Trends in Surgical Critical Care Training Among General Surgery Residents: Pursuing an Ideal Curriculum.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) provides no specific guidelines for surgical critical care (SCC) training during general surgery residency. Growing emphasis is placed on this experience with increasing case requirements and dedicated SCC content on board certification exams. METHODS: A digital survey was distributed to ACGME-accredited general surgery residencies via email. Respondents reported number and setting of critical care months during residency and rated comfort level within 5 critical care principles and overall satisfaction with their SCC experience. Study cohorts were formed to compare experiences and competencies between respondents based on setting, months, postgraduate year (PGY) level, and formal surgical intensive care unit (SICU) experience. Differences between cohorts were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel test (P < .05). RESULTS: Seventy-three residents responded with 45% training at academic centers versus 46% in community hospitals. Approximately 50% completed a formal SICU rotation, while 9% reported no dedicated critical care rotation during residency. Overall, 78% felt satisfied with their SCC experience. Residents training at academic centers were more satisfied overall and felt more comfortable with ventilator management. Those who completed 5 or more months of critical care training reported greater confidence with intravenous sedation and ventilator management, while residents having a formal SICU rotation felt more confident with vasopressor and ventilator management. DISCUSSION: Variability remains within SCC training among general surgery residents with perceived benefits seen in training at academic centers and completing a formal SICU rotation. Although limited, these findings offer a foundation for developing an effective SCC curriculum.

Thyroidectomy Remains a Safe Option for Graves' Disease.

Total thyroidectomy (TT) or near-TT (NTT) is often recommended over medical management for the treatment of Graves' disease (GD). We assess the safety within surgical subspecialties at our institution for TT/NTT in GD patients. A retrospective review of patients undergoing TT/NTT for GD was performed from 2004 to 2016. Patient factors, thyroid size, surgeon subspecialty, and intraoperative/postoperative outcomes were all reviewed. Multivariate analyses were used to determine risk factors for complications. A total of 383 patients underwent TT/NTT. Two hundred thirty-three patients underwent TT/NTT by otolaryngology (n = 233, 60.8%), surgical oncology (n = 140, 36.6%), general surgery (n = 8, 2.1%), and unknown (n = 2, 0.5%). On multivariate analysis, surgical duration was longer for males (P = 0.001) and increased thyroid weights (P = 0.001). No association with hypocalcemia or recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis was found with factors considered. No factors were found to be associated with the ability to identify the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was increased in younger patients (0.010), males (P = 0.001), increased BMI (P = 0.012), and increased thyroid weight (P < 0.001). EBL was also associated with the physician performing the operation, where EBL was greatest for TT/NTT performed by general surgeons, followed by surgical oncologists and then by otolaryngology (P = 0.006). TT/NTT is safe and a reasonable option for the treatment of GD.