Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Thromb Haemost ; 14(9): 1779-87, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27314634

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Essentials Antibodies to domain 1 of ß2 glycoprotein I (aD1) are a subset of antiphospholipid antibodies. We evaluated the added diagnostic value of an automated aD1 assay in antiphospholipid syndrome. AD1 IgG correctly classifies patients at risk for thrombosis. Agreement between aD1 and aß2GPI IgG is high, limiting the added value of aD1 in our setting. Click to hear Professor de Groot's perspective on new mechanistic understanding in antiphospholipid syndrome SUMMARY: Background Laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) includes lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL) or anti-ß2 glycoprotein I (aß2 GPI) antibodies. Antibodies targeting domain 1 of ß2 GPI (aD1) constitute a pathogenic subset of autoantibodies. Objectives In this cohort study, we determined the clinical performance characteristics, additional diagnostic value and the contribution to APS risk stratification of an automated aD1 assay. Patients/Methods LAC, aCL, aß2 GPI and aD1 IgG were measured in 101 APS patients, 123 patients with autoimmune disorders, 82 diseased controls and 120 healthy controls. aD1 antibodies were detected by QUANTA Flash(®) Beta2GPI-Domain 1 chemiluminescence immunoassay. Results With a cut-off value of 20.0 CU, the aD1 IgG assay identifies APS patients in a clinically affected patient cohort with a sensitivity of 53.5% and specificity of 98.8%. It implied a high odds ratio (OR) for clinical events (OR, 17.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-40.5). aD1 IgG did not add diagnostic value to the formal aPL panel because aß2 GPI IgG was nearly as specific but more sensitive for APS (sensitivity 56.4%) with a higher OR for clinical events (36.2; 95% CI, 11.1-117.9). High aD1 titers identify triple-positive patients and patients with thrombosis in a ß2 GPI-dependent LAC-positive population. Agreement between aD1 IgG and aß2 GPI IgG was high (positive and negative agreement 91.7% and 98.4%, respectively). Conclusion Detection of aD1 IgG correctly classifies patients at risk of thrombosis. However, the contribution of aD1 IgG to APS diagnosis and risk stratification depends upon the solid phase assays used for aCL and aß2 GPI detection.


Assuntos
Anticorpos/imunologia , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/imunologia , Trombose/imunologia , beta 2-Glicoproteína I/imunologia , Adulto , Anticorpos Anticardiolipina/imunologia , Anticorpos Antifosfolipídeos/imunologia , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/diagnóstico , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoensaio , Imunoglobulina G/química , Inibidor de Coagulação do Lúpus/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Trombose/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...