Preservation of the Innate Immune Response to Clostridioides difficile Infection in Hospitalized Immunocompromised Patients.

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) immune response is influenced by the innate and adaptive (humoral) immune systems. Our prior research found attenuated humoral responses to C difficile in immunocompromised hosts (ICHs) with CDI. We sought to evaluate whether the innate immune response to CDI was influenced by ICH status. Methods: We conducted a prospective study of hospitalized adults with CDI (acute diarrhea, positive C difficile stool nucleic acid amplification testing [NAAT], and decision to treat), with and without immunosuppression and measured a panel of cytokines (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], interleukin [IL]-10, IL-15, IL-1ß, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α) in blood and stool at CDI diagnosis. Results were compared with measurements from a cohort of asymptomatic carrier patients (ASCs) (NAAT positive, without diarrhea) with and without immunocompromise. Results: One hundred twenty-three subjects (42 ICHs, 50 non-ICHs, 31 ASCs) were included. Median values for blood and stool cytokines were similar in ICH versus non-ICH CDI subjects. In blood, G-CSF, IL-10, IL-15, IL-6, and IL-8 were higher in both groups of CDI subjects versus the ASC cohort (P < .05). In stool, IL-1ß and IL-8 were higher in both groups of CDI subjects versus the ASC cohort (P < .05). Median stool concentrations of IL-1ß demonstrated significant differences between the groups (ICHs, 10.97 pg/mL; non-ICHs, 9.71 pg/mL; and ASCs, 0.56 pg/mL) (P < .0001). Conclusions: In this small exploratory analysis, ICH status did not significantly impact blood and fecal patterns of cytokines in humans at the diagnosis of CDI, suggesting that the innate immune response to C difficile may be conserved in immunocompromised patients.

Baseline stool toxin concentration is associated with risk of recurrence in children with Clostridioides difficile infection.

BACKGROUND: In adults with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), higher stool concentrations of toxins A and B are associated with severe baseline disease, CDI-attributable severe outcomes, and recurrence. We evaluated whether toxin concentration predicts these presentations in children with CDI. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of inpatients aged 2-17 years with CDI who received treatment. Patients were followed for 40 days after diagnosis for severe outcomes (intensive care unit admission, colectomy, or death, categorized as CDI primarily attributable, CDI contributed, or CDI not contributing) and recurrence. Baseline stool toxin A and B concentrations were measured using ultrasensitive single-molecule array assay, and 12 plasma cytokines were measured when blood was available. RESULTS: We enrolled 187 pediatric patients (median age, 9.6 years). Patients with severe baseline disease by IDSA-SHEA criteria (n = 34) had nonsignificantly higher median stool toxin A+B concentration than those without severe disease (n = 122; 3,217.2 vs 473.3 pg/mL; P = .08). Median toxin A+B concentration was nonsignificantly higher in children with a primarily attributed severe outcome (n = 4) versus no severe outcome (n = 148; 19,472.6 vs 429.1 pg/mL; P = .301). Recurrence occurred in 17 (9.4%) of 180 patients. Baseline toxin A+B concentration was significantly higher in patients with versus without recurrence: 4,398.8 versus 280.8 pg/mL (P = .024). Plasma granulocyte colony-stimulating factor concentration was significantly higher in CDI patients versus non-CDI diarrhea controls: 165.5 versus 28.5 pg/mL (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher baseline stool toxin concentrations are present in children with CDI recurrence. Toxin quantification should be included in CDI treatment trials to evaluate its use in severity assessment and outcome prediction.

