RESUMO
Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent neurological disease characterised by disseminated areas of demyelination and atrophy within the central nervous system, inducing cognitive disorders in 45%-65% of persons with MS (PwMS). Neuropsychology and neuroimaging studies provide evidence of the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation interventions, including memory and attention. Recently, serious game therapy (SGT) has been used in rehabilitation to improve cognitive processing speed. The aim of this study is to describe the protocol of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of a tablet-based cognitive home intervention among ambulatory PwMS, in comparison to a standardised neuropsychological rehabilitation. Methods and analysis: This will be a parallel-assignment, double-blinded, RCT. One hundred and fifty (75 per arm) PwMS will be randomly assigned to receive cognitive rehabilitation session over 4 months (four 20-min sessions/week) of either: (1) tablet-based SGT or (2) conventional cognitive exercises. The same assessor will evaluate outcome measures at three points: at baseline (T0), after the 16 therapy sessions weeks (T1), and 6 months after the end of treatment (T2). The primary outcomes were the scores from the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Data analysis will be performed to compare the efficacy of the two treatments. We expect superior efficiency of tablet-based SGT in contrast to conventional cognitive exercises, based on BICAMS measures of speed processing information and episodic memory. Ethics and dissemination: The trial protocol is registered on ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT04694534) and benefits from a favourable opinion from an ethics committee (RC-P0066-2018-A00411-54).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The anticlockwise (ACW) deviation of the visual and visuohaptic subjective verticals (SVs), known to occur in patients with right hemisphere lesion, is amplified by spatial neglect (N). These patients have only been assessed when sitting. We investigated the hypothesis that postural changes modulate visuohaptic SV deviation. METHODS: Eight patients presenting with a right hemisphere lesion and spatial N were compared with 6 matched control subjects (C). In the dark, they had to rotate a luminous rod to put it at the vertical in 4 conditions: (1) sitting with plantar sole support; (2) sitting without plantar sole support; (3) sitting with legs extended on a support; and (4) supine position. RESULTS: N patients showed a significant ACW deviation (-4.5 degrees) of the SV compared with C subjects (+0.01 degrees). The effect of body position depended on the group (P=0.022) because changes had definite effects in the N but not in the C group. In fact, the former showed a reduction of the ACW deviation, from the first to the fourth condition. CONCLUSIONS: Although the possible role of plantar and leg somaesthetic inputs remains to be thoroughly investigated, the modulation of gravitational inputs at trunk or vestibular level influences the SV deviation in N patients. This has to be put in relation with the modulation of N signs reported by other authors when passing from the sitting to the supine position.