Krónikus pancreatitis miatt végzett pancreasfej-resectiós mutéteink elemzése.

Introduction: In case of chronic pancreatitis with inflammatory enlargement of the pancreatic head, several operations exist for the treatment, such as the Beger-, Frey-, Whipple-procedures and the Berne modification. A comparison of the results of these procedures is presented in this study. In addition to this, innovations in pancreatojejunal and biliodigestive anastomosis are also described. Material and Methods: 231 pancreatic head resections were carried out between 1991 and 2021. The data were retrospectively evaluated. Late results were also examined using questionnaires. Results: The Berne modification and the Frey-procedure were more advantageous, than the Whipple- and the Beger-operation in terms of operating time, need for transfusion (P < 0,001), while regarding, the postoperative intensive care unit and total hospital stay both procedures were more favourable, than the Whipple one (P < 0,001). The early morbidity rate was the highest after the Whipple-procedure (P = 0,004). These differences were statistically significant. The reoperation and mortality rates were comparable between the groups. The quality of life of the patients was acceptable, nevertheless in the majority of the cases the alcohol and nicotine abuse was not stopped. Conclusion: The Frey-operation and the Berne modification were the most advantageous, regarding the early postoperative outcomes. However the latter one is preferable, due to its simplicity. During these procedures a single layer continuous suture technique was used for the pancreatojejunal anastomosis, and an extrapancreatic biliodigestive anastomosis is recommended for the solution of cholestasis. due to the superior results.

Addition of daratumumab to multiple myeloma backbone regimens significantly improves clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Daratumumab has shown clinical benefit in multiple myeloma. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding daratumumab to backbone anti-myeloma treatments. Systematic search was performed up to August 2021 to identify randomised controlled trials comparing the outcomes of backbone therapy with and without daratumumab in relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed myeloma (RRMM and NDMM, respectively). Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Primary outcomes were death or disease progression, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, and stringent complete response (sCR). Secondary outcomes were complete response or better and safety endpoints prespecified in the study protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42020222904). In NDMM, MRD negativity [OR = 3.61 (CI 2.33-5.61)] and sCR [OR = 2.29 (CI 1.49-3.51)] were more likely and death or disease progression [HR = 0.47 (CI 0.39-0.57)] was less likely to occur with daratumumab compared to control. Regarding RRMM, MRD negativity [OR = 5.43 (CI 2.76-10.66)] and sCR [OR = 3.08 (CI 2.00-4.76)] were more likely and death or disease progression was less likely [HR = 0.50 (CI 0.37-0.67)] with daratumumab compared to control. The addition of daratumumab has shown high clinical efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile for the treatment of NDMM and RRMM regarding the endpoints examined.

"I was a dark horse in the eyes of her family": the relationship of cohabiting female couples and their families in Hungary.

This article focuses on the relationship of female couples with their parents, siblings, and other relatives by exploring various patterns of coming out and family attitudes. After reviewing existing literature in this field, the article explores the extent to which my interviewees are out to their family, the reasons for and the possible complications about staying in the closet. Next the parents' reactions are discussed, which range from complete rejection through not admitting the truth to themselves to acceptance. Parents find it difficult to come out about their daughter to their immediate environment, as they fear prejudice and being blamed for her sexual orientation. This can also lead to conflict and alienation between parents and daughter. Accepting a person's sexual orientation and relationship, however, is only the first step toward her full integration into the family. Full inclusion in the family is only present when the person's same-sex partner is treated as kin to the same extent as an opposite-sex partner would be. This is demonstrated in a variety of ways, such as the names used (especially by the couple's children) and the system of obligations and favors constituting a formative element of kinship. There might be conflicts, however, when the two partners have different backgrounds and thus different expectations of family relations.