped according to the type of antibiotic administered. A retrospective propensity-score-matched case-control study of patients treated with TGC plus doxycycline or TGC plus ciprofloxacin was performed. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were confirmed to have V. vulnificus septicemia during the study, and the 30-day survival rate was 39% (85/218). The patients were classified into the following six treatment groups: TGC monotherapy (n = 82), TGC plus doxycycline therapy (n = 42), TGC plus ciprofloxacin therapy (n = 39), ciprofloxacin monotherapy (n = 14), other ß-lactam monotherapy (n = 10), and other (n = 31). The survival rates of these groups were as follows: TGC monotherapy (35%), TGC plus doxycycline (38%), TGC plus ciprofloxacin (54%), ciprofloxacin monotherapy (29%), other ß-lactam (20%), and other (39%). The 30-day survival rate showed no significant difference between the TGC plus doxycycline and TGC plus ciprofloxacin groups (log-rank test, P = 0.18). Among the 81 patients treated with TGC plus doxycycline or TGC plus ciprofloxacin, 12 per treatment group were selected by propensity-score matching. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics or the frequency of fasciotomy between the two groups. The 30-day survival rate showed no significant difference between the TGC plus doxycycline (50%) and TGC plus ciprofloxacin (67%) groups (log-rank test, P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the outcome of TGC plus ciprofloxacin therapy was comparable to that of TGC plus doxycycline therapy in patients with V. vulnificus septicemia.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Vibrioses/tratamento farmacológico , Vibrio vulnificus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , República da Coreia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vibrioses/microbiologia , Vibrio vulnificus/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...