Capacity of CD34+ progenitor-derived dendritic cells to distinguish between sensitizers and irritants.

In an attempt to develop an in vitro test to identify contact sensitizers, mostly dendritic cells (DCs) derived from monocytes (Mo-DC) have been used. Less is known about the potency of DC derived from CD34+ progenitors (CD34-DC) for in vitro allergen testing. CD34+ progenitor derived DC were exposed to nine well-known allergens (one weak, three moderate and five strong allergens) and two irritants. Surface marker expression (CD86, CD83 and HLA-DR) and cytokine production (IL-6, IL-12 and TNF-alpha) were analyzed after 24 h exposure to these chemicals. All allergens tested induced a significant increase in at least one of the DC surface markers. In contrast, none of the irritants tested were able to significantly upregulate membrane marker expression in exposed DC. The level of upregulation of CD86, CD83 and HLA-DR was dependent on the nature and concentration of the chemical, but not on the classification of the allergen. Changes in cytokine production (IL-6, IL-12 and TNF-alpha) were not consistently related to exposure to an allergen. Based on these results, we conclude that the in vitro test using CD34-DC has the capacity to distinguish between allergens and irritants based on altered phenotypic characteristics.

Phenotypic alterations and IL-1beta production in CD34(+) progenitor- and monocyte-derived dendritic cells after exposure to allergens: a comparative analysis.

Dendritic cells (DC) have been shown to capture and process antigens and play an initiating role in contact sensitization. Cells with dendritic morphology can be generated in vitro either from CD34(+) cord blood cells or from CD14(+) peripheral monocytes. The aim of this study was to determine the state of maturation/activation of both populations after exposure to several concentrations of four well-established model allergens (nickel sulfate, eugenol, alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde and 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid) or the irritant sodium dodecyl sulfate. We analyzed the surface expression of CD86, CD83 and HLA-DR and the production of IL-1beta. DC from the two sources were generated separately in two laboratories, but challenged using identical test protocols. Using both DC populations it was possible to detect the allergens under investigation, though minor differences regarding effective concentrations were noted. The non-responsiveness of CD34-DC to CIN was probably due to non-optimal concentrations. Ni(2+), known as a moderate allergen in vivo, showed the most prominent effect in both cell systems. CD86 expression was the most reliable phenotypic marker for the in vitro identification of allergens. Due to substantial individual variations it was difficult to draw any definite conclusions as to the relevance of IL-1beta production as an activation endpoint. We conclude that both test systems are able to respond to allergens, but CD34-DC must be exposed to higher concentrations to demonstrate significant phenotypic changes. On the other hand, Mo-DC from only some of the donors reacted to allergens, in contrast to CD34-DC, which responded to allergens irrespective of the donor, thus necessitating the use of Mo-DC cultures from several blood donors.