Stool Interleukin-1ß Differentiates Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) From Asymptomatic Carriage and Non-CDI Diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the understanding and diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), clinical distinction within the colonization-infection continuum remains an unmet need. METHODS: By measuring stool cytokines and antitoxin antibodies in well-characterized cohorts of CDI (diarrhea, nucleic acid amplification test [NAAT] positive), non-CDI diarrhea (NCD; diarrhea, NAAT negative), asymptomatic carriers (ASC; no diarrhea, NAAT positive) and hospital controls (CON; no diarrhea, NAAT negative), we aim to discover novel biological markers to distinguish between these cohorts. We also explore the relationship of these stool cytokines and antitoxin antibody with stool toxin concentrations and disease severity. RESULTS: Stool interleukin (IL) 1ß, stool immunoglobulin A (IgA), and immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-toxin A had higher (P < .0001) concentrations in CDI (n = 120) vs ASC (n = 43), whereas toxins A, B, and fecal calprotectin did not. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUCs) for IL-1ß, IgA, and IgG anti-toxin A were 0.88, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively. A multipredictor model including IL-1ß and IgA anti-toxin A achieved an ROC-AUC of 0.93. Stool IL-1ß concentrations were higher in CDI compared to NCD (n = 75) (P < .0001) and NCD + ASC+ CON (CON, n = 75) (P < .0001), with ROC-AUCs of 0.83 and 0.86, respectively. Stool IL-1ß had positive correlations with toxins A (ρA = +0.55) and B (ρB = +0.49) in CDI (P < .0001) but not in ASC (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Stool concentrations of the inflammasome pathway, proinflammatory cytokine IL-1ß, can accurately differentiate CDI from asymptomatic carriage and NCD, making it a promising biomarker for CDI diagnosis. Significant positive correlations exist between stool toxins and stool IL-1ß in CDI but not in asymptomatic carriers.

Stool Toxin Concentration Does Not Distinguish Clostridioides difficile Infection from Colonization in Children Less Than 3 Years of Age.

In a prospective cohort study, stools from children <3 years with and without diarrhea who were Clostridioides difficile nucleic acid amplification test-positive underwent ultrasensitive and quantitative toxin measurement. Among 37 cases and 46 controls, toxin concentration distributions overlapped substantially. Toxin concentration alone does not distinguish C. difficile infection from colonization in young children.

Analysis of Intestinal Mycobiota of Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection among a Prospective Inpatient Cohort.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a burden to health care systems worldwide. Gut microbiota dysbiosis associated with CDI has been well accepted. However, contribution of fungal mycobiota to CDI has recently gained research interest. Here, we report the gut mycobiota composition of 149 uniquely well characterized participants from a prospective clinical cohort and evaluate the discriminating ability of gut mycobiota to classify CDI and non-CDI patients. Fecal samples were divided into two groups: (i) CDI (inpatients who had clinically significant diarrhea and positive nucleic acid amplification testing [NAAT] and received subsequent CDI therapy, n = 58) and (ii) non-CDI, which can be further divided into three subgroups: (a) carrier (inpatients with positive stool NAAT but without diarrhea; n = 28); (b) diarrhea (inpatients with negative stool NAAT; n = 31); and (c) control (inpatients with negative stool NAAT and without diarrhea; n = 32). Fecal mycobiota composition was analyzed by internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) sequencing. In comparison to non-CDI patients, CDI patients tend to have gut mycobiota with lower biodiversity, weaker fungi correlations, and weaker correlations between fungi and host immune factors. Notably, 11 genera (Saccharomyces, Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cystobasidium, Cladosporium, and so on) were significantly enriched in non-CDI patients, and Pichia and Suhomyces were enriched in patients with CDI, while 1 two genera, Cystobasidium and Exophiala, had higher abundance in patients with diarrhea compared with CDI (linear discriminant analysis [LDA] > 3.0; P < 0.05). Ascomycota and Basidiomycota (or Candida and Saccharomyces) exhibited a strong negative correlation (r ≤ -0.714 or r ≤ -0.387; P < 0.05), and the ratios of Ascomycota to Basidiomycota or genera Candida to Saccharomyces were dramatically higher in CDI patients than in non-CDI patients (P < 0.05). A disease-specific pattern with much weaker fungal abundance correlations was observed in the CDI group compared to that in the non-CDI and diarrhea groups, suggesting that these correlations may contribute to the development of CDI. Our findings provided specific markers of stool fungi that distinguish CDI from all non-CDI hospitalized patients. This study's potential clinical utility for better CDI diagnosis warrants further investigation. IMPORTANCE Clostridioides difficile is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen that causes a serious and potentially life-threatening infection of the human gut. It remains an existing challenge to distinguish active infection of CDI from diarrhea with non-CDI causes. A few large prospective studies from recent years suggest that there is no single optimal test for the diagnosis of CDI. Previous research has concentrated on the relationship between bacteria and CDI, while the roles of fungi, as a significant proportion of the gut microbial ecosystem, remain understudied. In this study, we report a series of fungal markers that may add diagnostic values for the development of a more systematic approach to accurate CDI diagnosis. These results help open the door for better understanding of the relationship between host immune factors and the fungal community in the context of CDI pathogenesis.

