Développement, validation et fiabilité d'un questionnaire pour l'évaluation du recours aux thérapeutes alternatifs : QuERTA.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this work were: 1) to develop and validate a questionnaire to understand several dimensions of the use of CAM practitioners in France and 2) to evaluate the test-retest reliability of each of its items. PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: Development and validation (face validity): A questionnaire was created and then analyzed by 7 experts, including 3 social scientists. Before finalization, the questionnaire was tested on a sample of 43 individuals via cognitive interviews. Test-retest reliability: 322 individuals completed the questionnaire twice (at least 9 days apart). The reliability of the 107 categorical variables that compose the questionnaire was assessed by unweighted Gwet's AC1 coefficient. RESULTS: A short and clear questionnaire, suitable for collecting the targeted information, was methodically developed. In total, excluding descriptive items characterizing the population, the questionnaire includes 114 items, 107 of which are closed and 7 open. 107 of these items are conditional. The average filling time was less than 3 minutes. Of the 107 categorical items, 1 item was associated with moderate test-retest reliability, 9 items with good reliability and 97 with very good reliability. CONCLUSION: A reliable and valid questionnaire to evaluate the use of CAM practitioners in France is available. It may allow the collection of data necessary to assess the public health issue that this phenomenon represents.

Methodological Considerations to Investigate Dosage Parameters of Intensive Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Children with Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review of RCTs.

PURPOSES: To identify and synthesize RCTs on the isolated effect of dosage parameters of upper limb Intensive Motor Rehabilitation Treatments (IMRT) of children with Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy (USCP); to identify the most frequent methodological weaknesses. METHODS: Searches were conducted until September 2018 in gray and published literature databases and supplemented by exploring the identified studies' references. Inclusion criteria applied: RCT; children aged 1.5 to 19 years with USCP; upper limb IMRT differing only from ≥1/4 dosage parameters between groups. Literature analyses conducted: qualitative and descriptive. RESULTS: We identified 461 studies. Seventeen were included: three presented a rehabilitation dosage distinction between groups in Frequency-Time, four in Intensity-Progressivity, three in Intensity-Restraint, two in Intensity-Environment and five presented ≥3 distinctions above. CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistencies were noted between USCP lifelong issues, and the short follow-ups and lack of participation assessments. Confounding factors and misstatements in Intent To Treat (ITT) analyses were identified. A meta-analysis was considered irrelevant. ABBREVIATIONS: USCP, CP: Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy, Cerebral Palsy; RCT: Randomized Controlled Trial; IMRT: Intensive Motor Rehabilitation Treatment.

Predictive factors of complementary and alternative medicine use in the general population in Europe: A systematic review.

AIM: To identify predictive factors of CAM use in the general population in Europe. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to summarize and analyse the published data on factors predictive of CAM use by the general population in Europe. The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google Scholar, PsycInfo, PubMed and the Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to August 2, 2018. We selected observational studies (case-control, cohort and cross-sectional) of adults conducted in Europe. Risk of bias was determined using the ROBINS-I tool recommended by the Cochrane Group. RESULTS: Over six thousand articles were identified of which 49 met our inclusion criteria. Twenty three studies investigated the consultation of CAM practitioners, five looked at the use of CAM products, one concerned CAM practices and twenty studied combinations of these. Female gender and self-reported chronic disease are predictive factors of CAM practitioner use. In contrast, marital status is not a predictive factor for consulting a CAM practitioner. Female gender is also a predictive factor of CAM product use. For all other factors investigated, no clear conclusions could be drawn. CONCLUSION: We found no clear specificity of the use of CAM practitioners versus conventional health practitioners. Other directions of public health research should be explored, rather than assuming that there is specificity.

