Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Asthma ; 58(7): 946-957, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32285714

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are frequently used as relievers for acute asthma and controllers for severe asthma. However, the relief offered by OCS is counterbalanced by adverse effects. We aimed to describe how patients perceive OCS treatment benefits and risks, and how this could affect their adherence to the treatment. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with asthma registered with Carenity, an online patient community, were invited to respond to a questionnaire containing 35 closed and 3 open questions to assess their asthma and perceptions of OCS. RESULTS: 268/300 respondents were receiving or had received OCS for asthma (58 for long-term use and 107 for short-term use). The mean age at diagnosis was 21.3 years. 66% had uncontrolled asthma (GINA control score 3 or 4). Although 42% perceived OCS to be efficacious, 46% mentioned adverse effects. Respondents were mostly satisfied with OCS (median = 7.0/10), particularly for efficacy (median = 8.0/10). Respondents reported having strategies to avoid OCS, mainly because of adverse effects. 26% of respondents had previously reduced or stopped OCS; this proportion was 22% for short-term OCS users and 36% for long-term users. 15% of the respondents not receiving long-term OCS would take the treatment without doing anything else if long-term OCS were prescribed; 42% would seek an alternative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: OCS for asthma is perceived efficient but associated with adverse effects. Patients seek alternative treatment.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/psicologia , Percepção , Administração Oral , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Dieta , Feminino , França , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Comportamento de Busca de Informação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 7(5): 1477-1487, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30685573

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma (SA) is defined by treatment intensity. The availability of national databases allows accurate estimation of the prevalence, long-term outcomes, and costs of SA. OBJECTIVE: To provide accurate information on SA, focusing on comorbidities, mortality, health care resource consumption, and associated costs. METHODS: A cohort of patients with SA identified in 2012 was extracted from a French representative claims database and followed for 3 years. Their characteristics, comorbidities, mortality, and direct costs were compared with a matched control group without asthma. RESULTS: A total of 690 patients with SA were matched to 2070 patients without asthma (mean age, 61 years; 65.7% women). The prevalence of SA was estimated to be 0.18% to 0.51% of the French adult population. Comorbidities were more frequent in patients with SA (73.9% suffered from cardiovascular disease vs 54.3% in controls; P < .001). A total of 58.7% of patients with SA used oral corticosteroids (OCS) in 2012 with a mean intake of 3.3 boxes/year/patient and 9% received ≥6 dispensings of OCS. A total of 6.7% were treated by omalizumab. Patients with SA were more frequently hospitalized (33.2% vs 19.7%; P < .001), more frequently consulted a general practitioner (97.8% vs 83.9%; P < .001) (9.8 ± 6.8 vs 6.2 ± 5.3 consultations/year; P < .001), and 31% have consulted a private respiratory physician. Compared with controls, 3-year cumulative mortality was higher in SA (7.1% vs 4.5%; P = .007). Direct medical cost was $9227 versus $3950 (P < .001) mostly driven by medication costs. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of SA in the French adult population is at least 18 of 10,000. Burden of disease is high with respect to comorbidities, mortality, and asthma-related health care resource use.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração Oral , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/economia , Asma/fisiopatologia , Asma/terapia , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
3.
BMC Med Educ ; 14: 103, 2014 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24885005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oral presentations of clinical cases by medical students during medical rounds in hospital wards are a source of anxiety and little is known about how this anxiety can be alleviated. The objective of this study was to investigate whether video-based feedback of public oral presentations can reduce anxiety in 4th year medical students. METHODS: Multicentre randomized study conducted in six intensive care units (ICU) and emergency departments (ED) in France over a 9-month period in 2012. One hundred and forty two 4th year medical students were randomized to two groups: intervention and control. Students in the intervention group were recorded while making an oral presentation of a patient during morning ward rounds, followed by video-based feedback. Students in the control group conducted presented classical oral presentations without being filmed and with no formal feedback. Anxiety levels during a public oral presentation were assessed using the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S). The primary outcome was the difference in STAI-S scores between groups at the beginning and at the end of a 3-month ICU or ED internship. RESULTS: Seventy four students were randomized to the 'video-based feedback' group and 68 were randomized to the control group. In both groups, STAI-S scores were significantly lower after 3 months of internship. However, the reduction in STAI-S scores was significantly greater in the "video-based feedback" group than in controls (-9.2 ± 9.3 vs. -4.6 ± 8.2, p = 0.024. Compared to the control group, significantly fewer students with high-level anxiety were observed in the "video-based feedback" group after 3 months of internship (68 vs. 28%, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to "usual practice", video-assisted oral feedback reduced anxiety and significantly decreased the proportion of students experiencing severe anxiety.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Retroalimentação , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Ansiedade/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Gravação em Vídeo , Adulto Jovem
4.
Anesthesiology ; 115(3): 568-74, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21795963

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After brain death, adrenal insufficiency (AI) is very common and may be one of the mechanisms that contributes to hemodynamic instability and loss of potential organ donors. However, when diagnosed by total cortisol measurement, critically ill patients may be overdiagnosed as having AI. The aims of this study were to assess the prevalence of AI when diagnosed using free cortisol measurement and the accuracy of total cortisol measurement to diagnose AI in brain-dead patients. METHODS: All consecutive brain-dead patients were included in this single-center noninterventional clinical observation study. Assessment of adrenocorticotropin, corticosteroid-binding globulin, baseline and tetracosactin-stimulated serum free and total cortisol concentrations were performed. AI was defined as a baseline free cortisol concentration ≤ 55 nM(-1) and/or Δ free cortisol ≤ 55 nM(-1). Patients were considered to have a low albumin concentration if less than 25 g · L(-1) and a low corticosteroid-binding globulin concentration if less than 27 mg · L(-1) in men or 31 mg · L(-1) in women. RESULTS: Among the 42 included patients, the incidence of AI was 83% (95% CI, 69-93%). Baseline total cortisol was correlated with baseline free cortisol, whatever the albumin or corticosteroid-binding globulin concentration. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of baseline total cortisol measurement to diagnose AI was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.81-0.98). The optimal cutoff was 485 nM(-1), providing a sensitivity and a specificity of 89% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Total baseline cortisol measurement is accurate and sufficient to diagnose AI in brain-dead patients, even if albumin or corticosteroid-binding globulin concentrations are low.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Adrenal/diagnóstico , Morte Encefálica/diagnóstico , Hidrocortisona/sangue , Insuficiência Adrenal/sangue , Hormônio Adrenocorticotrópico/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante de Órgãos , Curva ROC , Albumina Sérica/análise , Transcortina/análise , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...