Higher In Vivo Fecal Concentrations of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B in Patients With North American Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Type 1/Ribotype 027 Strain Infection.

Ultrasensitive, quantitative Clostridioides difficile stool toxin measurement demonstrated significantly higher concentrations of toxins A and B in patients infected with the North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1/ribotype 027 (NAP-1/027) strain compared with other strains, providing in vivo confirmation of the in vitro association between NAP-1/027 and elevated toxin production.

Ultrasensitive and Quantitative Toxin Measurement Correlates With Baseline Severity, Severe Outcomes, and Recurrence Among Hospitalized Patients With Clostridioides difficile Infection.

BACKGROUND: Stool toxin concentrations may impact Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) severity and outcomes. We correlated fecal C difficile toxin concentrations, measured by an ultrasensitive and quantitative assay, with CDI baseline severity, attributable outcomes, and recurrence. METHODS: We enrolled 615 hospitalized adults (≥18 years) with CDI (acute diarrhea, positive stool nucleic acid amplification testing, and decision to treat). Baseline stool toxin A and B concentrations were measured by single molecule array. Subjects were classified by baseline CDI severity (4 scoring methods) and outcomes within 40 days (death, intensive care unit stay, colectomy, and recurrence). RESULTS: Among 615 patients (median, 68.0 years), in all scoring systems, subjects with severe baseline disease had higher stool toxin A+B concentrations than those without (P < .01). Nineteen subjects (3.1%) had a severe outcome primarily attributed to CDI (group 1). This group had higher median toxin A+B (14 303 pg/mL [interquartile range, 416.0, 141 967]) than subjects in whom CDI only contributed to the outcome (group 2, 163.2 pg/mL [0.0, 8423.3]), subjects with severe outcome unrelated to CDI (group 3, 158.6 pg/mL [0.0, 1795.2]), or no severe outcome (group 4, 209.5 pg/mL [0.0, 8566.3]) (P = .003). Group 1 was more likely to have detectable toxin (94.7%) than groups 2-4 (60.5%-66.1%) (P = .02). Individuals with recurrence had higher toxin A+B (2266.8 pg/mL [188.8, 29411]) than those without (154.0 pg/mL [0.0, 5864.3]) (P < .001) and higher rates of detectable toxin (85.7% versus 64.0%, P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: In CDI patients, ultrasensitive stool toxin detection and concentration correlated with severe baseline disease, severe CDI-attributable outcomes, and recurrence, confirming the contribution of toxin quantity to disease presentation and clinical course.

Humoral Immune Response to Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B in Hospitalized Immunocompromised Patients With C difficile Infection.