[Development, validation and reliability of the CAM Practitioner Use Questionnaire (CAMP-Q)]. / Développement, validation et fiabilité d'un questionnaire pour l'évaluation du recours aux thérapeutes alternatifs : QuERTA.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this work were: 1) to develop and validate a questionnaire to understand several dimensions of the use of CAM practitioners in France and 2) to evaluate the test-retest reliability of each of its items.Purpose of research: Development and validation (face validity): A questionnaire was created and then analyzed by 7 experts, including 3 social scientists. Before finalization, the questionnaire was tested on a sample of 43 individuals via cognitive interviews. Test-retest reliability: 322 individuals completed the questionnaire twice (at least 9 days apart). The reliability of the 107 categorical variables that compose the questionnaire was assessed by unweighted Gwet's AC1 coefficient. RESULTS: A short and clear questionnaire, suitable for collecting the targeted information, was methodically developed. In total, excluding descriptive items characterizing the population, the questionnaire includes 114 items, 107 of which are closed and 7 open. 107 of these items are conditional. The average filling time was less than 3 minutes. Of the 107 categorical items, 1 item was associated with moderate test-retest reliability, 9 items with good reliability and 97 with very good reliability. CONCLUSION: A reliable and valid questionnaire to evaluate the use of CAM practitioners in France is available. It may allow the collection of data necessary to assess the public health issue that this phenomenon represents.

[Open heart surgery under acupuncture ? Decrypting a program broadcast on France 2] / Une opération à cœur ouvert sous acupuncture ? Décryptage d'une émission diffusée sur France 2

OBJECTIVES: To analyze a clip from the program ? Acupuncture, osteopathy, hypnosis: do complementary medicines have superpowers ? about acupuncture as an anesthetic for surgical procedures in China. To propose a rational explanation for the phenomena observed. To describe the processes leading a public service broadcasting channel to offer this type of content at prime time and the potential consequences in terms of public health. METHOD: Analysis using critical thinking attitudes and skills, along with a bibliographical search of Medline, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases. RESULTS: The information delivered in the television clip is ambiguous. It does not allow the viewer to form an informed opinion on the relevance of acupuncture as an anesthetic for surgical procedures. It is reasonable to assume that the clip shows surgery performed with undisclosed epidural anesthesia coupled with mild intravenous anesthesia, sometimes performed in other countries. What needs to be highlighted here is the overestimation of acupuncture added to the protocol. The media tend to exaggerate the risks and expected effects of the treatments they report on, which can lead patients to turn to unproven therapies. CONCLUSION: Broadcasting such a clip at prime time underlines the urgent need for the public and all health professionals to be trained in sorting and critically analyzing health information.

Do Robotics and Virtual Reality Add Real Progress to Mirror Therapy Rehabilitation? A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Mirror therapy has been used in rehabilitation for multiple indications since the 1990s. Current evidence supports some of these indications, particularly for cerebrovascular accidents in adults and cerebral palsy in children. Since 2000s, computerized or robotic mirror therapy has been developed and marketed. OBJECTIVES: To map the extent, nature, and rationale of research activity in robotic or computerized mirror therapy and the type of evidence available for any indication. To investigate the relevance of conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis on these therapies. METHOD: Systematic scoping review. Searches were conducted (up to May 2018) in the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and PsycINFO databases. References from identified studies were examined. RESULTS: In sum, 75 articles met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were publicly funded (57% of studies; n = 43), without disclosure of conflict of interest (59% of studies; n = 44). The main outcomes assessed were pain, satisfaction on the device, and body function and activity, mainly for stroke and amputees patients and healthy participants. Most design studies were case reports (67% of studies; n = 50), with only 12 randomized controlled trials with 5 comparing standard mirror therapy versus virtual mirror therapy, 5 comparing second-generation mirror therapy versus conventional rehabilitation, and 2 comparing other interventions. CONCLUSION: Much of the research on second-generation mirror therapy is of very low quality. Evidence-based rationale to conduct such studies is missing. It is not relevant to recommend investment by rehabilitation professionals and institutions in such devices.

