Preservation of post-transplant lung function with aerosol cyclosporin.

Post-lung transplant use of aerosol cyclosporin (ACsA) is considered by examining the relationship between deposited aerosol dose and effect. In a sub-study of placebo controlled trials of ACsA as a rejection prophylaxis, 15 drug subjects received aerosol dose quantification tests to gage their ability to effectively deposit the nebulised drug in their transplanted lung(s). A total of seven placebo subjects received mock deposition tests. The deposited doses and mock doses were compared to changes in the forced expiratory volume in one second, at six time points during the 2-yr trial period (ACsA was started within 6 weeks post-transplant). Linear relationships were demonstrated between deposited dose and improvement in lung function in the drug subjects at all intervals. Mock dose data from placebo subjects did not demonstrate similar correlation. Based on these results, subjects were grouped by dose and compared. Subjects depositing > or = 5 mg of the drug in the periphery of their transplant(s) had improving pulmonary function on average. Low-dose and placebo subjects demonstrated declines, more A2-A4 rejection events in the latter portion of the trial, and more chronic rejection beyond the end of the trial. A dose-to-effect relationship is demonstrated for aerosol cyclosporin in terms of pulmonary function and biopsy proven rejection.

Aerosol cyclosporin therapy in lung transplant recipients with bronchiolitis obliterans.

The majority of patients who develop bronchiolitis obliterans, after lung transplantation, die within 2-3 yrs after onset since treatment with conventional immunosuppression is typically ineffective. A case/control study was conducted in lung transplant recipients with biopsy-documented bronchiolitis obliterans to determine whether aerosol cyclosporin use contributed to increased survival. The cases comprised 39 transplant recipients who received open-label aerosol cyclosporin treatment in addition to conventional immunosuppression. The controls were transplant recipients treated with conventional immunosuppression alone. There were 51 controls from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and 100 from a large multicentric database (Novartis Lung Transplant Database). Forced expiratory volume in one second expressed as a percentage of the predicted value was an independent predictor of survival in all patients with bronchiolitis obliterans. Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed a survival advantage for aerosol cyclosporin cases compared to the Pittsburgh control group. A survival advantage was also seen when comparing study cases to multicentric controls. Aerosol cyclosporin, given with conventional immunosuppression to lung transplant recipients with bronchiolitis obliterans, provides a survival advantage over conventional therapy alone.

Improving drug delivery from medical nebulizers: the effects of increased nebulizer flow rates and reservoirs.

Drug delivery from jet nebulizers can be considered in terms of the dose inhaled and the respirability of that dose. It is proposed that dose respirability and dose per breath can be controlled through specification of the driving gas flowrate, and that the dose inhaled per breath can also be increased through the use of nebulizer reservoirs. When a Hudson Micromist nebulizer was used and assessments of respirability were made utilizing phase Doppler interferometry, it was noted that the portion of the spray mass in droplet sizes of

Neutrophils, unopposed neutrophil elastase, and alpha1-antiprotease defenses following human lung transplantation.

Neutrophils are sequestered in the newly transplanted lung after reperfusion or with infection, rejection, and chronic graft dysfunction. Because unopposed (free) neutrophil elastase (NE) released into bronchoalveolar secretions may injure the lung allograft and impair bacterial clearance, we assessed total neutrophil numbers, myeloperoxidase activity as an index of neutrophil influx and degranulation, alpha1-antiprotease (alpha1-AP) concentrations, and unopposed NE activity in bronchoalveolar secretions from lung transplant recipients. Unopposed NE activity was present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from recipients transplanted for emphysema associated with alpha1-AP deficiency as well as recipients without such deficiency (171 of 2,137 BALF; 8%). Ten of 17 (59%) recipients with alpha1-AP deficiency who were followed for at least 1 yr after transplant with multiple surveillance and diagnostic bronchoscopies had at least one BALF containing unopposed NE, usually associated with the presence of > or = 10(5) colony forming units/ml BALF of aerobic bacteria. In contrast, 19 of 58 (33%) with emphysema not associated with alpha1-AP deficiency, 8 of 32 (25%) recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF), 6 of 16 (38%) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and 11 of 36 (31%) with other indications for transplant had unopposed NE in BALF. alpha1-AP levels were significantly elevated in the early posttransplant time period and could be augmented considerably in alpha1-AP-deficient recipients with episodes of infection or rejection. Our findings indicate that unopposed NE activity can be found in both alpha1-AP-deficient and alpha1-AP-sufficient recipients after transplantation, usually in association with endobronchial bacterial infection.