BACKGROUND: The humoral immune response to Clostridioides difficile toxins in C difficile infection (CDI) is incompletely characterized in immunocompromised hosts (ICHs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of hospitalized adults with CDI, with and without immunosuppression (hematologic malignancy, active solid tumor, solid organ or stem cell transplant, inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune disease, congenital or acquired immunodeficiency, asplenia, chronic receipt of high-dose steroids, or receipt of immunosuppressing medications within 12 months). Serum and stool antibody concentrations of immunoglobulin (Ig)M, IgG, and IgA to C difficile toxins A and B at treatment days 0, 3, and 10-14 were compared. RESULTS: Ninety-eight subjects (47 ICH; 51 non-ICH) were enrolled. Baseline serum antitoxin A and B antibody levels were similar. At day 3, ICHs demonstrated lower serum levels of antitoxin A IgG, antitoxin A IgA, and antitoxin B IgA (all P < .05). At day 10-14, lower antitoxin A IgG concentrations were observed in ICHs (ICH, 21 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] units; interquartile range [IQR], 16.4-44.6) compared with non-ICH subjects (49.0 ELISA units; IQR, 21.5-103; P = .045). In stool, we observed lower concentrations of antitoxin B IgA antibodies at baseline and at day 3 for ICH subjects, with a notable difference in concentrations of antitoxin B IgA at day 3 (ICH, 6.7 ELISA units [IQR, 1.9-13.9] compared with non-ICH, 18.1 ELISA units [IQR, 4.9-31.7]; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The ICHs with CDI demonstrated lower levels of C difficile antitoxin antibodies in serum and stool during early CDI therapy compared with non-ICHs. These data provide insight into the humoral response to CDI in ICHs.

Integrating gut microbiome and host immune markers to understand the pathogenesis of Clostridioides difficile infection.

Clostridioides difficile (C.difficile) infection is the most common cause of healthcare-associated infection and an important cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. A comprehensive understanding of C.difficile infection (CDI) pathogenesis is crucial for disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Here, we characterized gut microbial compositions and a broad panel of innate and adaptive immunological markers in 243 well-characterized human subjects (including 187 subjects with both microbiota and immune marker data), who were divided into four phenotype groups: CDI, Asymptomatic Carriage, Non-CDI Diarrhea, and Control. We found that the interactions between gut microbiota and host immune markers are very sensitive to the status of C.difficile colonization and infection. We demonstrated that incorporating both gut microbiome and host immune marker data into classification models can better distinguish CDI from other groups than can either type of data alone. Our classification models display robust diagnostic performance to differentiate CDI from Asymptomatic carriage (AUC~0.916), Non-CDI Diarrhea (AUC~0.917), or Non-CDI that combines all other three groups (AUC~0.929). Finally, we performed symbolic classification using selected features to derive simple mathematic formulas that explicitly quantify the interactions between the gut microbiome and host immune markers. These findings support the potential roles of gut microbiota and host immune markers in the pathogenesis of CDI. Our study provides new insights for a microbiome-immune marker-derived signature to diagnose CDI and design therapeutic strategies for CDI.

Fecal Mycobiota Combined With Host Immune Factors Distinguish Clostridioides difficile Infection From Asymptomatic Carriage.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although the role of gut microbiota in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has been well established, little is known about the role of mycobiota in CDI. Here, we performed mycobiome data analysis in a well-characterized human cohort to evaluate the potential of using gut mycobiota features for CDI diagnosis. METHODS: Stool samples were collected from 118 hospital patients, divided into 3 groups: CDI (n = 58), asymptomatic carriers (Carrier, n = 28), and Control (n = 32). The nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer 2 was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform to assess the fungal composition. Downstream statistical analyses (including Alpha diversity analysis, ordination analysis, differential abundance analysis, fungal correlation network analysis, and classification analysis) were then performed. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in alpha and beta diversity between patients with CDI and Carrier (P < .05). Differential abundance analysis identified 2 genera (Cladosporium and Aspergillus) enriched in Carrier. The ratio of Ascomycota to Basidiomycota was dramatically higher in patients with CDI than in Carrier and Control (P < .05). Correlations between host immune factors and mycobiota features were weaker in patients with CDI than in Carrier. Using 4 fungal operational taxonomic units combined with 6 host immune markers in the random forest classifier can achieve very high performance (area under the curve ∼92.38%) in distinguishing patients with CDI from Carrier. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides specific markers of stool fungi combined with host immune factors to distinguish patients with CDI from Carrier. It highlights the importance of gut mycobiome in CDI, which may have been underestimated. Further studies on the diagnostic applications and therapeutic potentials of these findings are warranted.

