Oral versus intravenous iron for anemia in pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Our findings suggest that treating antepartum anemia with currently available iron therapies would result in significant cost-savings and reductions in adverse outcomes associated with anemia in this context. Ferric carboxymaltose likely confers the greatest overall benefit among competing options. This conclusion is robust to uncertainty, even when the cost these therapies is significantly higher than is demonstrated in the literature.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Postpartum hemorrhage is a significant contributor to maternal mortality worldwide and in the United States. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce PPH complications although it is not routinely recommended for use as prophylaxis to date. To estimate the cost-effectiveness of alternative risk-dictated strategies utilizing prophylactic tranexamic acid for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. We constructed a microsimulation-based Markov decision-analytic model estimating the cost-effectiveness of three alternative risk-dictated strategies for tranexamic acid prophylaxis versus the no prophylaxis in a cohort of 3.8 million pregnant women delivering in the United States. Each strategy differentially modified risk-specific hemorrhage probabilities by preliminary estimates of tranexamic acid's prophylactic efficacy. Outcome measures included incremental costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and outcomes averted. Costs and benefits were considered from the healthcare system and societal perspectives over a lifetime time horizon. All intervention strategies were dominant versus no prophylaxis, implying that they were simultaneously more effective and cost-saving. Prophylaxing delivering women irrespective of hemorrhage risk produced the most favorable results overall, with estimated cost savings greater than $690 million and up to 149,505 PPH cases, 2,933 hysterectomies, and 70 maternal deaths averted, per annual cohort. Threshold analysis suggested that tranexamic acid is likely to be cost-saving for health systems at costs below $190 per gram. Our findings suggest that routine prophylaxis with tranexamic acid would likely result in substantial cost-savings and reductions in adverse maternal outcomes in this context. This study is a cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrating cost-savings and reduction in adverse maternal outcomes with routine tranexamic acid as prophylaxis for post-partum hemorrhage.

An update to tranexamic acid trends during the peripartum period in the United States, 2019 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: Results from the 2017 World Maternal Antifibrinolytic trial found that patients who received tranexamic acid during delivery had significantly lower rates of death and hysterectomy. Several months after the World Maternal Antifibrinolytic trial publication, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists endorsed the consideration of tranexamic acid usage when traditional uterotonics fail during postpartum hemorrhage. Since then, tranexamic acid usage has become more mainstream for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate tranexamic acid trends in obstetrics both temporally and geographically within the United States. Additional outcomes included patient demographics and perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 19 hospitals divided into East, Central, and West geographic regions within the Universal Health Services, Incorporated network. Rates of tranexamic acid use were compared from July 2019 through June 2021. Patient demographics and perinatal outcomes were analyzed for tranexamic acid recipients. RESULTS: During the two-year study period, 3.2% (1580/50,150) of patients received tranexamic acid during delivery. The western region of the United States demonstrated increased tranexamic acid use over the 2-year study period. Recipients of tranexamic acid were more likely to have a history of postpartum hemorrhage (P<.0001), chronic hypertension (P<.0001), preeclampsia (P<.0001), and/or diabetes (P=.004). Patients who received tranexamic acid did not have an increased likelihood of venous thromboembolism in comparison with those who did not receive tranexamic acid (8 [0.5%] vs 226 [0.5%]; P=.77). Of those who received tranexamic acid, 53.2% (840/1580) had an estimated blood loss <1000 mL. CONCLUSION: Nationally, a higher percentage of patients received tranexamic acid without a postpartum hemorrhage diagnosis compared with previous studies, and the western region of the United States had an overall increased use of tranexamic acid during delivery compared with previous years. There was no increased risk of venous thromboembolism in those who received tranexamic acid, regardless of postpartum hemorrhage diagnosis.