Skin cancer in women of color: Epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical manifestations.

Malignant melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC), which include basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, account for 40% of all neoplasms in white patients, making these cancers the most common malignancy in the United States. Given the large number of NMSC cases in white patients, there is a correspondingly large body of literature addressing various aspects of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. The incidence of both malignant melanoma and NMSC is well established and remains significantly lower in patients with skin of color (SoC) when compared with white patients. Although there is a lower incidence of skin cancer in SoC, there is often a poorer prognosis among this group. There is even more limited data focusing on women of color, making an accurate determination of incidence and mortality difficult. This gender disparity causes decreased skin cancer awareness and index of suspicion among patients and providers, hindering appropriate evaluation and care. Therefore, there is a need for an increased understanding of skin cancer in women of color. In the traditional sense, SoC refers to people of African, Asian, Native American, Middle Eastern, and Hispanic backgrounds. Patients in these ethnic groups have richly pigmented skin that is usually categorized as Fitzpatrick types III through VI and thus have notable differences in skin disease and presentation compared with fair-skinned individuals. We present this review of skin cancer in women of color to give a reasonably comprehensive representation of the literature to advance our understanding and knowledge in this unique population.

An expert panel consensus on opioid-prescribing guidelines for dermatologic procedures.

BACKGROUND: Opioid overprescribing is a major contributor to the opioid crisis. The lack of procedure-specific guidelines contributes to the vast differences in prescribing practices. OBJECTIVE: To create opioid-prescribing consensus guidelines for common dermatologic procedures. METHODS: We used a 4-step modified Delphi method to conduct a systematic discussion among a panel of dermatologists in the fields of general dermatology, dermatologic surgery, and cosmetics/phlebology to develop opioid prescribing guidelines for some of the most common dermatologic procedural scenarios. Guidelines were developed for opioid-naive patients undergoing routine procedures. Opioid tablets were defined as oxycodone 5-mg oral equivalents. RESULTS: Postoperative pain after most uncomplicated procedures (76%) can be adequately managed with acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen. Group consensus identified no specific dermatologic scenario that routinely requires more than 15 oxycodone 5-mg oral equivalents to manage postoperative pain. Group consensus found that 23% of the procedural scenarios routinely require 1 to 10 opioid tablets, and only 1 routinely requires 1 to 15 opioid tablets. LIMITATIONS: These recommendations are based on expert consensus in lieu of quality evidence-based outcomes research. These recommendations must be individualized to accommodate patients' comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure-specific opioid prescribing guidelines may serve as a foundation to produce effective and responsible postoperative pain management strategies after dermatologic interventions.

Cellulite: Patient Selection and Combination Treatments for Optimal Results-A Review and Our Experience.

BACKGROUND: More than 90% of women have reported concerns of cellulite on their skin. Both commercially advertised creams and topical pharmacological agents have shown limited improvement. Thus far, there has been a paucity of thorough review articles on how to address and treat this condition. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how the etiology and pathogenesis of cellulite can help guide treatment combinations and provide a more algorithmic approach to comprehensively address a condition that affects so many women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the literature surrounding treatment options for cellulite and the authors' experience in this area are provided. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes available treatment options for cellulite, including topical agents, controlled subcision, energy-based devices, dermal fillers, and new injectable medications. Furthermore, the various ways that these treatments can be combined in an algorithmic and sequential approach based on the degree of volume loss, skin laxity, and excess adiposity associated with cellulite are addressed. These combination therapies for cellulite are supported both in the published literature and the authors' experience to help clinicians tailor a comprehensive treatment plan for the multiple factors that contribute to cellulite. Further clinical trials are needed to compare various devices and techniques for cellulite as well as combination treatments.