RESUMO
BackgroundSeveral studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 omicron is an immune escape variant and current vaccines and infection with pre-omicron variants provide limited protection against BA.1. Meanwhile, however, omicron BA.2 has become the dominant variant in many countries and has replaced BA.1. As BA.2 has several mutations especially in the receptor binding and the N terminal domain compared to BA.1, we analyzed whether BA.2 shows further immune escape relative to BA.1. MethodsWe characterized neutralization profiles against the new BA.2 omicron variant in plasma samples from a variety of individuals with different numbers of exposures to infection/vaccination, including samples from previously virus-naive, BA.2 omicron-infected individuals. To illustrate antigenic differences of the two omicron sub-variants and pre-omicron variants we performed antigenic cartography and generated antibody landscapes. ResultsUnvaccinated individuals after a single exposure to BA.2 had limited cross-neutralizing antibodies to pre-omicron variants and to BA.1. Consequently, our antigenic map, which included all Variants of Concern and both BA.1 and BA.2 omicron sub-variants, showed that both omicron sub-variants are distinct to pre-omicron variants, but that the two omicron variant are also antigenically distinct from each other. The antibody landscapes illustrate that cross-neutralizing antibodies against the whole antigenic space, as described in our maps, are generated only after three or more exposures to antigenically close variants but also after two exposures to antigenically distinct variants. ConclusionsHere, we describe the antigenic space inhabited by the relevant SARS-CoV-2 variants, the understanding of which will have important implications for further vaccine strain adaptations.
RESUMO
It is uncertain to which extent antibody and T-cell responses after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 are associated with reduced risk of breakthrough infection and whether their measurement enhances risk prediction. We conducted a phase-4 open-label clinical trial in the pre-omicron era, enrolling 2,760 individuals aged [≥]16 years 35{+/-}8 days after having received the second dose of BNT162b2 (baseline 15-21 May 2021). Over a median 5.9-month of follow-up, we identified incident SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections using weekly antigen tests, a confirmatory PCR test, and/or serological evidence for incident infection. We quantified relative risks adjusted for age, sex, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for different immunological parameters and assessed improvements in risk discrimination. In contrast to the T-cell response, higher plasma levels of binding antibodies and antibodies in a surrogate neutralization assay were associated with reduced risk of breakthrough infection. Furthermore, assessment of anti-spike IgG levels enhanced prediction of breakthrough infection and may therefore be a suitable measurable correlate of protection in practice.
RESUMO
Recently, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant B.1.1.529 (Omicron) has been described. Here, we analyze titers of neutralizing antibodies of sera from convalescent or vaccinated individuals against the new B.1.1.529 variant and compared them with titers against other Variants of Concern (B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1617.2) using replication competent SARS-CoV-2 variants. We found that sera from vaccinated individuals neutralized the B.1.1.529 variant to a much lesser extent than any other variant analyzed. Neutralization capacity against B.1.1.529 was maintained best against sera from super immune individuals (infected and vaccinated or vaccinated and infected).
