Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 40(3): 358-65, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24075824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal system for lymph node (LN) staging in gastric cancer is still a subject of debate. The aim of our study was to analyse the probability of error in negative LN (pN0) gastric carcinomas when a low number of LNs were harvested using a probabilistic model. METHODS: Patients with gastric carcinoma who underwent R0 resection at three university hospitals between 2004 and 2009 were retrospectively included. A Bayesian model was used to analyse the probability of error for negative LNs (pN0) gastric carcinomas. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test were used to compare the overall and specific mortality of prognosis groups. RESULTS: Of the 291 patients included, 123 were classified as pN0 (42%). A significant correlation was found between the extent of the LN dissection performed and the number of the LNs retrieved. According to the Bayesian model the carcinomas with 9 or fewer negative lymph nodes were considered to have a high risk (HR) of misclassification, whereas patients with 10-25 LNs analysed and those with more than 26 negative lymph nodes were considered to have a moderate risk (MR) and low risk (LR), respectively. The log-rank test showed a significant improvement in the disease-specific survival for the MR pN0 (p < 0.001) and LR pN0 (p < 0.04) but not for the HR pN0 patients compared to pN1 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed probabilistic model is clinically useful for differentiating the prognosis in pN0 gastric carcinomas when an insufficient number of negative lymph nodes are retrieved.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teorema de Bayes , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Gastrectomia/métodos , Gastrectomia/mortalidade , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Espanha , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex ; 77(2): 76-81, 2012.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22672851

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no international consensus on the approach of choice for performing appendectomy. AIMS: To analyze and compare open and laparoscopic approaches in the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out on patients over 14-years-old operated on for suspected acute appendicitis between January 2007 and December 2009. Variables were: age, sex, body mass index, specialized surgeon or resident in training, progression duration, conversion rate, use of drains, abdominal cavity irrigation, macroscopic appearance of the appendix, onset time of anesthesia, ASA classification, postoperative hospital stay, resumption of intake of liquids, and complications. The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic approach (LA) and open approach (OA). RESULTS: A total of 533 patients were enrolled (290 LA and 243 OA). Onset time of anesthesia was 75 min (30-190 min) in LA vs 55 min (20-160 min) in OA (p<0,0001). COMPLICATIONS: intraabdominal abscesses in 17 LA cases vs 13 OA cases (p=0,79); surgical wound alterations in 16 LA cases vs 47 OA cases (p=0,0001); incisional hernias in 2 LA cases (1%) vs 10 OA cases (p=0,008). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital stay (3 days), resumption of intake of liquids (1 day) or readmission rate (8%). CONCLUSIONS: There are fewer surgical wound alterations and incisional hernias with the laparoscopic approach, but there is higher cost, lengthier surgery duration, and a longer learning curve. Our results cannot provide a clear indication for one approach or the other, and therefore each case must be evaluated on an individual basis.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia , Feminino , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 101(2): 117-20, 121-4, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19335047

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Controversy remains about the management of gallstone ileus. While some authors propose enterotomy, others defend the one-stage procedure (simultaneously fistula repair). The objective of the present study was to analyze management options and comparative study their results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective and descriptive study with revision of clinical stories of patients with the diagnosis of gallstone ileus between 1987 and 2008. All the following variables were recorded: dates of hospital admission, surgery and discharge, age, sex, pathological antecedents, preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis, treatment, location of the fistula and location of the obstruction. End-result variables were: postoperative complications, mortality, complications during the follow-up and biliary complications. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included of 46,648 admissions. Age, comorbidity, and intraoperative diagnosis were related with poorer short- and long-outcomes. The percentage of postoperative complications was similar for groups with and without fistula repair. Mortality was higher in the group with fistula repair (15 vs. 25%). Biliary complications were more frequent in the group without fistula repair (11 vs. 0%). Sex, location of the fistula and location of the obstruction did not be related with the prognosis. CONCLUSION: One-stage procedure is related with higher mortality rate than enterotomy alone. Nevertheless, fistula repair reduces the number of biliary complications during the follow-up.


