Bear maul craniocerebral trauma in Kashmir Valley.

Craniocerebral injuries constitute the bulk of the trauma patients in all the tertiary-care hospitals. Bear attacks as a cause of trauma to the brain and its protective covering are rare. This was a hospital-based retrospective (January 1990 to July 2005) and prospective study (August 2005 to December 2010). Craniocerebral trauma was seen in 49 patients of bear maul injuries. Loss of scalp tissue was seen in 17 patients, 13 of whom had exposed pericranium and needed split-thickness skin grafting, while 4 patients with exposed skull bones required scalp transposition flaps as an initial procedure. Skull bone fractures without associated brain injury were observed in 24 cases. Frontal bone was the site of fracture in the majority of cases (95%). Surgical intervention was needed in 18 patients for significantly depressed fractures. Three of these patients had depressed frontal bone fractures with underlying contusions and needed brain debridement and duraplasty. Injury to the brain was observed in 8 patients. Trauma to the brain and its protective coverings as a result of bear attacks is rarely known. Brain injury occurs less commonly as compared to soft tissue and bony injury. Craniocerebral trauma as a result of bear assaults has been a hitherto neglected area of trauma as the past reported incidence has been very low. Of late, the incidence and severity of such attacks has assumed grave proportions in areas adjacent to known bear habitats. An innocuous-looking surface wound might be the only presentation of an underlying severe brain trauma. Public awareness has to be generated to protect the people living in hilly areas.

Incidence and pattern of bear maul injuries in Kashmir.

BACKGROUND: Injuries due to mauling by bears are rarely reported in the literature. The high incidence of such injuries in Kashmir, India, which is a valley surrounded by dense forests and is a habitat of Asiatic Black bears, urged us to undertake such a study in our department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted both retrospectively (January 1990-July 2005) and prospectively (August 2005-December 2007). RESULTS: A total of 417 cases were recorded and all the injuries were caused by black bears alone. Majority of the patients were young to middle-aged (96.8% of cases) and predominantly males (80.33%). The incidence was highest during July to November (76.82%), and most of the attacks (97%) occurred during daytime. Soft-tissue injury occurred in all 417 cases, bones were involved in 131 (31.41%) while the visceral organs were injured in four (12.94%) patients. The face (80.57%) was most common part of the body injured, followed by the head (54.67%), and all the patients had soft-tissue injury (100%). In spite of devastating injuries caused by bear maulings, the mortality rate was only 2.39%. CONCLUSION: Injuries due to mauling by black bear occur mainly between July and November. The young and middle-aged men have a higher tendency to be wounded. The face and head were the most commonly affected sites, while visceral injuries were rare. Mortality was low, and reconstruction of many of the injuries was challenging, often necessitating a staged procedure. Those living in villages close to black bear habitats may benefit from education related to the risk and severity of the attacks in the hope of reducing the number of injuries seen.

Isolated aglossia in a six year old child presenting with impaired speech: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: The most mobile organ of the body, the tongue is associated with various congenital anomalies; most of which are in association with many other systemic abnormalities. Rarely do they occur in isolation. Isolated aglossia, that we presented, is one of the more rare presentations. CASE PRESENTATION: Our patient is a 6-year-old male child of Asiatic origin from Kashmir (India), who was physically well built and mentally sound and presented with history of impaired speech. The patient had normal velopharangeal competence but absence of tongue which was replaced by a small mucus membrane projection near the floor of oropharangeal isthmus. The patient had no difficulty in feeding or taste sensation but he was unable to pronounce lingual consonants. CONCLUSION: Isolated aglossia is very rare condition explained on the basis of growth failure of lateral lingual swellings and tubercular impar. Such patients do not usually need reconstruction of tongue; as feeding, swallowing and taste sensations are usually intact and speech cannot be improved by reconstruction. However, malocclusion of teeth needs to be taken care of.