Bone mineralization is elevated and less heterogeneous in adults with type 2 diabetes and osteoarthritis compared to controls with osteoarthritis alone.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether trabecular bone mineralization differed in adults with type 2 diabetes compared to adults without type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Proximal femur specimens were obtained following a total hip replacement procedure from men and women ≥65 years of age with and without type 2 diabetes. A scanning electron microscope was used for quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI) analysis of trabecular bone samples from the femoral neck. Gray scale images (pixel size=5.6 µm(2)) were uploaded to ImageJ software and gray level (GL) values were converted to calcium concentrations (weight [wt] % calcium [Ca]) using data obtained with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. The following bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) outcomes were collected: the weighted mean bone calcium concentration (CaMEAN), the most frequently occurring bone calcium concentration (CaPEAK) and mineralization heterogeneity (CaWIDTH). Differences between groups were assessed using the Student's t-test for normally distributed data and Mann-Whitney U-test for non-normally distributed data. An alpha value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Thirty-five Caucasian participants were recruited (mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 75.5 [6.5]years): 14 adults with type 2 diabetes (years since type 2 diabetes diagnosis, 13.5 [7.4]years) and 21 adults without type 2 diabetes. In the adults with type 2 diabetes, bone CaMEAN was 4.9% greater (20.36 [0.98]wt.% Ca versus 19.40 [1.07]wt.% Ca, p=0.015) and CaWIDTH was 9.4% lower (median [interquartile range] 3.55 [2.99-4.12]wt.% Ca versus 3.95 [0.71]wt.% Ca, p<0.001) compared to controls. There was no between-group difference in CaPEAK (21.12 [0.97]wt.% Ca for type 2 diabetes versus 20.44 [1.30]wt.% Ca for controls, p=0.121). CONCLUSION: The combination of elevated mean calcium concentration in bone and lower mineralization heterogeneity in adults with type 2 diabetes may have deleterious effects on the biomechanical properties of bone. These microscopic alterations in bone mineralization, which may be mediated by suppressed bone remodeling, further elucidate higher fracture risk in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Osteoporosis knowledge among individuals with recent fragility fracture.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate osteoporosis knowledge among patients with fractures and to evaluate factors associated with osteoporosis knowledge. METHODS: Patients with fragility fractures participated in a telephone interview. Participants were asked what they thought osteoporosis was. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR, 95% CI) were calculated to identify factors associated with a correct definition. Predictors identified in univariate analysis were entered into multivariable logistic regression models. A subset also completed the Facts on Osteoporosis Quiz. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients (82% women) participated in the study, with mean (SD) age being 67.5 (12.7) years. Ninety-five (75%) respondents gave correct osteoporosis definitions. The odds of an individual providing a correct definition of osteoporosis were higher for those who reported a diagnosis of osteoporosis or those who reported higher education levels, but the odds decreased with increasing age. A total of 49 (39%) respondents completed the Facts on Osteoporosis Quiz; the average score was 13.6 (3.8) of 21. Areas that respondents scored poorly on were related to key risk factors. CONCLUSION: Many patients with fractures are unaware of important risk factors. Education initiatives aimed at improving osteoporosis knowledge should be directed at individuals at high risk of fracture. Nurses and other allied healthcare providers working in fracture clinics, acute care, and rehabilitation settings are in an ideal position to communicate information about osteoporosis and fracture risk to individuals with a recent fragility fracture.

Osteoporosis risk perceptions among patients who have sustained a fragility fracture.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions of patients who have sustained a fragility fracture regarding their future fracture risk and the beliefs underlying their perceptions. METHODS: Patients with fragility fracture participated in a telephone interview. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to characterize patient characteristics and perspectives of future fracture risk. Content analysis of qualitative statements was independently performed by three investigators to identify common themes and contrasting statements, and the findings were discussed to ensure consensus. RESULTS: Consistent themes were identified among participant responses irrespective of whether they responded "yes", "no" or "unsure" when asked whether they were at increased fracture risk: (1) patients' perception of risk was influenced by whether or not they believed they had osteoporosis, which may be altered by interaction with health care providers; (2) patients' had their own perceptions of their bone health; (3) patients' attributed their risk to their own actions or "carefulness"; and (4) patients' had specific beliefs about their fracture and determinants of fracture risk. CONCLUSION: Patients who experience fragility fractures develop perceptions about future fracture risk that are influenced by interactions with health care providers, as well as beliefs about their fracture and beliefs that they can modify their risk. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health care providers should discuss strategies for fracture prevention with all patients after fragility fracture to ensure that patients understand that participation in preventative behaviours can modify their risk.

Musculotendinous transfer as a treatment option for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: teres major or latissimus dorsi?

Irreparable posterior cuff tears can cause pain and lack of shoulder function. Surgical treatment includes musculotendinous transfers of either latissimus dorsi (LD) or teres major (TM). This study aimed to give a detailed description of the morphology of these two muscles with particular regard to their suitability for use in transfers. Sixty-two shoulders in 31 cadaveric specimens (mean age 50 years) were dissected. The mean length of the TM was 13.7 cm at its superior edge while the distance from the muscle origin to the greater tuberosity (GT) was 19.2 cm. The tendon of the TM had a length of 1.5 cm, a width of 3.4 cm, and a thickness of 1.3 mm. The mean length of the LD was 26.0 cm and the distance from its origin to the GT was 32.9 cm. The mean length of the LD tendon was 5.2 cm, its width 2.9 cm, and its thickness 1.0 mm. The increased length required to achieve transfer was 47% (of the original length) for TM and 33% for LD. Both TM and LD could reach the GT with ease, according to the potential muscle excursions. Tension of the neurovascular bundle is more probable with LD because it enters the muscle relatively closer to the tendon. Problems with regard to reattachment may be more likely to occur in a transfer of the TM because of its short tendon.

Arteriovenous malformation mimicking femoral osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.

We encountered a case of apparent progressive femoral osteolysis around a well-fixed cementless implant in a young patient. At the time of revision arthroplasty, massive hemorrhaging occurred during exposure and attempted femoral component extraction. Urgent packing of the exposed endosteum with polymethyl methacrylate controlled the bone bleeding. Emergent angiography confirmed an arteriovenous malformation with extensive proximal diaphyseal involvement directly at the site of osteolysis. This arteriovenous malformation was treated successfully with selective arterial embolization and second-stage resection. In retrospect, the index arthroplasty operative note indicated an excessive amount of blood loss, and prerevision radiographs showed osteolysis with uncharacteristic vascular markings. The presence of an osteolytic lesion in total hip arthroplasty should not be assumed to be attributed to polyethylene granuloma, and any atypical radiographic features should prompt further preoperative investigations.