Evaluación oftalmológica de pacientes con úlcera de pie diabético / Ophthalmologic evaluation of patients with diabetic foot ulcer

Introducción: La prevalencia de diabetes aumenta paulatinamente a nivel mundial y con ello, se incrementa el riesgo de complicaciones microvasculares como la retinopatía diabética. El riesgo de ceguera se reduce con control metabólico estable, diagnóstico temprano y tratamiento adecuado. Objetivo: Comparar el resultado del examen oftalmológico realizado antes de iniciar el tratamiento con Heberprot-P, con el realizado a los cinco meses de iniciado, a diferentes dosis. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, retrospectivo, en 77 pacientes incluidos en cuatro ensayos clínicos de Heberprot-P. Se realizó análisis de las variables examen oftalmológico antes y después del tratamiento, tipo de diabetes y años de evolución. Resultados: Se observó predominio de los diabéticos tipo 2 respecto a los tipo 1 en una razón 11:1, con una media de 16,3 años de evolución de la diabetes. La mitad de los pacientes tenían retinopatía diabética no proliferativa, con predominio de la forma leve, en el examen realizado antes del tratamiento con Heberprot-P. Solo un paciente anciano con otras comorbilidades, desarrolló una retinopatía diabética proliferativa, luego de un examen previo en que se observó retinopatía diabética no proliferativa y edema macular diabético. Conclusiones: La aparición o progresión de retinopatía diabética es infrecuente en pacientes complicados con úlcera del pie diabético tratados con Heberprot-P, hasta cinco meses después de tratamiento(AU)

Introduction: The prevalence of diabetes gradually increases worldwide and with it, the risk of microvascular complications such as diabetic retinopathy. The risk of blindness is reduced with stable metabolic control, early diagnosis and adequate treatment. Objective: To compare the result of the ophthalmological examination performed before starting treatment with Heberprot-P, with that performed five months after initiation, at different doses. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in 77 patients included in four clinical trials of Heberprot-P. Analysis of the ophthalmological examination variables before and after treatment, type of diabetes and years of evolution were performed. Results: Prevalence of type 2 diabetics was observed with respect to type 1 in an 11: 1 ratio, with an average of 16.3 years of diabetes evolution. Half of the patients had nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, predominantly of the mild form, in the examination performed before treatment with Heberprot-P. Only one elderly patient with other comorbidities developed a proliferative diabetic retinopathy, after a previous examination in which non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema were observed. Conclusions: The appearance or progression of diabetic retinopathy is uncommon in complicated patients with diabetic foot ulcer treated with Heberprot-P, up to five months after treatment(AU)

Nasal administration of the neuroprotective candidate NeuroEPO to healthy volunteers: a randomized, parallel, open-label safety study.

BACKGROUND: Delivery of therapeutic agents as erythropoietin (EPO) into Central Nervous System through intranasal route could benefit patients with neurological disorders. A new nasal formulation containing a non-hematopoietic recombinant EPO (NeuroEPO) has shown neuroprotective actions in preclinical models. In the current study, the safety of NeuroEPO was evaluated for the first time in humans. METHODS: A phase I, randomized, parallel, open-label study was carried out in healthy volunteers. They received, intranasally, 1 mg of NeuroEPO every 8 h during 4 days (Group A) or 0.5 mg of NeuroEPO (Group B) with the same schedule. The working hypothesis was that intranasal NeuroEPO produce <10% of severe adverse reactions in the evaluated groups. Therefore, a rigorous assessment of possible adverse events was carried out, which included tolerance of the nasal mucosa and the effect on hematopoietic activity. Clinical safety evaluation was daily during treatment and laboratory tests were done before and on days 5 and 14 after starting treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-five volunteers, 56% women, with a mean age of 27 yrs. were included. Twelve of them received the highest NeuroEPO dose. Twenty types of adverse events occurred, with headache (20%) and increase of hepatic enzymes (20%) as the most reported ones. Nasopharyngeal itching was the most common local event but only observed in four patients (16%), all of them from the lowest dose group. About half of the events were very probably or probably caused by the studied product. Most of the events were mild (95.5%), did not require treatment (88.6%) and were completely resolved (81.8%). No severe adverse events were reported. During the study the hematopoietic variables were kept within reference values. CONCLUSIONS: NeuroEPO was a safe product, well tolerated at the nasal mucosa level and did not stimulate erythropoiesis in healthy volunteers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Cuban Public Registry of Clinical Trials RPCEC00000157 , June 10, 2013.