Rejection after organ transplantation: a historical review.

Progress toward understanding the biochemical basis of human individuality spans centuries, but tissue rejection remains the primary clinical challenge of organ transplantation. This article highlights the chronology of scientific discoveries made in the quest to overcome the rejection associated with transplantation. The purposes of this review are to raise clinicians' awareness of the advances in surgery, genetics, immunology, and immunosuppression that have contributed to the current knowledge of tissue rejection and to indicate potential new directions in this challenging field.

Balloon dilation and endobronchial stent placement for bronchial strictures after lung transplantation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of balloon dilation and endobronchial stent placement for bronchial fibrous stenoses and bronchomalacia after lung transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bronchial dilation and/or stent placement was performed on 25 lung transplant recipients. Indications included severe dyspnea with postobstructive pneumonia (n = 24) and respiratory failure (n = 1). All patients underwent pulmonary function testing (PFT) before and after bronchial dilation, the results of which were evaluated for changes. A total of 63 procedures were performed between February 1996 and December 1998. Thirty-five lesions were treated (18 were due to bronchomalacia, 17 were due to fibrosis). Areas treated included the left mainstem bronchus (n = 11), bronchus intermedius (n = 10), right mainstem bronchus (n = 7), left upper lobe bronchus (n = 4), right lower lobe bronchus (n = 2), and right middle lobe bronchus (n = 1). Bronchoscopic and/or bronchographic follow-up ranged from 1 to 34 months (mean, 15 months). RESULTS: Six-month primary patency of stents placed for bronchomalacia was 71% (10 of 14), with three of the four occlusions caused by mechanical failure of Palmaz stents in the mainstem bronchi. Six-month primary patency for treatment of fibrous strictures was 29%. Secondary patency at 1 year was 100% for both bronchomalacia and fibrous strictures. After treatment, there was a significant improvement in mean PFT results (P = .01-.0001). There was one acute complication, obstruction of the left lower lobe bronchus by a Wallstent treated by dilating a hole in the side of the stent. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon dilation and stent placement are safe and effective for bronchial strictures and bronchomalacia after lung transplantation, resulting in significant improvement in PFT results. However, there is almost universal restenosis in patients treated for fibrous strictures necessitating reintervention for prolonged patency.

Empyema complicating successful lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and etiology of empyema complicating successful lung transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: University medical center transplant service. PATIENTS: All recipients (n = 392) of single-lung, double-lung, and heart-lung transplantation between May 1984 and April 1997. RESULTS: Of the 392 transplant recipients, empyema was documented in 14 patients (3.6%) at a mean time (+/- SD) of 46 days after transplantation (range, 14 to 167 days). Of these 14 recipients with empyema, 4 recipients (28.6%) died of infectious complications related to empyema. Empyema was seen secondary to Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and saprophytic organisms; however, there was no predominance of a particular organism recovered from the empyemic fluid (chi2 = 0.53; p = 0.75). The development of empyema was not related to whether the transplant was performed secondary to a septic or nonseptic lung disorder (chi2 = 1.06; p = 0.67), nor was it related to the type of transplant procedure performed (ie, single-lung, double-lung, or heart-lung allografts; chi2 = 4.39; p = 0.30). CONCLUSION: Empyema, a relatively uncommon complication of lung transplantation, is not related to the type of allograft received or to whether the recipient had a septic or a nonseptic lung disorder. If empyema does occur, the mortality associated with this infection is substantial.