Absence of Toxemia in Clostridioides difficile Infection: Results from Ultrasensitive Toxin Assay of Serum.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is caused by Toxins A and B, secreted from pathogenic strains of C. difficle. This infection can vary greatly in symptom severity and in clinical presentation. Current assays used to diagnose CDI may lack the required sensitivity to detect the exotoxins circulating in blood. The ultrasensitive single molecule array (Simoa) assay was modified to separately detect toxin A and toxin B in serum with a limit of detection at the low picogram level. When applied to a diverse cohort, Simoa was unable to detect toxins A or B in serum from patients with CDI, including many classified as having severe disease. The detection of toxin may be limited by the inference of antitoxin antibodies circulating in serum. This result does not support the hypothesis that toxemia occurs in C. difficile infection, conflicting with the findings of other published reports.

Host Immune Markers Distinguish Clostridioides difficile Infection From Asymptomatic Carriage and Non-C. difficile Diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Recent data indicate that Clostridioides difficile toxin concentrations in stool do not differentiate between C. difficile infection (CDI) and asymptomatic carriage. Thus, we lack a method to distinguish a symptomatic patient with CDI from a colonized patient with diarrhea from another cause. To address this, we evaluated markers of innate and adaptive immunity in adult inpatients with CDI (diagnosed per US guidelines), asymptomatic carriage, or non-CDI diarrhea. METHODS: CDI-NAAT patients had clinically significant diarrhea and positive nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) and received CDI treatment. Carrier-NAAT patients had positive stool NAAT but no diarrhea. NAAT-negative patients (with and without diarrhea) were also enrolled. A panel of cytokines and anti-toxin A and B immunoglobulin (Ig) were measured in serum; calprotectin and anti-toxin B Ig A/G were measured in stool. NAAT-positive stool samples were tested by an ultrasensitive toxin assay (clinical cutoff, 20 pg/mL). RESULTS: Median values for interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), MCP-1, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and IgG anti-toxin A in blood and IgA/G anti-toxin B in stool were significantly higher in CDI patients compared with all other groups (P < .05). Concentration distributions for IL-6, GCSF, TNF-α, and IgG anti-toxin A in blood, as well as IgA and IgG anti-toxin B in stool, separated CDI patients from all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Specific markers of innate and adaptive immunity distinguish CDI from all other groups, suggesting potential clinical utility for identifying which NAAT- and toxin-positive patients with diarrhea truly have CDI.

Laxative Use Does Not Preclude Diagnosis or Reduce Disease Severity in Clostridiodes difficile Infection.

BACKGROUND: To optimize utility of laboratory testing for Clostridiodes difficile infection (CDI), the 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America-Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA-SHEA) clinical practice guidelines recommend excluding patients from stool testing for C. difficile if they have received laxatives within the preceding 48 hours. Sparse data support this recommendation. METHODS: Patients with new-onset diarrhea (≥3 bowel movements in any 24-hour period in the 48 hours before stool collection) and a positive stool C. difficile nucleic acid amplification test were enrolled. Laxative use within 48 hours before stool testing, severity of illness (defined by 4 distinct scoring methods), and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: 209 patients with CDI were studied, 65 of whom had received laxatives. There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients meeting severe CDI criteria by 4 severity scoring methods in patients receiving versus not receiving laxatives (66.2% vs 56.3%, respectively; P = .224) by IDSA-SHEA, the primary scoring system. Similar rates of serious outcomes attributable to CDI, including death, intensive care unit admission, and colectomy, were observed in the laxative and no laxative groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found similar rates of severe CDI and serious CDI-attributable clinical outcomes in CDI-diagnosed patients who did or did not receive laxatives. Precluding recent laxative users from CDI testing, as proposed by the IDSA-SHEA guideline, carries a potential for harm due to delayed diagnosis and treatment.