Lip repositioning with or without myotomy: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Lip repositioning is a conservative surgical method for the correction of excess gingival display (EGD) by limiting the upward retraction of the lips. Lip repositioning presents a simple method for the treatment of gummy smile. The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to assess lip repositioning, compared to lip repositioning with muscle severance for efficacy in treatment of EGD and resultant stability. METHODS: A single-blinded, controlled, parallel-group RCT was performed. Twenty patients with EGD were enrolled in the study, treated with lip repositioning with and without muscle severance. Participants were assessed for EGD reduction, changes in lip length and result stability at 3, 6 and 12 months. Additionally, pain, swelling and satisfaction, were assessed. RESULTS: Classic lip repositioning was found capable of reducing EGD by 2.73 mm (SD ± 1.281), while lip repositioning with muscle severance offered an improved reduction in EGD with a mean reduction of 3.57mm (SD ± 1.62). Lip length, swelling and pain scores were found comparable between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Lip repositioning is an effective method for treating EGD, however, muscle severance provides a more stable result at 12 months when compared to the classical technique. More studies are necessary to fully assess this procedure.

Periodontal regeneration employing gingival margin-derived stem/progenitor cells: an animal study.

AIM: This study investigated the periodontal regenerative potential of gingival margin-derived multipotent postnatal stem/progenitor cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Periodontal defects were induced at six sites in eight miniature pigs in the premolar/molar area (-4 weeks). Autologous cells isolated from the gingival margin were magnetically sorted using STRO-1 antibodies and characterized flow cytometrically for the expression of CD14, CD31, CD34, CD45, CD117 and STRO-1 surface markers. Colony formation and multilineage differentiation potential were tested. The cells were expanded and loaded on deproteinized bovine cancellous bone (DBCB) and Collagen scaffolds. Within every miniature pig, six periodontal defects were randomly treated with loaded-DBCB (test group 1), unloaded-DBCB (control group 1), loaded-Collagen scaffolds (test group 2), unloaded-Collagen scaffolds (control group 1), scaling and root planing (negative control 1) or left untreated (negative control 2). Differences in clinical attachment level (ΔCAL), probing depth (ΔPD), gingival recession (ΔGR) and radiographic defect volume (ΔRDV) between baseline and 12 weeks, as well as histological attachment level (HAL), junctional epithelium length (JE) and connective tissue adhesion (CTA) after 12 weeks were evaluated. RESULTS: Isolated cells showed stem/progenitor cell characteristics. Cell-loaded scaffolds showed higher ΔCAL, ΔPD, ΔGR, HAL and lower JE and CTA compared with unloaded scaffolds and negative controls. The sort of scaffold had no significant influence on the measured outcomes. CONCLUSION: Gingival margin-derived stem/progenitor cells show significant periodontal regenerative potential.

Local application of hyaluronan gel in conjunction with periodontal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Hyaluronic acid application has been proven to be beneficial in a number of medical disciplines. The aim of the current study was to clinically evaluate the effect of local application of hyaluronan gel in conjunction with periodontal surgery. Fourteen patients with chronic periodontitis having four interproximal intrabony defects (≥3 mm) with probing depth values >5 mm were included in this split-mouth study. Following initial nonsurgical periodontal therapy and re-evaluation, defects were randomly assigned to be treated with modified Widman flap (MWF) surgery in conjunction with either 0.8% hyaluronan gel (test) or placebo gel (control) application. Clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), gingival recession (GR), plaque index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) values were taken at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Differences between test and control sites were evaluated using a Wilcoxon signed-rank and a McNemar test. A Friedman and a Cochran test were used to test equal ranks over time. Statistically significant differences were noted for CAL and GR (P < 0.05) in favor of the test sites. No significant differences were found regarding PD, BOP, or PI values (P > 0.05). Hyaluronan gel application in conjunction with periodontal surgery appears to result in significant improvement of CAL and in a reduction in GR. Hyaluronan gel application appears to improve the clinical outcome of MWF surgery.