Lung transplantation for end-stage pulmonary sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a multi-system granulomatous disease which can cause significant pulmonary morbidity and occasionally be fatal. The long term benefit of lung transplantation for this disorder are unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review was made of nine single lung transplant procedures performed at the University of Pittsburgh between March 1991 and March 1995 in patients with end-stage lung disease secondary to sarcoidosis. Two contemporaneous groups of recipients receiving transplants for COPD (n = 30) and inflammatory lung disease (n = 13) served as control groups. Surviving recipients underwent sequential surveillance bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsy. RESULTS: All recipients survived beyond post-operative day (POD) 30, with 5 recipients currently alive. One year survival for this group was 6/9 (67%). Eight of the 9 sarcoidosis recipients had sequential lung biopsy procedures. Five of these 8 recipients (62.5%) had recurrence of granulomata in the lung allograft with the mean time to diagnosis of recurrent sarcoidosis being POD 224.2 +/- 291.3 (range POD 21-719). None of these 5 recipients had radiographic evidence or clinical symptoms related to granulomatous inflammation in the allograft. Pre-operative and post-operative spirometric values were available on 8 recipients. Vital capacity significantly improved in all recipients from 1.54 +/- 0.43 litres to 2.55 +/- 0.63 litres by POD 180 and was maintained through the fourth postoperative year (p < 0.05 Wilcoxon Signed Rank). Spirometric values were also compared before and after transplantation in the 5 recipients with granulomata in the allograft. Vital capacity significantly improved in these 5 recipients from 1.53 +/- 0.48 litres to 2.71 +/- 0.71 litres by POD 180 and was maintained throughout the first postoperative year (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon Signed Rank). The prevalence of high grade acute cellular rejection [ACR (histologic grades III and IV)] did not differ from that seen in a contemporaneous group of 30 single lung recipients who received allografts for COPD (p < 0.05 Mann-Whitney U), nor when compared to a group of 13 single lung recipients who received allografts for immunologically mediated lung disease (p < 0.05 Mann-Whitney U). The prevalence of chronic rejection (histologic obliterative bronchiolitis [OB]) in the sarcoidosis recipients was 4/8 (50%). In the controls with COPD recipients the prevalence of OB was 10/30 (33.3%), and in the 13 controls with immunologic disease it was 6/13 (46.2%). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of OB between the sarcoidosis recipients and controls. When analyzed to the fifth year after transplantation, freedom from the development of OB also failed to differ between these 3 groups (p = 0.25, Logrank, Mantel-Cox). CONCLUSIONS: Although granulomatous inflammation in the lung allograft is common following transplantation for sarcoidosis, it is not clinically or radiographically relevant. In addition, the prevalence of high grade ACR and histologic OB is no different when compared to other single lung recipients. For these reasons lung transplantation is a viable alternative for end-stage lung disease secondary to sarcoidosis.

Pulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To define the prevalence of colonization and infection of the lower respiratory tract (LRT) with Aspergillus in lung transplant recipients with and without cystic fibrosis (CF). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Large university lung transplant center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The postoperative course of 31 CF and 53 non-CF double lung or double lobar transplant recipients receiving allografts from April 1991 to February 1996 was reviewed. All recipients were subjected to surveillance bronchoscopy and biopsy at predetermined intervals and when clinically indicated. BAL fluid (BALF) and biopsy material were examined by appropriate fungal culture and staining techniques. Infection was defined by the finding of tissue-invasive disease on biopsy specimens. RESULTS: Seven of the 31 CF recipients (22%) had Aspergillus isolated from cultures of sputum prior to transplantation. Following transplantation, 15 CF recipients (48%) had Aspergillus isolated from either sputum or BALF, including 4 of the 7 recipients identified with the fungus prior to transplantation. By contrast, 21 of the 53 non-CF recipients (40%) had Aspergillus isolated from the LRT following transplantation, none having had the fungus isolated prior to transplantation. The prevalence of Aspergillus did not differ between these groups (p = 0.51). Infections with Aspergillus occurred in 4 of the CF recipients (27%) and did not differ from the 3 infections (14%) identified in the non-CF recipients (p = 0.36). However, three of the four infections in the CF recipients involved the healing bronchial anastomosis and occurred prior to postoperative day 60. All three of these recipients had Aspergillus preoperatively. Postoperative infection was more common in the CF recipients having Aspergillus preoperatively than in those CF recipients without preoperative Aspergillus (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Isolation of Aspergillus from the LRT following double lung transplantation is common and generally not associated with tissue-invasive disease. Those CF recipients with Aspergillus isolated in cultures of sputum preoperatively are at risk for postoperative infections with this agent. The healing bronchial anastomosis is particularly vulnerable.