Assuntos
Fístula Biliar/cirurgia , Colecistectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Obstrução Duodenal/cirurgia , Cálculos Biliares , Doenças do Íleo/cirurgia , Íleus/cirurgia , Fístula Intestinal/cirurgia , Doenças do Jejuno/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Fístula Biliar/complicações , Comorbidade , Obstrução Duodenal/epidemiologia , Obstrução Duodenal/etiologia , Obstrução Duodenal/terapia , Feminino , Hidratação , Humanos , Doenças do Íleo/epidemiologia , Doenças do Íleo/etiologia , Doenças do Íleo/terapia , Íleus/epidemiologia , Íleus/etiologia , Íleus/terapia , Fístula Intestinal/complicações , Intubação Gastrointestinal , Doenças do Jejuno/epidemiologia , Doenças do Jejuno/etiologia , Doenças do Jejuno/terapia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 101(2): 117-124, feb. 2009. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-74350

RESUMO

Introducción: todavía existe gran controversia sobre el mejor tratamiento del íleo biliar. Algunos autores proponen la enterotomía aislada, mientras otros defienden la reparación de la fístula bilioentérica en el mismo acto quirúrgico. El objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar las opciones terapéuticas en estos pacientes y estudiar sus resultados. Material y métodos: estudio retrospectivo y descriptivo, con revisión de las historias clínicas de los pacientes diagnosticados de íleo biliar desde 1987 hasta 2008. Se recogieron las fechas de ingreso, de intervención y del alta, edad, sexo, antecedentes patológicos, diagnóstico preoperatorio o intraoperatorio, tratamiento, lugar de la fístula y lugar de la obstrucción. Como variables de resultado se utilizaron las complicaciones postoperatorias, mortalidad, complicaciones en el seguimiento y complicaciones biliares. Resultados: se incluyeron 40 pacientes sobre 46.648 ingresos. La edad, la comorbilidad y el diagnóstico intraoperatorio se relacionaron con peores resultados a corto y largo plazo. El porcentaje de complicaciones postoperatorias fue similar para el grupo con abordaje de la fístula y para el grupo con enterotomía aislada. La mortalidad fue superior en el grupo con abordaje de la fístula (15 frente a 25%). Las complicaciones biliares fueron más frecuentes en el grupo sin abordaje de la fístula biliar (11 frente a 0%). El sexo, lugar de la fístula o el lugar de la obstrucción no demostraron diferencias. Conclusión: la cirugía en un solo tiempo se relaciona con mayor mortalidad que la enterotomía aislada. No obstante, añadir la reparación de la fístula reduce el número de complicaciones biliares en el seguimiento(AU)


Introduction: controversy remains about the management of gallstone ileus. While some authors propose enterotomy, others defend the one-stage procedure (simultaneously fistula repair). The objective of the present study was to analyze management options and comparative study their results. Material and methods: retrospective and descriptive study with revision of clinical stories of patients with the diagnosis of gallstone ileus between 1987 and 2008. All the following variables were recorded: dates of hospital admission, surgery and discharge, age, sex, pathological antecedents, preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis, treatment, location of the fistula and location of the obstruction. End-result variables were: postoperative complications, mortality, complications during the follow-up and biliary complications. Results: a total of 40 patients were included of 46,648 admissions. Age, comorbidity, and intraoperative diagnosis were related with poorer short- and long-outcomes. The percentage of postoperative complications was similar for groups with and without fistula repair. Mortality was higher in the group with fistula repair (15vs. 25%). Biliary complications were more frequent in the group without fistula repair (11 vs. 0%). Sex, location of the fistula and location of the obstruction did not be related with the prognosis. Conclusion: one-stage procedure is related with higher mortality rate than enterotomy alone. Nevertheless, fistula repair reduces the number of biliary complications during the follow-up(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fístula Biliar/complicações , Fístula Biliar/cirurgia , Colecistectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Obstrução Duodenal/epidemiologia , Obstrução Duodenal/cirurgia , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Doenças do Íleo/cirurgia , Fístula Intestinal/cirurgia , Doenças do Jejuno/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Comorbidade , Obstrução Duodenal/terapia , Hidratação , Doenças do Íleo/terapia , Íleo/cirurgia , Intubação Gastrointestinal/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 100(7): 387-92, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18808284

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: surgeon influence on colorectal cancer surgery outcomes has been repeatedly studied in the scientific literature, but conclusions have been contradictory. Here we study whether surgeon specialization is a determinant factor for outcome in these patients. The importance of propensity scores (PS) in surgical research is also studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a retrospective study was performed and medical records were reviewed for 236 patients who were intervened for colon cancer in Castellon General Hospital (Spain). Cases were divided into two groups (specialist and non-specialist surgeons), and both 5-year surveillance and disease free survival were compared. Comparisons were first made with no adjustments, and then subsequently using PS analysis. RESULTS: the initial (non-adjusted) analysis was clearly favourable for the specialist surgeon group (5-year surveillance, 64.3 vs. 79.3%, p = 0.028). After adjusting for PS no statistical significance was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: surgeon specialization had no significant impact on patient outcome after colon cancer surgery. Propensity score analysis is an important tool in the analysis of surgical non-randomized studies, particularly when events under scrutiny are rare.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Cirurgia Geral , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Especialização , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...