Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Immunother ; 33(6): 639-47, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20551832

RESUMO

Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) is a tumor antigen in prostate cancer and the target of several anti-tumor vaccines in earlier clinical trials. Ultimately, the goal of anti-tumor vaccines is to elicit a sustainable immune response, able to eradicate a tumor, or at least restrain its growth. We have investigated plasmid DNA vaccines and have previously conducted a phase 1 trial in which patients with recurrent prostate cancer were vaccinated with a DNA vaccine encoding PAP. In this study, we investigated the immunologic efficacy of subsequent booster immunizations, and conducted more detailed longitudinal immune analysis, to answer several questions aimed at guiding optimal schedules of vaccine administration for future clinical trials. We report that antigen-specific cytolytic T-cell responses were amplified after immunization in 7 of 12 human leukocyte antigen-A2-expressing individuals, and that multiple immunizations seemed necessary to elicit PAP-specific interferon-gamma-secreting immune responses detectable by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. Moreover, among individuals who experienced a >/=200% increase in prostate-specific antigen doubling time, long-term PAP-specific interferon-gamma-secreting T-cell responses were detectable in 6 of 8, but in only 1 of 14 individuals without an observed change in prostate-specific antigen doubling time (P=0.001). Finally, we identified that immune responses elicited could be further amplified by subsequent booster immunizations. These results suggest that future trials using this DNA vaccine, and potentially other anti-tumor DNA vaccines, could investigate ongoing schedules of administration with periodic booster immunizations. Moreover, these results suggest that DNA vaccines targeting PAP could potentially be combined in heterologous immunization strategies with other vaccines to further augment PAP-specific T-cell immunity.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Neoplasias/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Anticâncer , Neoplasias da Próstata/imunologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Proteínas Tirosina Fosfatases/administração & dosagem , Linfócitos T Citotóxicos/metabolismo , Fosfatase Ácida , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Antígeno HLA-A2/metabolismo , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Interferon gama/metabolismo , Ativação Linfocitária/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Linfócitos T Citotóxicos/imunologia , Linfócitos T Citotóxicos/patologia , Vacinas de DNA
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 27(25): 4047-54, 2009 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19636017

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) is a prostate tumor antigen. We have previously demonstrated that a DNA vaccine encoding PAP can elicit antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in rodents. We report here the results of a phase I/IIa trial conducted with a DNA vaccine encoding human PAP in patients with stage D0 prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients were treated in a dose-escalation trial with 100 microg, 500 microg, or 1,500 microg plasmid DNA, coadministered intradermally with 200 microg granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as a vaccine adjuvant, six times at 14-day intervals. All patients were observed for 1 year after treatment. RESULTS: No significant adverse events were observed. Three (14%) of 22 patients developed PAP-specific IFN gamma-secreting CD8+ T-cells immediately after the treatment course, as determined by enzyme-linked immunospot. Nine (41%) of 22 patients developed PAP-specific CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cell proliferation. Antibody responses to PAP were not detected. Overall, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time was observed to increase from a median 6.5 months pretreatment to 8.5 months on-treatment (P = .033), and 9.3 months in the 1-year post-treatment period (P = .054). CONCLUSION: The demonstration that a DNA vaccine encoding PAP is safe, elicits an antigen-specific T-cell response, and may be associated with an increased PSA doubling time suggests that a multi-institutional phase II trial designed to evaluate clinical efficacy is warranted.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Vacinas Anticâncer/administração & dosagem , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Proteínas Tirosina Fosfatases/imunologia , Fosfatase Ácida , Adenocarcinoma/enzimologia , Adenocarcinoma/imunologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/imunologia , Vacinas Anticâncer/efeitos adversos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos e Macrófagos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Intradérmicas , Interferon gama/metabolismo , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/enzimologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/imunologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Proteínas Recombinantes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinas de DNA/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...