Allograft colonization and infections with pseudomonas in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of pseudomonal infection, colonization, and inflammation in the allograft of lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF) as compared with recipients with other end-stage lung disease. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: University medical center transplant service. PATIENTS: All patients with CF and chronic pseudomonal infection (n=62) and patients with nonseptic end-stage lung disease (n=52) receiving a double lung transplant between October 1983 and March 1996. RESULTS: Fifty lung transplant recipients with CF survived beyond postoperative day (POD) 15 and were subject to sequential bronchoscopy with BAL. Forty-four CF lung transplant recipients had Pseudomonas isolated from the allograft by median POD 15 as compared with 21 non-CF lung transplant recipients (p<0.001) with isolation at median POD 158 (p<0.0001). Thirteen CF lung transplant recipients had histologic evidence of infection when Pseudomonas was isolated as compared with only three of the non-CF lung transplant recipients (p<0.01). These infections occurred earlier in the CF lung transplant recipients (median POD 10 vs 261) (p<0.01). When compared with non-CF lung transplant recipients, CF lung transplant recipients with Pseudomonas isolated but without concomitant histologic infection (colonized) were demonstrated to have increased number of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) in the BAL fluid recovered from the allograft (17.66+/-24.94 x 10(6) cells vs 3.46+/-4.73 x 10(6)) (p<0.05). Non-CF lung transplant recipients who became colonized with Pseudomonas also had a greater number of PMNs recovered when compared with non-CF lung transplant recipients who did not have Pseudomonas (22.32+/-34.00 x 10(6) cells vs 0.21+/-0.18 x 10(6)) (p<0.01). Nine of 32 (28%) lung transplant recipients with CF have died from pseudomonal allograft infections, but this is no greater than 4 of 21 (19%) deaths related to Pseudomonas infection in recipients without CF (p=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Isolation of Pseudomonas from the lung allograft occurs more frequently and earlier after transplantation in recipients with CF. While infections related to Pseudomonas also occur more frequently in recipients with CF, there is no increase in mortality. There is an intense inflammatory response in the lung allograft associated with the isolation of Pseudomonas in recipients with and without CF.

Use of aerosolized colistin sodium in cystic fibrosis patients awaiting lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) who are awaiting lung transplant, prolonged exposure to systemic antibiotics has frequently led to airway colonization with resistant isolates of Pseudomonas. This resistance limits the arsenal of effective antimicrobials available for infections after the initiation of immunosuppression and has been considered a theoretical deterrent to lung transplantation. METHODS: Twenty CF transplant candidates with "pan-resistant" Pseudomonas received maintenance antibiotic therapy with aerosolized colistin sodium (75 mg b.i.d.), and intravenous antibiotics were eliminated. Ten other CF candidates did not use colistin sodium. Sputum cultures and antibiotic sensitivities were followed every 3-6 weeks. RESULTS: All 20 candidates (100%) who used aerosolized colistin sodium became colonized with sensitive isolates of Pseudomonas in an average of 45.1+/-20.2 days. In contrast, only 3 of 10 CF transplant candidates (30%) who did not use colistin sodium later became colonized with sensitive isolates. The mean time to spontaneous emergence of sensitive organisms was 144.6+/-48.0 days in candidates who did not use colistin sodium and was significantly longer than in the candidates who used colistin sodium (P=0.007). The occurrence of redeveloping sensitive isolates of Pseudomonas was significantly greater in the candidates who used colistin sodium (P<0.05). Of the candidates who used colistin sodium, six have been transplanted at our institution. In five of these six recipients (83.3%) bacterial cultures taken from the explanted lungs continued to demonstrate sensitive organisms. CONCLUSION: Aerosolized colistin sodium may be a useful therapy to promote emergence of sensitive microbes in CF candidates with pan-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas.