Reliability of diagnosis and clinical efficacy of visceral osteopathy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the World Health Organization published benchmarks for training in osteopathy in which osteopathic visceral techniques are included. The purpose of this study was to identify and critically appraise the scientific literature concerning the reliability of diagnosis and the clinical efficacy of techniques used in visceral osteopathy. METHODS: Databases MEDLINE, OSTMED.DR, the Cochrane Library, Osteopathic Research Web, Google Scholar, Journal of American Osteopathic Association (JAOA) website, International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine (IJOM) website, and the catalog of Académie d'ostéopathie de France website were searched through December 2017. Only inter-rater reliability studies including at least two raters or the intra-rater reliability studies including at least two assessments by the same rater were included. For efficacy studies, only randomized-controlled-trials (RCT) or crossover studies on unhealthy subjects (any condition, duration and outcome) were included. Risk of bias was determined using a modified version of the quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL) in reliability studies. For the efficacy studies, the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess their methodological design. Two authors performed data extraction and analysis. RESULTS: Eight reliability studies and six efficacy studies were included. The analysis of reliability studies shows that the diagnostic techniques used in visceral osteopathy are unreliable. Regarding efficacy studies, the least biased study shows no significant difference for the main outcome. The main risks of bias found in the included studies were due to the absence of blinding of the examiners, an unsuitable statistical method or an absence of primary study outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the systematic review lead us to conclude that well-conducted and sound evidence on the reliability and the efficacy of techniques in visceral osteopathy is absent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review is registered PROSPERO 12th of December 2016. Registration number is CRD4201605286 .

Reliability of Diagnosis and Clinical Efficacy of Cranial Osteopathy: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: In 2010, the World Health Organization released benchmarks for training in osteopathy in which they considered cranial osteopathy as an important osteopathic skill. However, the evidence supporting the reliability of diagnosis and the efficacy of treatment in this field appears scientifically weak and inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: To identify and critically evaluate the scientific literature dealing with the reliability of diagnosis and the clinical efficacy of techniques and therapeutic strategies used in cranial osteopathy. METHODS: Relevant keywords were used to search the electronic databases MEDLINE, PEDro, OSTMED.DR, Cochrane Library, and in Google Scholar, Journal of American Osteopathy Association and International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine websites. Searches were conducted up to end June 2016 with no date restriction as to when the studies were completed. As a complementary approach we explored the bibliography of included articles and consulted available previous reviews dealing with this topic. STUDY SELECTION: Regarding diagnostic processes in cranial osteopathy, we analyzed studies that compared the results obtained by at least two examiners or by the same examiner on at least two occasions. For efficacy studies, only randomized-controlled-trials or crossover-studies were eligible. We excluded articles that were not in English or French, and for which the full-text version was not openly available. We also excluded studies with unsuitable study design, in which there was no clear indication of the use of techniques or therapeutic strategies concerning the cranial field, looked at combined treatments, used a non-human examiner and subjects or used healthy subjects for efficacy studies. There was no restriction regarding the type of disease. SEARCH RESULTS: In our electronic search we found 1280 references concerning reliability of diagnosis studies plus four references via our complementary strategy. Based on the title 18 articles were selected for analysis. Nine were retained after applying our exclusion criteria. Regarding efficacy, we extracted 556 references from the databases plus 14 references through our complementary strategy. Based on the title 46 articles were selected. Thirty two articles were not retained on the grounds of our exclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Risk of bias in reliability studies was assessed using a modified version of the quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability. The methodological quality of the efficacy studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Two screeners conducted these analyses. RESULTS: For reliability studies, our analysis leads us to conclude that the diagnostic procedures used in cranial osteopathy are unreliable in many ways. For efficacy studies, the Cochrane risk of bias tool we used shows that 2 studies had a high risk of bias, 9 were rated as having major doubt regarding risk of bias and 3 had a low risk of bias. In the 3 studies with a low risk of bias alternative interpretations of the results, such as a non-specific effect of treatment, were not considered. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate, consistently with those of previous reviews, that methodologically strong evidence on the reliability of diagnostic procedures and the efficacy of techniques and therapeutic strategies in cranial osteopathy is almost non-existent.