A Description of IVIG Use in Term Neonates with ABO Incompatibility.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if treatment with IVIG of neonates with ABO incompatibility (without Rh incompatibility) results in decreased number of packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions and phototherapy use. STUDY DESIGN: An Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, single-institution retrospective study was conducted. Neonates ≥38 weeks' gestational age born between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016, with ABO incompatibility were included. The comparison among groups was performed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables; continuous variables were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty-eight neonates with ABO incompatibility met inclusion criteria, 579 were included in the analyses. From these, 431 (74%) neonates had positive Direct Antiglobulin Test (DAT); 98 (17%) received IVIG and 352 (61%) received phototherapy. Thirty-six (6%) neonates received pRBC and 6 (1%) required exchange transfusions. Only 3 (0.5%) infants received pRBC transfusions postdischarge, by 3 months of age. Neonates requiring IVIG had lower initial hemoglobin (13.6 vs. 16.0 g/dL, p ≤ 0.0001) and higher bilirubin at start of phototherapy (9.1 vs. 8.1 mg/dL, p = 0.0064). From the 42 (7%) neonates who received simple and exchange transfusions, IVIG use was not associated with decreased use or number of transfusions (p = 0.5148 and 0.3333, respectively). Newborns with A+ and B+ blood types had comparable initial hemoglobin, DAT positivity, APGAR, and bilirubin. However, infants with B+ blood group were more likely (than A + ) to require phototherapy (p < 0.001), receive IVIG (p = 0.003), and need phototherapy for a longer duration (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this large retrospective study reveal that giving IVIG to neonates with ABO incompatibility was associated with increased simple or exchange transfusions. Newborns with B+ blood type required more phototherapy and IVIG. Further studies are needed to better stratify neonates who would benefit from IVIG use in order to optimize treatment strategies and avoid unnecessary risks and adverse events. KEY POINTS: · IVIG use not associated with decreased use of pRBC or exchanges.. · Phototherapy duration associated with increased IVIG and pRBC use.. · Newborns with B+ blood type had worse hemolytic anemia..

Vactosertib, a novel TGF-ß1 type I receptor kinase inhibitor, improves T-cell fitness: a single-arm, phase 1b trial in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Functional blockade of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß) signaling pathway improves the efficacy of cytotoxic and immunotherapies. We conducted a phase 1b study to determine the safety, efficacy, and maximal tolerated dose (200 mg po bid) of the potent, orally-available TGF-ß type I receptor kinase inhibitor vactosertib in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma patients who had received ≥2 lines of chemoimmunotherapy. Vactosertib combined with pomalidomide was well-tolerated at all doses, had a manageable adverse event profile and induced durable responses with 80% progression-free survival (PFS-6) at 6 months, while pomalidomide alone historically achieved 20% PFS-6. Following treatment, the immunosuppressive marker PD-1 expression was reduced on patient CD8+ T-cells. Following ex vivo treatment, vactosertib decreased PD-1 expression on patient CD138+ cells, reduced PD-L1/PD-L2 on patient CD138+ cells and enhanced the anti-myeloma activity of autologous T-cells. Taken together, vactosertib is a safe immunotherapy that modulates the T-cell immunophenotype to reinvigorate T-cell fitness. Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous hematologic malignancy characterized by the excessive proliferation of clonal plasma cells (1, 2). MM remains mostly incurable but a small group of patients can achieve long-term remission (3). Treatment of MM presents unique challenges due to the complex molecular pathophysiology and genetic heterogeneity (4, 5). Given that MM is the second most common blood cancer characterized by cycles of remission and relapse, the development of new therapeutic modalities is crucial (6, 7). The prognosis for MM patients has improved substantially over the past two decades with the development of more effective therapeutics, e.g., proteasome inhibitors, and regimens that demonstrate greater anti-tumor activity (8-10). The management of RRMM represents a vital aspect of the overall care for patients with disease and a critical area of ongoing scientific and clinical research (10-12).

Are NCI Cancer Centers Providing Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer Focused Clinical Services? A National Survey.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate the current services and delivery models of adolescent and young adult oncology (AYAO)-specific programs at NCI-designated Cancer Centers (NCI-CCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: NCI, academic, and community cancer centers were electronically sent surveys from October to December 2020 and administered via REDCap. RESULTS: Survey responses were received from 50 of 64 (78%) NCI-CCs, primarily completed by pediatric oncologists (53%), adult oncologists (11%), and social workers (11%). Half (51%) reported an existing AYAO program, with most (66%) started within the past 5 years. Although most programs combined medical and pediatric oncology (59%), 24% were embedded within pediatrics alone. Most programs saw patients aged 15 (55%) to 39 years (66%) mainly via outpatient clinic consultation (93%). Most centers reported access to a range of medical oncology and supportive services, but dedicated services specifically for adolescent and young adults (AYAs) were available at a much lower extent, such as social work (98% vs 58%) and psychology (95% vs 54%). Although fertility preservation was offered by all programs (100%), only two-thirds of NCI centers (64%) reported providing sexual health services to AYAs. Most NCI-CCs (98%) were affiliated with a research consortium, and a lesser extent (73%) reported collaboration between adult and pediatric researchers. Nearly two-thirds (60%) reported that AYA oncology care was important/very important to their respective institution and reported providing good/excellent care to AYAs with cancer (59%), but to a lesser extent reported good/excellent research (36%), sexual health (23%), and education of staff (21%). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this first-ever national survey to assess AYAO programs showed that only half of NCI-CCs report having a dedicated AYAO program, and that areas of improvement include staff education, research, and sexual health services for patients.