Dose-related reversal of acute lung rejection by aerosolized cyclosporine.

This study evaluated the effectiveness of aerosolized cyclosporine as rescue therapy for refractory acute rejection in lung-transplant patients that is unresponsive to conventional therapy. Over 2 yr, nine allograft recipients with histologic evidence of persistent acute rejection and worsening pulmonary function were enrolled. Twenty-two patients with similar degrees of unremitting rejection served as historical controls. Aerosolization of cyclosporin A (300 mg in 4.8 ml propylene glycol) using an AeroTech II jet nebulizer was instituted daily for 12 consecutive days followed by a maintenance regimen of 3 d/wk. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus blood and plasma levels were maintained within therapeutic ranges throughout this trial. Efficacy was assessed by histologic grade of rejection, interleukin-6 (IL-6) mRNA expression by graft bronchoalveolar lavage cells, and pulmonary function testing before and during cyclosporine therapy. In seven patients, results were correlated to deposition of cyclosporine aerosol in the allograft(s) as measured by radioisotopic techniques. At a mean of 37 d after initiation of aerosolized cyclosporine, graft histology improved in eight of the nine patients. Cellular IL-6 mRNA expression decreased significantly in seven patients (mean IL-6/actin +/- SD, 40.96 +/- 118 versus 0.33 +/- 0.57 [p = 0.038]). Pulmonary function (FEV1), which had decreased posttransplant (over a mean of 347 d of observation) from a best value of 1.98 +/- 0.8 L to 1.59 +/- 0.6 L (p = 0.0077), improved over time (152 d) to a posttransplant value of 1.90 +/- 0.8 (p = 0.025). In the control subjects, FEV1 inexorably declined over a comparable period of observation (best posttransplant value 2.36 +/- 0.86 to 1.32 +/- 0.53, p < 0.0001). There was a strong correlation between cyclosporine deposition in the allograft and improvement in FEV1 (r = 0.900, p < 0.01). Fewer cycles of pulsed corticosteroids (1.4 +/- 0.9 versus 0.2 +/- 0.4, p = 0.011) and anti-thymocyte globulin 0.8 +/- 0.4 versus 0, p = 0.018) and reduced doses of oral prednisone (10.8 +/- 3.1 versus 6.1 +/- 4.2 mg/d, p = 0.026) were observed during treatment with aerosolized cyclosporine. Episodes of pneumonia also were reduced significantly during aerosol therapy (2.6 versus 0.95 episodes/100 d, p = 0.029). Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity did not occur, and no patients withdrew from the study. Aerosolized cyclosporine appears to be safe and effective therapy for refractory acute rejection, but confirmation by a larger, randomized trial is necessary. The correlation observed between deposition of cyclosporine aerosol and physiologic improvement of lung function suggests that there is a dose-response relationship between the concentration of cyclosporine in the allograft and immunologic tolerance.

Treatment of refractory acute allograft rejection with aerosolized cyclosporine in lung transplant recipients.

