A three-dimensional comparative study on the scapulohumeral relationship in normal and osteoarthritic shoulders.

BACKGROUND: Eccentric loading due to humeral translation is associated with worse clinical outcomes in hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional relationship of the humeral head to the scapula (scapulohumeral relationship) in nonpathologic shoulders and in shoulders with primary osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans of 151 nonpathologic shoulders (control group) and 110 shoulders with primary glenohumeral arthritis (OA group) were analyzed by measuring the anterior-posterior, inferior-superior, and medial-lateral position of the humeral head in relation to the scapula. Shoulders were classified as centered (type A) or posteriorly subluxed (type B) according to the Walch classification of glenoid morphology. Reproducibility and differences in scapulohumeral relationship were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The scapulohumeral relationship could be determined reliably: the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged between 0.780 and 0.978; the typical error of measurement ranged between 2.4% and 5.0%. Both type A and type B shoulders showed significant posterior translation of the humeral head (P <.001). Type B shoulders had significantly more posterior translation than type A shoulders (P <.001). A tendency of inferior translation was noted, although with only marginal statistical significance (P = .051). In each morphology class, a medial deviation of the humeral head, representing a reduced glenohumeral distance, was measured (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The main characteristics of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis are posterior humeral head translation relative to the scapula, reduced glenohumeral distance, and a tendency toward inferior humeral head translation in both type A and type B shoulders.

Determination of a reference system for the three-dimensional study of the glenohumeral relationship.

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of the normal and pathological three-dimensional glenohumeral relationship is imperative when planning and performing a total shoulder arthroplasty. There is, however, no consensus on which references should be used when studying this relationship. The purpose of the present study was to define the most suitable glenoid plane with normally distributed parameters, narrowest variability, and best reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstruction CT scans were performed on 152 healthy shoulders. Four glenoid planes, each determined by three surgically accessible bony reference points, were determined. Two planes were triangular, with the same base defined by the most anterior and posterior point of the glenoid. The most inferior and the most superior point of the glenoid, respectively, define the top of Saller's inferior plane and the Saller's superior plane. The two other planes are formed by best-fitting circles. The circular max plane is defined by the superior tubercle, and two points at the distal third of the glenoid. The circular inferior plane is defined by three points at the rim of the inferior quadrants of the glenoid. RESULTS: The parameters of all four planes behave normally. The humeral center of rotation is identically positioned for both the circular max and circular inferior plane (X = 91.71°/X = 91.66° p = 0.907 and Y = 90.83°/Y = 91.7° p = 0.054, respectively) and different for the Saller's inferior and Saller's superior plane (p ≤ 0.001). The circular inferior plane has the lowest variability to the coronal scapular plane (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides arguments to use the circular inferior glenoid plane as preferred reference plane of the glenoid.

Operative guidelines for the reconstruction of the native glenoid plane: an anatomic three-dimensional computed tomography-scan reconstruction study.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the native plane in biconcave eroded glenoids is difficult. Nevertheless, accurate reconstruction of this plane is imperative for successful total shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to determine guidelines that can increase the accuracy of glenoid component positioning. METHODS: Three different circular planes were determined on 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans of 152 healthy shoulders. First, the circular max (CM) plane is formed with the superior tubercle and 2 points, 1 anterior and 1 posterior, at the rim of the inferior third of the glenoid. Second, the circular inferior (CI) plane is formed by 3 points at the inferior 2 quadrants of the glenoid rim. Third, the circular minima (Cm) plane is formed with 3 points situated at the noneroded sector of the anterior glenoid. The angulation of the spinal scapular axis (SSA), the line between the most medial point of the scapular spine and the center of the three different glenoid planes, and the correlation coefficient between the radius of the circle and the length of SSA are calculated. RESULTS: Angle SSA in the x-axis were 94°, 93°, 93° and in the y-axis were 95°, 111°, and 111° for CM, CI, and Cm, respectively. Correlation coefficient between the radius of the circle and the length of SSA: r = 0.69 for CM, r = 0.75 for CI, and r = 0.75 for Cm. CONCLUSION: Three points situated at the native anterior glenoid can reconstruct, within 2° accuracy (95% confidence interval, 1.8°-2.3°), the CI plane. A relationship exists between the radii of the 3 glenoid circles and the width of the scapula (SSA length).