Follow-up of screening patients conservatively treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2-3.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency and correlates of non-adherence to follow-up among patients conservatively treated for CIN2-3. STUDY DESIGN: Study population comprised 1560 patients aged 25-64 years from a screening programme in northern Italy. The regional standard protocol was used as a reference. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio probability of a patient being lost to follow-up (no check-ups within 27 months of treatment) or incompletely followed-up (1-3 negative check-ups) versus having 4 negative check-ups. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients (21%) were lost to follow-up, 678 (43%) were incompletely followed-up, 352 (23%) presented for 4 negative check-ups and 204 (13%) were diagnosed with persistent disease. The probability of no or incomplete follow-up was greater for patients who lived in the urban district, who were treated in private settings (versus screening centres), who exhibited a visibile squamocolumnar junction on pre-treatment colposcopy, who were treated with cold knife excision and local destructive therapy (versus loop diathermy excision), and whose surgical specimens had positive excision margins. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the reference protocol was poor. Factors involved in follow-up failures require greater clinical attention.

Disease persistence in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing electrosurgical conization.

OBJECTIVE: Cone margin status has been reported to be the most important predictor of residual disease in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) undergoing electrosurgical excisional treatment. The primary aim of this study of patients treated with electrosurgical conization was to evaluate the association of cone margin status and other clinical and pathologic factors with the probability of residual disease. METHODS: The study population comprised 699 patients with at least one follow-up visit within 12 months of conization. Residual disease was defined as a histology diagnosis of CIN within 3 years of conization. Multivariate associations were evaluated with multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Attendance to follow-up was 97% for the second visit and 34% for the third visit. Residual disease was detected in a total of 38 patients (5.4%). The detection rate was 3.3% at the first visit, 2.1% at the second visit, and 0.4% at the third visit. An increased probability of residual disease was associated with a referral Pap smear reported as high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma (odds ratio, 2.9; reference category, low-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia). A decreased probability was associated with a squamocolumnar junction entirely visible at the first follow-up visit (odds ratio, 0.2; reference category, squamocolumnar junction not visible). Patient age, time period, lesion size, lesion site, grade of CIN, cone width, cone depth, and margin status had no influence. CONCLUSIONS: The determinants of residual disease in this study differed from those generally reported so far. Factors associated with effectiveness of electrosurgical treatment of CIN need further research.

Does microcolposcopy protect patients with CIN and unsatisfactory colposcopy from the risk of incomplete excision of disease at the time of conization?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of microcolposcopy in preventing incomplete electrosurgical excision at the endocervical cone margin in patients with CIN and unsatisfactory colposcopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four-hundred and twenty-one patients were studied. Complete excision of disease at the endocervical margin was evaluated using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One-hundred and eighty-three patients underwent microcolposcopy. In 160 patients, the cone depth exceeded the endocervical extension of the squamocolumnar junction as predicted by microcolposcopy. In 23 patients, the opposite was observed. Microcolposcopy was not performed in 238 patients. For the three groups, the frequency of endocervical cone margin involvement was 22%, 22%, and 13%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that patients with a cone depth exceeding the endocervical margin of the squamocolumnar junction as predicted by microcolposcopy had no reduction in the risk of incomplete conization. CONCLUSION: The use of microcolposcopy awaits validation for assessment of the transformation zone to predict negative conization margins.