Lung transplant recipients who have persistent acute cellular rejection are at increased risk for the development of chronic rejection, the leading cause of reduced long-term survival. This study evaluated the use of aerosolized cyclosporine as rescue therapy for unremitting acute rejection. Between June 1993 and March 1996, 18 patients with rejection that failed to resolve after therapy with pulse steroids and antilymphocyte globulin were enrolled in the study. Aerosolized cyclosporine A (300 mg) treatment was initiated for 10 consecutive days followed by a maintenance regimen of 3 days per week. Efficacy was assessed by graft histologic and pulmonary function testing. With the use of linear regression, results in these patients were compared with those in 23 control patients, matched for histologic acute rejection, who had continued to receive conventional rescue therapy. Two patients were unable to tolerate the treatments and were withdrawn from the study. Significant improvement in histologic rejection occurred in 14 of the remaining 16 patients after a mean of 37 days of aerosolized cyclosporine therapy. Measures of forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (change in percent predicted/100 days plus or minus the standard error) increased over time in the treated patients whereas the condition of control patients declined despite repeated attempts at conventional rescue (forced vital capacity, aerosolized cyclosporine group, 4.6 +/- 2.9 vs control group -8.1 +/- 1.9, p = 0.001; forced expiratory volume in 1 second, aerosolized cyclosporine group, 2.1 +/- 4.4 vs control group -9.8 +/- 2.6, p = 0.043). Renal and hepatic toxicity during cyclosporine therapy was not observed. The incidence of acute histologic rejection (> or = A2) decreased from 2.49 +/- 0.68 episodes/100 days before aerosolized cyclosporine therapy to 0.72 +/- 0.3 episodes/100 days (p < 0.05). In summary, aerosolized cyclosporine is a safe and effective therapy for acute rejection that has failed to improve with conventional treatment.

Spirometry values in stable lung transplant recipients.

To clarify the usefulness of spirometry to assess the function of the lung allograft post-transplant, we retrospectively reviewed 351 sequential spirometry measurements performed by 65 healthy recipients after the 80th postoperative day when the clinical evaluation and fiberoptic bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage excluded significant rejection or infection in the allograft. The mean coefficients of variation (CV) and significant values for change (SC) for the FVC, FEV1, and FEF25-75% were calculated according to the type of transplant procedure (heart-lung and double-lung [HL-DL] versus single-lung [SL]), and to the time after transplant when the spirometry measurements were obtained < or = 1 yr versus > 1 yr). The SC for the FVC decreased with time after transplantation for both HL-DL (< or = 1 yr: 17% versus > 1 yr: 7%) and SL recipients (< or = 1 yr: 13% versus > 1 yr: 8%). The higher degree of variability within the first year was primarily due to increasing values especially in the HL-DL recipients. The SC for the FEV1 also decreased over time for HL-DL recipients (< or = 1 yr: 18% versus > 1 yr: 9%) but was similar for SL recipients at both intervals (13%). Our results suggest that decreases of > or = 11% in FVC or 12% in FEV1 in HL-DL recipients and > or = 12% in FVC or 13% in FEV1 for SL recipients indicate a significant decrease in allograft function that may be due to infection or rejection.

Lung and heart-lung transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh.

The application of lung transplantation as a treatment modality for patients with severe pulmonary disease has changed dramatically since its inception. At the University of Pittsburgh, the criteria for recipient selection continues to evolve and, in an effort to maximize scarce donor organs, the criteria for donor lung acceptance have been extended. Patient survival during the first 3 years after transplantation continues to improve but longer term survival is limited by infectious complications and chronic rejection. In early studies, the utilization of cyclosporine delivered directly to the lungs via aerosol has resulted in dramatic improvement in pulmonary function in recipients with immune mediated allograft injury and has allowed a reduction in systemic immunosuppression. We are hopeful that interventions such as this will result in prolongation of patient survival with less toxicity.

Lung transplantation for respiratory failure resulting from systemic disease.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation for pulmonary failure resulting from systemic disease is controversial. We reviewed our transplant experience in patients with sarcoidosis, scleroderma, lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and graft-versus-host disease. METHODS: This retrospective review examined the outcome of 23 patients who underwent pulmonary transplantation for these systemic diseases. Group 1 included 15 patients with pulmonary hypertension who underwent transplantation (9 for sarcoidosis, 6 for scleroderma), and group 2 included 8 patients with normal pulmonary artery pressures who underwent transplantation (5 for lymphangioleiomyomatosis, 3 for graft-versus-host disease). The incidences of infection and rejection, pulmonary function, and survival were measured and compared with those of patients who underwent transplantation for isolated pulmonary disease. RESULTS: Although there were no differences in the rate of infection between patients who underwent transplantation for systemic versus isolated disease, patients with pulmonary hypertension who underwent transplantation for systemic disease had significantly lower rates of rejection. Four patients with sarcoidosis and 2 with lymphangioleiomyomatosis demonstrated recurrence in the allograft. Survival was similar between patients who underwent transplantation for systemic versus isolated disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with respiratory failure resulting from these systemic diseases can undergo transplantation with outcomes comparable to those obtained in patients who undergo transplantation for isolated pulmonary disease.

Aerosolized cyclosporine in lung recipients with refractory chronic rejection.

This study evaluated aerosolized cyclosporine as rescue therapy for lung transplant recipients with unremitting chronic rejection. Nine patients with histologic active obliterative bronchiolitis and progressively worsening airway obstruction refractory to conventional immune suppression received aerosolized cyclosporine. Improvement in rejection histology was seen in seven of nine patients. We compared the changes in the FVC and FEV1 over time using linear regression analysis in these seven histologic responders and nine historical control patients. During the pretreatment period for both the experimental and control groups, the FVC and FEV1 declined at comparable rates. After aerosolized cyclosporine there was stabilization of pulmonary function, whereas in the controls there was continued decline. Cyclosporine blood levels were less than 50 ng/ml 24 h after an aerosolized dose of 300 mg in five patients receiving oral tacrolimus. Nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and a greater than expected rate of infection was not observed. This study suggests that aerosolized cyclosporine is safe and may be effective therapy for refractory chronic rejection in lung transplant recipients.

Lung transplantation: implications for the general internist.

The modern era of lung transplantation was ushered in on the wings of discoveries in new immunosuppressive agents and surgical technique. It has allowed those with end-stage organ disease to have a second chance at life. Even though still in its youth relative to other solid organ transplants, it is gaining momentum and promises to be a continuing area of growth and development. Although over 2,700 lung transplants have been done in the last 13 years worldwide, the lack of availability of donor organs is the major factor slowing the rapid expansion of this field of endeavor. Primary care physicians may have an impact on this problem by raising the awareness for organ donation in their patients and patients' families. Although initially performed almost exclusively for those with pulmonary vascular disease, indications have now expanded to include interstitial disease, septic lung disease, and emphysema, with the latter being the major reason for transplantation today. Unfortunately, at experienced institutions with long waiting lists, 20% or more of candidates do not survive to transplantation. With proper care and selection of transplant candidates it is hoped that more will survive to benefit from this treatment. The primary care physician will likely be assuming a greater role in the management of transplant candidates as their numbers increase. The care of transplant recipients, although often complex, is frequently rewarding. For the most part it is performed at transplant centers, but a role for the recipient's local physician in this process is also growing in the era of managed care. This chapter has also highlighted how the recipient's local physician can participate in postoperative care. Strict attention needs to be paid to any and all signs of organ rejection or infection because both can have devastating consequences. Awareness of the medications used in this population, their side effects, and drug interactions is essential. Despite the recent advances in pharmacologic therapy, organ rejection continues to be problematic. This is especially the case with the entity of chronic rejection because it frequently fails to respond long-term to therapy and accounts for a significant percentage of late mortality. Although infections continue to be the primary cause of both early and late mortality in these recipients, proper care and postoperative prophylaxis can lessen the incidence. Likewise, early and aggressive treatment of infections in recipients can be lifesaving. Despite all the potential problems, patients receiving lung transplants are living longer and return to productive lives. Between 50% and 60% are now living between 3 and 4 years, and one can only anticipate that this will continue to climb as our understanding of infections, medications, and the body's immunoregulatory system improves. As techniques for donor organ allocation and organ preservation improve, it is hoped that all those with end-stage lung disorders may have the opportunity to benefit from this expanding technology.